Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
 	 	 	
þ	 	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004	
OR
 	 	 	
o	 	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO ______________.	
Commission File No. 1-13179
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 	 	 	
New York	 	31-0267900	
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	 	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)	
Incorporation or Organization)	 	 	
 	 	 	
5215 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite 2300, Irving Texas	 	75039	
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	 	(Zip code)	
(972) 443-6500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  o  No  þ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ      Accelerated filer o       Non-accelerated filer o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No  þ
     As of April 21, 2006, there were 56,522,193 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding.

 

 
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Page	 	 	
 	 	No.	 	 	
EXPLANATORY NOTE	 	 	3	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
PART — FINANCIAL INFORMATION	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 1.Financial Statements	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income — Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)	 	 	4	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)	 	 	5	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income — Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)	 	 	6	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income— Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)	 	 	7	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (unaudited)	 	 	8	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (unaudited)	 	 	9	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	 	 	10	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	 	 	31	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	 	 	48	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 4.Controls and Procedures	 	 	49	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 1.Legal Proceedings	 	 	51	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote for Security Holders	 	 	53	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Item 6.Exhibits	 	 	54	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
SIGNATURES	 	 	55	 	 	
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302	
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302	
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906	
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906	
2

Table of Contents
EXPLANATORY NOTE
     As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (“2004 Annual Report”), we have restated our previously issued financial statements for 2002, 2003 and the first quarter of 2004. We refer to this restatement as the “2004 Restatement.”
     The consolidated financial statements for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Quarterly Report”), and all amounts referenced in this Quarterly Report for prior periods and prior period comparisons, are presented on a restated basis. For a description of the restatement, see Note 2 to the accompanying condensed statements and Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2004 Annual Report.
     As a result of the restatement and our obligations regarding internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), we delayed filing this Quarterly Report and certain of our other periodic reports. Due to this delay and the significant changes we have made to our business in the interim, certain information presented herein relating to our business relates to certain events that occurred subsequent to June 30, 2004, including the restatement of our financial statements, disclosures regarding our internal controls and procedures and updates to legal proceedings.
     On February 13, 2006, we filed our 2004 Annual Report and included therein our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended and our restated consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. We did not amend our Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for periods affected by the restatement that ended on or prior to December 31, 2003, and the financial statements and related financial information contained in such reports should no longer be relied upon.
3

Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Sales	 	$	648,477	 	 	$	608,151	 	
Cost of sales	 	 	450,777	 	 	 	426,795	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross profit	 	 	197,700	 	 	 	181,356	 	
Selling, general and administrative expense	 	 	155,668	 	 	 	128,223	 	
Integration expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	5,662	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	808	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income	 	 	42,032	 	 	 	46,663	 	
Interest expense	 	 	(19,740	)	 	 	(21,302	)	
Interest income	 	 	306	 	 	 	622	 	
Loss on optional prepayments of debt	 	 	(85	)	 	 	(480	)	
Other expense, net	 	 	(1,131	)	 	 	(2,587	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	 	21,382	 	 	 	22,916	 	
Provision for income taxes	 	 	15,597	 	 	 	8,476	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income from continuing operations	 	 	5,785	 	 	 	14,440	 	
Discontinued operations, net of tax	 	 	487	 	 	 	217	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	6,272	 	 	$	14,657	 	

Earnings per share:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.10	 	 	$	0.26	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.11	 	 	$	0.26	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.10	 	 	$	0.26	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.11	 	 	$	0.26	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4

Table of Contents
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Net earnings	 	$	6,272	 	 	$	14,657	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive income (expense):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax	 	 	(7,625	)	 	 	23,059	 	
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax	 	 	3,191	 	 	 	(320	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive (loss) income	 	 	(4,434	)	 	 	22,739	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	 	$	1,838	 	 	$	37,396	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5

Table of Contents
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Sales	 	$	1,253,626	 	 	$	1,165,369	 	
Cost of sales	 	 	877,046	 	 	 	816,620	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross profit	 	 	376,580	 	 	 	348,749	 	
Selling, general and administrative expense	 	 	295,780	 	 	 	257,152	 	
Integration expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	12,073	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,820	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income	 	 	80,800	 	 	 	77,704	 	
Interest expense	 	 	(39,827	)	 	 	(42,438	)	
Interest income	 	 	562	 	 	 	1,535	 	
Loss on optional prepayments of debt	 	 	(85	)	 	 	(639	)	
Other expense, net	 	 	(4,809	)	 	 	(4,198	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	 	36,641	 	 	 	31,964	 	
Provision for income taxes	 	 	23,788	 	 	 	12,511	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income from continuing operations	 	 	12,853	 	 	 	19,453	 	
Discontinued operations, net of tax	 	 	561	 	 	 	473	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	13,414	 	 	$	19,926	 	

Earnings per share:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.23	 	 	$	0.35	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	0.01	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.36	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.23	 	 	$	0.35	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	0.01	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.36	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6

Table of Contents
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Net earnings	 	$	13,414	 	 	$	19,926	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive income (expense):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax	 	 	(14,313	)	 	 	37,900	 	
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax	 	 	407	 	 	 	(394	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive (loss) income	 	 	(13,906	)	 	 	37,506	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive (loss) income	 	$	(492	)	 	$	57,432	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7

Table of Contents
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	June 30,	 	 	December 31,	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
ASSETS	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	 	$	24,450	 	 	$	53,522	 	
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,714 and $18,641	 	 	495,358	 	 	 	505,949	 	
Inventories, net	 	 	431,731	 	 	 	412,374	 	
Deferred taxes	 	 	75,267	 	 	 	64,585	 	
Prepaid expenses and other	 	 	29,692	 	 	 	26,091	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current assets	 	 	1,056,498	 	 	 	1,062,521	 	
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $430,345 and $411,836	 	 	437,382	 	 	 	443,864	 	
Goodwill	 	 	870,879	 	 	 	871,960	 	
Deferred taxes	 	 	23,776	 	 	 	31,741	 	
Other intangible assets, net	 	 	162,982	 	 	 	169,084	 	
Other assets, net	 	 	93,190	 	 	 	101,342	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	 	$	2,644,707	 	 	$	2,680,512	 	

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable	 	$	256,054	 	 	$	250,614	 	
Accrued liabilities	 	 	283,414	 	 	 	286,433	 	
Debt due within one year	 	 	83,692	 	 	 	71,035	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current liabilities	 	 	623,160	 	 	 	608,082	 	
Long-term debt due after one year	 	 	831,139	 	 	 	879,766	 	
Retirement obligations and other liabilities	 	 	367,272	 	 	 	370,201	 	
Shareholders’ equity:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Serial preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, no shares issued	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Common shares, $1.25 par value	 	 	72,018	 	 	 	72,018	 	
Shares authorized — 120,000	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Shares issued — 57,614	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Capital in excess of par value	 	 	476,681	 	 	 	477,443	 	
Retained earnings	 	 	423,542	 	 	 	410,128	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	972,241	 	 	 	959,589	 	
Treasury stock, at cost — 2,654 and 2,775 shares	 	 	(59,734	)	 	 	(62,575	)	
Deferred compensation obligation	 	 	6,531	 	 	 	7,445	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	 	 	(95,902	)	 	 	(81,996	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total shareholders’ equity	 	 	823,136	 	 	 	822,463	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	 	$	2,644,707	 	 	$	2,680,512	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
8

Table of Contents
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Cash flows — Operating activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	13,414	 	 	$	19,926	 	
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation	 	 	30,937	 	 	 	30,118	 	
Amortization	 	 	5,510	 	 	 	5,230	 	
Amortization of deferred loan costs and discount	 	 	2,525	 	 	 	2,491	 	
Write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs and discount	 	 	85	 	 	 	639	 	
Net loss on the disposition of assets	 	 	144	 	 	 	731	 	
Restricted stock compensation expense	 	 	148	 	 	 	189	 	
Change in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts receivable	 	 	3,459	 	 	 	35,366	 	
Inventories	 	 	(20,974	)	 	 	13,000	 	
Prepaid expenses and other	 	 	(4,287	)	 	 	(84	)	
Other assets	 	 	210	 	 	 	(5,072	)	
Accounts payable	 	 	5,981	 	 	 	(16,793	)	
Accrued liabilities and income taxes payable	 	 	(1,689	)	 	 	3,662	 	
Retirement obligations and other liabilities	 	 	1,776	 	 	 	785	 	
Net deferred taxes	 	 	(1,149	)	 	 	4,246	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	 	 	36,090	 	 	 	94,434	 	

Cash flows — Investing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Capital expenditures	 	 	(20,810	)	 	 	(12,749	)	
Cash received for disposal of assets	 	 	3,626	 	 	 	—	 	
Cash paid for acquisition	 	 	(9,429	)	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash flows used by investing activities	 	 	(26,613	)	 	 	(12,749	)	

Cash flows — Financing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net (repayments) borrowings under lines of credit	 	 	(720	)	 	 	1,305	 	
Payments on long-term debt	 	 	(37,479	)	 	 	(85,000	)	
Proceeds from sale of common shares	 	 	1,116	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash flows used by financing activities	 	 	(37,083	)	 	 	(83,695	)	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	 	 	(1,466	)	 	 	6,996	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	 	 	(29,072	)	 	 	4,986	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	 	 	53,522	 	 	 	48,991	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	 	$	24,450	 	 	$	53,977	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
9

Table of Contents
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2004, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, are unaudited. In management’s opinion, all adjustments comprising normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such condensed consolidated financial statements have been made.
     The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes in this Quarterly Report are presented as permitted by Regulation S-X and do not contain certain information included in our annual financial statements and notes to the financial statements. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the restated consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 presented in our 2004 Annual Report, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 13, 2006.
Stock-Based Compensation
     We have several stock-based employee compensation plans, which we account for under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. For 2004 and prior years, no stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net earnings for stock option grants, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to or in excess of the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Should we elect to modify any of our existing stock option awards, APB No. 25, as interpreted by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Financial Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation,” requires us to recognize the intrinsic value of the underlying options at the date the modification becomes effective. Modifications could include accelerated vesting, a reduction in exercise prices or extension of the exercise period.
     Awards of restricted stock are valued at the market price of our common stock on the grant date and recorded as unearned compensation within shareholders’ equity. The unearned compensation is amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period of the restricted stock. We had unearned compensation of $1.2 million and $0.9 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. These amounts will be recognized into net earnings in prospective periods.
     The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to all stock-based employee compensation, calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
10

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Net earnings, as reported	 	$	6,272	 	 	$	14,657	 	
Restricted stock compensation expense (income) included in net earnings, net of related tax effects	 	 	136	 	 	 	62	 	
Less: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects	 	 	(593	)	 	 	(587	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Pro forma net earnings	 	$	5,815	 	 	$	14,132	 	

Net earnings per share — basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	0.11	 	 	$	0.26	 	
Pro forma	 	 	0.11	 	 	 	0.26	 	
Net earnings per share — diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	0.11	 	 	$	0.26	 	
Pro forma	 	 	0.10	 	 	 	0.26	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Net earnings, as reported	 	$	13,414	 	 	$	19,926	 	
Restricted stock compensation expense (income) included in net earnings, net of related tax effects	 	 	97	 	 	 	124	 	
Less: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects	 	 	(1,012	)	 	 	(1,175	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Pro forma net earnings	 	$	12,499	 	 	$	18,875	 	

Net earnings per share — basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.36	 	
Pro forma	 	 	0.23	 	 	 	0.34	 	
Net earnings per share — diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.36	 	
Pro forma	 	 	0.23	 	 	 	0.34	 	
     The above pro forma disclosures may not be representative of effects for future years, since the determination of the fair value of stock options granted includes an expected volatility factor and additional option grants are expected to be made each year.
Other Accounting Policies
     Our significant accounting policies, for which no significant changes have occurred in the quarter ended June 30, 2004, are detailed in Note 1 of our 2004 Annual Report.
Accounting Developments
Pronouncements Implemented
     In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) by business enterprises that are the primary beneficiaries. A VIE is an entity: 1) that does not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or 2) whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, or
11

Table of Contents
3) whose equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests, and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the enterprise that has the majority of the risks or rewards associated with the VIE. We believe we have no interests in VIEs that require disclosure or consolidation under FIN No. 46(R), and therefore its implementation had no significant effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
     In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (the “Medicare Act”). The Medicare Act provides for certain federal subsidies on drug benefits provided under retiree health plans. In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we adopted FSP No. 106-2, retroactive to December 8, 2003, the date of the enactment of the Medicare Act. The expected subsidy reduced our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $4.5 million, which we recognized as a reduction in the unrecognized net actuarial loss and will be amortized over the average remaining service life of the employees eligible for postretirement benefits. We do not expect the adoption of FSP No. 106-2 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
     Although there are no other final pronouncements recently issued that we have not adopted and that we expect to impact reported financial information or disclosures, accounting promulgating bodies have a number of pending projects which may directly impact us. We continue to evaluate the status of these projects and as these projects become final, we will provide disclosures regarding the likelihood and magnitude of their impact, if any.
2. Restatement
     For the errors discussed below, we restated our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 presented herein.
     The following table sets forth the nature of significant restatement errors and their impact on the previously reported net earnings:
Summary of Restatement Issues Affecting Net Earnings
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three months ended	 	 	Six months ended	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	June 30, 2003	 	 	June 30, 2003	 	
Net earnings, as previously reported	 	$	13,227	 	 	$	21,469	 	
Inventory valuation	 	 	3,038	 	 	 	2,270	 	
Intercompany reconciliations	 	 	(380	)	 	 	(1,570	)	
Financial derivatives	 	 	(606	)	 	 	(1,162	)	
Pension expense	 	 	761	 	 	 	812	 	
Fixed assets and intangibles	 	 	(20	)	 	 	(843	)	
Other	 	 	273	 	 	 	435	 	
Tax matters	 	 	(1,636	)	 	 	(1,485	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings, as restated	 	$	14,657	 	 	$	19,926	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     Inventory Valuation — We corrected our financial statements for inconsistencies in the application of our accounting policy for obsolete and slow moving inventory, errors in our last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) calculations, and errors in adjusting for lower-of-cost-or-market considerations. The inconsistencies related to (i) obsolete and slow moving inventory mainly resulting from limitations in our systems and processes that did not effectively identify excess inventory quantities; and (ii) the inventories of acquired businesses where our identification of slow moving items was not performed timely. The errors in LIFO and lower-of-cost-or-market resulted from inaccurate calculations.
12

