e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2004 |
OR |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-13179
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
31-0267900 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
5215 N. OConnor Boulevard
Suite 2300, Irving, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
75039
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(972) 443-6500
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK, $1.25 PAR VALUE
|
|
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE |
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company. Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the
closing price of the registrants common stock as reported
on June 30, 2005 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter), was approximately $1,047,732,075. For purposes of the
foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers
and known 5% beneficial owners have been deemed affiliates.
Number of the registrants common shares outstanding as of
February 6, 2006, was 56,218,606.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
EXPLANATORY NOTE
We have restated our results for 2002, 2003 and for the first
quarter of 2004. The Restatement of our annual 2002 consolidated
financial statements, our annual and interim 2003 consolidated
financial statements and our 2004 first quarter consolidated
financial statements is collectively referred to as the
2004 Restatement.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 (Annual Report)
includes our consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended and our
restated consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002. We will file restated condensed consolidated
financial statements in an amendment to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 at a later date. The
impact of the 2004 Restatement on periods prior to
January 1, 2002 is reflected as a decrease of
$13.7 million to beginning retained earnings as of
January 1, 2002. Information in Item 6. Selected
Financial Data, however, is presented on a restated basis
for all of the periods presented, and the impact of the 2004
Restatement on periods prior to January 1, 2000 is
reflected as a decrease of $2.8 million to beginning
retained earnings as of January 1, 2000.
The 2004 Restatement corrects errors made in the
application of accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP), including errors with respect
to inventory valuation,
long-term contract
accounting, intercompany accounts, pension expense, fixed assets
and intangibles, financial derivatives, unclaimed property, tax
matters, and other adjustments from unreconciled accounts. The
2004 Restatement is more fully described in Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report. The cumulative net reduction in net earnings for the
2004 Restatement was $35.9 million. This includes the
$13.7 million reduction to beginning retained earnings at
January 1, 2002, the total $19.1 million reduction in
net earnings to 2003 and 2002 results of operations discussed
below, and the $3.1 million decrease in net earnings to the
first quarter of 2004 results of operations.
The impact of the 2004 Restatement decreased sales for 2003 by
$7.4 million and increased sales for 2002 by
$2.6 million, decreased net earnings for 2003 and 2002 by
$8.4 million and $10.7 million, respectively, and
decreased total assets, decreased total liabilities and
increased total shareholders equity at December 31,
2003 by $120.1 million, $121.8 million and
$1.7 million, respectively. The decreases in both total
assets and total liabilities are due primarily to the proper
netting of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The net increase
in shareholders equity at December 31, 2003 is due
primarily to an increase in currency translation adjustments net
of tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive loss,
partially offset by the cumulative $32.8 million decrease
in net earnings through December 31, 2003 discussed above.
Diluted net earnings decreased by $0.16 and $0.20 per share
for 2003 and 2002, respectively.
As a result of the 2004 Restatement and the new obligations
regarding internal control certification under Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404 we were
unable to timely file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), this Annual Report and our
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the
quarterly periods ended June 30, 2004, September 30,
2004, March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2005. We will continue to work towards
becoming current in our quarterly filings with the SEC as soon
as practicable after the filing of this Annual Report. We will
not, however, be able to timely file with the SEC our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2006.
We did not amend our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K or
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for
periods affected by the 2004 Restatement that ended on or prior
to December 31, 2003, and the financial statements and
related financial information contained in such reports should
no longer be relied upon.
All amounts referenced in this Annual Report for prior periods
and prior period comparisons reflect the balances and amounts on
a restated basis.
i
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
PART I
GENERAL
We believe that we are a world leading manufacturer and
aftermarket service provider of comprehensive flow control
systems. We were incorporated in the State of New York on
May 1, 1912. We develop and manufacture
precision-engineered flow control equipment, such as pumps,
valves and seals, for critical service applications that require
high reliability. We use our manufacturing platform to offer a
broad array of aftermarket equipment services, such as
installation, advanced diagnostics, repair and retrofitting.
We sell our products and services to more than
10,000 companies, including some of the worlds
leading engineering and construction firms, original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) distributors and end users. Our
products and services are used in several distinct industries
across a broad geographic reach. Our sales mix by industry in
2004 consisted of oil and gas (32%), chemical (18%), general
industrial (28%), power generation (16%) and water treatment
(6%). Our revenues by geographic region in 2004 originated in
North America (40%), Europe, the Middle East and Africa (40%),
Asia Pacific (13%) and Latin America (7%). We have pursued a
strategy of industry diversity and geographic breadth to
mitigate the impact on our business of an economic downturn in
any one of the industries or in any one part of the world we
serve. For information on our revenues and assets by geographic
areas, see Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements
included in this Annual Report.
We conduct our operations through three business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pump Division (FPD) for engineered pumps,
industrial pumps and related services; |
|
|
|
Flow Control Division (FCD) for industrial valves,
manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, valve actuators
and controls and related services; and |
|
|
|
Flow Solutions Division (FSD) for precision
mechanical seals and related services. |
FLOWSERVE PUMP DIVISION
Through FPD, we design, manufacture, distribute and service
engineered and industrial pumps and pump systems, replacement
parts and related equipment, principally to industrial markets.
FPDs products and services are primarily used by companies
that operate in the oil and gas, chemical processing, power
generation, water treatment and general industrial markets. Our
pump systems and components are manufactured at 27 plants
worldwide, of which 9 are located in North America, 10 in Europe
and 8 in South America and Asia. We also manufacture a small
portion of our pumps through several foreign joint ventures. We
market our pump products through our worldwide sales force and
our regional service and repair centers or through independent
distributors and sales representatives.
In November 2004, we sold our Government Marine Business Unit
(GMBU), a business within FPD, to Curtiss-Wright
Electro-Mechanical Corporation for approximately
$28 million, generating a pre-tax gain of $7.4 million
after the allocation of approximately $8 million of FPD
goodwill and $1 million of intangible assets. GMBU, which
provided pump technology and service for U.S. Navy
submarines and aircraft carriers, did not serve our core market
and represented only a small part of our total pump business. We
used net proceeds from the disposition of GMBU to reduce our
outstanding indebtedness. As a result of this disposition, we
have presented the assets, liabilities and results of operations
of the GMBU as discontinued operations for all periods included
in the Annual Report.
FPD Products
We manufacture more than 150 different active pump models,
ranging from simple fractional horsepower industrial pumps to
high horsepower engineered pumps (greater than 30,000
horsepower). Our pumps are manufactured in a wide range of metal
alloys and with a variety of configurations, including pumps
that utilize
1
mechanical seals (sealed pumps) and pumps that do not utilize
mechanical seals (magnetic-drive and other pumps).
The following is a summary list of our pump products and
globally recognized brands:
FPD Product Types
|
|
|
|
|
Centrifugal Pumps |
|
Positive Displacement Pumps |
|
Specialty Products & Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Process ANSI and ISO
|
|
Reciprocating |
|
Hydraulic Decoking Systems |
Petroleum Process API 610
|
|
Gear |
|
Reactor Recycle Systems |
Horizontal Between Bearing Single stage
|
|
Twin Screw |
|
|
Horizontal Between Bearing Multi stage
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical
|
|
|
|
|
Submersible Motor
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear
|
|
|
|
|
FPD Brand Names
|
|
|
ACEC
|
|
Cameron |
Byron Jackson
|
|
Duriron |
Durco
|
|
IDP |
Flowserve
|
|
Pleuger |
Pacific
|
|
Sier-Bath |
Scienco
|
|
United Centrifugal |
Worthington-Simpson
|
|
Wilson-Snyder |
Western Land Roller
|
|
Jeumont-Schneider |
Worthington
|
|
TKL |
Aldrich
|
|
|
FPD Services
We provide engineered aftermarket services through our global
network of 65 service centers in 27 countries. Our FPD
service personnel provide a comprehensive set of equipment
maintenance services for flow management control systems,
including repair, advanced diagnostics, installation,
commissioning, re-rate and retrofit programs, machining and full
service solution offerings. A large portion of our FPD service
work is performed on a quick response basis, and we offer
24-hour service in all
of our major markets.
FPD New Product Development
Our investments in new product research and development have
consistently led to the production of more reliable and higher
efficiency pumps. The majority of our new FPD products and
enhancements are driven by our customers need to achieve
higher production rates at lower costs. As a result, we
continually work with our customers to develop better pump
solutions to improve the availability and efficiency of their
pump systems. None of our newly developed pump products have
required, however, the investment of a material amount of our
assets or was otherwise material.
FPD Customers
FPDs customer mix is diversified, including leading
engineering and construction firms, OEMs, distributors and end
users. Our sales mix of original equipment products and
aftermarket replacement parts diversifies our business and
somewhat mitigates the impact of economic cycles in our business.
FPD Competition
The pump industry is highly fragmented, with more than 100
competitors. We compete, however, primarily against a relatively
limited number of large companies operating on a global scale.
Competition is
2
generally based on price, expertise, delivery times, breadth of
product offerings, contractual terms, previous installation
history and reputation for quality. Some of our largest pump
industry competitors include ITT Industries, Ebara Corporation,
KSB Inc., The Weir Group PLC, Sulzer Pumps and United
Technologies Corporation.
The pump industry has undergone considerable consolidation in
recent years, primarily caused by (1) the need to lower
costs through reduction of excess capacity and
(2) customers preference to align with global full
service suppliers in simplifying their supplier base. Despite
the consolidation activity, the market remains highly
competitive. We believe that we are the largest pump
manufacturer serving the oil, chemical and power generation
industries, and the third largest pump manufacturer overall. We
believe that our broad range of pumps for the oil, power and
chemical industries, our strong customer relationships and more
than 100 years of experiences in pumping equipment, and our
reputation for providing quality engineering solutions are our
major sources of competitive advantage.
FPD Backlog
FPDs backlog of orders at December 31, 2004 was
$576 million, compared with $570 million at
December 31, 2003. We shipped all of our backlog at
December 31, 2004 as of December 31, 2005.
FLOW CONTROL DIVISION
Through FCD, we design, manufacture and distribute industrial
valves, manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, actuators
and related equipment, and provide a variety of flow
control-related services. Our valve products are an integral
part of a flow control system and they are used to control the
flow of liquids and gases. Substantially all of our valves are
specialized and engineered to perform specific functions within
a flow control system.
Our products are primarily used by companies that operate in the
chemical, power generation, oil and gas, water and general
industries. We manufacture valves and actuators through five
major manufacturing plants in the U.S. and 17 major
manufacturing plants outside the U.S. We also manufacture a
small portion of our valves through foreign joint ventures.
Beginning in fiscal 2005, FCD was organized into the following
three business units: Controls, Process and Power, which have
global responsibility for original equipment, parts and
services. The Controls business unit markets control valves
through FCDs sales force or on a commission basis through
sales representatives in our principal markets. While the end
users are often different, the Process business unit and Power
business unit market manual valve and actuation products
targeted at the global power industry through FCDs sales
force and a network of distributors.
In February 2005, we announced our intention to divest certain
non-core service
operations, collectively called the General Services Group
(GSG), which is part of FCD. GSG was sold on
December 31, 2005 for approximately $16 million in
gross cash proceeds, subject to final working capital
adjustments, while retaining approximately $12 million of
net accounts receivable. The divestiture encompassed the third
party valve repair and on-line services businesses and includes
34 service center locations, primarily in the U.S. The
FCDs OEM service, repair and distribution locations were
not part of the divestiture. Due to our divestiture of this
business, GSG will be reported as discontinued operations in
2005. GSG generated $116 million in revenues during fiscal
year 2004. See Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for a detailed discussion of the GSG
disposition.
FCD Products
Our valve, actuator and automated valve accessory offerings
represent one of the most comprehensive product portfolios in
the flow control industry. Our valves are used in a wide variety
of applications, from general service to highly corrosive
environments, as well as in environments experiencing extreme
temperatures and/or pressures and applications requiring zero
leakage. In addition to traditional valves, we also produce
valves that incorporate smart valve technologies,
which integrate high technology sensors, microprocessor controls
and digital positioners into a high performance control valve,
permitting real time system analysis, system warnings and remote
services. We believe we were the first company to introduce
3
smart valve technologies in response to demands for
increased plant automation, more efficient process control and
digital communications. We offer a growing line of digital
products and plan to continue to incorporate digital
technologies into our existing products to upgrade performance.
The following is a summary list of our general valve products
and globally recognized brands, other than GSG products and
brands:
FCD
Product Types
|
|
|
Actuators and Accessories
|
|
Digital Communications |
Control Valves
|
|
Manual Quarter-Turn Valves |
Ball Valves
|
|
Valve Automation Systems |
Lubricated Plug Valves
|
|
Valve/ Actuator Software |
Pneumatic Positioners
|
|
Nuclear Valves |
Electro Pneumatic Positioners
|
|
Quarter-Turn Actuators |
Smart Valves
|
|
Valve Repair Services |
|
FCD
Brand Names
|
|
|
|
Accord
|
|
NAF |
Anchor/ Darling
|
|
NAVAL |
Argus
|
|
Noble Alloy |
Atomac
|
|
Norbro |
Automax
|
|
Nordstrom |
Battig
|
|
PMV |
Durco
|
|
P+W |
Edward
|
|
Serck Audco |
Gestra
|
|
Schmidt Armaturen |
Kammer
|
|
Valtek |
Limitorque
|
|
Vogt |
McCANNA/ MARPAC
|
|
Worcester Controls |
FCD Services
We provide aftermarket services through our network of 51
(including 34 for GSG) service centers located throughout the
world. Our service personnel provide a comprehensive set of
equipment maintenance services for flow control systems,
including advanced diagnostics repair, installation,
commissioning, retrofit programs and field machining
capabilities. A large portion of our service work is performed
on a quick response basis, including
24-hour service in all
of our major markets. Offering these types of services provides
us access to our customers installed base of flow control
products.