Table of Contents
     Intercompany Reconciliations — Our accounting for intercompany transactions was adversely affected by information technology system conversions, acquisitions, and changes in corporate processes for recording intercompany transactions. Our initial analysis of intercompany transactions was expanded to include an assessment of intercompany balance differences at each of the reporting dates. Certain reconciling items were identified through this assessment that required adjustment to the consolidated statements of operations.
     Financial Derivatives — We identified errors in our accounting for financial derivatives related to foreign currency forward exchange contracts, which consisted of incorrectly recording unrealized gains and losses in other comprehensive loss for certain contracts that did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. We also identified errors related to the recording of balances underlying the financial derivatives.
     Pension Expense — As part of a comprehensive review of our pension plans, we identified errors in the accounting for non-U.S. pension plans. Certain plan obligations had not been measured at the actuarially determined present value, which resulted in errors in our annual pension expense and related liabilities.
     Fixed Assets and Intangibles — As part of a comprehensive physical observation and assessment of fixed assets, we identified errors in our fixed asset processes related to disposals and abandonments that were not recorded in our accounting records necessitating adjustments to report the gains or losses on disposal in the appropriate periods. We also identified errors that resulted from not adjusting for the impact of purchase accounting within the general ledgers at certain locations of recently acquired businesses, amortization of leasehold improvements over periods in excess of the related lease terms, and errors in the amortization of intangible assets. These errors affected amounts reported for fixed assets, goodwill, other intangible assets, depreciation and amortization, loss on disposals, and foreign currency translation accounts.
     Other — We identified other errors as part of the restatement where the individual impact on net earnings was not as significant, which resulted from the following:
 	•	 	errors in the original allocation of the purchase price for acquired businesses to property, plant and equipment, goodwill, accrued liabilities and deferred income taxes;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	errors in reconciliations of account balances;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	errors in accounting for equity investments that were based on foreign accounting standards rather than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”); and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	other errors which were not deemed individually significant for separate disclosure.	
     Tax Matters — Due to significant employee turnover, information technology system limitations, corporate legal restructurings, several multinational acquisitions, and inadequate reconciliations, we identified errors in the amounts recorded in current and deferred income taxes. We undertook a process to identify our tax basis amounts, for both domestic and international locations, and performed a comprehensive review of our purchase accounting for recent acquisitions. This process included a detailed compilation of our book and tax differences at each of the reporting dates, as well as reconciliations of our income tax payable accounts to tax returns, as filed or as amended.
     We also identified errors that occurred in applying purchase accounting to businesses acquired, including income tax liabilities arising in years prior to the acquisitions, which were corrected in the related balance sheet accounts. We also identified errors in our U.S. federal income tax returns filed for 1999 through 2001 as a result of an Internal Revenue Service examination of those years. We amended our tax returns for those years and reflected the impact of those amendments within current and deferred domestic income tax balance sheet accounts at each of the annual reporting dates through December 31, 2004.
     Tax matters also includes the results of assessing the other restatement entries to determine which amounts had a corresponding impact on our provision for income taxes.
13

Table of Contents
     The following table presents the impact of the restatement adjustments, further described below, and of the business classified as discontinued operations in 2004 that is described in Note 3, on our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Information
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three months ended June 30, 2003	 	 	Six months ended June 30, 2003	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	As Restated	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	As Restated	 	
 	 	As	 	 	 	 	 	 	with	 	 	As	 	 	 	 	 	 	with	 	
(Amounts in thousands,	 	Previously	 	 	 	 	 	 	Discontinued	 	 	Previously	 	 	 	 	 	 	Discontinued	 	
except per share data)	 	Reported	 	 	As Restated	 	 	Operations	 	 	Reported	 	 	As Restated	 	 	Operations	 	
Sales	 	$	614,036	 	 	$	614,208	 	 	$	608,151	 	 	$	1,178,047	 	 	$	1,176,544	 	 	$	1,165,369	 	
Cost of sales	 	 	434,068	 	 	 	431,828	 	 	 	426,795	 	 	 	828,577	 	 	 	825,706	 	 	 	816,620	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross profit	 	 	179,968	 	 	 	182,380	 	 	 	181,356	 	 	 	349,470	 	 	 	350,838	 	 	 	348,749	 	
Selling, general and administrative expense	 	 	130,447	 	 	 	128,905	 	 	 	128,223	 	 	 	258,771	 	 	 	258,490	 	 	 	257,152	 	
Integration expense	 	 	5,662	 	 	 	5,662	 	 	 	5,662	 	 	 	12,073	 	 	 	12,073	 	 	 	12,073	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	808	 	 	 	808	 	 	 	808	 	 	 	1,820	 	 	 	1,820	 	 	 	1,820	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating income	 	 	43,051	 	 	 	47,005	 	 	 	46,663	 	 	 	76,806	 	 	 	78,455	 	 	 	77,704	 	
Interest expense	 	 	(21,302	)	 	 	(21,302	)	 	 	(21,302	)	 	 	(42,438	)	 	 	(42,438	)	 	 	(42,438	)	
Interest income	 	 	599	 	 	 	622	 	 	 	622	 	 	 	1,488	 	 	 	1,535	 	 	 	1,535	 	
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment	 	 	(480	)	 	 	(480	)	 	 	(480	)	 	 	(639	)	 	 	(639	)	 	 	(639	)	
Other expense, net	 	 	(1,674	)	 	 	(2,585	)	 	 	(2,587	)	 	 	(2,441	)	 	 	(4,198	)	 	 	(4,198	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	 	20,194	 	 	 	23,260	 	 	 	22,916	 	 	 	32,776	 	 	 	32,715	 	 	 	31,964	 	
Provision for income taxes	 	 	6,967	 	 	 	8,603	 	 	 	8,476	 	 	 	11,307	 	 	 	12,789	 	 	 	12,511	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income from continuing operations	 	 	13,227	 	 	 	14,657	 	 	 	14,440	 	 	 	21,469	 	 	 	19,926	 	 	 	19,453	 	
Discontinued operations, net of tax	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	217	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	473	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	13,227	 	 	$	14,657	 	 	$	14,657	 	 	$	21,469	 	 	$	19,926	 	 	$	19,926	 	

Net earnings per share — basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.39	 	 	$	0.36	 	 	$	0.35	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.01	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.39	 	 	$	0.36	 	 	$	0.36	 	

Net earnings per share — diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.39	 	 	$	0.36	 	 	$	0.35	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.01	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.24	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.26	 	 	$	0.39	 	 	$	0.36	 	 	$	0.36	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     Our restatement corrects the consolidated statements of operations for the following errors:
 	•	 	Sales increased $0.2 million and decreased $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, primarily due to errors that reported sales in a period later than determined in accordance with GAAP for which there is no significant impact on net earnings in the periods presented.	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Cost of sales decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to errors in the following (in thousands):	
14

Table of Contents

 	 	Three Months	 	 	Six Months	 	
Inventory valuation	 	$	(3,038	)	 	$	(2,270	)	
Intercompany reconciliations	 	 	374	 	 	 	1,564	 	
Pension expense	 	 	(388	)	 	 	(776	)	
Long-term contract accounting	 	 	78	 	 	 	326	 	
Other (mainly errors in account reconciliations)	 	 	734	 	 	 	(1,715	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total cost of sales	 	$	(2,240	)	 	$	(2,871	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Long-Term Contract Accounting — We identified a long-term contract in which costs related to the contracts were not recorded in the appropriate periods and resulted in corrections to cost of sales in prior periods. This error did not have a significant impact on net earnings in the periods presented.
•	 	Selling, general and administrative expense decreased $1.5 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, primarily due to errors in pension expense ($0.4 million and 0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively), errors in accounting for equity investments ($0.9 million and $0.5 million the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively), and other individually insignificant errors.	
 	 	 	
•	 	Other expense, net increased $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, primarily due to errors in the accounting for foreign currency forward contracts that did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting ($0.6 million and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively) and other individually insignificant errors.	
 	 	 	
•	 	Provision for income taxes increased $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, primarily due to corrections in deferred tax accounts and the income tax effect of the errors described above. Included in this was $1.1 million and $20,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, due to the tax impact on the restatement items.	
     The following table presents the impact of the restatement adjustments on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Information
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three months ended	 	 	Six months ended	 	
 	 	June 30, 2003	 	 	June 30, 2003	 	
 	 	As Previously	 	 	 	 	 	 	As Previously	 	 	 	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	Reported	 	 	As Restated	 	 	Reported	 	 	As Restated	 	
Net earnings	 	$	13,227	 	 	$	14,657	 	 	$	21,469	 	 	$	19,926	 	
Other comprehensive income (expense):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax	 	 	27,527	 	 	 	23,059	 	 	 	32,061	 	 	 	37,900	 	
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax	 	 	(1,050	)	 	 	(320	)	 	 	(1,265	)	 	 	(394	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other comprehensive income	 	 	26,477	 	 	 	22,739	 	 	 	30,796	 	 	 	37,506	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	 	$	39,704	 	 	$	37,396	 	 	$	52,265	 	 	$	57,432	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
15

Table of Contents
     Our consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003, was also restated for the items discussed above. The following table presents the major subtotals in our 2003 consolidated statements of cash flows and the related impact of the restatement adjustments discussed above:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Information
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six months ended	 	
 	 	June 30, 2003	 	
 	 	As Previously	 	 	 	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	Reported	 	 	As Restated	 	
Net cash flows provided (used) by:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating activities	 	$	97,344	 	 	$	94,434	 	
Investing activities	 	 	(12,749	)	 	 	(12,749	)	
Financing activities	 	 	(85,000	)	 	 	(83,695	)	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	 	 	6,996	 	 	 	6,996	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	 	 	6,591	 	 	 	4,986	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	 	 	49,293	 	 	 	48,991	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	 	$	55,884	 	 	$	53,977	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     The footnotes contained in these condensed consolidated financial statements also reflect the impact of the restatement discussed in this footnote.
3. Discontinued Operations
     In the first quarter of 2004, we made a definitive decision to sell our Government Marine Business Unit (“GMBU”), a business within our Flowserve Pump Division (“FPD”). As a result, we reclassified the operation to discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2004. In November 2004, we sold GMBU to Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation for approximately $28 million, generating a pre-tax gain of $7.4 million after the allocation of approximately $8 million of FPD goodwill and $1 million of intangible assets. GMBU, which provided pump technology and service for U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers, did not serve our core market and represented only a small part of our total pump business. We used net proceeds from the disposition of GMBU to reduce our outstanding indebtedness. As a result of this sale, we have presented the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the GMBU as discontinued operations for all periods included.
     GMBU generated the following results of operations:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in millions)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Sales	 	$	5.9	 	 	$	6.1	 	
Cost of sales	 	 	4.4	 	 	 	5.1	 	
Selling, general and administrative expense	 	 	0.7	 	 	 	0.7	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	 	0.8	 	 	 	0.3	 	
Provision for income taxes	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	0.1	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Results for discontinued operations, net of tax	 	$	0.5	 	 	$	0.2	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
 	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
(Amounts in millions)	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Sales	 	$	11.6	 	 	$	11.2	 	
Cost of sales	 	 	9.2	 	 	 	9.1	 	
Selling, general and administrative expense	 	 	1.5	 	 	 	1.3	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	 	0.9	 	 	 	0.8	 	
Provision for income taxes	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	0.3	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Results for discontinued operations, net of tax	 	$	0.6	 	 	$	0.5	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
16

Table of Contents
     GMBU’s assets and liabilities have been reclassified to prepaid expenses and other, property, plant and equipment, net, accounts payable and accrued liabilities to reflect discontinued operations. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, GMBU’s assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	June 30,	 	 	December 31,	 	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
Accounts receivable, net	 	$	2.8	 	 	$	3.9	 	
Inventory, net	 	 	7.7	 	 	 	5.7	 	
Property, plant and equipment, net	 	 	1.5	 	 	 	1.6	 	
Goodwill	 	 	7.8	 	 	 	7.8	 	
Other intangible assets, net	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	1.4	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	 	$	21.2	 	 	$	20.4	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable	 	$	3.0	 	 	$	3.3	 	
Accrued liabilities	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	2.0	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities	 	$	3.4	 	 	$	5.3	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
4. Acquisition
     We acquired the remaining 75% interest in Thompsons, Kelly and Lewis, Pty. Ltd (“TKL”) an Australian manufacturer and supplier of pumps, during March 2004. The incremental interests acquired were accounted for as a step acquisition and TKL’s results of operations have been consolidated since the date of acquisition. The estimated fair value of the net assets acquired (including approximately $2.2 million of cash acquired) exceeded the cash paid of $12 million and, accordingly, no goodwill was recognized.
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedges
     We enter into forward contracts to hedge our risk associated with transactions denominated in currencies other than the local currency of the operation engaging in the transaction. Our risk management and derivatives policy specify the conditions in which we enter into derivative contracts. As of June 30, 2004, we have approximately $143.9 million of notional amount in outstanding contracts with third parties. As of June 30, 2004, the maximum length of any forward contract in place was 23 months.
     Certain of our forward contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting. The fair value of these outstanding forward contracts at June 30, 2004 was an asset of $0.5 million and an asset of $4.7 million at December 31, 2003. Unrealized losses from the changes in the fair value of these forward contracts of $0.6 million for the quarters ended both June 30, 2004 and 2003, and $4.6 million and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are included in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of outstanding forward contracts qualifying for hedge accounting was a liability of $0.1 million and $2.3 million at December 31, 2003. Unrealized gains from the changes in the fair value of qualifying forward contracts and the associated underlying exposures of $50,000 and $15,000, net of tax, for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $134,000 and $45,000, net of tax, for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are included in other comprehensive income (loss).
     Also as part of our risk management program, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge exposure to floating interest rates on certain portions of our debt. As of June 30, 2004, we have $150 million of notional amount in outstanding interest rate swaps with third parties. As of June 30, 2004, the maximum remaining length of any interest rate contract in place was approximately 29 months. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements was a liability of $4.7 million and $7.6 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Unrealized losses from the changes in fair value of our interest rate swap agreements, net of reclassifications, of $2.0 million and $0.5 million, net of tax, for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.8 million, net of tax, for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, are included in other comprehensive income (loss).
17

Table of Contents
     We are exposed to risk from credit-related losses resulting from nonperformance by counterparties to our financial instruments. We perform credit evaluations of our counterparties under forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements and expect all counterparties to meet their obligations. We have not experienced credit losses from our counterparties. Additionally, we are exposed to risk of our derivative contracts not qualifying for hedge accounting.
6. Debt
     Debt, including capital lease obligations, consisted of:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	June 30,	 	 	December 31,	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
Term Loan Tranche A:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
U.S. Dollar Tranches, interest rate of 3.86% in 2004 and 3.74% in 2003	 	$	169,524	 	 	$	200,004	 	
Euro Tranche, interest rate of 4.50% in 2004 and 4.65% in 2003	 	 	11,918	 	 	 	12,292	 	
Term Loan Tranche C, interest rate of 4.06% in 2004 and 4.00% in 2003	 	 	458,473	 	 	 	465,473	 	
Revolving Line of Credit, interest rate of 4.25% in 2004	 	 	5,000	 	 	 	—	 	
Senior Subordinated Notes, net of discount, coupon of 12.25%:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
U.S. Dollar denominated	 	 	186,872	 	 	 	186,739	 	
Euro denominated	 	 	78,587	 	 	 	80,998	 	
Receivable factoring obligations	 	 	3,823	 	 	 	4,543	 	
Capital lease obligations and other	 	 	634	 	 	 	752	 	

Debt and capital lease obligations	 	 	914,831	 	 	 	950,801	 	
Less amounts due within one year	 	 	83,692	 	 	 	71,035	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total debt due after one year	 	$	831,139	 	 	$	879,766	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
2000 Credit Facilities
     As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our 2000 Credit Facilities were composed of Tranche A and Tranche C term loans and a revolving line of credit. Tranche A consisted of a U.S. dollar denominated tranche and a Euro denominated tranche, the latter of which was a term note due in 2006. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we made scheduled and optional debt payments of $27.5 million and $10.0 million, respectively. During the remainder of 2004, we made mandatory and optional principal payments of $167.9 million and $150.0 million, respectively.
     The Tranche A and Tranche C loans had ultimate maturities of June 2006 and June 2009, respectively. The term loans bore floating interest rates based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a borrowing spread, or the prime rate plus a borrowing spread, at our option. The borrowing spread for the senior credit facilities can increase or decrease based on the leverage ratio as defined in the credit facility and on our public debt ratings.
     As part of the 2000 Credit Facilities, we also had a $300 million revolving line of credit that was set to expire in June 2006. The revolving line of credit allows us to issue up to $200 million in letters of credit. Approximately $5 million and $0 was outstanding under the revolving line of credit at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. We had outstanding letters of credit of $45.5 million at June 30, 2004, which reduced borrowing capacity to $249.5 million, compared with a borrowing capacity of $257.3 million at December 31, 2003.
     We were required, under certain circumstances as defined in the 2000 Credit Facilities, to use a percentage of excess cash generated from operations to reduce the outstanding principal of the term loans in the following year. Based upon the annual calculations performed at December 31, 2003, no additional principal payments became due in 2004 under this provision.
Senior Subordinated Notes
     At June 30, 2004, we had $188.5 million and €65 million (equivalent to $79.3 million at June 30, 2004) face value of Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding. The Senior Subordinated Notes were originally issued in 2000 at a discount to yield
18

Table of Contents
12.5%, but have a coupon interest rate of 12.25%. Interest on these notes was payable semi-annually in February and August. In August 2005, all remaining Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding were called by us at 106.125% of face value as specified in the loan agreement and repaid, along with accrued interest.
EIB Credit Facility
     On April 14, 2004, we and one of our European subsidiaries, Flowserve B.V., entered into an agreement with European Investment Bank (“EIB”), pursuant to which EIB agreed to loan us up to €70 million, with the ability to draw funds in multiple currencies, to finance in part specified research and development projects undertaken by us in Europe. Borrowings under the EIB credit facility bear interest at a fixed or floating rate of interest agreed to by us and EIB with respect to each borrowing under the facility. Loans under the EIB credit facility are subject to mandatory repayment, at EIB’s discretion, upon the occurrence of certain events, including a change of control or prepayment of certain other indebtedness. In addition, the EIB credit facility contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to dispose of assets related to the financed project and require us to deliver to EIB our audited annual financial statements within 30 days of publication. Our obligations under the EIB credit facility are guaranteed by a letter of credit outstanding under our New Credit Facilities. In August 2004, we borrowed $85 million at a floating interest rate based on 3-month U.S. LIBOR that resets quarterly.
Debt Covenants
     Our 2000 Credit Facilities that have now been refinanced, the letter of credit facility guaranteeing our obligations under the EIB credit facility, and the agreements governing our domestic receivables program each required us to deliver to creditors thereunder our audited annual consolidated financial statements within a specified number of days following the end of each fiscal year. In addition, the indentures governing our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes required us to timely file with the SEC our annual and quarterly reports.
7. Inventories
     Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market. Cost is determined for principally all U.S. inventories by the LIFO method and for other inventories by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method.
     Inventories and the method of determining costs were:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	June 30,	 	 	December 31,	 	
(Amounts in thousands)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
Raw materials	 	$	123,754	 	 	$	115,695	 	
Work in process	 	 	225,086	 	 	 	229,049	 	
Finished goods	 	 	239,559	 	 	 	230,234	 	
Less: Progress billings	 	 	(84,843	)	 	 	(92,490	)	
Less: Excess and obsolete reserve	 	 	(44,482	)	 	 	(43,354	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	459,074	 	 	 	439,134	 	
LIFO reserve	 	 	(27,343	)	 	 	(26,760	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net inventory	 	$	431,731	 	 	$	412,374	 	

Percent of inventory accounted for by:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
LIFO	 	 	50	%	 	 	50	%	
FIFO	 	 	50	%	 	 	50	%	
8. Restructuring Costs — IFC
Restructuring Costs
     In conjunction with the acquisition of the Flow Control Division of Invensys plc (“IFC”) during 2002, we initiated a restructuring program designed to reduce costs and eliminate excess capacity by closing 18 valve facilities, including 10
19

Table of Contents
service facilities, and reducing sales and related support personnel. Our actions, some of which were approved and committed to in 2002 with the remaining actions approved and committed to in 2003, are expected to result in a gross reduction of approximately 889 positions and a net reduction of approximately 662 positions. Net position eliminations represent the gross positions eliminated from the closed facilities offset by positions added at the receiving facilities, which are required to produce the products transferred into the receiving facilities.
     We established a restructuring program reserve upon acquisition of IFC, and recognized additional accruals of $4.5 million in 2003 for this program, including $3.2 million during the first six months, primarily related to the closure of certain valve service facilities and the related reductions in workforce. Cash expenditures against the accrual were $11.6 million in 2003, including $7.4 million during the first six months, and $2.0 million during the first six months of 2004. The remaining accrual of $7.3 million reflects payments to be made in 2004 and beyond for severance obligations due to terminated personnel in Europe of $4.4 million as well as lease and other contract termination and exit costs of $2.9 million.
     Cumulative costs associated with the closure of Flowserve facilities of $7.2 million through December 31, 2003, have been recognized as restructuring expense in operating results, whereas cumulative costs associated with the closure of IFC facilities of $17.9 million, including related deferred taxes of $6.2 million, became part of the purchase price allocation of the transaction. The effect of these closure costs increased the amount of goodwill otherwise recognizable as a result of the IFC acquisition.
     The following illustrates activity related to the IFC restructuring reserve:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Other Exit	 	 	
(Amounts in millions)	 	Severance	 	Costs	 	Total	
 	 	 	
Balance at January 1, 2003	 	$	10.7	 	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	16.4	 	
Additional accruals	 	 	3.8	 	 	 	0.7	 	 	 	4.5	 	
Cash expenditures	 	 	(8.8	)	 	 	(2.8	)	 	 	(11.6	)	
 	 	 	
Balance at December 31, 2003	 	 	5.7	 	 	 	3.6	 	 	 	9.3	 	
Cash expenditures	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(1.3	)	
 	 	 	
Balance at March 31, 2004	 	 	4.8	 	 	 	3.2	 	 	 	8.0	 	
Cash expenditures	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.7	)	
 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2004	 	$	4.4	 	 	$	2.9	 	 	$	7.3	 	
 	 	 	
Integration Costs – IFC
     We did not incur acquisition-related integration expenses in 2004. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, we incurred acquisition-related integration expense in conjunction with IFC, which is summarized below:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months	 	Six Months	
 	 	ended June 30,	 	ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2003	 	2003	
 	 	 	
Personnel and related costs	 	$	2.6	 	 	$	6.3	 	
Transfer of product lines	 	 	1.7	 	 	 	3.4	 	
Asset impairments	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	0.8	 	
Other	 	 	0.8	 	 	 	1.6	 	

IFC integration expense	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	12.1	 	

Cash expense	 	$	5.0	 	 	$	11.2	 	
Non-cash expense	 	 	0.7	 	 	 	0.9	 	
 	 	 	
IFC integration expense	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	12.1	 	
 	 	 	
     The acquisition-related activities resulted in integration costs as categorized above and further defined as follows. Personnel and related costs include payroll, benefits, consulting fees, and retention and integration performance bonuses paid
20

Table of Contents
to our employees and contractors for the development, management and execution of the integration plan. Transfer of product lines includes costs associated with the transfer of product lines as well as realignment required in the receiving facilities. Asset impairments reflect the loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment at the facilities closed and disposal of inventory for discontinued product lines when the facilities were combined. The other category includes costs associated with information technology integration, legal entity consolidations, legal entity name changes, signage, new product literature and others. None of these items individually amounted to greater than $0.5 million.
Remaining Restructuring and Integration Costs – IFC
     At December 31, 2003, we largely completed restructuring and integration activities related to IFC, except for payments to be made for certain European activities. We expect to incur no additional restructuring and integration costs related to this integration program. Payments from the restructuring accrual will continue throughout 2004 and into 2005 due to the timing of severance obligations in Europe.
9. Earnings Per Share
     Basic and diluted earnings per weighted average share outstanding were calculated as follows:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Income from continuing operations	 	$	5,785	 	 	$	14,440	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	6,272	 	 	$	14,657	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted average shares	 	 	55,207	 	 	 	55,159	 	
Effect of potentially dilutive securities	 	 	322	 	 	 	154	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — weighted average shares	 	 	55,529	 	 	 	55,313	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings per share:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.10	 	 	$	0.26	 	
Net earnings	 	 	0.11	 	 	 	0.26	 	
Diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.10	 	 	$	0.26	 	
Net earnings	 	 	0.11	 	 	 	0.26	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Income from continuing operations	 	$	12,853	 	 	$	19,453	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	13,414	 	 	$	19,926	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted average shares	 	 	55,165	 	 	 	55,159	 	
Effect of potentially dilutive securities	 	 	295	 	 	 	153	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — weighted average shares	 	 	55,460	 	 	 	55,312	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings per share:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.23	 	 	$	0.35	 	
Net earnings	 	 	0.24	 	 	 	0.36	 	
Diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.23	 	 	$	0.35	 	
Net earnings	 	 	0.24	 	 	 	0.36	 	
21

Table of Contents
     Options outstanding with an exercise price greater than the average market price of the common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
     The following summarizes options to purchase common stock that were excluded from the computations of potentially dilutive securities:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
 	 	2004	 	2003	
Total number excluded	 	 	1,159,862	 	 	 	2,709,543	 	
Weighted average exercise price	 	$	27.19	 	 	$	22.38	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
 	 	2004	 	2003	
Total number excluded	 	 	1,159,862	 	 	 	2,718,543	 	
Weighted average exercise price	 	$	27.19	 	 	$	22.35	 	
10. Legal Matters and Contingencies
     We are a defendant in a large number of pending lawsuits (which include, in many cases, multiple claimants) that seek to recover damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos containing products manufactured and/or distributed by us in the past. Any such products were encapsulated and used only as components of process equipment, and we do not believe that any emission of respirable asbestos fibers occurred during the use of this equipment. We believe that a high percentage of the applicable claims are covered by applicable insurance or indemnities from other companies.
     On February 4, 2004, we received an informal inquiry from the SEC requesting the voluntary production of documents and information related to our February 3, 2004 announcement that we would restate our financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the full years 2002, 2001 and 2000. On June 2, 2004, we were advised that the SEC had issued a formal order of private investigation into issues regarding this restatement and any other issues that arise from the investigation. We continue to cooperate with the SEC in this matter.
     During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, related lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas (the “Court’’), alleging that we violated federal securities laws. Since the filing of these cases, which have been consolidated, the lead plaintiff has amended its complaint several times. The lead plaintiff’s current pleading is the fifth consolidated amended complaint (“Complaint’’). The Complaint alleges that federal securities violations occurred between February 6, 2001 and September 27, 2002 and names as defendants Mr. C. Scott Greer, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Renee J. Hornbaker, our former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, which served as underwriters for two of our public stock offerings during the relevant period. The Complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The lead plaintiff seeks unspecified compensatory damages, forfeiture by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of unspecified incentive-based or equity-based compensation and profits from any stock sales, and recovery of costs. On November 22, 2005, the Court entered an order denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint on the pleadings in their entirety. The case is currently set for trial on March 27, 2007. We continue to believe that the lawsuit is without merit and are vigorously defending the case.
     We have been involved as a potentially responsible party (“PRP’’) at former public waste disposal sites that may be subject to remediation under pending government procedures. The sites are in various stages of evaluation by federal and state environmental authorities. The projected cost of remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged “fair share’’ allocation, is uncertain and speculative until all studies have been completed and the parties have either negotiated an amicable resolution or the matter has been judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties who have similarly been identified, and the identification and location of additional parties is continuing under applicable federal or state law. Many of the other parties identified are financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay their share of the remediation costs. Based on our information about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it is likely that ultimate remediation liability costs for each site will be apportioned among all liable parties,
22

Table of Contents
including site owners and waste transporters, according to the volumes and/or toxicity of the wastes shown to have been disposed of at the sites. We believe that our exposure for existing disposal sites will be less than $100,000.
     We are also a defendant in several other lawsuits, including product liability claims, that are insured, subject to the applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on currently available information, we believe that we have adequately accrued estimated probable losses for such lawsuits. We are also involved in a substantial number of labor claims, including one case where we had a confidential settlement reflected in our results of operations for the second quarter of 2004.
     Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be quantified with absolute certainty, we have established reserves covering these exposures, which we believe to be reasonable based on past experience and available facts. While additional exposures beyond these reserves could exist, they currently cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate these potential contingent loss exposures and, if they develop, recognize expense as soon as such losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.
     We are also involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, none of which we believe to be material to our business, operations or overall financial condition. However, resolutions or dispositions of claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have a significant impact on our operating results for the reporting period in which any such resolution or disposition occurs.
11. Retirement and Postretirement Benefits
     Components of the net periodic cost (benefit) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	U.S.	 	Non-U.S.	 	Postretirement	
Three Months Ended June 30,	 	Defined Benefit Plans	 	Defined Benefit Plans	 	Medical Benefits	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	 	2004	 	2003	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net periodic cost (benefit)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service cost	 	$	3.5	 	 	$	3.4	 	 	$	0.9	 	 	$	0.6	 	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	—	 	
Interest cost	 	 	3.8	 	 	 	3.9	 	 	 	2.2	 	 	 	1.9	 	 	 	1.3	 	 	 	1.5	 	
Expected return on plan assets	 	 	(4.3	)	 	 	(4.3	)	 	 	(1.1	)	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Curtailments/settlements	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Amortization of unrecognized net loss	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	0.3	 	
Amortization of prior service costs	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.8	)	 	 	(0.8	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cost recognized	 	$	3.3	 	 	$	2.8	 	 	$	2.3	 	 	$	2.0	 	 	$	1.0	 	 	$	1.0	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
     Components of the net periodic cost (benefit) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	U.S.	 	Non-U.S.	 	Postretirement	
Six Months Ended June 30,	 	Defined Benefit Plans	 	Defined Benefit Plans	 	Medical Benefits	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	 	2004	 	2003	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net periodic cost (benefit)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service cost	 	$	6.9	 	 	$	6.7	 	 	$	1.7	 	 	$	1.3	 	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	0.1	 	
Interest cost	 	 	7.7	 	 	 	7.9	 	 	 	4.4	 	 	 	3.8	 	 	 	2.7	 	 	 	2.9	 	
Expected return on plan assets	 	 	(8.7	)	 	 	(8.6	)	 	 	(2.2	)	 	 	(1.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Curtailments/settlements	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Amortization of unrecognized net loss	 	 	1.3	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	0.7	 	 	 	0.7	 	 	 	0.7	 	
Amortization of prior service costs	 	 	(0.6	)	 	 	(0.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.6	)	 	 	(1.6	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cost recognized	 	$	6.6	 	 	$	5.5	 	 	$	4.5	 	 	$	4.0	 	 	$	1.9	 	 	$	2.1	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 -	
12. Income taxes
     For the three months ended June 30, 2004, we earned $21.4 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $15.6 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 72.9%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we earned $36.6 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $23.8 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 64.9%. The effective tax rate varied
23