FCD New Product Development
Our investments in new FCD product research and development
focus on technological leadership and differentiating our
product offerings. When appropriate, we invest in the redesign
of existing products in an effort to improve their performance
and continually meet customer needs. None of our newly developed
products required the investment of a material amount of our
assets or was otherwise material.
FCD Customers
FCDs customer mix is diversified within several
industries, including chemical, water, petroleum and power
industries. FCDs product mix includes original equipment
and aftermarket parts.
FCD Competition
Like the pump market, the valve market has undergone a
significant amount of consolidation in recent years but remains
highly fragmented. Some of our largest valve industry
competitors include Crane Co., Dresser Inc., Emerson, Kitz and
Tyco.
4
Within the valve industry, we believe that the top 10 valve
manufacturers, on a global basis, collectively maintain
approximately 30% of the market. Based on independent industry
sources, we believe that we are, on a global basis, the second
largest industrial valve supplier. We believe that our
comprehensive portfolio of valve products and services, our
focus on service and our competency in severe corrosion and
erosion applications are key sources of our competitive
advantage.
FCD Backlog
FCDs backlog of orders at December 31, 2004 was
$228 million, compared with $216 million at
December 31, 2003. We shipped approximately 90% of our
backlog at December 31, 2004 as of December 31, 2005.
FLOW SOLUTIONS DIVISION
Through FSD, we design, manufacture and distribute mechanical
seals, sealing systems and parts, and provide related services,
principally to industrial markets. Flow control products require
mechanical seals to be replaced throughout the products
useful lives. The replacement of mechanical seals is an integral
part of our aftermarket services. Our mechanical seals are used
on a variety of rotating equipment, including pumps, mixers,
compressors, steam turbines and other specialty equipment,
primarily in the petroleum, chemical processing, mineral and ore
processing and general industrial end-markets.
We manufacture mechanical seals at three plants in the U.S. and
at four plants outside the U.S. Through our global network
of 62 seal quick response centers, we provide service, repair
and diagnostic services for maintaining components of flow
control systems. Our mechanical seal products are primarily
marketed to end users through our direct sales force and on a
commission basis to distributors and sales agents. A portion of
our mechanical seal products is sold directly to OEMs for
incorporation into rotating equipment requiring mechanical seals.
FSD Products
We design, manufacture and distribute approximately 180
different models of mechanical seals and sealing systems. We
believe our ability to deliver or ship engineered new seal
product orders within 72 hours from the customers
request, through design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and
delivery, provides us with a leading competitive advantage.
Mechanical seals are critical to the reliable operation of
rotating equipment for prevention of leakage and emissions of
hazardous substances and the reduction of shaft wear caused by
non-mechanical seals. We also manufacture a gas-lubricated
mechanical seal that is used in high-speed compressors for gas
transmission and in the oil and gas production markets. We
continually update our mechanical seals and sealing systems to
integrate emerging technologies.
The following list summarizes our seal products and services and
globally recognized brands:
|
|
|
FSD Product Types |
|
FSD Brand Names |
|
Cartridge Seals
|
|
BW Seals |
Dry-Running Seals
|
|
Durametallic |
Metal Bellow Seals
|
|
Five Star Seal |
Elastomeric Seals
|
|
Flowserve |
Slurry Seals
|
|
Flowstar |
Split Seals
|
|
GASPAC |
Gas Barrier Seals
|
|
Interseal |
Couplings
|
|
Pacific Wietz |
Service and Repair
|
|
Pac-Seal |
Accessories and Support Systems
|
|
|
Monitoring and Diagnostics
|
|
|
5
FSD Services
We provide aftermarket services through our network of 62 seal
quick response centers located throughout the world, including
24 such sites in North America. We also provide asset management
services and condition monitoring for rotating equipment.
Approximately 75% of our service work is performed on a quick
response basis, and we offer
24-hour service in all
of our major markets.
FSD New Product Development
Our investments in new product research and development focus on
developing longer lasting and more efficient products and
value-added services. Approximately 30% of our original
equipment mechanical seal sales for 2004 were sales of products
developed within the past five years. In addition to numerous
product upgrades, our recent mechanical seal and seal system
innovations include: (1) a sterilizable mixer seal;
(2) a high pressure compressor barrier seal; (3) a new
web-based asset management tool; (4) an equipment data
point monitoring package; (5) engineered plastic
critical-wear components for rotating equipment we are marketing
jointly with a key supplier; and (6) large diameter
compressor seals. We also market Flowstar.Net, an
interactive tool used to actively monitor and manage information
relative to equipment performance. Flowstar.Net enhances our
customers ability to make informed decisions and respond
quickly to plant production problems, extend the life of their
production equipment and therefore lower maintenance expenses.
None of these newly developed seal products required the
investment of a material amount of our assets or was otherwise
material.
FSD Customers
Our mechanical seal products are sold directly to end users and
to OEMs for incorporation into pumps, compressors, mixers or
other rotating equipment requiring mechanical seals. Our
mechanical seal sales are diversified among several industries,
including petroleum, chemical, mineral and ore processing and
general industries.
FSD Competition
We compete against a number of manufacturers in the sale of
mechanical seals. Our largest global mechanical seal competitor
is John Crane, a unit of Smiths Group Plc. Based on independent
industry sources, we believe that we are, on a global basis, the
second largest industrial mechanical seals supplier. Our ability
to quickly turn around customers requests for engineered
seal products, from design to engineering, manufacturing,
testing and delivery, is our major source of competitive
advantage.
FSD Backlog
FSDs backlog of orders at December 31, 2004 was
$44 million, compared with $41 million at
December 31, 2003. We shipped all of our backlog at
December 31, 2004 as of December 31, 2005.
GENERAL BUSINESS
Competition
Despite the consolidation trend over the past 10 years, the
markets for our products are highly competitive, with
competition occurring on the basis of price, technical
expertise, timeliness of delivery, contractual terms, previous
installation history and reputation for quality and reliability.
Timeliness of delivery, quality and the proximity of service
centers are important considerations for our aftermarket
products and services. In geographic regions where we are
positioned to provide a quick response, customers have
traditionally relied on us, rather than our competitors, for
aftermarket products relating to our highly engineered and
customized products. However, aftermarket competition for
standard products has increased. Price competition tends to be
more significant for OEMs than aftermarket services and
generally has been increasing. In the aftermarket portion of our
service business, we compete against large and well-established
national or global competitors and, in some markets, against
smaller regional and local companies, as well as
6
the in-house maintenance departments of our end user customers.
In the sale of aftermarket products and services, we benefit
from our large installed base of pumps and valves, which require
maintenance, repair and replacement parts. In the petroleum
industry, the competitors for aftermarket services tend to be
the customers own in-house capabilities. In other
industries, except the nuclear power industry, the competitors
for aftermarket services tend to be local independent repair
shops. Low cost replicators of spare parts are competitors for
spare parts for all industries except for the nuclear power
industry. We possess certain competitive advantages in the
nuclear power industry due to our N Stamp, a
prerequisite to serve customers in that industry, and our
considerable base of proprietary knowledge.
Generally, our customers are attempting to reduce the number of
vendors from which they purchase, thereby reducing the size and
diversity of their inventory. Although vendor reduction programs
could adversely affect our business, we have been successful in
entering into global arrangements with a number of customers to
leverage competitive advantages.
New Product Development
We spent approximately $25.2 million, $24.9 million
and $23.9 million during 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively, on research and development initiatives. Our
research and development group consists of engineers involved in
new product development and improvement of existing products.
Additionally, we sponsor consortium programs for research with
various universities and jointly conduct limited development
work with certain vendors, licensees and customers. We believe
current expenditures are adequate to sustain our ongoing
research and development activities.
Customers
We sell to a wide variety of customers in the petroleum,
chemical, power generation, water treatment and general
industries. No individual customer accounted for more than 5% of
our consolidated 2004 revenues.
We are not required to carry unusually high amounts of inventory
to meet customer delivery requirements. We have been working to
increase our overall inventory efficiency to improve our
operational effectiveness and to reduce working capital needs.
We generally do not provide rights of product return for our
customers and do not offer extended payment terms.
Selling and Distribution
We primarily distribute our products through direct sales by
employees assigned to specific regions, industries or products.
In addition, we use distributors and sales agents to supplement
our direct sales force in countries where business practices or
customs make it appropriate, or wherever it is uneconomical to
have a direct sales staff. We generate a majority of our sales
leads through existing relationships with vendors, customers and
prospects or through referrals.
Intellectual Property
We own a number of trademarks and patents relating to the name
and design of our products. We consider our trademarks and
patents to be an important aspect of our business. In addition,
our pool of proprietary information, consisting of know-how and
trade secrets related to the design, manufacture and operation
of our products, is considered particularly important and
valuable. Accordingly, we attempt to proactively protect such
proprietary information. We generally own the rights to the
products which we manufacture and sell and are unencumbered by
any license or franchise to operate. Our trademarks typically
extend indefinitely, whereas our existing patents generally
expire 20 years from the dates they were filed, which
occurred at various times in the past. We do not believe that
the expiration of patents will have a material adverse impact on
our operations.
7
Raw Materials
The principal raw materials used in manufacturing of our
products are readily available and include bar stock and
structural steel, castings, fasteners, gaskets, motors, silicon
and carbon faces and fluoropolymer components. While
substantially all raw materials are purchased from outside
sources, we have been able to obtain an adequate supply and
anticipate no shortages of such materials. We continue to expand
worldwide sourcing to capitalize on low cost sources of
purchased goods.
We are a vertically integrated manufacturer of certain pump and
valve products. Certain corrosion-resistant castings for our
pumps and quarter-turn valves are manufactured at our foundries.
Other metal castings are either manufactured at our foundries or
purchased from outside sources.
We also use highly engineered corrosion resistant plastic parts
for certain pump and valve product lines. These include
rotomolding as well as injection and compression molding of a
variety of fluoropolymer and other plastic materials. We do not
anticipate difficulty in obtaining raw materials in the future.
Suppliers of raw materials for nuclear markets must be qualified
by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and,
accordingly, are limited in number. However, to date we have
experienced no significant difficulty in obtaining such
materials.
Employees and Labor Relations
We have approximately 14,000 employees, of whom
approximately one-half work in the U.S. Some of our hourly
employees at our pump manufacturing plant located in Vernon,
California, our pump service center located in Cleveland, Ohio,
our valve manufacturing plant located in Lynchburg, Virginia,
and our foundry located in Dayton, Ohio, are represented by
unions. Additionally, some employees at select facilities in the
following countries are unionized or have employee works
councils: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil,
Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the
Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
We believe relations with our employees throughout our
operations are generally satisfactory, including those employees
represented by unions and works councils. No unionized facility
produces more than 5% of our revenues. We entered into new
multi-year collective bargaining agreements with the unions in
our U.S. sites during 2005.
Environmental Regulations and Proceedings
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations in all
jurisdictions in which we have operating facilities. These
requirements primarily relate to the generation and disposal of
solid and hazardous waste, air emissions and waste water
discharges. We periodically make capital expenditures to abate
and control pollution and to satisfy environmental requirements.
At present, we have no plans for any material capital
expenditures for environmental control equipment at any of our
facilities. However, we have incurred and continue to incur
operating costs relating to ongoing environmental compliance
matters, although certain costs have been reduced by successful
waste minimization programs. Based on existing and proposed
environmental requirements and our anticipated production
schedule, we believe that future environmental compliance
expenditures will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We use hazardous substances and generate hazardous wastes in
most of our manufacturing and foundry operations. Many of our
current and former properties are or have been used for
industrial purposes and may require some
clean-up of historical
contamination. During the due diligence phase of our
acquisitions, we conduct environmental site assessments in an
attempt to determine any potential environmental liability and
to identify the need for clean-up. We are currently conducting
follow-up investigation
and/or remediation activities at those locations where we have
known environmental concerns. We have cleaned up a majority of
the sites with known historical contamination and we are
addressing the remaining identified issues.
Over the years, we have been involved as one of several
potentially responsible parties (PRP) at former
public waste disposal sites that are or were subject to
investigation and remediation. We are currently involved
8
as a PRP at four Superfund sites. The sites are in various
stages of evaluation by government authorities. Our total
projected fair share cost allocation at all four of
these sites is expected to be less than $100,000.
We have established reserves that we believe to be adequate to
cover our currently identified
on-site and off-site
environmental liabilities.
Exports
Licenses are required from U.S. government agencies to
export certain products. In particular, products with nuclear
applications are restricted, as are certain other pump, valve
and mechanical seal products.
Our export sales from the U.S. to foreign unaffiliated
customers were $275.6 million in 2004; $203.6 million
in 2003 and $251.2 million in 2002.
AVAILABILITY OF FORMS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Our shareholders may obtain, without charge, copies of the
following documents as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:
|
|
|
|
|
annual reports on
Form 10-K,
|
|
|
|
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
|
|
|
|
current reports on
Form 8-K,
|
|
|
|
changes in beneficial ownership for insiders, |
|
|
|
proxy statements, and |
|
|
|
any amendments thereto, |
as soon as reasonably practical after such material is filed
with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Except as otherwise stated in these reports, the information
contained on our website or available by hyperlink from our
website is not incorporated into this Annual Report or other
documents we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Copies may also be obtained by accessing our website at
www.flowserve.com or by providing a written request for
such copies or additional information regarding our operating or
financial performance to Michael E. Conley, Vice President
of Investor Relations, Flowserve Corporation, 5215 North
OConnor Blvd., Suite 2300, Irving, Texas 75039.