Table of Contents
from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily due to increased foreign losses for which valuation allowances had been established and the impact of increased foreign earnings repatriation used to pay down U.S. debt.
13. Segment Information
     We are principally engaged in the worldwide design, manufacture, distribution and service of industrial flow management equipment. We provide pumps, valves and mechanical seals primarily for the petroleum industry, chemical-processing industry, power-generation industry, water industry, general industry and other industries requiring flow management products.
     We have the following three divisions, each of which constitutes a business segment:
 	•	 	Flowserve Pump Division;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Flow Control Division; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Flow Solutions Division.	
     Each division manufactures different products and is defined by the type of products and services provided. Each division has a President, who reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer, and a Division Controller, who reports directly to our Chief Accounting Officer. For decision-making purposes, our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior executive management use financial information generated and reported at the division level. Our corporate headquarters does not constitute a separate division or business segment.
     We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on each segment’s operating income excluding special items, such as restructuring and integration costs related to the IFC acquisition. We believe that special items, while indicative of efforts to integrate acquired companies such as IFC and IDP into our business, do not reflect ongoing business results. We believe investors and other users of our financial statements can better evaluate and analyze historical and future business trends if special items are excluded from each segment’s operating income. Operating income before special items is not a recognized measure under GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to, or a better indicator of, GAAP measures of performance.
     Amounts classified as All Other include the corporate headquarters costs and other minor entities that do not constitute separate segments. Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at cost plus a profit margin, with the margin on such sales eliminated with consolidation.
     Effective January 1, 2004, we realigned certain small sites between segments. Accordingly, the segment information for all periods presented herein has been reported under our revised organizational structure.
     The following is a summary of the financial information of the reportable segments reconciled to the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
24

Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Subtotal –	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Flowserve	 	Flow	 	Flow	 	Reportable	 	 	 	 	 	Consolidated	
(amounts in thousands)	 	Pump	 	Solutions	 	Control	 	Segments	 	All Other	 	Total	
Sales to external customers	 	$	317,574	 	 	$	89,721	 	 	$	239,730	 	 	$	647,025	 	 	$	1,452	 	 	$	648,477	 	
Intersegment sales	 	 	1,308	 	 	 	8,154	 	 	 	1,019	 	 	 	10,481	 	 	 	(10,481	)	 	 	—	 	
Segment operating income	 	 	22,542	 	 	 	18,576	 	 	 	21,059	 	 	 	62,177	 	 	 	(20,145	)	 	 	42,032	 	
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Subtotal –	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(As restated)	 	Flowserve	 	Flow	 	Flow	 	Reportable	 	 	 	 	 	Consolidated	
(amounts in thousands)	 	Pump	 	Solutions	 	Control	 	Segments	 	All Other	 	Total	
Sales to external customers	 	$	288,507	 	 	$	84,602	 	 	$	233,575	 	 	$	606,684	 	 	$	1,467	 	 	$	608,151	 	
Intersegment sales	 	 	151	 	 	 	5,819	 	 	 	1,640	 	 	 	7,610	 	 	 	(7,610	)	 	 	—	 	
Segment operating income (before special items)  (1)	 	 	20,811	 	 	 	17,223	 	 	 	22,550	 	 	 	60,584	 	 	 	(7,451	)	 	 	53,133	 	

(1)	 	Special items reflect costs associated with the IFC acquisition including $5.7 million of integration expense and $0.8 million of restructuring expense.	
     A reconciliation of total consolidated operating income before special items to consolidated earnings before income taxes follows:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended June 30,	 	
(amounts in thousands)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Total consolidated operating income (before special items)	 	$	42,032	 	 	$	53,133	 	
Less:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net interest expense	 	 	(19,434	)	 	 	(20,680	)	
Loss on optional prepayments of debt	 	 	(85	)	 	 	(480	)	
Other expense, net	 	 	(1,131	)	 	 	(2,587	)	
Special items:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Integration expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	5,662	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	808	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	$	21,382	 	 	$	22,916	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Subtotal –	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Flowserve	 	Flow	 	Flow	 	Reportable	 	 	 	 	 	Consolidated	
(amounts in thousands)	 	Pump	 	Solutions	 	Control	 	Segments	 	All Other	 	Total	
Sales to external customers	 	$	613,147	 	 	$	177,559	 	 	$	460,168	 	 	$	1,250,874	 	 	$	2,752	 	 	$	1,253,626	 	
Intersegment sales	 	 	2,965	 	 	 	15,154	 	 	 	2,353	 	 	 	20,472	 	 	 	(20,472	)	 	 	—	 	
Segment operating income	 	 	41,139	 	 	 	35,763	 	 	 	33,317	 	 	 	110,219	 	 	 	(29,419	)	 	 	80,800	 	
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Subtotal –	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(As restated)	 	Flowserve	 	Flow	 	Flow	 	Reportable	 	 	 	 	 	Consolidated	
(amounts in thousands)	 	Pump	 	Solutions	 	Control	 	Segments	 	All Other	 	Total	
Sales to external customers	 	$	565,160	 	 	$	163,563	 	 	$	434,065	 	 	$	1,162,788	 	 	$	2,581	 	 	$	1,165,369	 	
Intersegment sales	 	 	3,126	 	 	 	11,930	 	 	 	4,137	 	 	 	19,193	 	 	 	(19,193	)	 	 	—	 	
Segment operating income (before special items)  (1)	 	 	41,606	 	 	 	33,113	 	 	 	33,219	 	 	 	107,938	 	 	 	(16,341	)	 	 	91,597	 	

(1)	 	Special items reflect costs associated with the IFC acquisition including $12.1 million of integration expense and $1.8 million of restructuring expense.	
25

Table of Contents
     A reconciliation of total consolidated operating income before special items to consolidated earnings before income taxes follows:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	 	
(amounts in thousands)	 	2004	 	 	2003	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	 	
Total consolidated operating income (before special items)	 	$	80,800	 	 	$	91,597	 	
Less:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net interest expense	 	 	(39,265	)	 	 	(40,903	)	
Loss on optional prepayments of debt	 	 	(85	)	 	 	(639	)	
Other expense, net	 	 	(4,809	)	 	 	(4,198	)	
Special items:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Integration expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	12,073	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,820	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings before income taxes	 	$	36,641	 	 	$	31,964	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
14. Subsequent Events
Financing Matters
     In October 2004, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries entered into an accounts receivable securitization whereby we could obtain up to $75 million in financing by securitizing certain U.S.-based receivables with a third party. In October 2005, we terminated this accounts receivable securitization facility. In connection with the termination, we borrowed approximately $48 million under our New Credit Facilities to repurchase our receivables then held by such third party.
     In March 2005, we obtained consents from our major lenders that enhanced our flexibility under our 2000 Credit Facilities to among other things permit the August 2005 refinancing of our 2000 Credit Facilities and the repurchase of our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes. On August 12, 2005, we entered into New Credit Facilities comprised of a $600 million term loan expiring on August 10, 2012 and a $400 million revolving line of credit, which can be utilized to provide up to $300 million in letters of credit, expiring on August 12, 2010. We refer to these credit facilities collectively as our New Credit Facilities. The proceeds of borrowings under our New Credit Facilities were used to call our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes and retire our indebtedness outstanding under our 2000 Credit Facilities. We also replaced the letter of credit agreement guaranteeing our obligations under the EIB credit facility described in Note 6 with a letter of credit issued under the new revolving line of credit.
     We incurred $9.3 million in fees related to the new facilities, of which $0.3 million were expensed in 2005. Prior to the refinancing, we had $11.8 million of unamortized deferred loan costs related to the 2000 Credit Facilities and the Senior Subordinated Notes. Based upon the final syndicate of financial institutions for the New Credit Facilities, we expensed $10.5 million of these unamortized deferred loan costs in 2005. In addition to the total loan costs of $10.8 million that were expensed, we recorded a charge of $16.5 million for premiums paid to call the Senior Subordinated Notes, for a total loss on extinguishment of $27.3 million recorded in 2005. The remaining $9.0 million of fees related to the new facilities were capitalized and combined with the remaining $1.3 million of previously unamortized deferred loan costs for a total of $10.3 million in deferred loan costs included in other assets, net. These costs will be amortized over the term of the New Credit Facilities.
     Borrowings under our New Credit Facilities bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate (which is based on greater of the prime rate most recently announced by the administrative agent under our New Credit Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2) LIBOR plus an applicable margin determined by reference to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”), which at December 31, 2005 was 1.75% for LIBOR borrowings. In addition, we pay lenders under the New Credit Facilities a commitment fee equal to a
26

Table of Contents
percentage, determined by reference to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, of the unutilized portion of the revolving line of credit, and letter of credit fees with respect to each financial standby letter of credit outstanding under our New Credit Facilities equal to a percentage based on the applicable margin in effect for LIBOR borrowings under the new revolving line of credit. The fee for performance standby letters of credit is 0.5% lower than the fee for financial standby letters of credit.
     In connection with the New Credit Facilities, during 2005 we entered into $275 million of notional amount of interest rate swaps to hedge exposure of floating interest rates. Of this total notional amount of $275 million, $130 million carried a start date of September 30, 2005 and $145 million carried a start date of December 30, 2005. These swaps, combined with the $135 million of interest rates swaps held by us at the time of the refinancing, total $410 million of notional amount of interest rate swaps outstanding at December 31, 2005.
     Our obligations under the New Credit Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by substantially all of our existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries. In addition, prior to our obtaining and maintaining investment grade credit ratings, our and the guarantors’ obligations under the New Credit Facilities are collateralized by substantially all of our and the guarantors’ assets.
     The loans under our New Credit Facilities are subject to mandatory repayment with, in general:
 	•	 	100% of the net cash proceeds of asset sales; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Unless we attain and maintain investment grade credit ratings:	

 	•	 	75% of our excess cash flow, subject to a reduction based on the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	50% of the proceeds of any equity offerings; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	100% of the proceeds of any debt issuances (subject to certain exceptions).	
     We may prepay loans under our New Credit Facilities in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.
     As a result of the 2004 Restatement and the new obligations regarding internal controls attestation under Section 404, we did not timely issue our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2004, September 30, 2004, March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005, and were unable to timely file with the SEC our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for such periods. Prior to the refinancing of our 2000 Credit Facilities and the replacement of the standby letter of credit facility, we obtained waivers thereunder extending the deadline for the delivery of our financial statements to the lenders under our 2000 Credit Facilities and the letter of credit facility guaranteeing the EIB credit facility and, as a result of such waivers, were not in default. We did not seek or obtain a waiver under the indentures governing our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes with respect to our inability to timely file with the SEC the required reports and, prior to the refinancing of our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes, were in default thereunder. However, our debt is properly classified as non-current in our balance sheet as we demonstrated our ability and intent to obtain new long-term credit facilities in August 2005.
     We have determined, utilizing our restated financial information, that on multiple occasions we did not comply with some of the financial covenants in our 2000 Credit Facilities, which are no longer in effect. We believe that we could have undertaken readily available actions to maintain compliance or obtained a waiver or amendment to the 2000 Credit Facilities had the new restated results then been known. We have complied with all other non-financial covenants under our 2000 Credit Facilities. We believe that these covenant violations have no impact on our New Credit Facilities and that the amounts outstanding under the 2000 Credit Facilities are properly classified in our consolidated balance sheet.
     Our New Credit Facilities contain covenants requiring us to deliver to lenders leverage and interest coverage financial covenants and our audited annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements. Under the leverage covenant, the maximum permitted leverage ratio steps down beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, with a further step-down beginning with the fourth quarter of 2007. Under the interest coverage covenant, the minimum required interest coverage ratio steps up beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, with a further step-up beginning with the fourth quarter of 2007. Compliance with these financial covenants under our New Credit Facilities is tested quarterly, and we have complied with the financial covenants as of December 31, 2005. Delivery of the December 31, 2004 audited consolidated financial statements was required by
27

Table of Contents
December 31, 2005 and delivery of the December 31, 2005 audited financial statements is required by May 30, 2006. We received a waiver from our lenders to deliver the December 31, 2004 audited financial statements by February 28, 2006. The December 31, 2004 audited financial statements were delivered February 13, 2006. Further, we are required to furnish to our lenders within 50 days of the end of each of the first three quarters of each year our consolidated balance sheet, and related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows.
     Our New Credit Facilities also contain covenants restricting our and our subsidiaries’ ability to dispose of assets, merge, pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, incur indebtedness and guarantees, create liens, enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates, make capital expenditures, engage in any business activity other than our existing business or any business activities reasonably incidental thereto. With the waiver for delivery of the December 31, 2004 audited financial statements, we are currently in compliance with all debt covenants under the New Credit Facilities.
Legal Matters
     On October 6, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in the 193rd Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit names as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker, and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., William C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O. Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We are named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on the purported misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the plaintiff asserts claims against the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff alleges that these purported violations of state law occurred between April 2000 and the date of suit. The plaintiff seeks on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, injunctive relief and/or the imposition of a constructive trust on defendants’ assets, disgorgement of compensation, profits or other benefits received by the defendants from us, and recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs. We strongly believe that the suit was improperly filed and have filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case.
     On February 7, 2006, we received a subpoena from the SEC regarding goods and services that we delivered to Iraq from 1996 through 2003 during the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program. We are in the process of reviewing and responding to the subpoena and intend to cooperate with the SEC. We believe that other companies in our industry (as well as in other industries) have received similar subpoenas and requests for information.
     On March 14, 2006, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in federal court in the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit names as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker, and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., Lewis M. Kling, William C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O. Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We are named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on certain of the purported misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the plaintiff asserts claims against the defendants for breaches of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff alleges that the purported breaches of fiduciary duty occurred between 2000 and 2004. The plaintiff seeks on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, disgorgement by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of salaries, bonuses, restricted stock and stock options, and recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs. We strongly believe that the suit was improperly filed and intend to file a motion seeking dismissal of the case.
     Since we manufacture and sell our products globally, we are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. In March 2006, we initiated a process to determine our compliance posture with respect to U.S. export control laws and regulations. Upon initial investigation, it appears that some product transactions and technology transfers require further research to determine compliance with U.S. export control laws and regulations. With assistance from outside counsel, we are currently involved in a systematic process to conduct further research. Any potential violations of U.S. export control laws and regulations that are identified may result in civil or criminal penalties, including fines and/or suspension of the privilege to engage in export transactions or to have our foreign affiliates receive U.S.-origin goods, software or technology. Because our research into this issue is ongoing, we are unable to determine the extent of any violations or the nature or amount of any potential penalties to which we might be subject to in the future. As a result, we cannot currently predict whether the resolution of this matter will materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations. At this time, we have not made any provision in our consolidated financial statements for any fines or penalties that might be incurred relating to this matter.
Stock Matters
     On June 1, 2005, we took action to extend to December 31, 2006, the regular term of certain options granted to employees, including executive officers, qualified retirees and directors, which were scheduled to expire in 2005. Subsequently, we took action on November 4, 2005, to extend the exercise date of these options, and options expiring in 2006, to January 1, 2009. We thereafter concluded, however, that recent regulatory guidance issued under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code might cause the recipients’ extended options to become subject to unintended adverse tax consequences under Section 409A. Accordingly, effective December 14, 2005, the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors partially rescinded, in accordance with the regulations, the extensions of the regular term of these options, to provide as follows:
 	(i)	 	the regular term of options otherwise expiring in 2005 will expire 30 days after the options first become exercisable when our SEC filings have become current and an effective SEC Form S-8 Registration Statement has been filed with the SEC, and	
28

Table of Contents
 	(ii)	 	the regular term of options otherwise expiring in 2006 will expire on the later of:	

 	(1)	 	75 days after the regular term of the option as originally granted expires, or	
 	 	 	 	
 	(2)	 	December 31, 2006 (assuming the options become exercisable in 2006 for the reasons included in (i) above).	
     These extensions are subject to our shareholders approving certain applicable plan amendments at our next annual shareholders’ meeting, scheduled for August 2006. If shareholders do not approve the plan amendments as currently posed in our proxy statement, these extension actions will become void. If such plan amendments are approved at our next annual shareholders’ meeting, the extensions will be considered as a stock modification for financial reporting purposes subject to the recognition of a non-cash compensation charge in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. Our actual charge will be contingent upon many factors, including future share price volatility, risk free interest rate, option maturity, strike price, share price and dividend yield.
     The earlier extension actions also extended the option exercise period available following separation from employment for reasons of death, disability and termination not for cause or certain voluntary separations. These separate extensions were partially rescinded at the December 14, 2005, meeting of the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and as so revised are currently effective and not subject to shareholder approval. The exercise period available following such employment separations has been extended to the later of (i) 30 days after the options first became exercisable when our SEC filings have become current and an effective SEC Form S-8 Registration Statement has been filed with the SEC, or (ii) the period available for exercise following separation from employment under the terms of the option as originally granted. This extension is considered for financial reporting purposes as a stock modification subject to the recognition of a non-cash compensation change in accordance with APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” of approximately $1 million in 2005. The extension of the exercise period following separation from employment does not apply to option exercise periods governed by a separate separation contract or agreement.
Other Matters
     In the first quarter of 2005, we made a definitive decision to sell certain non-core service operations, collectively called the General Services Group (“GSG”) and engaged an investment banking firm to commence marketing. As a result, we reclassified the operation to discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2005. Sales for GSG were $116 million in 2004. Total assets at December 31, 2004 ascribed to GSG were approximately $63 million. We performed an impairment analysis of long-lived assets on a held and used basis, and concluded that no impairment was warranted as of December 31, 2004. GSG was sold on December 31, 2005 for approximately $16 million in gross cash proceeds, subject to final working capital adjustments, while retaining approximately $12 million of net accounts receivable. We used approximately $11 million of the net cash proceeds to reduce our indebtedness. In 2005, we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $31 million related to GSG.
     To promote continuity of senior management, in March 2005 our Board of Directors approved a Transitional Executive Security Plan, which provides cash and stock-based incentives to key management personnel to remain employed by us for the near term. As a result of this plan, we recorded additional compensation expenses in 2005 of approximately $3 million. See “Transitional Executive Security Plan” in Item 11 of our 2004 Annual Report for a detailed discussion on this plan.
     During 2005, we made a number of modifications to our stock plans, including the acceleration of certain restricted stock grants and outstanding options, as well as the extension of the exercise period associated with certain outstanding options. These modifications resulted from severance agreements with former executives and from our decision to temporarily suspend option exercises. As a result of the modifications, we recorded additional compensation expenses in 2005 of approximately $7 million based upon the intrinsic values of the awards, primarily related to severance agreements with former executives, on the dates the modifications were made.
     As a result of the severance and executive search payments related to the management changes of approximately $2 million, expenses under the Transitional Executive Security Plan described above and stock compensation expense resulting from the modification of our stock option plans described above, we recorded total incremental compensation expense of approximately $12 million in 2005.
29

Table of Contents
     We have recently concluded an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) audit of our U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 1999 through 2001. Based on its audit work, the IRS has issued proposed adjustments to increase taxable income during 1999 through 2001 by $12.8 million, and to deny foreign tax credits of $2.9 million in the aggregate. The tax liability resulting from these proposed adjustments will be offset with foreign tax credit carryovers and other refund claims, and therefore should not result in a material future cash payment, pending final review by the Joint Committee on Taxation. The effect of the adjustments to current and deferred taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements for annual periods covered by the 2004 Restatement.
30

Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report and our 2004 Annual Report.
OVERVIEW
     We produce engineered and industrial pumps, industrial valves, control valves, nuclear valves, valve actuation and precision mechanical seals, and provide a range of related flow management services worldwide, primarily for the process industries. Equipment manufactured and serviced by us is predominately used in industries that deal with difficult-to-handle and corrosive fluids as well as environments with extreme temperature, pressure, horsepower and speed. Our businesses are affected by economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries where our products are sold and serviced, by the cyclical nature of the petroleum, chemical, power, water and other industries served, by the relationship of the U.S. dollar to other currencies, and by the demand for and pricing of customers’ products. We believe the impact of these conditions is somewhat mitigated by the strength and diversity of our product lines, geographic coverage and significant installed base, which provides potential for an annuity stream of revenue from parts and services.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Restatement
     This Quarterly Report includes our restated condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 resulting from our 2004 Restatement.
     The 2004 Restatement corrects errors made in the application of GAAP, including errors with respect to inventory valuation, long-term contract accounting, intercompany accounts, pension expense, fixed assets and intangibles, financial derivatives, unclaimed property, tax matters, and other adjustments from unreconciled accounts. The 2004 Restatement is more fully described in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.
     The impact of the 2004 Restatement increased sales for the three months ended June 30, 2003 by $0.2 million and decreased sales for the six months ended June 30, 2003 by $1.5 million, increased net earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2003 by $1.4 million and decreased net earnings for six months ended June 30, 2003 by $1.5 million. Diluted net earnings per share increased by $0.02 and decreased by $0.03 per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.
     For further discussion of other recent developments, see Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 2004 Annual Report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
Consolidated Results
Bookings, Sales and Backlog
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	670.2	 	 	$	622.4	 	
Sales	 	 	648.5	 	 	 	608.2	 	
Backlog	 	 	872.5	 	 	 	814.7	 	
31

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	1,333.0	 	 	$	1,230.4	 	
Sales	 	 	1,253.6	 	 	 	1,165.4	 	
Backlog	 	 	872.5	 	 	 	814.7	 	
     We define a booking as the receipt of a customer order that contractually engages us to perform activities on behalf of our customer with regard to manufacture, service or support. Bookings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $27.8 million, or 4.5%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $20 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. Bookings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $37.9 million, or 3.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $65 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increases are primarily attributable to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $10.0 million and $13.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and is included in our Flowserve Pump Division, and strengthening markets in North America and Europe, particularly in the project business, for our Flow Control Division.
     Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $20.9 million, or 3.4%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $19 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $28.1 million, or 2.4%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $60 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increases are primarily attributable to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $9.4 million and $14.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and is included in our Flowserve Pump Division, and strengthening markets for both our Flow Control Division and Flow Solutions Division.
     Net sales to international customers, including export sales from the U.S., were 64% of sales in the second quarter of 2004 compared with 59% in the same period in 2003, and 62% of sales in the first half of 2004 as compared with 56% in the same period in 2003. Favorable currency translation was the primary factor for the increase in 2004 compared with the prior period.
     Backlog represents the accumulation of uncompleted customer orders. Backlog at June 30, 2004 increased by $37.1 million, or 4.6%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $21 million, as compared with June 30, 2003. The backlog increase compared with the prior year resulted from increased bookings during the second quarter of 2004.
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Gross profit	 	$	197.7	 	 	$	181.4	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	30.5	%	 	 	29.8	%	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Gross profit	 	$	376.6	 	 	$	348.7	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	30.0	%	 	 	29.9	%	
     Gross profit margin of 30.5% for the three months ending June 30, 2004 increased from 29.8% from the same period in 2003. The increase is primarily driven by increased shipments, improved efficiencies and higher aftermarket sales, which generally have a higher margin, in our Flowserve Pump Division. Gross profit margin of 30.0% for the six months ending June 30, 2004 was flat with the same period in 2003.
32

Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expense (“SG&A”)
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
SG&A expense	 	$	155.7	 	 	$	128.2	 	
SG&A expense as a percentage of sales	 	 	24.0	%	 	 	21.1	%	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
SG&A expense	 	$	295.8	 	 	$	257.2	 	
SG&A expense as a percentage of sales	 	 	23.6	%	 	 	22.1	%	
     SG&A for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $23.7 million, or 18.5%, excluding currency effects of approximately $4 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase in SG&A is due primarily to higher professional fees of $14.4 million generally related to our restatement and legal matters, as well as higher incentive compensation accruals of $2.4 million.
     SG&A for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $26.6 million, or 10.3%, excluding currency effects of approximately $12 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase in SG&A is due primarily to higher professional fees of $16.1 million generally related to the restatement and legal matters, as well as higher incentive compensation accruals of $4.3 million.
Integration and Restructuring Expense
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Integration expense	 	$	—	 	 	$	5.7	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.8	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Integration expense	 	$	—	 	 	$	12.1	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	1.8	 	
     There were no integration or restructuring expenses in the first half of 2004 due to the substantial completion of the program at the end of 2003. The integration and restructuring expenses in 2003 relate to the integration of IFC into the Flow Control Division. Integration expense represents period costs associated with IFC acquisition-related reorganizations such as relocation of product lines from closed to receiving facilities, realignment of receiving facilities, performance and retention bonuses, idle manufacturing costs, costs related to the integration team and asset impairments. Restructuring expense represents severance and other exit costs related to our valve facility closures and reductions in work force. We have largely completed our restructuring and integration activities related to IFC, except for completion of certain European integration activities. See the discussion on “Restructuring and Acquisition Related Charges” included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis for a more detailed description of the integration and restructuring program.
Operating Income
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Operating income	 	$	42.0	 	 	$	46.7	 	
Operating income as a percentage of sales	 	 	6.5	%	 	 	7.7	%	
33

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Operating income	 	$	80.8	 	 	$	77.7	 	
Operating income as a percentage of sales	 	 	6.4	%	 	 	6.7	%	
     Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $6.6 million, or 14.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $2 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The decrease is primarily a result of the increase in SG&A discussed above. The increase in SG&A is partially offset by a decrease of $6.5 million in integration and restructuring expenses in 2004.
     Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $3.1 million, or 4.0%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $6 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The decrease is primarily a result of the increase in SG&A discussed above. The increase in SG&A is partially offset by a decrease of $13.9 million in integration and restructuring expenses in 2004.
Interest Expense, Interest Income and Loss on Repayment of Debt
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Interest expense	 	$	19.7	 	 	$	21.3	 	
Interest income	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	0.6	 	
Loss on optional prepayments of debt	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	0.5	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Interest expense	 	$	39.8	 	 	$	42.4	 	
Interest income	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	1.5	 	
Loss on optional prepayments of debt	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	0.6	 	
     Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $1.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2003 due to reduced debt levels associated with optional and scheduled debt paydowns since June 30, 2003. Approximately 45% of our debt was at fixed rates at June 30, 2004, including the effects of $150 million notional interest rate swaps.
     Interest income was lower than 2003 due to a lower average cash balance in 2004.
     During both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we recognized expenses of $0.1 million for the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs related to optional debt repayments of $10.0 million. For the same periods in 2003, we incurred expenses of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to optional debt prepayments.
Other Expense, net
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Other expense, net	 	$	(1.1	)	 	$	(2.6	)	
34

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Other expense, net	 	$	(4.8	)	 	$	(4.2	)	
     Other expense, net for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $1.5 million as compared with the same period in 2003 primarily due to increases in foreign currency transaction gains.
     Other expense, net for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $0.6 million as compared with the same period in 2003 primarily due to increases in unrealized losses on forward contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting, partially offset by foreign currency transaction gains.
Tax Expense and Tax Rate
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Provision for income tax	 	$	15.6	 	 	$	8.5	 	
Effective tax rate	 	 	72.9	%	 	 	37.0	%	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Provision for income tax	 	$	23.8	 	 	$	12.5	 	
Effective tax rate	 	 	64.9	%	 	 	39.1	%	
     Our effective tax rate of 72.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased from 37.0% for the same period in 2003. Our effective tax rate of 64.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased from 39.1% for the same period in 2003. The increases are due to increased foreign losses for which valuation allowances had been established and increased foreign earnings repatriation in 2004 used to pay down U.S. debt. We utilized prior year foreign tax credit carry forwards against the tax liability resulting from these repatriations. However, the benefit of a significant portion of these foreign tax credit carry forwards was recognized in prior years’ effective tax rates.
Net Earnings and Earnings Per Share
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Income from continuing operations	 	$	5.8	 	 	$	14.4	 	
Net earnings	 	 	6.3	 	 	 	14.7	 	
Net earnings per share from continuing operations — diluted	 	 	0.10	 	 	 	0.26	 	
Net earnings per share — diluted	 	 	0.11	 	 	 	0.26	 	
Average diluted shares	 	 	55.5	 	 	 	55.3	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Income from continuing operations	 	$	12.9	 	 	$	19.5	 	
Net earnings	 	 	13.4	 	 	 	19.9	 	
Net earnings per share from continuing operations — diluted	 	 	0.23	 	 	 	0.35	 	
Net earnings per share — diluted	 	 	0.24	 	 	 	0.36	 	
Average diluted shares	 	 	55.5	 	 	 	55.3	 	
35

Table of Contents
     Net earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $8.4 million, or 57.1%, as compared with the same period in 2003, and net earnings per share decreased $0.15 over the same period. Net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $6.5 million, or 32.7%, as compared with the same period in 2003, and net earnings per share decreased $0.12 over the same period. The decreases in net earnings reflect the increases in SG&A and tax expense discussed above, partially offset by the decreases in integration and restructuring expenses and interest expense.
     Average diluted shares were relatively flat in the first half of 2004 compared with the same period in 2003.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Other comprehensive income (loss)	 	$	(4.4	)	 	$	22.7	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Other comprehensive income (loss)	 	$	(13.9	)	 	$	37.5	 	
     Other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased $27.1 million as compared with the same period in 2003, reflecting a weakening of the Euro during the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, as compared with a strengthening of the Euro during the same period in 2003, partially offset by an increase in unrealized hedging gains.
     Other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased $51.4 million as compared with the same period in 2003, primarily reflecting a weakening of the Euro during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, as compared with a strengthening of the Euro during the same period in 2003.
Business Segments
     We conduct our business through three business segments that represent our major product areas: Flowserve Pump Division (“FPD”) for engineered pumps, industrial pumps and related services; Flow Control Division (“FCD”) for industrial valves, manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, valve actuators and related services; and Flow Solutions Division (“FSD”) for precision mechanical seals and related services. We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on each segment’s operating income excluding special items, such as restructuring and integration costs related to the IFC acquisition. We believe that special items, while indicative of efforts to integrate IFC in our business, do not reflect ongoing business results. We believe investors and other users of our financial statements can better evaluate and analyze historical and future business trends if special items are excluded from each segment’s operating income. Operating income before special items is not a recognized measure under GAAP and should not be viewed as an alternative to, or a better indicator of, GAAP measures of performance. Effective January 1, 2004, we realigned certain small sites between segments. Accordingly, the segment information for all periods presented herein has been reported under our revised organizational structure. See Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report for further discussion of our segments. The key operating results for our three business segments, FPD, FCD and FSD are discussed below.
Flowserve Pump Division
     Through FPD, we design, manufacture, distribute and service engineered and industrial pumps and pump systems, replacement parts and related equipment, principally to industrial markets. FPD has 27 manufacturing facilities worldwide, of which nine are located in North America, 10 in Europe, and eight in South America and Asia. FPD also has 65 service centers, which are either free standing or co-located in a manufacturing facility.
36