We have adopted Self Governance Guidelines for our Board of
Directors and Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for our Board
of Directors, our Chief Executive Officer, financial management
and our employees generally. We also have charters for the Audit
Committee, Finance Committee, Organization and Compensation
Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
of our Board of Directors. Copies of the foregoing documents may
be obtained on our website as noted in the above paragraph, and
such information is available in print to any shareholder who
requests it.
The certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required pursuant to Sections 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are included as Exhibits to this
Annual Report. Our Chief Executive Officer certified to the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on December 22,
2005, pursuant to Section 303A.12 of the NYSEs
listing standards, that he was not aware of any violation by the
Company of the NYSEs corporate governance listing
standards as of that date.
RISK FACTORS
Any of the events discussed as risk factors below may occur. If
they do, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known
to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impair our
business operations.
9
|
|
|
We have material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting, which could adversely affect our ability to
report our financial condition and results of operations
accurately and on a timely basis. |
In connection with our 2004 Restatement and our assessment of
internal control over financial reporting under Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified material
weaknesses in our internal control. For a discussion of our
internal control over financial reporting and a description of
the identified material weaknesses, see Item 9A.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.
Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting could adversely impact our ability to provide timely
and accurate financial information. While we have taken measures
to strengthen our internal control in response to the previously
identified material weaknesses, including by implementing
strengthened control procedures for information systems,
enhancing company-level monitoring controls processes and
expanding our internal audit and corporate compliance functions,
and engaged outside consultants to assist us in our efforts,
additional work remains to be done to address the identified
material weaknesses. If we are unsuccessful in implementing or
following our remediation plan, or fail to update our internal
control as our business evolves or to integrate acquired
businesses into our controls system, we may not be able to
timely or accurately report our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows or maintain effective disclosure
controls and procedures. If we are unable to report financial
information timely and accurately or to maintain effective
disclosure controls and procedures, we could be subject to,
among other things, regulatory or enforcement actions by the SEC
and the NYSE, including a delisting from the NYSE, securities
litigation, events of default under our new credit facilities,
debt rating agency downgrades or rating withdrawals, and a
general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could
adversely affect our business prospects and the valuation of our
common stock.
Furthermore, there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness
of any system of controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding
of the controls and procedures. We could face additional
litigation exposure and a greater likelihood of an SEC
enforcement or NYSE regulatory action if further restatements
were to occur or other accounting-related problems emerge. In
addition, any future restatements or other accounting-related
problems may adversely affect our financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
If we fail to comply with the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our business
prospects and stock valuation could be adversely
affected. |
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires our
management to report on, and our independent registered public
accounting firm to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. This legislation is relatively
new, and neither companies nor accounting firms have significant
experience in complying with its requirements. We have expended
significant resources to comply with our obligations under
Section 404 with respect to the year ended
December 31, 2004. If we are unable to comply with our
obligations under Section 404 in the future or experience
delays in future reports of our management and outside auditors
on our internal control over financial reporting, or if we fail
to respond timely to any changes in the Section 404
requirements, we may be unable to timely file with the SEC our
periodic reports and may be subject to, among other things,
regulatory or enforcement actions by the SEC and the NYSE,
including delisting from the NYSE, securities litigation, events
of default under our new credit facilities, debt rating agency
downgrades or rating withdrawals and a general loss of investor
confidence, any one of which could adversely affect our business
prospects and the valuation of our common stock.
|
|
|
We are currently subject to securities class action
litigation, the unfavorable outcome of which might have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. |
A number of federal putative lawsuits have been filed against
us, certain of our former officers, our independent auditors and
the lead underwriters of our most recent public stock offerings,
alleging violations of securities laws. We believe that these
lawsuits, which have been consolidated, are without merit and
are vigorously defending them and have notified our applicable
insurers. We cannot, however, determine with
10
certainty the outcome or resolution of these claims or the
timing for their resolution. The case is currently set for trial
on March 27, 2007. In addition to the expense and burden
incurred in defending this litigation and any damages that we
may suffer, our managements efforts and attention may be
diverted from the ordinary business operations in order to
address these claims. If the final resolution of this litigation
is unfavorable to us, our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows might be materially adversely affected
if our existing insurance coverage is unavailable or inadequate
to resolve the matter.
|
|
|
The ongoing SEC investigation regarding our restatement
could materially adversely affect our company. |
Following our announcement on February 3, 2004 of the
restatement of our previously issued annual results for the
years 2000 through 2002 and the quarterly results for 2003, the
SEC initiated an informal inquiry into the facts and
circumstances relating to the restatement. On June 2, 2004,
the SEC issued a formal order of private investigation into the
issues regarding that restatement and any other issues that
arise from the investigation. We continue to cooperate with the
SEC in this matter. We are unable to predict the outcome of this
investigation. If the SEC takes enforcement action with regard
to this investigation, we may be required to pay fines, consent
to injunctions against future conduct or suffer other penalties.
|
|
|
The IRS is auditing our tax returns, and a negative
outcome of the audit would require us to make additional tax
payments that may be material. |
We have recently concluded an IRS audit of our U.S. federal
income tax returns for the years 1999 through 2001. Based on its
audit work, the IRS has issued proposed adjustments to increase
taxable income during 1999 through 2001 by $12.8 million,
and to deny foreign tax credits of $2.9 million in the
aggregate. The tax liability resulting from these proposed
adjustments will be offset with foreign tax credit carryovers
and other refund claims, and therefore should not result in a
material future cash payment, pending final review by the Joint
Committee on Taxation. The effect of the adjustments to current
and deferred taxes has been reflected in the consolidated
financial statements for periods covered by the 2004 Restatement.
During 2006, the IRS will commence an audit of our U.S. federal
income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004. While we
expect that the upcoming IRS audit will be similar in scope to
the recently completed examination, the upcoming audit may be
broader. Furthermore, the preliminary results from the audit of
1999 through 2001 are not indicative of the future result of the
audit of 2002 through 2004. The audit of 2002 through 2004 may
result in additional tax payments by us, the amount of which may
be material, but will not be known until that IRS audit is
finalized.
In the course of the tax audit for the years 1999 through 2001,
we have identified recordkeeping and other material internal
control weaknesses, which caused us to incur significant expense
to substantiate our tax return items and address information and
document requests made by the IRS. We expect to incur similar
expenses with respect to the upcoming IRS audit of the years
2002 through 2004.
Due to the recordkeeping issues referred to above, the IRS has
issued a Notice of Inadequate Records for the years 1999 through
2001 and may issue a similar notice for the years 2002 through
2004. While the IRS has agreed not to assess penalties for
inadequacy of records with respect to the years 1999 through
2001, no assurances can be made that the IRS will not seek to
assess such penalties or other types of penalties with respect
to the years 2002 through 2004. Such penalties could result in a
material impact to the consolidated results of operations.
|
|
|
We operate and manage our business on a number of
different computer systems, including several aging Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) systems that rely on manual
processes, which could adversely affect our ability to
accurately report our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows. |
We operate and manage our business on a number of different
computer systems, including disparate legacy systems inherited
from our predecessors. Some of our computer systems, as well as
some of our computer hardware, are aging and contain inefficient
processes. For example, several of our older ERP systems rely on
manual processes, which are generally labor intensive and
increase the risk of error. Furthermore, as discussed below
under Item 9A. Controls and Procedures, as of
the end of 2004, we did not
11
maintain adequate information technology general controls, as
our information technology infrastructure was not adequate to
support our financial and accounting responsibilities and we did
not have adequate controls supporting application system
changes, computer operations and restricted access. Unless we
are able to enhance our computer systems generally and
information technology general controls specifically, our
ability to identify, capture and communicate pertinent
information may be compromised, which in turn may compromise our
ability to timely and accurately report our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
Economic, political and other risks associated with
international operations could adversely affect our
business. |
A substantial portion of our operations is conducted and located
outside the United States. We have manufacturing or service
facilities in 31 countries and sell to customers in over
70 countries, in addition to the United States. Moreover,
we outsource our manufacturing and engineering functions to, and
source our raw materials and components from, India, China,
Mexico and Latin American and Eastern European countries.
Accordingly, our business is subject to risks associated with
doing business internationally, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
instability in a specific countrys or regions
political or economic conditions, particularly in emerging
markets and the Middle East; |
|
|
|
trade protection measures, such as tariff increases, and import
and export licensing and control requirements; |
|
|
|
potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws; |
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations; |
|
|
|
difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting receivables
through some foreign legal systems; |
|
|
|
differing and, in some cases, more stringent labor regulations; |
|
|
|
partial or total expropriation; |
|
|
|
differing protection of intellectual property; |
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
inability to repatriate income or capital; and |
|
|
|
difficulty in administering and enforcing corporate policies,
which may be different than the normal business practices of
local cultures. |
For example, political unrest and a two-month nation-wide work
stoppage in Venezuela in 2002 negatively impacted demand for our
products from customers in that country and other customers,
such as U.S. oil refineries, that were affected by the
resulting disruption in the supply of crude oil. Similarly, the
military conflict in the Middle East softened the level of
capital investment and demand for our products and services in
that region, notwithstanding the historically high prices for
oil. Additionally, we are investigating or have investigated
certain allegations regarding foreign management engaging in
unethical practices prohibited by our Code of Business Conduct
which could have inappropriately benefited them at Company
expense.
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies, as a
significant portion of our revenue, and certain of our costs,
assets and liabilities, are denominated in currencies other than
U.S. dollar. The primary foreign currencies to which we
have exposure are the Euro, British pound, Canadian dollar,
Mexican peso, Japanese yen, Singapore dollar, Brazilian real,
Australian dollar, Argentinean peso and Venezuelan bolivar.
Certain of the foreign currencies to which we have exposure,
such as the Argentinean peso, have undergone significant
devaluation in the past. Although we enter into forward
contracts to hedge our risks associated with transactions
denominated in foreign currencies, no assurances can be made
that exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
12
Our international operations are subject to a variety of laws
and regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and regulations issued by the U.S. Customs
Service, the Bureau of Export Administration, various foreign
governmental agencies, including applicable customs, currency
exchange control and transfer pricing regulations and various
programs administered by the United Nations. No assurances can
be made that we will continue to be found to be operating in
compliance with, or be able to detect violations of, any such
laws or regulations. In addition, we cannot predict the nature,
scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our
international operations might be subject or the manner in which
existing laws might be administered or interpreted.
Our future success will depend, in large part, on our ability to
anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks
associated with our international operations. Any of these
factors could, however, adversely affect our international
operations and, consequently, our results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
|
|
|
Our business depends on the levels of capital investment
and maintenance expenditures by our customers, which in turn are
affected by the cyclical nature of their markets and their
liquidity. |
Demand for most of our products depends on the level of new
capital investment and maintenance expenditures by our
customers. The levels of capital expenditures by our customers
depend, in turn, on the general economic conditions and
conditions in their industry, as well as on their liquidity.
The businesses of many of our customers, particularly general
industrial companies, chemical companies and oil refineries,
are, to varying degrees, cyclical and have experienced periodic
downturns. Our customers in these industries historically have
tended to delay large capital projects, including expensive
maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. For
example, demand for our products and services from our general
industrial customers, such as steel and pulp and paper
manufacturers, was negatively impacted by the
U.S. recession in the early part of this decade. Similarly,
in response to high oil and natural gas prices and a weak demand
for their products due to the soft economy, during the past
several years our chemical customers reduced their spending on
capital investments and operated their facilities at lower
levels, reducing demand for our products and services. Some of
our customers may delay capital maintenance even during
favorable conditions in their markets. For example, while high
oil prices generally spur demand for our products and services
in upstream petroleum markets, they often reduce demand for our
products and services from oil refineries, as refiners seek to
take advantage of favorable margins by operating at high levels
of capacity utilization and deferring maintenance.
The ability of our customers to finance capital investment and
maintenance may be affected by factors independent of the
conditions in their industry. For example, despite high natural
gas prices in 2003, there was little additional investment or
maintenance activity by our gas customers, many of which have
experienced liquidity constraints as a result of financial
difficulties related to their former energy trading activities.
The diminished demand for our products and services leads to
excess manufacturing capacity and subsequent accelerated erosion
of average selling prices in our industry, which could adversely
affect our business, results of operations, including profit
margins, financial condition and cash flows.
|
|
|
As we expand our customer alliance programs, an increasing
portion of our revenues will be on a fixed-fee basis, subjecting
us to the risks associated with cost overruns. |
As part of our customer alliance programs, we enter into
maintenance agreements that are fixed-fee arrangements. Under
these agreements, we provide maintenance services, including
replacement parts and repair services, at a specified fixed fee
and, accordingly, bear the risk of cost overruns. While we
conduct a detailed analysis of the customers equipment
prior to entering into fixed-fee maintenance agreements and
benefit from our extensive experience in the flow control
industry, our failure to estimate accurately the anticipated
equipment failures and maintenance costs could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, including profit
margins, financial condition and cash flows.
13
|
|
|
We sell our products in highly competitive markets, which
puts pressure on our profit margins and limits our ability to
maintain or increase the market share of our products. |
The markets for our products are fragmented and highly
competitive. We compete against large and well-established
national and global companies, as well as regional and local
companies, low cost replicators of spare parts and in-house
maintenance departments of our end user customers. We compete
based on price, technical expertise, timeliness of delivery,
previous installation history and reputation for quality and
reliability, with price competition tending to be more
significant for sales to original equipment manufacturers. Some
of our customers are attempting to reduce the number of vendors
from which they purchase in order to reduce the size and
diversity of their inventory. To remain competitive, we will
need to invest continuously in manufacturing, marketing,
customer service and support and our distribution networks. No
assurances can be made that we will have sufficient resources to
continue to make the investment required to maintain or increase
our market share or that our investments will be successful. If
we do not compete successfully, our business, our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be
adversely affected.
|
|
|
Environmental compliance costs and liabilities could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows. |
Our operations and properties are subject to extensive
regulation under environmental laws. These laws can impose
substantial sanctions for violations or operational changes that
may limit production. We must conform our operations to
applicable regulatory requirements and adapt to changes in such
requirements in all countries in which we operate.