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	343.0	 	 	$	317.3	 	
Sales	 	 	318.9	 	 	 	288.7	 	
Gross profit	 	 	81.7	 	 	 	68.1	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	25.6	%	 	 	23.6	%	
Operating income	 	 	22.5	 	 	 	20.8	 	
Operating income as a percentage of sales	 	 	7.1	%	 	 	7.2	%	
Backlog	 	 	597.1	 	 	 	562.9	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	661.4	 	 	$	623.1	 	
Sales	 	 	616.1	 	 	 	568.3	 	
Gross profit	 	 	152.8	 	 	 	137.4	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	24.8	%	 	 	24.2	%	
Operating income	 	 	41.1	 	 	 	41.6	 	
Operating income as a percentage of sales	 	 	6.7	%	 	 	7.3	%	
Backlog	 	 	597.1	 	 	 	562.9	 	
     Bookings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $15.8 million, or 5.0%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $10 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $10.0 million, as well as improvements in the chemical and general industrial markets.
     Bookings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $6.8 million, or 1.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $31 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $13.6 million, offset by increased selectivity on lower margin projects, particularly in the petroleum industry.
     Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $20.5 million, or 7.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $10 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $9.4 million, and strengthening of the North American operations.
     Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $17.4 million, or 3.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $30 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $14.1 million.
     Gross profit margin of 25.6% for the three months ending June 30, 2004 increased from 23.6% for the same period in 2003. Gross profit margin of 24.8% for the six months ending June 30, 2004 increased from 24.2% for the same period in 2003. The increases are attributable to increased shipments, improved efficiencies and higher aftermarket sales, which generally have a higher profit margin.
     Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $0.8 million, or 3.7%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $1 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is attributable to the increased margin discussed above and our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, which contributed $0.6 million. These positives are partially offset by an increase in incentive compensation of $1.1 million and an increase in legal fees of $4.7 million.
     Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $3.2 million, or 7.6%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $3 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The decrease is due to an increase in incentive
37

Table of Contents
compensation of $1.9 million, and an increase in legal fees of $5.1 million, partially offset by the increase in gross profit margin discussed above and a contribution of $1.0 million due to our acquisition of the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004.
Flow Control Division
     Through FCD, we design, manufacture and distribute industrial valves, manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, actuators and related equipment, and provide a variety of flow control-related services. We manufacture valves and actuators through five major manufacturing plants in the U.S. and 17 major manufacturing plants outside the U.S. We have 51 valve service centers, of which 34 are related to GSG, that are generally free standing and principally based in the U.S. As a result of our 2002 acquisition of IFC, we believe we are one of the world’s leading suppliers of valves and related products and services to the chemical industry. Based on independent industry sources, we believe that we are the second largest industrial valve supplier on a global basis. We believe that our comprehensive portfolio of valve products and services is a key source of our competitive advantage. Further, our focus on service and severe corrosion and erosion applications is a key competency.
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	242.3	 	 	$	229.0	 	
Sales	 	 	240.7	 	 	 	235.2	 	
Gross profit	 	 	73.9	 	 	 	73.0	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	30.7	%	 	 	31.1	%	
Operating income (before special items)	 	 	21.1	 	 	 	22.6	 	
Integration expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	5.7	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.8	 	
Operating income (after special items)	 	 	21.1	 	 	 	16.1	 	
Operating income (before special items) as a percentage of sales	 	 	8.7	%	 	 	9.6	%	
Backlog	 	 	241.4	 	 	 	221.0	 	

 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	496.7	 	 	$	445.7	 	
Sales	 	 	462.5	 	 	 	438.2	 	
Gross profit	 	 	139.5	 	 	 	133.0	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	30.2	%	 	 	30.4	%	
Operating income (before special items)	 	 	33.3	 	 	 	33.2	 	
Integration expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	12.1	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	1.8	 	
Operating income (after special items)	 	 	33.3	 	 	 	19.3	 	
Operating income (before special items) as a percentage of sales	 	 	7.2	%	 	 	7.6	%	
Backlog	 	 	241.4	 	 	 	221.0	 	
     Bookings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $4.7 million, or 2.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $9 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is due to strengthening of the markets in North America and Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMA”), particularly the project business. The North American increase of $6.9 million reflects strengthening in multiple customer markets, with the increase in EMA of $8.5 million attributable to strong project bookings in the United Kingdom and Germany in the power market. These increases were partially offset by $1.9 million of lower bookings performance in Australia associated with change in the local management team and by $4.8 million in lower bookings for the industrial services group.
     Bookings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $24.6 million, or 5.5%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $26 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The increase is due to strengthening of the markets in North America and EMA, particularly the project business. The North American increase of $14.2 million reflects
38

Table of Contents
strengthening in multiple customer markets, with the increase in EMA of $19.4 million attributable to strong project bookings in the United Kingdom, Sweden and Germany across multiple customer markets. These increases were partially offset by $5.6 million of lower bookings for the industrial services group.
     Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $2.6 million, or 1.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $8 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The decrease reflects operating weakness of our industrial services group for which sales decreased $4.8 million, and decreases of $3.8 million in EMA, particularly in France and Germany, reflective of delays in the manufacturing process at select facilities. These were partially offset by improved process valve sales in North America and control valve sales in Asia Pacific.
     Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $1.1 million, or 0.3%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $23 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The slight increase reflects a $3.3 million sales increase in Asia Pacific primarily reflective of improved Singapore sales levels of control valves, a $4.5 million increase in EMA in the process and control valves, and a $5.4 million increase in North America sales. These increases were partially offset by $7.8 million of lower sales for the industrial services group.
     Gross profit margin of 30.7% and 30.2% for the three and six months ending June 30, 2004, respectively, were relatively flat as compared with the same periods in 2003.
     Operating income (before special items) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $2.3 million, or 10.4%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $1 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The decrease is attributable to a $0.9 million increase in professional fees, a $0.7 million increase in incentive compensation, a $0.8 million decrease in equity income of unconsolidated subsidiaries and to a $0.5 million loss related to fire damage at a small U.S. location. This is partially offset by $0.8 million of higher gross profit on the aforementioned sales increase.
     Operating income (before special items) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $2.2 million, or 6.7%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $2 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The decreases are primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in professional fees, a $1.9 million increase in incentive compensation and to a $0.5 million loss related to fire damage at a small U.S. location. Special items during 2003 are associated with the acquisition and integration of IFC into FCD.
Flow Solutions Division
     Through FSD, we design, manufacture and distribute mechanical seals, sealing systems and parts and provide related services, principally to industrial markets. FSD has seven manufacturing operations, four of which are located in North America, two are in Europe and one is in Singapore. FSD operates 62 QRCs worldwide, including 24 such sites in North America, 14 in Europe, and the remainder located in South America and Asia. Our ability to turn around engineered seal products within 72 hours from the customer’s request, through design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and delivery, is our major source of competitive advantage. Based on independent industry sources, we believe that we are the second largest mechanical seal supplier on a global basis.
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Quarter Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	95.8	 	 	$	89.6	 	
Sales	 	 	97.9	 	 	 	90.4	 	
Gross profit	 	 	42.3	 	 	 	40.2	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	43.2	%	 	 	44.5	%	
Operating income	 	 	18.6	 	 	 	17.2	 	
Operating income as a percentage of sales	 	 	19.0	%	 	 	19.0	%	
Backlog	 	 	43.1	 	 	 	40.6	 	
39

Table of Contents
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Bookings	 	$	195.5	 	 	$	180.6	 	
Sales	 	 	192.7	 	 	 	175.5	 	
Gross profit	 	 	84.1	 	 	 	77.8	 	
Gross profit margin	 	 	43.6	%	 	 	44.3	%	
Operating income	 	 	35.8	 	 	 	33.1	 	
Operating income as a percentage of sales	 	 	18.6	%	 	 	18.9	%	
Backlog	 	 	43.1	 	 	 	40.6	 	
     Bookings for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $4.6 million, or 5.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $2 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. Bookings for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $8.0 million, or 4.5%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $7 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. The bookings improvement generally reflects FSD’s emphasis on end user business and success in establishing longer-term customer alliance programs. Increased market conditions also contributed to the increase.
     Sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $5.8 million, or 6.4%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $2 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $10.6 million, or 6.1%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $7 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. As discussed above, the improved market conditions, combined with heightened levels of service and customer alliance programs have contributed to the sales growth.
     Gross profit margin of 43.2% for the three months ending June 30, 2004 decreased from 44.5% for the same period in 2003. Gross profit margin of 43.6% for the six months ending June 30, 2004 decreased from 44.3% for the same period in 2003. The decreases are primarily attributable to increases in worldwide metals prices and a higher percentage of project sales, which generally have lower margins.
     Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $1.2 million, or 6.8%, as compared with the same period in 2003. Currency had a negligible impact on operating income for the quarter. Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 increased by $1.3 million, or 4.0%, excluding currency benefits of approximately $1 million, as compared with the same period in 2003. These improvements reflect the benefits of increased sales, as well as the operating efficiencies resulting from our continuous improvement process initiative.
RESTRUCTURING AND ACQUISITION RELATED CHARGES
Restructuring Costs
     In conjunction with the IFC acquisition during 2002, we initiated a restructuring program designed to reduce costs and eliminate excess capacity by closing 18 valve facilities, including 10 service facilities, and reducing sales and related support personnel. Our actions, some of which were approved and committed to in 2002 with the remaining actions approved and committed to in 2003, are expected to result in a gross reduction of approximately 889 positions and a net reduction of approximately 662 positions. Net position eliminations represent the gross positions eliminated from the closed facilities offset by positions added at the receiving facilities, which are required to produce the products transferred into the receiving facilities.
     We established a restructuring program reserve upon acquisition of IFC, and recognized additional accruals of $4.5 million in 2003 for this program, including $3.2 million during the first six months, primarily related to the closure of certain valve service facilities and the related reductions in workforce. Cash expenditures against the accrual were $11.6 million in 2003, including $7.4 million during the first six months, and $2.0 million during the first six months of 2004. The remaining accrual of $7.3 million reflects payments to be made in 2004 and beyond for severance obligations due to terminated personnel in Europe of $4.4 million as well as lease and other contract termination and exit costs of $2.9 million.
     Cumulative costs associated with the closure of Flowserve facilities of $7.2 million through December 31, 2003, have been recognized as restructuring expense in operating results, whereas cumulative costs associated with the closure of IFC
40

Table of Contents
facilities of $17.9 million, including related deferred taxes of $6.2 million, became part of the purchase price allocation of the transaction. The effect of these closure costs increased the amount of goodwill otherwise recognizable as a result of the IFC acquisition.
     The following illustrates activity related to the IFC restructuring reserve:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Other Exit	 	 	
(Amounts in millions)	 	Severance	 	Costs	 	Total	
 	 	 	
Balance at January 1, 2003	 	$	10.7	 	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	16.4	 	
Additional accruals	 	 	3.8	 	 	 	0.7	 	 	 	4.5	 	
Cash expenditures	 	 	(8.8	)	 	 	(2.8	)	 	 	(11.6	)	
 	 	 	
Balance at December 31, 2003	 	 	5.7	 	 	 	3.6	 	 	 	9.3	 	
Cash expenditures	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(1.3	)	
 	 	 	
Balance at March 31, 2004	 	 	4.8	 	 	 	3.2	 	 	 	8.0	 	
Cash expenditures	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.7	)	
 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2004	 	$	4.4	 	 	$	2.9	 	 	$	7.3	 	
 	 	 	
Remaining Restructuring and Integration Costs — IFC
     We did not incur acquisition-related integration expenses in 2004 as, by December 31, 2003, we had largely completed restructuring and integration activities related to IFC, except for payments to be made for certain European activities. We expect to incur no additional restructuring and integration costs. Payments from the restructuring accrual will continue throughout 2004 and into 2005 due to the timing of severance obligations in Europe. For discussion of integration costs incurred in 2003 as a result of our acquisition of IFC, see Note 8 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow Analysis
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30,	
(Amounts in millions)	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	 	 	 	 	(As restated)	
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	 	$	36.1	 	 	$	94.4	 	
Net cash flows used by investing activities	 	 	(26.6	)	 	 	(12.7	)	
Net cash flows used by financing activities	 	 	(37.1	)	 	 	(83.7	)	
     Cash generated by operations and borrowings available under our existing revolving credit facility are our primary sources of short-term liquidity. Our sources of operating cash include the sale of our products and services. Our cash balance at June 30, 2004 was $24.5 million, as compared with $53.5 million at December 31, 2003.
     Cash flows provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2004 were $36.1 million, compared with $94.4 million in the first six months of 2003. Working capital, excluding cash, was a use of operating cash flow of $17.5 million in the first six months of 2004, compared with a source of $35.2 million in the prior year period. The improvement in working capital for the current period primarily reflects an increase of $21.0 million in inventories versus the prior year. The increase in inventory was generally due to the higher backlog.
     Accounts receivable for the first six months was a source of $3.5 million of cash flow compared with a source of $35.4 million in the prior year, and days’ sales outstanding decreased slightly to 69 days as compared to 70 in the prior year. Inventory was a $21.0 million use of cash flow for the first six months of 2004, compared with a $13.0 million source of cash in the prior year. Inventory turns improved to 4.2 times at June 30, 2004 compared with 4.1 times at June 30, 2003.
41

Table of Contents
     We made the following quarterly contributions to our U.S. defined benefit pension plans:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Quarter ending:	 	2004	 	2003	
 	 	(Amounts in millions)	
March 31	 	$	0.2	 	 	$	0.1	 	
June 30	 	 	8.1	 	 	 	2.9	 	
September 30	 	 	5.3	 	 	 	23.9	 	
December 31	 	 	1.7	 	 	 	0.1	 	
 	 	 	
 	 	$	15.3	 	 	$	27.0	 	
 	 	 	
     Cash flows used by investing activities in the first half of 2004 were $26.6 million, compared with $12.7 million in the first half of 2003. Cash outflows in 2004 were primarily due to capital expenditures and the acquisition of TKL in March 2004 (described below). Cash outflows in 2003 were due to capital expenditures.
     Cash flows used by financing activities in the first half of 2004 were $37.1 million, compared with $83.7 million in the first half of 2003. Cash outflows in both periods were primarily due to payments of long-term debt.
     We believe cash flows from operating activities combined with availability under our existing revolving credit agreement and our existing cash balance will be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash flow needs for the next 12 months. Cash flows from operations could be adversely affected by economic, political and other risks associated with sales of our products, operational factors, competition, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in interest rates, among other factors.
Acquisitions
     We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities of various sizes. The cost and terms of any financing to be raised in conjunction with any acquisition, including our ability to raise economical capital, is a critical consideration in any such evaluation.
     In March 2004, we acquired the remaining 75% interest in TKL for approximately $12 million. We paid for the acquisition with cash generated by operations. Prior to the acquisition, we held a 25% interest in TKL. As a result of this acquisition, we strengthened our product offering in the mining industry, broadened our manufacturing capacity in the Asia Pacific region and gained foundry capacity.
Capital Expenditures
     Capital expenditures were $20.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, compared with $12.7 million for the same period in 2003. Capital expenditures were funded primarily by operating cash flows. For each period, capital expenditures were invested in new and replacement machinery and equipment, information technology and acquisition integration activities, including structures and equipment required at receiving facilities. For the full year 2004, our capital expenditures were approximately $45 million, including approximately $5 million in July 2004 for the purchase of a building we previously leased for the manufacture of valves. Certain of our facilities may face capacity constraints in the foreseeable future, which may lead to higher capital expenditure levels.
     We received cash on disposal of a divestiture of a small distribution business of $3.6 million in the first quarter of 2004.
Financing
2000 Credit Facilities
     On August 8, 2000, we entered into senior credit facilities comprised of a $275.0 million Tranche A term loan, a $475.0 million Tranche B term loan and a $300.0 million revolving line of credit, hereinafter collectively referred to as our “2000 Credit Facilities.” In connection with our acquisition of IFC in May 2002, we amended and restated our 2000 Credit Facilities to provide for (1) an incremental $95.3 million Tranche A term loan and (2) a $700.0 million Tranche C term loan. The proceeds of the incremental Tranche A term loan and the Tranche C term loan were used to finance a portion of the acquisition purchase price and to repay in full the Tranche B term loan.
42

Table of Contents
     Borrowings under our 2000 Credit Facilities bore interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate (which was based on the prime rate most recently announced by the administrative agent under our 2000 Credit Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus, in the case of Tranche A term loan and loans under the revolving line of credit, an applicable margin determined by reference to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, and, in the case of Tranche C term loan, an applicable margin based on our long-term debt ratings.
     During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we made scheduled and optional debt payments of $27.5 million and $10.0 million, respectively. During the remainder of 2004, we made mandatory and optional principal payments of $167.9 million and $150.0 million, respectively.
Senior Subordinated Notes
     At June 30, 2004, we had $188.5 million and €65 million (equivalent to $79.3 million at June 30, 2004) face value of Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding. The Senior Subordinated Notes were originally issued in 2000 at a discount to yield 12.5%, but have a coupon interest rate of 12.25%. Interest on these notes was payable semi-annually in February and August. In August 2005, all remaining Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding were called by us at 106.125% of face value as specified in the loan agreement and repaid, along with accrued interest.
New Credit Facilities
     On August 12, 2005, we entered into New Credit Facilities comprised of a $600.0 million term loan maturing on August 10, 2012 and a $400.0 million revolving line of credit, which can be utilized to provide up to $300.0 million in letters of credit, expiring on August 12, 2010. We used the proceeds of borrowings under our New Credit Facilities to refinance our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes and indebtedness outstanding under our 2000 Credit Facilities. Further, we replaced the letter of credit agreement that guaranteed our EIB credit facility (described below) with a letter of credit issued as part of the New Credit Facilities.
     Borrowings under our New Credit Facilities bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate (which is based on greater of the prime rate most recently announced by the administrative agent under our New Credit Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2) LIBOR plus an applicable margin determined by reference to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, which as of December 31, 2005 was 1.75% for LIBOR borrowings.
     The loans under our New Credit Facilities are subject to mandatory repayment with, in general:
 	•	 	100% of the net cash proceeds of asset sales; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Unless we attain and maintain investment grade credit ratings:	

 	•	 	75% of our excess cash flow, subject to a reduction based on the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	50% of the proceeds of any equity offerings; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	100% of the proceeds of any debt issuances (subject to certain exceptions).	
     We may prepay loans under our New Credit Facilities in whole or in part, without premium or penalty.
EIB Credit Facility
     On April 14, 2004, we and one of our European subsidiaries, Flowserve B.V., entered into an agreement with EIB, pursuant to which EIB agreed to loan us up to €70 million, with the ability to draw funds in multiple currencies, to finance in part specified research and development projects undertaken by us in Europe. Borrowings under the EIB credit facility bear interest at a fixed or floating rate of interest agreed to by us and EIB with respect to each borrowing under the facility. Loans under the EIB credit facility are subject to mandatory repayment, at EIB’s discretion, upon the occurrence of certain events, including a change of control or prepayment of certain other indebtedness. In addition, the EIB credit facility contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to dispose of assets related to the financed project and require us to deliver to EIB our audited annual financial statements within 30 days of publication. Our obligations under the EIB credit facility are guaranteed by a letter of credit outstanding under our New Credit Facilities.
43

Table of Contents
     In August 2004, we borrowed $85 million at a floating interest rate based on 3-month U.S. LIBOR that resets quarterly. As of December 31, 2004, the interest rate was 2.39%. The maturity of the amount drawn is June 15, 2011, but may be repaid at any time without penalty. Concurrent with borrowing the $85 million we entered into a derivative contract with a third party financial institution, swapped this principal amount to €70.6 million and fixed the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to a fixed interest rate of 4.19% through the scheduled repayment date.
     Additional discussion of our 2000 Credit Facilities, New Credit Facilities, and EIB credit facility is included in Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included in this Quarterly Report.
     We have entered into interest rate and currency swap agreements to hedge our exposure to cash flows related to the credit facilities discussed above. These agreements are more fully described in “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
Accounts Receivable Securitization
     In October 2004, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries entered into an accounts receivable securitization whereby we could obtain up to $75 million in financing by securitizing certain U.S.-based receivables with a third party. In October 2005, we terminated this accounts receivable securitization facility. In connection with the termination, we borrowed approximately $48 million under our New Credit Facilities to repurchase our receivables then held by such third party.
Accounts Receivable Factoring
     Through our European subsidiaries, we engage in non-recourse factoring of certain accounts receivable. The various agreements have different terms, including options for renewal and mutual termination clauses. Under our 2000 Credit Facilities, such factoring was generally limited to $50 million, based on due date of the factored receivables. The limit on factoring was raised to $75 million under the New Credit Facilities entered into in August 2005. See additional discussion of our accounts receivable factoring program in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2004 Annual Report.
Debt Covenants and Other Matters
     Our 2000 Credit Facilities that have now been refinanced, the letter of credit facility guaranteeing our obligations under the EIB credit facility, and the agreements governing our domestic receivables program each required us to deliver to creditors thereunder our audited annual consolidated financial statements within a specified number of days following the end of each fiscal year. In addition, the indentures governing our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes required us to timely file with the SEC our annual and quarterly reports. As a result of the 2004 Restatement and the new obligations regarding internal controls attestation under Section 404, we did not timely issue our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2004, September 30, 2004, March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005, and were unable to timely file with the SEC our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for such periods. Prior to the refinancing of our 2000 Credit Facilities and the replacement of the standby letter of credit facility, we obtained waivers thereunder extending the deadline for the delivery of our financial statements to the lenders under our 2000 Credit Facilities and the letter of credit facility guaranteeing the EIB credit facility and, as a result of such waivers, were not in default due to the delay in the delivery of our financial statements. We did not seek or obtain a waiver under the indentures governing our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes with respect to our inability to timely file with the SEC the required reports and, prior to the refinancing of our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes, were in default thereunder. However, our debt is properly classified as non-current in our balance sheet as we demonstrated our ability and intent to obtain new long-term credit facilities in August 2005.
     We have determined, utilizing our restated financial information, that on multiple occasions we did not comply with some of the financial covenants in our 2000 Credit Facilities, which are no longer in effect. We believe that we could have undertaken readily available actions to maintain compliance or obtained a waiver or amendment to the 2000 Credit Facilities had the new restated results then been known. We have complied with all other non-financial covenants under our 2000 Credit Facilities. We believe that these covenant violations have no impact on our New Credit Facilities and that the amounts outstanding under the 2000 Credit Facilities are properly classified in our consolidated balance sheet.
44

Table of Contents
     Our New Credit Facilities contain covenants requiring us to deliver to lenders leverage and interest coverage financial covenants and our audited annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements. Under the leverage covenant, the maximum permitted leverage ratio steps down beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, with a further step-down beginning with the fourth quarter of 2007. Under the interest coverage covenant, the minimum required interest coverage ratio steps up beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, with a further step-up beginning with the fourth quarter of 2007. Compliance with these financial covenants under our New Credit Facilities is tested quarterly, and we have complied with the financial covenants as of December 31, 2005. Delivery of our December 31, 2005 audited financial statements is required by May 30, 2006. Further, we are required to furnish within 50 days of the end of each of the first three quarters of each year our consolidated balance sheet, and related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows.
     Our New Credit Facilities also contain covenants restricting our and our subsidiaries’ ability to dispose of assets, merge, pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, incur indebtedness and guarantees, create liens, enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates, make capital expenditures, engage in any business activity other than our existing business or any business activities reasonably incidental thereto. With the waiver for delivery of the December 31, 2004 audited financial statements, we are currently in compliance with all debt covenants under the New Credit Facilities.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
     Management’s discussion and analysis are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related footnotes contained within this report. Our more critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. These critical policies, for which no significant changes have occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2004, include:
 	•	 	Revenue Recognition;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance for Doubtful Accounts;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Inventories and Related Reserves;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Deferred Tax Asset Valuation;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Tax Reserves;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Restructuring and Integration Expense;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Legal and Environmental Accruals;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Warranty Accruals;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Pension and Postretirement Benefits Obligations; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.	
     Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our condensed consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective of our financial position and results of operations. This is not to suggest that other general risk factors, such as changes in worldwide demand, changes in material costs, performance of acquired businesses and others, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.
     The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based upon the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The significant estimates are reviewed quarterly with our Audit/Finance Committee.
ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
     We have presented the information about accounting pronouncements not yet implemented in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.
45

Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Information is Subject to Risk and Uncertainty
     This Quarterly Report and other written reports and oral statements we make from time-to-time contain various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include assumptions about our future financial and market conditions, operations and results. In some cases forward looking statements can be identified by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plans,” “seeks,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “intends,” or other comparable terminology. These statements are not historical facts or guarantees of future performance but instead are based on current expectations and are subject to significant risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control. Among the many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements are:
 	•	 	we have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	continuing delays in our filing of our periodic public reports and any SEC, New York Stock Exchange or debt rating agencies’ actions resulting therefrom;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	the possibility of adverse consequences of the pending securities litigation and on-going SEC investigations;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	we may be exposed to product liability and warranty claims if the use of our products results, or is alleged to result, in bodily injury and/or property damage or our products fail to perform as expected;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	the possibility of adverse consequences of governmental tax audits of our tax returns, including the IRS audit of our U.S. tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	there are a substantial amount of outstanding stock options granted in past years to employees under the Company’s stock option plans which have been unexercisable for an extended period due to our non-current filing status of all our SEC financial reports. These include 809,667 options held by our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, C. Scott Greer. Given the significant increase in the Company’s share price during this exercise unavailability period, it is possible that many holders may want to exercise promptly when first able to do so. Once we regain both a current SEC financial report filing status and the ability to once again register our stock option shares with the SEC, we will reopen the stock option exercise program. We currently expect this reopening to occur in 2006. If the holders of a large number of these shares do then promptly exercise at this reopening, there would be some dilutive impact on the outstanding shares. We are still evaluating the impact of the reopening the stock option exercise program on our cash flows;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	the costs of energy, metal alloys, nickel and other raw materials have increased and our operating margins and results of operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to pass such increases on to our customers;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	our ability to convert bookings, which are not subject to nor computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, into revenues at acceptable, if any, profit margins, since such profit margins cannot be assured nor be necessarily assumed to follow historical trends;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	our business depends on the levels of capital investment and maintenance expenditures by our customers, which in turn are affected by the cyclical nature of their markets and liquidity;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	work stoppages and other labor matters could adversely impact our business;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	changes in the financial markets and the availability of capital;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	we sell our products in highly competitive markets, which puts pressure on our profit margins and limits our ability to maintain or increase the market share of our products;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	we may not be able to continue to expand our market presence through acquisitions, and any future acquisitions may present unforeseen integration difficulties or costs;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	a substantial portion of our operations is conducted and located outside of the U.S. and economic, political and other risks associated with international operations could adversely affect our business in the U.S. and other countries and regions;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	our ability to comply with the laws and regulations affecting our international operations, including the U.S. export laws, and the effect of any noncompliance;	
46

Table of Contents
 	•	 	political risks, military actions or trade embargoes affecting customer markets, including the continuing conflict in Iraq and its potential impact on Middle Eastern markets and global petroleum producers;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	the health of the petroleum, chemical, power and water industries;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	adverse movement in currency exchange rates;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	unanticipated difficulties or costs associated with the implementation of systems, including software;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	our relative geographical profitability and its impact on our ability to utilize foreign tax credits;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	the recognition of significant expenses associated with realigning operations of acquired companies with those of our company;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	our ability to meet the financial covenants and other restrictive covenants in our debt agreements may limit our operating and financial flexibility;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	the loss of services of any of our newly appointed and existing senior management or other key personnel could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	any terrorist attacks and the response of the U.S. to such attacks or to the threat of such attacks;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	our ability to protect our intellectual property affects our competitive position;	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	changes in prevailing interest rates and our effective interest costs; and	
 	 	 	 	
 	•	 	adverse changes in the regulatory climate and other legal obligations imposed on our operations.	
     It is not possible to foresee or identify all the factors that may affect our future performance or any forward-looking information, and new risk factors can emerge from time to time. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
     All forward-looking statement included in this Quarterly Report are based on information available to us on the date of this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to revise our update any forward-looking statement or disclose any facts, events or circumstances that occur after the date hereof that may affect the accuracy of any forward-looking statement.
47

Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
     We have market risk exposure arising from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rate movements.
     Our earnings are impacted by changes in short-term interest rates as a result of borrowings under our 2000 Credit Facilities, which bear interest based on floating rates. At June 30, 2004, after the effect of interest rate swaps, we have approximately $494.9 million of variable rate debt obligations outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of 4.02%. A hypothetical change of 100-basis points in the interest rate for these borrowings, assuming constant variable rate debt levels, would have changed interest expense by approximately $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
     We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to financial instruments including interest rate swaps, but we expect all counterparties to meet their obligations given their creditworthiness. As of June 30, 2004, we have $150 million of notional amount in outstanding interest rate swaps with third parties with maturities through November 2006 compared to $215 million as of the same period in 2003.
     We employ a foreign currency hedging strategy to minimize potential losses in earnings or cash flows from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements. These strategies also minimize potential gains from favorable exchange rate movements. Foreign currency exposures arise from transactions, including firm commitments and anticipated transactions, denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency and from foreign-denominated revenues and profits translated back into U.S. dollars. Based on a sensitivity analysis at June 30, 2004, a 10% adverse change in the foreign currency exchange rates could impact our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 by $4.6 million as shown below:
 	 	 	 	 	