We use hazardous substances and generate hazardous wastes in
most of our manufacturing and foundry operations. Many of our
current and former properties are or have been used for
industrial purposes, and some may require
clean-up of historical
contamination. We are currently conducting investigation and/or
remediation activities at a number of locations where we have
known environmental concerns. In addition, we have been
identified as one of several potentially responsible parties at
four Superfund sites.
We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, operating and
capital costs to comply with environmental requirements. In
addition, new laws and regulations, stricter enforcement of
existing requirements, the discovery of previously unknown
contamination or the imposition of new
clean-up requirements
could require us to incur costs or become the basis for new or
increased liabilities that could adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
We are party to asbestos-containing product litigation
that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. |
We are a defendant in a large number of lawsuits that seek to
recover damages for personal injury allegedly resulting from
exposure to asbestos-containing products formerly manufactured
and/or distributed by us. All such products were used as
self-contained components of process equipment, and we do not
believe that there was any emission of ambient
asbestos-containing fiber during the use of this equipment.
Although we are defending these allegations vigorously and
believe that a high percentage of these lawsuits is covered by
insurance or indemnities from other companies, there can be no
assurance that we will prevail or that payments made by
insurance or such other companies would be adequate, and
unfavorable rulings, judgments and/or settlement terms could
adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows.
|
|
|
Our business may be adversely impacted by work stoppages
and other labor matters. |
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately
14,000 employees, approximately half of whom were located
in the United States. Of our U.S. employees, approximately
7% are represented by unions. We also have unionized employees
in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,
Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Although we
believe that our relations with our employees are good and we
have not experienced any recent strikes or work stoppages, no
assurances can be made that we will not in the future experience
these and other types of conflicts with labor unions, works
councils, other groups representing employees, or our employees
14
generally, or that any future negotiations with our labor unions
will not result in significant increases in the cost of labor.
|
|
|
Our competitive position is affected by our ability to
protect our intellectual property. |
Our ability to compete is affected by our ability to protect our
proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patents,
copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality
provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect
our proprietary rights. We cannot guarantee, however, that the
steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be
adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology. For
example, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret
protection may be unavailable or limited in some of the foreign
countries in which we operate. In addition, while we generally
enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and
third parties to protect our intellectual property, such
confidentiality agreements could be breached, and may not
provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets and know-how
related to the design, manufacture or operation of our products.
If it became necessary for us to resort to litigation to protect
our intellectual property rights, any proceedings could be
burdensome and costly, and we may not prevail. Furthermore,
adequate remedies may not be available in the event of an
unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets and
manufacturing expertise. If we fail to successfully enforce our
intellectual property rights, our competitive position could
suffer, which could harm our sales, results of operations and
cash flows.
|
|
|
Our success will depend to a significant extent on our
ability to retain senior executives and other key
personnel. |
During 2004 and 2005, we appointed a new Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Treasurer,
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Compliance
Officer, Chief Information Officer, Vice President of Tax, and a
Vice President of Human Resources, and we created and staffed
new positions responsible for accounting policy and procedures,
financial reporting, tax compliance and internal audit. Our
future success depends to a significant degree on the skills,
experience and efforts of our newly appointed and existing
senior management and other key personnel. The loss of the
services of any of these individuals could adversely affect our
ability to implement our business strategy. To promote
continuity of senior management, in March 2005 our Board of
Directors approved a Transitional Executive Security Plan, which
provides financial incentives to key management personnel to
remain employed by us for the near term. No assurances can be
made, however, that we will be successful in our efforts to
retain key members of our senior management.
|
|
|
If we are unable to obtain raw materials at favorable
prices, our operating margins and results of operations will be
adversely affected. |
We purchase substantially all electric power and other raw
materials we use in the manufacturing of our products from
outside sources. The costs of these raw materials have been
volatile historically and are influenced by factors that are
outside our control. In recent years, the prices for energy,
metal alloys, nickel and certain other of our raw materials have
increased, with the prices for energy currently exceeding
historical averages. If we are unable to pass increases in the
costs of our raw materials to our customers, our operating
margins and results of operations will be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Significant changes in pension fund investment performance
or assumptions relating to pension costs may have a material
effect on the valuation of our obligations under our defined
benefit pension plans, the funded status of these plans and our
pension expense. |
We maintain defined benefit pension plans that are required to
be funded in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada,
Japan, Mexico and The Netherlands, and defined benefit plans
that are not required to be funded in Germany, France, Austria
and Sweden. Our pension liability is materially affected by the
discount rate used to measure our pension obligations and, in
the case of the plans that are required to be funded, the level
of plan assets available to fund those obligations and the
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. A change in
the discount rate can result in a significant increase or
decrease in the valuation of
15
pension obligations, affecting the reported status of our
pension plans and our pension expense. Significant changes in
investment performance or a change in the portfolio mix of
invested assets can result in increases and decreases in the
valuation of plan assets or in a change of the expected rate of
return on plan assets. Changes in the expected return on plan
assets assumption can result in significant changes in our
pension expense. We currently expect to make substantial
contributions to our U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension
plans during the next three years, and may make additional
substantial contributions thereafter.
|
|
|
We may incur material costs as a result of product
liability and warranty claims, which could adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. |
We may be exposed to product liability and warranty claims in
the event that the use of our products results, or is alleged to
result, in bodily injury and/or property damage or our products
actually or allegedly fail to perform as expected. While we
maintain insurance coverage with respect to certain product
liability claims, we may not be able to obtain such insurance on
acceptable terms in the future, if at all, and any such
insurance may not provide adequate coverage against product
liability claims. In addition, product liability claims can be
expensive to defend and can divert the attention of management
and other personnel for significant periods of time, regardless
of the ultimate outcome. An unsuccessful defense of a product
liability claim could have an adverse affect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition and cash flows.
Even if we are successful in defending against a claim relating
to our products, claims of this nature could cause our customers
to lose confidence in our products and our company. Warranty
claims are not covered by insurance, and we may incur
significant warranty costs in the future for which we would not
be reimbursed.
|
|
|
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our
financial condition and our ability to fulfill our obligations
under our indebtedness. |
We have a substantial amount of debt. This level of indebtedness
could have important consequences to us. For example, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to our indebtedness; |
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions; |
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flows to fund working
capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts
and other general corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
limit our ability to take advantage of business opportunities as
a result of various restrictive covenants in our debt agreements; |
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and |
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow money or sell stock to fund our
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
corporate requirements. |
Subject to the restrictions in our debt agreements, we may incur
additional indebtedness in the future, which could further
exacerbate the effect of any of the consequences described above.
|
|
|
Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our
indebtedness limit our operating and financial
flexibility. |
The agreements governing our bank credit facilities and our
other outstanding indebtedness impose significant operating and
financial restrictions on us and limit our managements
discretion in operating our businesses. These agreements limit
our ability, among other things, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
16
|
|
|
|
|
change fiscal year; |
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other distributions; |
|
|
|
prepay subordinated debt, make investments and other restricted
payments; |
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
create liens; |
|
|
|
sell assets; and |
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates. |
Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by
events beyond our control. Failure to comply with these
covenants could result in an event of default which, if not
cured or waived, may have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
We may not be able to continue to expand our market
presence through acquisitions, and any future acquisitions may
present unforeseen integration difficulties or costs. |
Since 1997, we have expanded through a number of acquisitions,
and we may pursue acquisitions of businesses that are
complementary to ours in the future. Our ability to implement
this growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify
appropriate acquisition candidates, covenants in our credit
agreement and other debt agreements and our financial resources,
including available cash and borrowing capacity. In addition,
acquisition of businesses may require additional debt financing,
resulting in higher leverage and an increase in interest
expense, and could result in the incurrence of contingent
liabilities.
Should we acquire another business, the process of integrating
acquired operations into our existing operations may encounter
operating difficulties and may require significant financial
resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing
development or expansion of existing operations. Some of the
challenges associated with acquisitions include:
|
|
|
|
|
loss of key employees or customers of the acquired company; |
|
|
|
conforming the acquired companys standards, processes,
procedures and controls, including accounting systems and
controls, with our operations; |
|
|
|
coordinating operations that are increased in scope, geographic
diversity and complexity; |
|
|
|
retooling and reprogramming of equipment; |
|
|
|
hiring additional management and other critical
personnel; and |
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from our
day-to-day operations. |
Furthermore, no assurances can be made that we will realize the
cost savings, synergies or revenue enhancements that we may
anticipate from any acquisition, or that we will realize such
benefits within the time frame that we expect. If we are not
able to address the challenges associated with acquisitions and
successfully integrate acquired businesses, or if our integrated
product and service offerings fail to achieve market acceptance,
our business could be adversely affected.
Our corporate headquarters is a leased facility located in
Irving, Texas, which we began to occupy on January 1, 2004.
The lease term is for 10 years, and we have the option to
renew the lease for two additional five-year periods. We
currently occupy 125,000 square feet at this facility. We
recently expanded our leased facility by 25,000 square feet due
to our growth and began to occupy this additional space on
February 3, 2006.
17
Information on our principal manufacturing facilities operating
at December 31, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of | |
|
Approx. Sq. | |
|
|
Plants | |
|
Footage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
FPD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.:
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,284,000 |
|
|
Non-U.S.:
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2,598,000 |
|
FSD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.:
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
Non-U.S.:
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
FCD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.:
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,087,000 |
|
|
Non-U.S.:
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Most of our principal manufacturing facilities are owned. We
maintain a substantial network of U.S. and foreign service
centers and sales offices, most of which are leased. Our leased
facilities are generally covered by long term leases. We believe
we will be able to extend leases on our service centers and
sales offices where desired, as they expire. See Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report for additional information regarding our obligations
under leasing arrangements.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are a defendant in a large number of pending lawsuits (which
include, in many cases, multiple claimants) that seek to recover
damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to
asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or distributed by
us in the past. Any such products were encapsulated and used
only as components of process equipment, and we do not believe
that any emission of respirable asbestos fibers occurred during
the use of this equipment. We believe that a high percentage of
the applicable claims are covered by applicable insurance or
indemnities from other companies.
In June 2002, we were sued by Ruhrpumpen, Inc.
(Ruhrpumpen) who alleged antitrust violations,
conspiracy, fraud and breach of contract claims arising out of
our December 2000 sale to Ruhrpumpen of a plant in Tulsa,
Oklahoma and a license for eight defined pump lines. Ruhrpumpen
subsequently amended its complaint to add Mr. Ronald F.
Shuff, our Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, and
two other employees as individual defendants. Trial was held in
the matter during March 2004. At the end of the trial,
Mr. Shuff and the two other employees were dismissed from
the lawsuit. On or about May 26, 2004, and before receiving
a ruling from the court as to the remaining claims, the parties
entered into a confidential settlement agreement resolving all
of their pending disputes.
On February 4, 2004, we received an informal inquiry from
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
requesting the voluntary production of documents and information
related to our February 3, 2004 announcement that we would
restate our financial results for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and the full years 2002, 2001 and 2000.
On June 2, 2004, we were advised that the SEC had issued a
formal order of private investigation into issues regarding this
restatement and any other issues that arise from the
investigation. We continue to cooperate with the SEC in this
matter.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, related
putative lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern
District of Texas (the Court), alleging that we
violated federal securities laws. Since the filing of these
cases, which have been consolidated, the lead plaintiff has
amended its complaint several times. The lead plaintiffs
current pleading is the fifth consolidated amended complaint
(Complaint). The Complaint alleges that federal
securities violations occurred between February 6, 2001 and
September 27, 2002 and names as defendants Mr. C.
Scott Greer, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Ms. Renée J. Hornbaker, our former Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, and Banc
of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC,
which served as underwriters for two of our public stock
offerings during the relevant
18
period. The Complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b)
and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1933. The lead plaintiff seeks unspecified
compensatory damages, forfeiture by Mr. Greer and
Ms. Hornbaker of unspecified incentive-based or
equity-based compensation and profits from any stock sales, and
recovery of costs. On November 22, 2005, the Court entered
an order denying the defendants motions to dismiss the
Complaint on the pleadings in their entirety. The case is
currently set for trial on March 27, 2007. We continue to
believe that the lawsuit is without merit and are vigorously
defending the case.
On October 6, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was
filed purportedly on our behalf in the 193rd Judicial
District of Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit names as
defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker, and current board
members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr.,
William C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M.
Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris,
James O. Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We are
named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily on the purported
misstatements alleged in the above-described federal securities
case, the plaintiff asserts claims against the defendants for
breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement,
waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff
alleges that these purported violations of state law occurred
between April 2000 and the date of suit. The plaintiff seeks on
our behalf an unspecified amount of damages, injunctive relief
and/or the imposition of a constructive trust on
defendants assets, disgorgement of compensation, profits
or other benefits received by the defendants from us, and
recovery of attorneys fees and costs. We strongly believe
that the suit was improperly filed and have filed a motion
seeking dismissal of the case.
On February 7, 2006, we received a subpoena from the SEC
regarding goods and services that were delivered to Iraq from
1996 through 2003 during the United Nations Oil-for-Food
Program. We are in the process of reviewing and responding to
the subpoena and intend to cooperate with the SEC. We believe
that other companies in our industry (as well as in other
industries) have received similar subpoenas and requests for
information.
We have been involved as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at former public waste disposal sites that may
be subject to remediation under pending government procedures.