(Amounts in millions)	 	 	 	 	
Euro	 	$	2.4	 	
Indian rupee	 	 	0.4	 	
Singapore dollar	 	 	0.4	 	
British pound	 	 	0.2	 	
Canadian dollar	 	 	0.2	 	
Mexican peso	 	 	0.2	 	
Swiss franc	 	 	0.2	 	
Venezuelan bolivar	 	 	0.2	 	
Brazil real	 	 	0.1	 	
All other	 	 	0.3	 	
 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	4.6	 	
 	 	 	 	
     Exposures are hedged primarily with foreign currency forward contracts that generally have maturity dates less than one year. Company policy allows foreign currency coverage only for identifiable foreign currency exposures and, therefore, we do not enter into foreign currency contracts for trading purposes where the objective would be to generate profits. As of June 30, 2004, we have a U.S. dollar equivalent of $143.9 million in outstanding forward contracts with third parties compared with $78.3 million at June 30, 2003.
     Generally, we view our investments in foreign subsidiaries from a long-term perspective, and therefore, do not hedge these investments. We use capital structuring techniques to manage our investment in foreign subsidiaries as deemed necessary.
     We realized gains (losses) associated with foreign currency translation of $(7.6) million and $23.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $(14.3) million and $37.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which are included in other comprehensive income (loss). Transactional currency gains and losses arising from transactions outside of our sites’ functional currencies and changes in fair value of forward contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting are included in our consolidated results of operations. We realized foreign currency losses of $1.6 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $5.9 million and $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which is included in other expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, which primarily relate to changes in the fair values of forward contracts.
48

Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
     In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2004. In making this evaluation, our management considered the matters relating to our recently completed restatement of our financial statements and the material weaknesses described in our 2004 Annual Report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2004.
     A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As more fully described in “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” in Item 9A of our 2004 Annual Report, management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which also existed as of June 30, 2004:
     We did not maintain (1) an effective control environment, (2) effective monitoring controls to determine the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting and related policies and procedures, (3) effective controls over certain of our period-end financial close and reporting processes, (4) effective segregation of duties over automated and manual transaction processes, (5) effective controls over the preparation, review and approval of account reconciliations, (6) effective controls over the complete and accurate recording and monitoring of intercompany accounts, (7) effective controls over the recording of journal entries, both recurring and non-recurring, (8) effective controls over the existence, completeness and accuracy of fixed assets and related depreciation and amortization expense, (9) effective controls over the completeness and accuracy of revenue, deferred revenue, accounts receivable and accrued liabilities, (10) effective controls over the completeness, accuracy, valuation and existence of our inventory and related cost of sales accounts, (11) effective controls over the completeness and accuracy of our reporting of certain non-U.S. pension plans, (12) effective controls over the complete and accurate recording of rights and obligations associated with our accounts receivable factoring and securitization transactions, (13) effective controls over our accounting for certain derivative transactions, (14) effective controls over our accounting for equity investments, (15) effective controls over our accounting for income taxes, including income taxes payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related income tax provision, (16) effective controls over our accounting for mergers and acquisitions, (17) effective controls over the completeness and accuracy of certain accrued liabilities and the related operating expense accounts, (18) effective controls over the completeness, accuracy and validity of payroll and accounts payable disbursements to ensure that they were adequately reviewed and approved prior to being recorded and reported, (19) effective controls over the completeness, accuracy and validity of spreadsheets used in our financial reporting process to ensure that access was restricted to appropriate personnel, and that unauthorized modification of the data or formulas within spreadsheets was prevented, and (20) effective controls over the accuracy, valuation and disclosure of our goodwill and intangible asset accounts and the related amortization and impairment expense accounts, based on criteria established in  Internal Control — Integrated Framework  issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
     In light of the material weaknesses described in our 2004 Annual Report, we performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report were prepared in accordance with GAAP. As a result of these procedures, we believe that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP.
49

Table of Contents
Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses
     In response to the identified material weaknesses, our management, with oversight from our audit committee, has dedicated significant resources, including the engagement of external consultants, to support management in its efforts to improve our control environment and to remedy the identified material weaknesses. As more fully described in our 2004 Annual Report, the ongoing remediation efforts subsequent to December 31, 2004 are focused on (i) expanding our organizational capabilities to improve our control environment; (ii) implementing process changes to strengthen our internal control and monitoring activities; and (iii) implementing adequate information technology general controls.
     We believe that these remediation efforts have improved and will continue to improve our internal control over financial reporting, as well as our disclosure controls and procedures. However, not all of the material weaknesses described above and in our 2004 Annual Report will be remediated by December 31, 2005, our next reporting “as of” date under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404. Accordingly, we expect to report that our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures remain ineffective as of December 31, 2005.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There have been no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
50

Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
     We are a defendant in a large number of pending lawsuits (which include, in many cases, multiple claimants) that seek to recover damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos containing products manufactured and/or distributed by us in the past. Any such products were encapsulated and used only as components of process equipment, and we do not believe that any emission of respirable asbestos fibers occurred during the use of this equipment. We believe that a high percentage of the applicable claims are covered by applicable insurance or indemnities from other companies.
     On February 4, 2004, we received an informal inquiry from the SEC requesting the voluntary production of documents and information related to our February 3, 2004 announcement that we would restate our financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and the full years 2002, 2001 and 2000. On June 2, 2004, we were advised that the SEC had issued a formal order of private investigation into issues regarding this restatement and any other issues that arise from the investigation. We continue to cooperate with the SEC in this matter.
     During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, related lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas (the “Court’’), alleging that we violated federal securities laws. Since the filing of these cases, which have been consolidated, the lead plaintiff has amended its complaint several times. The lead plaintiff’s current pleading is the fifth consolidated amended complaint (“Complaint’’). The Complaint alleges that federal securities violations occurred between February 6, 2001 and September 27, 2002 and names as defendants Mr. C. Scott Greer, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Renee J. Hornbaker, our former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, which served as underwriters for two of our public stock offerings during the relevant period. The Complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The lead plaintiff seeks unspecified compensatory damages, forfeiture by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of unspecified incentive-based or equity-based compensation and profits from any stock sales, and recovery of costs. On November 22, 2005, the Court entered an order denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint on the pleadings in their entirety. The case is currently set for trial on March 27, 2007. We continue to believe that the lawsuit is without merit and are vigorously defending the case.
     On October 6, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in the 193rd Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit names as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker, and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., William C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O. Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We are named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on the purported misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the plaintiff asserts claims against the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff alleges that these purported violations of state law occurred between April 2000 and the date of suit. The plaintiff seeks on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, injunctive relief and/or the imposition of a constructive trust on defendants’ assets, disgorgement of compensation, profits or other benefits received by the defendants from us, and recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs. We strongly believe that the suit was improperly filed and have filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case.
     On February 7, 2006, we received a subpoena from the SEC regarding goods and services that we delivered to Iraq from 1996 through 2003 during the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program. We are in the process of reviewing and responding to the subpoena and intend to cooperate with the SEC. We believe that other companies in our industry (as well as in other industries) have received similar subpoenas and requests for information.
     On March 14, 2006, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed purportedly on our behalf in federal court in the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit names as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker, and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., Lewis M. Kling, William C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O. Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We are named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on certain of the purported misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the plaintiff asserts claims against the defendants for breaches of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff alleges that the purported breaches of fiduciary duty occurred between 2000 and 2004. The plaintiff seeks on our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, disgorgement by Mr.
51

Table of Contents
Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of salaries, bonuses, restricted stock and stock options, and recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs. We strongly believe that the suit was improperly filed and intend to file a motion seeking dismissal of the case.
     Since we manufacture and sell our products globally, we are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. In March 2006, we initiated a process to determine our compliance posture with respect to U.S. export control laws and regulations. Upon initial investigation, it appears that some product transactions and technology transfers require further research to determine compliance with U.S. export control laws and regulations. With assistance from outside counsel, we are currently involved in a systematic process to conduct further research. Any potential violations of U.S. export control laws and regulations that are identified may result in civil or criminal penalties, including fines and/or suspension of the privilege to engage in export transactions or to have our foreign affiliates receive U.S.-origin goods, software or technology. Because our research into this issue is ongoing, we are unable to determine the extent of any violations or the nature or amount of any potential penalties to which we might be subject to in the future. As a result, we cannot currently predict whether the resolution of this matter will materially adversely affect our financial position or results of operations. At this time, we have not made any provision in our consolidated financial statements for any fines or penalties that might be incurred relating to this matter.
     We have been involved as a potentially responsible party (“PRP’’) at former public waste disposal sites that may be subject to remediation under pending government procedures. The sites are in various stages of evaluation by federal and state environmental authorities. The projected cost of remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged “fair share’’ allocation, is uncertain and speculative until all studies have been completed and the parties have either negotiated an amicable resolution or the matter has been judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties who have similarly been identified, and the identification and location of additional parties is continuing under applicable federal or state law. Many of the other parties identified are financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay their share of the remediation costs. Based on our information about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it is likely that ultimate remediation liability costs for each site will be apportioned among all liable parties, including site owners and waste transporters, according to the volumes and/or toxicity of the wastes shown to have been disposed of at the sites. We believe that our exposure for existing disposal sites will be less than $100,000.
     We are also a defendant in several other lawsuits, including product liability claims, that are insured, subject to the applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on currently available information, we believe that we have adequately accrued estimated probable losses for such lawsuits. We are also involved in a substantial number of labor claims, including one case where we had a confidential settlement reflected in our 2004 results.
     Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be quantified with absolute certainty, we have established reserves covering these exposures, which we believe to be reasonable based on past experience and available facts. While additional exposures beyond these reserves could exist, they currently cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate these potential contingent loss exposures and, if they develop, recognize expense as soon as such losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.
     We are also involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, none of which we believe to be material to our business, operations or overall financial condition. However, resolutions or dispositions of claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have a significant impact on our operating results for the reporting period in which any such resolution or disposition occurs.
52

Table of Contents
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
     At our 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2004, Christopher A. Bartlett, Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr. and William C. Rusnack were elected to serve for three-year terms expiring in 2007. The following table shows the vote tabulation for the shares represented at the meeting.
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Nominee	 	Votes For	 	Votes Against	 	Abstain	 	Broker Non-votes	
Christopher A. Bartlett	 	 	47,507,146	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2,780,518	 	 	 	—	 	
Hugh K. Coble	 	 	47,471,731	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2,815,933	 	 	 	—	 	
George T. Haymaker, Jr.	 	 	47,479,370	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2,808,294	 	 	 	—	 	
William C. Rusnack	 	 	43,230,086	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	7,057,578	 	 	 	—	 	
Additional directors, whose terms of office as directors continued after the meeting, are as follows:
 	 	 	
Term expiring in 2005	 	Term expiring in 2006	
Michael F. Johnston	 	C. Scott Greer (1)	
Charles M. Rampacek	 	Diane C. Harris	
Kevin E. Sheehan	 	James O. Rollans	

(1)	 	C. Scott Greer resigned from the Board of Directors on April 4, 2005.	
     The shareholders also voted on the approval of the Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan. The following table shows the vote tabulation for the shares represented at the meeting.
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Proposal	 	Votes For	 	Votes Against	 	Abstain	 	Broker Non-votes	
Approval of 2004 Stock Compensation Plan	 	 	34,152,752	 	 	 	10,132,565	 	 	 	979,512	 	 	 	5,022,835	 	
53

Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits.
Set forth below is a list of exhibits included as part of this Quarterly Report:
 	 	 	
Exhibit No.	 	Description	
 	 	 	
3.1	 	1988 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Duriron Company, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Flowserve Corporation’s (f/k/a The Duriron Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988.	
 	 	 	
3.2	 	1989 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Flowserve Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989.	
 	 	 	
3.3	 	1996 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Flowserve Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.	
 	 	 	
3.4	 	April 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed as part of Annex VI to the Joint Proxy Statement/ Prospectus, which is part of Flowserve Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, dated June 19, 1997.	
 	 	 	
3.5	 	July 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Flowserve Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.	
 	 	 	
3.6	 	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Flowserve Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.9 to Flowserve Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.	
 	 	 	
10.1	 	Finance Contract, dated April 19, 2004, among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve B.V. and European Investment Bank, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Flowserve Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 18, 2005. 1	
 	 	 	
10.2	 	Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 24, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Flowserve Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, dated as of July 8, 2004. 2	
 	 	 	
10.3	 	Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit A to Flowserve Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, dated May 10, 2004.	
 	 	 	
31.1	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
31.2	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
32.1	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
32.2	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	

1	 	The Finance Contract was subsequently amended by the certain letter Amendment to Finance Contract, dated July 2, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Flowserve Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 18, 2005.	
 	 	 	
2	 	The First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was subsequently amended by that certain Limited Waiver and Third Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 15, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Flowserve Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 18, 2005. The First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, was terminated on August 12, 2005.	
54

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	   FLOWSERVE CORPORATION	 	 	
 	 	   (Registrant)	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
Date: April 26, 2006	 	   /s/ Lewis M. Kling	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	   Lewis M. Kling	 	 	
 	 	   President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
Date: April 26, 2006	 	   /s/ Mark A. Blinn	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	   Mark A. Blinn	 	 	
 	 	   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 	 	
55

Table of Contents
Exhibits Index
 	 	 	
Exhibit No.	 	Description	
 	 	 	
3.1	 	1988 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Duriron Company, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Flowserve Corporation’s (f/k/a The Duriron Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988.	
 	 	 	
3.2	 	1989 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Flowserve Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989.	
 	 	 	
3.3	 	1996 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.4 to Flowserve Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.	
 	 	 	
3.4	 	April 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed as part of Annex VI to the Joint Proxy Statement/ Prospectus, which is part of Flowserve Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, dated June 19, 1997.	
 	 	 	
3.5	 	July 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.6 to Flowserve Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.	
 	 	 	
3.6	 	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Flowserve Corporation, as amended, filed as Exhibit 3.9 to Flowserve Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.	
 	 	 	
10.1	 	Finance Contract, dated April 19, 2004, among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve B.V. and European Investment Bank, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Flowserve Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 18, 2005. 1	
 	 	 	
10.2	 	Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 24, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Flowserve Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, dated as of July 8, 2004. 2	
 	 	 	
10.3	 	Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit A to Flowserve Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, dated May 10, 2004.	
 	 	 	
31.1	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
31.2	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
32.1	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
32.2	 	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	

1	 	The Finance Contract was subsequently amended by the certain letter Amendment to Finance Contract, dated July 2, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Flowserve Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 18, 2005.	
 	 	 	
2	 	The First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was subsequently amended by that certain Limited Waiver and Third Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 15, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Flowserve Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 18, 2005. The First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended, was terminated on August 12, 2005.	

 
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Lewis M. Kling, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Flowserve Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;
     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 26, 2006
/s/ Lewis M. Kling                    
Lewis M. Kling
President and
Chief Executive Officer

 
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Mark A. Blinn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Flowserve Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;
     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and
     (d) Disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 26, 2006
/s/ Mark A. Blinn                    
Mark A. Blinn
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

 
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flowserve Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Lewis M. Kling, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Lewis M. Kling                    
Lewis M. Kling
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 26, 2006

 
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flowserve Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Mark A. Blinn, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Mark A. Blinn 
Mark A. Blinn
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 26, 2006