The sites are in various stages of evaluation by federal and
state environmental authorities. The projected cost of
remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged fair
share allocation, is uncertain and speculative until all
studies have been completed and the parties have either
negotiated an amicable resolution or the matter has been
judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties
who have similarly been identified, and the identification and
location of additional parties is continuing under applicable
federal or state law. Many of the other parties identified are
financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay
their share of the remediation costs. Based on our information
about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the
environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it
is likely that ultimate remediation liability costs for each
site will be apportioned among all liable parties, including
site owners and waste transporters, according to the volumes
and/or toxicity of the wastes shown to have been disposed of at
the sites. We believe that our exposure for existing disposal
sites will be less than $100,000.
We are also a defendant in several other lawsuits, including
product liability claims, that are insured, subject to the
applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on currently available information, we believe
that we have adequately accrued estimated probable losses for
such lawsuits. We are also involved in a substantial number of
labor claims, including one case where we had a confidential
settlement reflected in our 2004 results.
Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be
quantified with absolute certainty, we have established reserves
covering these exposures, which we believe to be reasonable
based on past experience and available facts. While additional
exposures beyond these reserves could exist, they currently
cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate these
potential contingent loss exposures and, if they develop,
recognize expense as soon as such losses become probable and can
be reasonably estimated.
We are also involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental
to our business, none of which we believe to be material to our
business, operations or overall financial condition. However,
resolutions or dispositions of
19
claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have a
significant impact on our operating results for the reporting
period in which any such resolution or disposition occurs.
As a consequence of all legal matters, including settlements of
both publicly disclosed litigation and otherwise, we recognized
expense of approximately $17 million in 2004,
$25 million in 2003 and $4 million in 2002.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES |
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol
FLS. On February 6, 2006, our records showed
approximately 1,855 shareholders of record.
The following table sets forth the range of high and low prices
per share of our common stock for the periods indicated.
PRICE RANGE OF FLOWSERVE COMMON STOCK
(Intraday High/Low Prices)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$27.72/$23.69 |
|
$22.77/$18.64 |
|
$15.43/$10.40 |
Second Quarter
|
|
$31.25/$25.16 |
|
$25.09/$19.47 |
|
$19.91/$11.14 |
Third Quarter
|
|
$37.78/$29.73 |
|
$25.35/$21.21 |
|
$22.86/$16.60 |
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$39.75/$32.75 |
|
$28.18/$20.40 |
|
$22.93/$18.90 |
We did not pay dividends on our common stock in 2003, 2004 or
the completed portion of 2005, and have no plans to commence
payment of cash dividends. The declaration and payment of
dividends is subject to limitations under our new credit
facilities, which prohibit declaration and payment of dividends
at any time there is a default thereunder and cap the aggregate
amount of dividends that may be made during the term of the new
credit facilities. See Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Senior Credit Facilities for
additional information on our new credit facilities.
During 2004, 2003 and 2002, we issued 288,447, 39,275 and
31,100 shares, respectively, of our common stock pursuant
to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933. A portion of these shares were issued
under director and officer stock compensation plans for
employees.
20
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004(a) | |
|
2003(b)(f) | |
|
2002(c)(f) | |
|
2001(d)(g) | |
|
2000(e)(g) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data and ratios) | |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
2,638,199 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,228,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,892,123 |
|
|
$ |
1,538,293 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
778,816 |
|
|
|
705,411 |
|
|
|
666,335 |
|
|
|
589,294 |
|
|
|
504,185 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
623,035 |
|
|
|
540,845 |
|
|
|
478,220 |
|
|
|
411,226 |
|
|
|
365,718 |
|
Integration expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
|
62,866 |
|
|
|
35,211 |
|
Restructuring expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
19,364 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
155,781 |
|
|
|
141,919 |
|
|
|
167,589 |
|
|
|
116,409 |
|
|
|
83,891 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
81,016 |
|
|
|
84,206 |
|
|
|
95,480 |
|
|
|
119,636 |
|
|
|
72,749 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
39,470 |
|
|
|
12,789 |
|
|
|
29,669 |
|
|
|
(6,911 |
) |
|
|
5,824 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
20,154 |
|
|
|
43,108 |
|
|
|
32,696 |
|
|
|
(18,092 |
) |
|
|
5,439 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share (diluted)
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
(0.46 |
) |
|
|
0.14 |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
44,463 |
|
|
|
34,759 |
|
|
|
(15,957 |
) |
|
|
5,439 |
|
Net earnings (loss) per share (diluted)
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
0.14 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
267,501 |
|
|
|
181,304 |
|
|
|
249,028 |
|
|
|
(47,749 |
) |
|
|
18,431 |
|
Dividends paid per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bookings
|
|
|
2,657,404 |
|
|
|
2,423,728 |
|
|
|
2,184,074 |
|
|
|
1,975,536 |
|
|
|
1,528,800 |
|
Ending backlog
|
|
|
836,380 |
|
|
|
818,200 |
|
|
|
733,662 |
|
|
|
662,803 |
|
|
|
659,250 |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
341,259 |
|
|
$ |
454,439 |
|
|
$ |
514,923 |
|
|
$ |
473,372 |
|
|
$ |
472,641 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,634,036 |
|
|
|
2,680,512 |
|
|
|
2,639,873 |
|
|
|
2,045,877 |
|
|
|
2,065,782 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
701,844 |
|
|
|
950,801 |
|
|
|
1,095,431 |
|
|
|
1,042,035 |
|
|
|
1,130,204 |
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities
|
|
|
397,655 |
|
|
|
370,201 |
|
|
|
360,448 |
|
|
|
223,639 |
|
|
|
210,555 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
870,225 |
|
|
|
822,463 |
|
|
|
708,557 |
|
|
|
388,771 |
|
|
|
301,515 |
|
FINANCIAL RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average net assets
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Net debt to capital ratio
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
59.6 |
% |
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
78.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Financial condition in 2004 includes the effects of the accounts
receivable securitization which increased cash by
$60.0 million, reduced accounts receivable by
$48.7 million and increased total debt by
$11.3 million. |
|
(b) |
|
Financial results in 2003 include integration expense of
$19.8 million and restructuring expense of
$2.9 million, resulting in a reduction in after tax net
earnings of $14.7 million (as restated). |
|
(c) |
|
Financial results in 2002 include IFC results from the date of
acquisition. Financial results in 2002 include integration
expense of $16.2 million, restructuring expense of
$4.3 million, a loss on debt extinguishment of
$11.2 million, and a $5.2 million purchase accounting
adjustment associated with the required
write-up and subsequent
sale of acquired inventory, resulting in a reduction in after
tax net earnings of $24.1 million (as restated). |
21
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Financial results in 2001 include integration expense of
$63.0 million, a reduction of our restructuring expense of
$1.2 million and a loss on debt extinguishment of
$17.9 million net of tax, resulting in a reduction in after
tax net earnings of $59.6 million (as restated). |
|
(e) |
|
Financial results in 2000 include Invatec and IDP from the date
of the respective acquisitions. Financial results in 2000
include integration expense of $35.2 million, restructuring
expense of $19.4 million and a loss on debt extinguishment
of $2.1 million net of tax, resulting in a reduction
in after tax net earnings of $37.5 million (as restated). |
|
(f) |
|
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report, the financial
statements from which the selected financial data are derived
have been restated. |
|
(g) |
|
Primarily from the matters described in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report, the selected financial data has been restated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated with |
|
|
|
As Restated with |
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Sales
|
|
$ |
1,917,332 |
|
|
$ |
1,917,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,892,123 |
|
|
$ |
1,538,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,538,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,538,293 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
603,542 |
|
|
|
595,212 |
|
|
|
589,294 |
|
|
|
504,713 |
|
|
|
504,185 |
|
|
|
504,185 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
411,338 |
|
|
|
413,754 |
|
|
|
411,226 |
|
|
|
361,619 |
|
|
|
365,718 |
|
|
|
365,718 |
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
130,369 |
|
|
|
119,800 |
|
|
|
116,409 |
|
|
|
88,519 |
|
|
|
83,891 |
|
|
|
83,891 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(6,911 |
) |
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(10,488 |
) |
|
|
(15,957 |
) |
|
|
(18,092 |
) |
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(10,488 |
) |
|
|
(15,957 |
) |
|
|
(15,957 |
) |
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
The impact of this restatement on periods prior to
January 1, 2000 is reflected as a decrease of
$2.8 million to beginning retained earnings as of
January 1, 2000.
|
|
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations set forth in this Item 7 reflects
the restatement of our 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial
statements as discussed below, and all amounts for these prior
periods and prior period comparisons reflect the balances and
amounts on a restated basis. In addition, the following
discussion and analysis reflects certain events that occurred
subsequent to the original due date for filing this Annual
Report, including, but not limited to, the completion of our
refinancing during the third quarter of 2005 and updates to
recently issued accounting standards. The following discussion
and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and
should be read in conjunction with, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and notes. Please see
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking
Statements sections for a discussion of the risks,
uncertainties and assumptions associated with these statements.
Unless otherwise noted, all amounts discussed herein are
consolidated.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We are an established leader in the fluid motion and control
business, with a strong portfolio of pumping systems, valves,
sealing solutions, automation and services in support of the
power, oil and gas, chemical, and other process markets. These
products are mission critical in the movement, control and
protection of fluids in our customers critical processes,
whether it is a refinery, a power generation facility or a
transportation pipeline. Our business model is heavily
influenced by the capital spending of these industries for the
placement
22
of new products in service. The worldwide installed base of our
products is another important source of revenue where our
products are expected to ensure the maximum operating time of
the many key industrial processes. The aftermarket business is
generally a higher margin business and a key component to our
profitable growth.
We have experienced steadily improving conditions in 2004 and
2005 in several core markets, including oil and gas, chemical,
and numerous general industries. The rise and continued
elevation of the price of crude oil and natural gas in
particular has spurred capital investment in the oil and gas
market, resulting in many new projects and expansion
opportunities. Although feedstock costs are increasing in the
chemical market, greater global demand is allowing companies to
pass through pricing and strengthen the global market. The
opportunity to increase our installed base of new products and
drive recurring aftermarket business in future years is a
critical by-product of these market conditions.
We have six key strategies that have been well communicated
throughout the business. One of our key strategies is the
globalization of our business. See Our Strategies
section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis for a
discussion of our six key strategies. We currently have
approximately 14,000 employees in more than 56 countries. We
continue to implement new Quick Response Centers
(QRCs) to be better positioned as near to our
customers as possible for service and support, as a means to
capture this important aftermarket business. Our markets have
improved and we see corresponding growth in our business, much
of which is in non-traditional areas of the world where new oil
and gas reserves have been discovered. We and our customers are
seeing rapid growth in Asia, with China providing a source of
significant project growth. We have a strategy in place to
increase our presence in China to capture the aftermarket
business with our current installed base as well as new projects
and process plant expansions.
Along with ensuring that we have the local capability to sell,
install and service our equipment in remote regions, it becomes
more imperative to continuously improve our global operations.
Our global supply chain capability is being expanded to meet the
global customer demands and ensure the quality and timely
delivery of our products. Significant efforts are underway to
reduce the supply base and drive processes across the divisions
to find areas of synergy and cost reduction. In addition, we are
improving our supply chain management capability to insure we
meet global customer demands. We continue to focus on improving
on-time delivery and quality, while reducing warranty costs
across our global operations through a focused Continuous
Improvement Process (CIP) initiative. The goal of
the CIP initiative is to maximize service fulfillment to our
customers (such as on-time delivery, reduced cycle time and
quality) at the highest internal productivity. This program is a
key factor in our margin expansion plans.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
|
|
|
Restatement of Financial Statements |
We have restated our results for 2002, 2003 and the first
quarter of 2004. The restatement of our annual 2002 consolidated
financial statements, our annual and interim 2003 consolidated
financial statements and our 2004 first quarter consolidated
financial statements is collectively referred to as the
2004 Restatement.
This Annual Report includes our consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then
ended and our restated consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2003 and for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002. We will file restated condensed consolidated
financial statements in an amendment to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2004 at a later date. The impact of
the 2004 Restatement on periods prior to January 1, 2002 is
reflected as a decrease of $13.7 million to beginning
retained earnings as of January 1, 2002. Information in
Item 6. Selected Financial Data, however, is
presented on a restated basis for all of the periods presented,
and the impact of the 2004 Restatement on periods prior to
January 1, 2000 is reflected as a decrease of
$2.8 million to beginning retained earnings as of
January 1, 2000.
The 2004 Restatement corrects errors made in the application of
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP), including errors with respect to inventory
valuation, long-term contract accounting, intercompany accounts,
pension expense, fixed assets and intangibles, financial
derivatives,
23
unclaimed property, tax matters, and other adjustments from
unreconciled accounts. The 2004 Restatement is more fully
described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report. The cumulative net
reduction in net earnings for the 2004 Restatement was
$35.9 million. This includes the $13.7 million
reduction to beginning retained earnings at January 1,
2002, the total $19.1 million reduction in net earnings to
2003 and 2002 results of operations discussed below, and the
$3.1 million reduction in net earnings to the first quarter
of 2004 results of operations.
The impact of the 2004 Restatement decreased sales for 2003 by
$7.4 million and increased sales for 2002 by
$2.6 million, decreased net earnings for 2003 and 2002 by
$8.4 million and $10.7 million, respectively, and
decreased total assets, decreased total liabilities and
increased total shareholders equity at December 31,
2003 by $120.1 million, $121.8 million and
$1.7 million, respectively. The decreases in total assets
and total liabilities are due primarily to the proper netting of
deferred tax assets and liabilities. The net increase in
shareholders equity at December 31, 2003 is due
primarily to an increase in currency translation adjustments,
net of tax included in accumulated other comprehensive loss,
partially offset by the cumulative $32.8 million decrease
in net earnings through December 31, 2003 discussed above.
Diluted net earnings per share decreased by $0.16 and
$0.20 per share for 2003 and 2002, respectively.
As a result of the 2004 Restatement and the new obligations
regarding internal control certification under Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, we were
unable to timely file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) this Annual Report and our
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the
quarterly periods ended June 30, 2004, September 30,
2004, March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and
September 30, 2005. We will continue to work toward
becoming current in our quarterly filings with the SEC as soon
as practicable after the filing of this Annual Report. We will
not, however, be able to timely file with the SEC our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2006.
The 2004 Restatement follows our earlier restatement, announced
on February 3, 2004, of annual results for the years 2000
through 2002 and quarterly results for 2003. We refer to the
prior restatement as the 2003 Restatement. The 2003
Restatement was completed on April 26, 2004 and principally
related to inventory and costs of sales adjustments resulting
primarily from reconciliation issues at two of our reporting
locations due to difficulties associated with the conversion to
new computer systems. The 2003 Restatement also included
corrective adjustments relating to the computation of our income
tax provision, classification of certain balance sheet accounts
and other account reconciliations.
As part of our assessment of internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404 and our 2004 Restatement, we
performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure
that our consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report were prepared in accordance with GAAP. These
procedures included, among other things, expansion of our
year-end closing procedures and dedication of significant
internal resources and external consultants to scrutinize
account analyses and reconciliations at a detailed level. We
conducted expanded assessments of customer shipments at certain
of our locations for revenue cut-off; analyzed certain long-term
sales contracts; analyzed pending litigation matters; analyzed
leasehold improvements for proper classification and
amortization; analyzed our inventory reserves, including our
obsolete and slow moving inventory calculations and estimates;
assessed our
non-U.S. actuarially
determined pension obligations and related liabilities; analyzed
our liabilities associated with unclaimed third party property;
analyzed our equity investments; analyzed our accounts
receivable factoring and securitization arrangements; analyzed
our accounting for financial derivatives; analyzed our purchase
accounting for acquired businesses; performed expanded
procedures on the existence, depreciation and disposals of fixed
assets; performed expanded analyses of our intercompany, income
tax and foreign currency translation accounts; and conducted
site visits at selected locations to perform additional account
balance examinations. As a result of these and other expanded
procedures, management believes that the financial statements
included in this Annual Report present fairly, in all material
respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash
flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP.
We have incurred significant costs in 2005 in connection with
the 2004 Restatement and financial statement audit,
Section 404 assessment and Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) tax audit, which is discussed
24
below. We expect that the professional fees expensed in 2005 for
external advisors relating to the 2004 Restatement and the IRS
audit, together with the fees for the audit of our 2004
consolidated financial statements and internal controls in
compliance with Section 404, will be approximately
$48 million. In 2004, we incurred approximately
$22 million in professional fees related to the 2003
Restatement, 2004 and 2003 financial statement audits,
Section 404 assessment and deferred tax analysis.
|
|
|
Pending SEC Investigations |
On February 4, 2004, we received an informal inquiry from
the SEC requesting the voluntary production of documents and
information related to the 2003 Restatement. On June 2,
2004, we were advised that the SEC issued a formal order of
private investigation into issues regarding the 2003 Restatement
and any other issues that arise from the investigation. We
continue to cooperate with the SEC in this matter.
On February 7, 2006, we received a subpoena from the SEC
regarding goods and services that were delivered to Iraq from
1996 through 2003 during the United Nations Oil-for-Food
Program. We are in the process of reviewing and responding to
the subpoena and intend to cooperate with the SEC. We believe
that other companies in our industry (as well as in other
industries) have received similar subpoenas and requests for
information.
|
|
|
Securities Class Action and Derivative
Lawsuits |
During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, related
putative lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern
District of Texas (the Court), alleging that we
violated federal securities laws. Since the filing of these
cases, which have been consolidated, the lead plaintiff has
amended its complaint several times in the action. The lead
plaintiffs current pleading is the fifth consolidated
amended complaint (Complaint). The Complaint alleges
that federal securities violations occurred between
February 6, 2001 and September 27, 2002 and names as
defendants Mr. C. Scott Greer, our former Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Renée J.
Hornbaker, our former Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, our independent registered
public accounting firm, and Banc of America Securities LLC and
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, which served as underwriters for
two of our public stock offerings during the relevant period.
The Complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a)
of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of
1933. The lead plaintiff seeks unspecified compensatory damages,
forfeiture by Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker of
unspecified incentive-based or equity-based compensation and
profits from any stock sales and recovery of costs. On
November 22, 2005, the Court entered an order denying the
defendants motions to dismiss the Complaint on the
pleadings in their entirety. The case is currently set for trial
on March 27, 2007. We continue to believe that the lawsuit
is without merit and are vigorously defending the case.
On October 6, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was
filed purportedly on behalf of our company in the
193rd Judicial District of Dallas County, Texas. The
lawsuit names as defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker,
and current board members Hugh K. Coble, George T.
Haymaker, Jr., William C. Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston,
Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E. Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O.
Rollans and Christopher A. Bartlett. We are named as a nominal
defendant. Based primarily on the purported misstatements
alleged in the above-described federal securities case, the
plaintiff asserts claims against the defendants for breach of
fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of
corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The plaintiff alleges
that these purported violations of state law occurred between
April 2000 and the date of suit. The plaintiff seeks on behalf
of our company an unspecified amount of damages, injunctive
relief and/or the imposition of a constructive trust on
defendants assets, disgorgement of compensation, profits
or other benefits received by the defendants from us, and
recovery of attorneys fees and costs. We strongly believe
that the suit was improperly filed and have filed a motion
seeking dismissal of the case.
25
We have recently concluded an IRS audit of our U.S. federal
income tax returns for the years 1999 through 2001. Based on its
audit work, the IRS has issued proposed adjustments to increase
taxable income during 1999 through 2001 by $12.8 million, and to
deny foreign tax credits of $2.9 million in the aggregate.
The tax liability resulting from these proposed adjustments will
be offset with foreign tax credit carryovers and other refund
claims, and therefore should not result in a material future
cash payment, pending final review by the Joint Committee on
Taxation. The effect of the adjustments to current and deferred
taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial
statements for periods covered by the 2004 Restatement.
During 2006, the IRS will commence an audit of our
U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2002 through
2004. While we expect that the upcoming IRS audit will be
similar in scope to the recently completed examination, the
upcoming audit may be broader. Furthermore, the preliminary
results from the audit of 1999 through 2001 are not indicative
of the future result of the audit of 2002 through 2004. The
audit of 2002 through 2004 may result in additional tax payments
by us, the amount of which may be material, but will not be
known until that IRS audit is finalized.
In the course of the IRS audit of 1999 through 2001, we have
identified recordkeeping and other material internal control
weaknesses, which caused us to incur significant expense to
substantiate our tax return items and address information and
document requests made by the IRS. We expect to incur similar
expense with respect to the upcoming IRS audit of the years 2002
through 2004.
Due to the recordkeeping issues referred to above, the IRS has
issued a Notice of Inadequate Records for the years 1999 through
2001, and may issue a similar notice for the years 2002 through
2004. While the IRS has agreed not to assess penalties for
inadequacy of records with respect to the years 1999 through
2001, no assurances can be made that the IRS will not seek to
assess such penalties or other types of penalties with respect
to the years 2002 through 2004. Such penalties could result in a
material impact to the consolidated results of operations.
|
|
|
Management Changes and Other Employee Matters |
During the past two years, following resignations of several of
our senior executives, we hired Lewis M. Kling as our Chief
Operating Officer and subsequently appointed him as our Chief
Executive Officer, hired Mark A. Blinn as our Chief Financial
Officer, Richard J. Guiltinan, Jr. as our Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer, Deborah K. Bethune as our Vice
President of Taxes, Thomas L. Pajonas as our President of our
Flow Control Division, Linda P. Jojo as Vice President and Chief
Information Officer, and Joseph R. Pinkston, as our Vice
President of Human Resources, appointed Mark D. Dailey as our
Chief Compliance Officer and Paul W. Fehlman as our
Treasurer, and created and staffed new positions responsible for
accounting policy and procedures, financial reporting, tax
compliance and internal audit. To promote continuity of senior
management, in March 2005 our Board of Directors approved a
Transitional Executive Security Plan, which provides cash and
stock-based incentives to key management personnel to remain
employed by us for the near term. As a result of this plan, we
recorded additional compensation expenses in 2005 of
approximately $3 million. See Transitional Executive
Security Plan in Item 11. Executive
Compensation of this Annual Report for a detailed
discussion on this plan.
During 2005, we made a number of modifications to our stock
plans, including the acceleration of certain restricted stock
grants and outstanding options, as well as the extension of the
exercise period associated with certain outstanding options.
These modifications resulted from severance agreements with
former executives and from our decision to temporarily suspend
option exercises. As a result of the modifications, we recorded
additional compensation expenses in 2005 of approximately
$7 million based upon the intrinsic values of the awards,
primarily related to severance agreements with former
executives, on the dates the modifications were made.
As a result of the severance and executive search payments
related to the management changes of approximately
$2 million, expenses under the Transitional Executive
Security Plan described above and stock
26
compensation expense resulting from the modification of our
stock option plans described above, we recorded total
incremental compensation expense of approximately
$12 million in 2005.
On June 1, 2005, we took action to extend to
December 31, 2006, the regular term of certain options
granted to employees, including executive officers, qualified
retirees and directors, which were scheduled to expire in 2005.
Subsequently, we took action on November 4, 2005, to extend
the exercise date of these options, and options expiring in
2006, to January 1, 2009. We thereafter concluded, however,
that recent regulatory guidance issued under section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code might cause the recipients
extended options to become subject to unintended adverse tax
consequences under section 409A. Accordingly, effective
December 14, 2005, the Organization and Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors partially rescinded, in
accordance with the regulations, the extensions of the regular
term of these options, to provide as follows:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
the regular term of options otherwise expiring in 2005 will
expire 30 days after the options first become exercisable
when our SEC filings have become current and an effective SEC
Form S-8
Registration Statement has been filed with the SEC, and |
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
the regular term of options otherwise expiring in 2006 will
expire on the later of: |
|
|
|
(1) 75 days after the regular term of the option as
originally granted expires, or |
|
|
(2) December 31, 2006 (assuming the options become
exercisable in 2006 for the reasons included in (i) above). |
These extensions are subject to our shareholders approving
certain applicable plan amendments at our next annual
shareholders meeting, tentatively scheduled for April
2006. If shareholders do not approve the plan amendments as
currently posed in our proxy statement, these extension actions
will become void. If such plan amendments are approved at our
next annual shareholder meeting, the extensions will be
considered as a stock modification for financial reporting
purposes subject to the recognition of a non-cash compensation
charge in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment. Our actual charge will be contingent upon many
factors, including future share price volatility, risk free
interest rate, option maturity, strike price, share price and
dividend yield.
The earlier extension actions also extended the option exercise
period available following separation from employment for
reasons of death, disability and termination not for cause or
certain voluntary separations. These separate extensions were
partially rescinded at the December 14, 2005, meeting of
the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, and as so revised are currently effective and not
subject to shareholder approval. The exercise period available
following such employment separations has been extended to the
later of (i) 30 days after the options first became
exercisable when our SEC filings have become current and an
effective SEC
Form S-8
Registration Statement has been filed with the SEC, or
(ii) the period available for exercise following separation
from employment under the terms of the option as originally
granted. This extension is considered for financial reporting
purposes as a stock modification subject to the recognition of a
non-cash compensation change in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, of approximately $1 million in
2005. The extension of the exercise period following separation
from employment does not apply to option exercise periods
governed by a separate separation contract or agreement.
|
|
|
Completion of Refinancing |
In the third quarter of 2005, we refinanced our
12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes and indebtedness
outstanding under our then existing credit facilities with the
proceeds of borrowings under our new credit facilities. Further,
we replaced the letter of credit agreement that guaranteed our
European Investment Bank (EIB) credit facility with
a letter of credit facility issued as part of the new credit
facilities. The new credit facilities are comprised of a term
loan of $600 million expiring in 2012 and a
$400 million revolving line of credit, which can be
utilized to provide up to $300 million in letters of
credit, expiring in 2010, hereinafter collectively referred to
as the New Credit Facilities. We recorded a total
loss on extinguishment of approximately $27 million in
2005. As a result of the refinancing and based on the current
interest rate
27
structure and amounts borrowed, we expect to reduce our interest
expense by more than $20 million on an annual basis. For
additional information on our New Credit Facilities, see the
Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this
Managements Discussion and Analysis and Note 12 to
our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable Securitization |
In October 2004, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries entered
into an accounts receivable securitization whereby we could
obtain up to $75 million in financing by securitizing
certain U.S.-based
receivables with a third party. Our subordinate interest in
receivables sold was $83.5 million at December 31,
2004. In October 2005, we terminated this accounts receivable
securitization facility. In connection with the termination, we
borrowed approximately $48 million under our New Credit
Facilities to repurchase our receivables then held by such third
party. See the Liquidity and Capital Resources
section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis and
Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included
in this Annual Report for further discussion on our
securitization arrangement.
|
|
|
Acquisitions and Divestitures |
In the first quarter of 2005, we made a definitive decision to
sell certain non-core service operations, collectively called
the General Services Group (GSG) and engaged an
investment banking firm to commence marketing. As a result, we
reclassified the operation to discontinued operations in the
first quarter of 2005. Sales for GSG were $116 million in
2004. Total assets at December 31, 2004 ascribed to GSG
were approximately $63 million. We performed an impairment
analysis of long-lived assets on a held and used basis, and
concluded that no impairment was warranted as of
December 31, 2004. GSG was sold on December 31, 2005
for approximately $16 million in gross cash proceeds,
subject to final working capital adjustments, while retaining
approximately $12 million of net accounts receivable. We
used approximately $11 million of the net cash proceeds to
reduce our outstanding indebtedness. In 2005, we recorded an
impairment loss of approximately $31 million related to GSG.
In November 2004, we sold our Government Marine Business Unit
(GMBU), a business within our Flowserve Pump
Division, to Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation for
approximately $28 million, generating a pre-tax gain of
$7.4 million after the allocation of approximately
$8 million in goodwill and $1 million in intangible
assets. GMBU, which provided pump technology and service for
U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers, did not serve
our core market and represented a small part of our total pump
business. We used net proceeds from the disposition of GMBU to
reduce our outstanding indebtedness. As a result of this sale,
we have presented the assets, liabilities and results of
operations of GMBU as discontinued operations for all prior
periods included.
In March 2004, we acquired the remaining 75% interest in
Thompson, Kelly & Lewis Pty. Ltd. (TKL) for
approximately $12 million. TKL is a leading Australian
designer, manufacturer and supplier of centrifugal pumps,
railway track work products and steel castings. Prior to the
acquisition, we held a 25% interest in TKL. As a result of this
acquisition, we strengthened our product offering in the mining
industry, broadened our manufacturing capacity in the Asia
Pacific region and gained foundry capacity. TKL had total assets
of approximately $24 million at the time of this
acquisition and sales of approximately $36 million in 2003.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We believe that we are a world leading manufacturer and
aftermarket service provider of comprehensive flow control
systems. We develop and manufacture precision-engineered flow
control equipment, such as pumps, valves and seals, for critical
service applications that require high reliability. We use our
manufacturing platform to offer a broad array of aftermarket
equipment services, such as installation, advanced diagnostics,
repair and retrofitting.
28
We conduct our operations through three business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pump Division (FPD), for engineered pumps,
industrial pumps and related services; |
|
|
|
Flow Control Division (FCD), for industrial valves,
manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, valve actuators
and controls and related services; and |
|
|
|
Flow Solutions Division (FSD), for precision
mechanical seals and related services. |
Our product portfolio is built on over 50 well-respected
brand names, such as Durco, IDP, Valtek and Durametallic, which
we believe is the most comprehensive in the industry. We sell
our products and services to more than 10,000 companies,
including some of the worlds leading engineering and
construction firms, original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs), distributors and end users.
Our products and services are used in several distinct
industries: oil and gas, chemical, power generation, water
treatment and several other industries that we collectively
refer to as general industries.
Demand for most of our products depends on the level of new
capital investment and maintenance expenditures by our
customers. The level of capital expenditures by our customers
depends, in turn, on the general economic conditions and
conditions in their industries, which affect their
profitability. The level of capital expenditures by our
customers also depends on their liquidity, whether through cash
flows from operations or access to financing.
The oil and gas industry represented approximately 32% of our
sales in 2004. High petroleum prices generally spur additional
investment in upstream petroleum projects, and high prices in
2004 contributed to an increase in bookings for projects,
particularly in Asia, Africa and South America. In the Middle
East, however, the Iraq war and the post-war unrest softened the
level of capital investments and demand for our products and
services, notwithstanding the historically high crude oil
prices. In contrast to their effect on the upstream petroleum
projects, high crude oil prices often reduce the demand for our
products and services from crude oil refineries and natural gas
processors as they seek to take advantage of favorable refining
margins by operating at high levels of capacity utilization and
deferring maintenance. Clean fuel regulations, particularly in
the U.S., led to some project business from crude oil refiners.
The profitability of such projects, however, is typically lower
than for maintenance related products and services.
While high oil and gas prices are generally good for our oil and
gas customers, they are generally adverse for chemical
companies, since crude oil and natural gas are critical inputs
in the manufacturing of their products. In 2004, the price of
natural gas in the U.S. increased almost 25% from 2003.
This significantly affected our chemical customers, who faced
high feed stock costs. However, greater global demand is
allowing companies to pass through pricing and strengthen the
global market. If the economy improves, and demand for
chemical-based products increases, we expect to see some
improvement in the demand for our products in the chemical
industry. Further, this industrys improved profitability
could spur new investment in other parts of the world such as
Asia, and we would expect to benefit from those investments as
well. In 2004, the chemical industry represented approximately
18% of our sales.
Increased natural gas prices also diminished the profitability
of many power generators that in recent years made significant
investments in power plants that generate electricity from
natural gas. While they have been able to recover a portion of
their higher costs through rate increases, their liquidity is
still challenged due to overinvestment in these power facilities
in recent years. However, a number of nuclear power generators
are planning significant maintenance activities. We have seen an
increase in our orders for this area and it has been a positive
contributor to 2005 orders, sales and earnings. In addition,
there are several coal-fired power plants planned for the U.S.,
and we are actively pursuing the flow control opportunities for
these projects. The revenue opportunity for our products at a
coal-fired plant typically can be three times that of a natural
gas power plant. The power industry represented approximately
16% of our sales in 2004.
Worldwide demand for fresh water and water treatment continues
to create demand for new facilities or for upgrades of existing
systems, many of which require products that we offer,
especially pumps. We believe
29
that we are a global leader in the desalination market, which is
an important source of fresh water in the Mediterranean area and
the Middle East. This is a significant market for our pumps and
valve actuation products. In 2004, the water market represented
approximately 6% of our sales.
General industries represents a variety of different businesses,
including mining, pulp and paper, food and beverage, steel and
heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC),
none of which individually represents more than 5% of total
sales in 2004. General industries represented approximately 28%
of our sales in 2004. Some of these businesses, such as mining,
pulp and paper and steel, appear to have experienced troughs in
2004. Other industries, such as food and beverage, were
relatively stable. HVAC was somewhat weaker due to a decline in
the commercial real estate market. In 2005, some of these
businesses that are tied to the economic recovery, particularly
mining, have shown improvement.
Our customers include engineering contractors, OEMs, end users
and distributors. Sales to engineering contractors and OEMs are
typically for large project orders, as are certain sales to
distributors. Project orders generally have lead times in excess
of three months. Project orders provide product to our customers
either directly or indirectly for their new construction
projects or facility enhancement projects.
The quick turnaround business, which we also refer to as the
book and ship business, is defined as orders that are received
from the customer (booked) and shipped within three months
of receipt. They are typically for more standard products, parts
or services. Each of our three segments generates this type of
business.
We use our manufacturing platform to offer a broad array of
aftermarket equipment services, such as installation, advanced
diagnostics, repair and retrofitting. Timelines of delivery,
quality and the proximity of service centers are important
considerations for our aftermarket products and services. In
geographic regions where we are positioned to provide a quick
response, customers have traditionally relied on us, rather than
our competitors, for aftermarket products relating to our highly
engineered and customized products. However, aftermarket
competition for standard products has increased. Price
competition tends to be more significant for OEMs than
aftermarket services and generally has been increasing. In the
sale of aftermarket products and services, we benefit from our
large installed base of pumps and valves, which requires
maintenance, repair and replacement parts.
Our reporting of trends by product type, customer type and
business type are based upon analytical review of individual
operational results and our knowledge of their respective
businesses, as we do not formally track revenues by any of these
categories. These trends are analyzed as a secondary reporting
mechanism that is not derived directly from our general ledger
system.
Our overarching objective is to grow our position as an
integrated solutions provider in the flow control industry.
Sustainable, profitable growth is being driven using six
strategies that are communicated throughout our company. These
strategies include: organic growth, globalization, process
excellence, portfolio management, organizational capability and
technology. The key elements of our strategies are outlined
below.
Organic growth is a key initiative to grow our revenues. Our
goal is to grow revenues through the development of new products
and services and customer partnering initiatives to maximize the
capture of the aftermarket business.
We seek to capture additional market share by creating
win-win opportunities for us and our customers
through sourcing and maintenance alliance programs pursuant to
which we provide all or an agreed portion of a customers
parts and servicing needs. Our customer alliances enable us to
develop long-term professional relationships with our customers
and serve as an effective platform for introducing new products
and services to our customers and generating additional sales.
We additionally seek to continue leveraging our substantial
installed pump, seal and valve base to expand our aftermarket
services business, as customers increasingly use third-party
aftermarket service providers like
30
us to reduce their fixed costs and improve profitability. The
aftermarket services business provides us with a steady source
of revenues and cash flows at higher margins than original
equipment sales and allows us to be in frequent contact with our
customers, building our knowledge of customer needs and
providing cross-selling opportunities. We have been installing
Flow Solutions QRCs globally to provide the immediate
parts, service and technical support required to effectively
manage and win the aftermarket business from our installed base.
New product and service development is driven through our
Product Management organization working in concert with
engineering, operation and sales. Our goal is to increase our
revenues from new products and services developed over the last
five years. Our new product development process has made
significant progress in demonstrating a pipeline of new and
modified products and services. We expect our research and
development costs to increase beginning in 2006 to support our
goal of increased revenues from new products and services.
The globalization initiative of our business has several facets
that include:
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding our global presence to capture business outside our
traditional geographic market areas (China, Russia, South
America and Africa), |
|
|
|
Utilizing low cost sourcing opportunities to remain competitive
in the global economy, and |
|
|
|
Attract and retain the global intellectual capital required to
support our global growth plans in the new geographical areas. |
We believe there are attractive OEM opportunities in
international markets, particularly in South America and
Asia Pacific, and we intend to continue to leverage our global
presence to further penetrate these markets. Our recent
successes in these markets include contracts worth more than
$40 million for the supply of pumps and related equipment
to the Nanhai petrochemicals project in China, and contracts
worth more than $12 million for the Shenhua coal
liquefaction project in China. In our aftermarket services
business, we seek to strategically add sites as our customers
and our customer base grow in order to provide our customers
with rapid response, fast delivery and onsite field repair.
We are focused on shifting, as appropriate, certain of our
manufacturing and engineering functions to, and increasing our
supply of raw materials and components from, lower cost areas
such as India, China, Mexico, South America and Eastern Europe.
In 2004, these areas accounted for approximately 17% of our
direct material spending, compared to approximately 5% in 2001.
We are also focused on utilizing supply chain management to
reduce our procurement costs, including by expanding purchases
through raw material auctions, further consolidating and
standardizing our purchasing to receive higher quantity-based
discounts and creating procurement alliances.
In addition, we have expanded our China presence with additional
sales people, new management, and growth plans that include
acquisition or development of new capabilities that will enhance
the penetration of programs in China for oil and gas and power
projects as well as provide a base for the export of products.
The process excellence initiative encapsulates ongoing programs
that include:
|
|
|
|
|
driving improved customer fulfillment across our company through
metrics such as on-time delivery, cost reduction, quality, cycle
time reduction and warranty reduction; and |
|
|
|
continuing to develop a culture of continuous improvement that
delivers maximum productivity and cost efficiencies, implements
consistent processes across our company and ensures our future
success as an integrated company. |
We seek to increase our operational efficiency through our CIP
initiative. It utilizes tools such as lean manufacturing, Six
Sigma methodology and constraint management to improve quality
and processes, reduce product cycle times and lower costs.
Recognizing that our employees are our most valuable resource in
31
achieving our operational excellence goals, we have instituted
broad CIP training, and to date over 800 of our employees are
CIP certified or trained black belts or green
belts, deployed on CIP projects throughout our company. As
a result of our CIP initiatives, we have developed and
implemented processes to shorten our engineering and
manufacturing cycle times, improve on-time delivery and service
response time, lower inventory levels and otherwise reduce
costs. We have also experienced success in applying best
practices achieved in any one of our businesses to our
other businesses, and continue to look for opportunities to
apply successful practices across our businesses.
We seek to continue to improve our working capital utilization,
with a particular focus on improving the management of our
accounts receivable and inventory. See further discussion in the
Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
The continued management of our portfolio of products and
services is critical to our companys success. We will
continue to pursue selective acquisitions and rationalize our
portfolio of products and services to ensure alignment with our
shareholders and customers.
We intend to continue to evaluate acquisition and investment
opportunities as we seek to broaden our product portfolio and
operational capabilities and to expedite our expansion into
faster growing Asian, African and South American markets. In
that regard, our additional investment in TKL in March 2004
strengthened our product offering in the mining industry and
broadened our manufacturing capabilities in the Asia Pacific
region, which includes China, Japan, Singapore, Korea, India,
Australia, New Zealand and Thailand.
We are seeking to divest operations that we consider non-core to
our overall business, such as operations that do not serve our
core customer base or provide limited synergies with our other
businesses. For example, as discussed above, in November 2004 we
sold GMBU and in December 2005 we sold GSG.
|
|
|
Organizational Capability |
There are several elements to building an enhanced
organizational capability:
|
|
|
|
|
The development of a deeper talent pool through training and
cross-divisional and functional assignments allows us the
flexibility as we grow and expand the organization to fill
positions internally. Career learning and development is
critical to the building of an improved global organizational
capability for the future. |
|
|
|
The need to capture the intellectual capital in our workforce
and that of our customers and share it within our company is
considered a competitive advantage, and |
|
|
|
Building an organization with improved compliance to mandatory
and recommended processes and procedures and implementing the
information systems that ensure compliance will be the backbone
of our culture as we move forward. |
A multi-year agreement with the LRN Company was completed in
2005 to distribute electronic learning packages in multiple
languages for the Flowserve Business Code of Conduct and other
compliance programs globally throughout our company. This will
be expanded to include export compliance, and regulatory
compliance (U.S. and foreign), as well as other programs around
harassment and employee behaviors. The emphasis on ethics and
compliance was significantly strengthened in 2005 as a core
organizational capability with a new Chief Compliance Officer.
In 2005, we installed a Learning Management System
(LMS) that allowed the development and tracking of
the delivery of electronic learning systems. This system allows
us to track our employees compliance and policy
understanding through electronic means. LMS also permits the
on-line enrollment for customer training as a means to share and
improve their intellectual capital.
Additional initiatives aimed at change management are evidenced
in such programs as our Standardization, Teamwork And Results
(STAR) initiative. STAR is aimed at developing and
implementing an
32
information systems architecture that will be employed over a
multi-year period. It will upgrade older enterprise resource
planning applications to enable standardization of our processes
and controls.
The infusion of new product technologies has become a core
requirement as we look to improve the development of new
products and services. Our internal goal is to improve the
percentage of new products as a function of revenue over the
next five years. The investment in technology will continue to
increase in 2006. A cross-divisional technology council will
ensure that the technologies developed are available for wide
use across all divisions to maximize the investments.
The development of an intelligent pumping system showcases the
technologies available to maximize uptime and proactively
identify anomalies before they become major issues. We were the
sponsor for a national energy summit in 2005 that brought
together major companies in the pursuit of energy management
initiatives. The technologies available to decrease the energy
usage for our customers are being infused into new services for
customers.
OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In general, consolidated results of operations and FCD segment
results of operations for 2004 and 2003 were higher than 2002
due to the impact of our acquisition of Invensys flow
control division (IFC), which was completed on
May 2, 2002. The results for IFC subsequent to that date
are included in our consolidated results and the results for our
Flow Control Division. Pro forma 2002 results of operations
reflect the results of operations as if the IFC acquisition had
occurred as of January 1, 2002. The IFC acquisition is
discussed in further detail in the Restructuring and
Acquisition Related Charges section of this
Managements Discussion and Analysis. The amounts discussed
for 2003 and for 2002 reflect the 2004 Restatement discussed
above and in Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report.
As a result of selling our GMBU, an FPD business, in November
2004, we treated this disposition as a discontinued operation
and reclassified the financial information reported for prior
periods. Income from discontinued operations, net of tax,
decreased $0.3 million in 2004, compared to a decrease of
$0.7 million in 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Sales
|
|
$ |
2,638.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,372.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,228.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,385.4 |
|
Sales in 2004 increased by $151.8 million, or 6.4%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $114 million,
as compared with 2003. Currency benefits are the result of the
strengthening of international currencies, particularly the
Euro, against the U.S. dollar. The increase in sales
includes new sales of $35.2 million resulting from our
acquisition of TKL in March 2004, increased activities of our
core markets served, including oil and gas, power and chemicals,
and strong growth in the Asia Pacific region.
Sales in 2003 decreased by $9.6 million, or 0.4%, excluding
currency benefits of approximately $154 million, as
compared with 2002. Currency benefits are the result of the
strengthening of international currencies, particularly the
Euro, against the U.S. dollar. Sales increased
approximately $141 million due to a full years
inclusion of IFC sales, but were more than offset by lower sales
of quick turnaround business into the chemical and general
industrial sectors attributable to the U.S. economic
slowdown and, to a lesser extent, the European recession in the
latter half of the year. Additionally, sales of replacement
parts and services to the Middle East and Venezuela decreased in
2003 due to post-war unrest and political unrest. Sales into the
water market also declined in 2003. Sales in 2003 declined 7.0%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $154 million,
as compared to pro forma 2002, reflecting weakness in the
chemical, power and general industrial markets in 2003 for valve
products and services.
33
Sales to international customers, including export sales from
the U.S., were approximately 63% of sales in 2004, compared with
60% of sales in 2003 and 55% of sales in 2002. IFCs
proportionately higher mix of international operations
contributed to the 2003 increase. Sales into the Asia Pacific
region were 13%, 9% and 12% in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Sales into Europe, Middle East and Africa
(EMA) were 40%, 40% and 33% in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Excluding currency translation impacts, we believe
that our sales to international customers will continue to
increase as a percentage of total sales, as we believe our
highest revenue growth opportunities are in Asia, South America
and Africa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Bookings
|
|
$ |
2,657.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,423.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,184.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,326.2 |
|
Backlog (at period end)
|
|
|
836.4 |
|
|
|
818.2 |
|
|
|
733.7 |
|
|
|
733.7 |
|
We define a booking as the receipt of a customer order that
contractually engages us to perform activities on behalf of our
customer with regard to manufacture, service or support.
Bookings in 2004 increased by $118.9 million, or 4.9%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $115 million,
as compared with 2003. Increased bookings are due to increases
in the oil and gas market, one of our primary served markets,
which was spurred by increased crude oil prices.
Bookings in 2003 increased by $78.4 million, or 3.6%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $161 million,
as compared with 2002. This increase is due to the impact from
the IFC acquisition and an increase in upstream oil and gas
projects, particularly in Asia, West Africa and Europe. Bookings
in 2003 were unfavorably impacted by reduced demand for products
and services to chemical, power and general industrial
customers. Additionally, bookings in 2003 into the Middle East
and Venezuela were lower due to the political and economic
turmoil in those regions. Bookings in 2003 were approximately
2.7% lower than pro forma 2002, excluding currency benefits of
approximately $161 million.
Backlog represents the accumulation of uncompleted customer
orders. We shipped approximately 97% of our backlog at
December 31, 2004 during 2005. Backlog at December 31,
2004 decreased by $14.5 million, or 1.8%, excluding
currency benefits of approximately $33 million, as compared
with 2003. The decrease is due to improved customer delivery
time. Backlog at December 31, 2003 increased by
$18.3 million, or 2.5%, excluding currency benefits of
approximately $66 million, as compared with 2002. The
increase primarily reflects the IFC acquisition.
|
|
|
Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Gross profit
|
|
$ |
778.8 |
|
|
$ |
705.4 |
|
|
$ |
666.3 |
|
|
$ |
719.1 |
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
Gross profit margin of 29.5% in 2004 decreased slightly as
compared with 2003. Gross profit margin in 2004 was positively
impacted by operational improvements attributable to our CIP
initiative, which resulted in cost savings, synergies and a
higher mix of aftermarket business, which generally has a higher
margin. These were offset by a $14.1 million charge to cost
of sales for the increase in the reserve for obsolete and slow
moving inventory in our Flow Control Division, as discussed
below, and an $14.1 million increase in incentive
compensation as compared to 2003.
Gross profit margin of 29.7% in 2003 was slightly lower than
2002 due primarily to decreased sales in our Flowserve Pump
Division, as discussed below. The positive impact of a full year
of the IFC acquisition, in addition to the cost savings
synergies resulting from the acquisition, were offset by a less
profitable product mix. The product mix contained lower volumes
of higher margin parts and quick turnaround business,
34
including lower volumes of historically more profitable chemical
and industrial pumps, industrial valves and service related
activities. The quick turnaround business is generally related
to more standard products, parts and services. The volume of
this business decreased due to reduced profitability of
customers in chemical, general industrial, gas pipeline, power
and refining industries.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
(SG&A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
SG&A
|
|
$ |
623.0 |
|
|
$ |
540.8 |
|
|
$ |
478.2 |
|
|
$ |
514.1 |
|
SG&A as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
21.6 |
% |
SG&A in 2004 increased by $61.0 million, or 11.3%,
excluding currency effects of approximately $21 million, as
compared with 2003. The increase is due to a $29.9 million
increase in annual incentive compensation and a
$21.7 million increase in professional and consulting fees
related primarily to the 2003 Restatement, 2004 and 2003
financial statement audits and compliance with Section 404.
SG&A in 2003 increased by $33.4 million, or 7.0%,
excluding currency effects of approximately $29 million, as
compared with 2002. The increase is primarily attributable to a
$21.6 million increase in legal fees and expenses resulting
from increased legal accruals for anticipated lawsuit
settlements.
|
|
|
Integration and Restructuring Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Integration expense
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
Restructuring expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
We did not incur integration or restructuring expenses in 2004.
The integration and restructuring expenses in 2003 and 2002
relate to the integration of IFC into the Flow Control Division.
We largely completed our restructuring and integration programs
related to IFC during 2003, except for final severance payments
and payments for other exit activities primarily related to
European integration activities. See Restructuring and
Acquisition Related Charges below for further discussion
on integration and restructuring expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Operating income
|
|
$ |
155.8 |
|
|
$ |
141.9 |
|
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
182.7 |
|
Operating income as percentage of sales
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Operating income in 2004 increased by $0.3 million, or
0.2%, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$14 million, as compared with 2003. As discussed above,
SG&A costs increased in 2004 as a result of increased
incentive compensation and increased professional and consulting
fees. The increase in SG&A costs is offset by the reduction
in integration and restructuring costs.
Operating income in 2003 decreased by $44.0 million, or
26.2%, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$18 million, as compared with 2002. The decrease is
primarily attributable to SG&A that increased as a result of
the full year impact of the IFC acquisition and legal expenses
discussed above. Operating income in 2003 decreased 32.3% from
pro forma 2002, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$18 million, primarily due to increased legal expenses in
2003.
35
|
|
|
Interest Expense and Loss on Repayment of Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
81.0 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
95.5 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Interest expense decreased $3.2 million, or 3.8%, in 2004,
and $11.3 million, or 11.8%, in 2003 due primarily to lower
prevailing interest rates and reduced debt levels associated
with optional and scheduled debt paydowns since the acquisition
of IFC, as well as lower borrowing interest rate spreads
associated with the renegotiation of our revolving credit
facility in April 2002. At December 31, 2004 approximately
69% of our debt was at fixed rates, including the effects of
$210.0 million of notional interest rate swaps.
Interest income decreased $2.2 million in 2004 as compared
to 2003 due to lower average cash balances. Interest income
increased $1.6 million in 2003 as compared to 2002 due to
higher cash balances.
During 2004, we incurred a charge of $2.7 million on debt
repayments and extinguishment related to the accelerated
write-off of unamortized prepaid financing fees resulting from
$327.9 million of optional and mandatory debt prepayments
triggered by the GMBU divestiture, the issuance of the EIB
credit facility and receivables securitization. Under the 2000
Credit Facilities (as described in the Liquidity and
Capital Resources section of this Managements
Discussion and Analysis), we were required to use the proceeds
of asset sales and new debt issuance, among other things, to pay
down the principal amount outstanding under the credit
facilities. In addition to mandatory repayments, we paid
optional prepayments of principal from excess cash generated
from operations. In 2003, we incurred losses of
$1.3 million related to the accelerated write-off of
unamortized prepaid financing fees resulting from
$163.1 million of optional debt prepayments throughout the
year.
|
|
|
Other (Expense) Income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
$ |
(14.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
Other expense, net increased $9.9 million in 2004 from
$4.5 million in 2003 due primarily to increases in
unrealized losses on forward contracts that did not qualify for
hedge accounting, partially offset by foreign currency
transaction gains. Other expense, net increased
$3.4 million in 2003, from $1.1 million in 2002 due
primarily to a $1.3 million decrease in unrealized gains on
forward contracts that did not qualify for hedge accounting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
39.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
47.6 |
% |
The 2004 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to Extraterritorial Income
(ETI) exclusion benefits of $4.9 million and
$23.3 million of net tax impact from foreign operations
resulting from approximately $85 million in foreign
earnings repatriation to pay down U.S. debt and increases in
worldwide tax reserves. We increased total reserves
approximately $11 million, primarily for
non-U.S. exposures
related to debt equity structures and transfer pricing.
The 2003 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to ETI exclusion benefits of
$2.5 million, changes in valuation allowances of
$5.5 million primarily relating to foreign tax credits and
the net impact of non U.S. operations of $2.2 million.
36
The 2002 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to ETI exclusion benefits of
$4.7 million and higher non-U.S. statutory tax rates.
We have operations in European and Asian countries that provide
various tax incentives. In 2003, we were granted an indefinite
preferential tax rate of approximately 10% in Switzerland for
certain sales and marketing activities. During 2004, we received
a 5 year, 10% tax rate in Singapore for income in excess of a
prescribed base amount generated from certain regional
headquarter activities, subject to certain employment and
investment requirements. In India, we were granted 100% tax
exemptions for profits derived from export sales and certain
manufacturing operations in prescribed areas for a period of 10
years. The Indian tax exemptions expire in 2011 and 2008,
respectively.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the 2004 Act) was signed into law, creating a
temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate
accumulated income earned outside the U.S. at an effective tax
rate of 5.25%, versus the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%.
During 2004, we repatriated approximately $46 million (as
part of the $85 million discussed above) pursuant to a
dividend reinvestment plan as described by the 2004 Act. We have
not recognized the lower tax rate on these dividends in our
financial statements due to uncertainties surrounding the
interpretation of the 2004 Act. To the extent this uncertainty
is favorably resolved in a future reporting period, the benefit
associated with these dividends will be recognized in that
period.
The 2004 Act also provides for a phase out of the existing ETI
exclusion for foreign export sales, as it was viewed to be
inconsistent with the international trade protocols by the
European Union. This phase out provides that the benefit for our
otherwise qualifying export sales in 2005 and 2006 will be
limited to approximately 80% and 60%, respectively. As a
replacement for the loss of the ETI export incentive, the 2004
Act provides a deduction for income from qualified domestic
production activities, which will be phased in from 2005 through
2010. The impact of this manufacturing deduction to our future
tax rate has not yet been quantified. Under the guidance of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. FAS
109-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 109 to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the tax deduction on
qualified production activities will be treated as a special
deduction, as described in SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. As such, the special
deduction will be reported in the period in which the deduction
is claimed on our tax return.
We expect our effective tax rate to be significantly lower in
2005 as compared with 2004 due to lower levels of dividend
repatriation from our low taxed foreign subsidiaries. Our
effective tax rate is based upon current earnings, estimates of
future taxable earnings for each domestic and international
location and the estimated impact of tax planning strategies.
Changes in any of these and other factors, including our ability
to utilize foreign tax credits and net operating losses or
results from tax audits, could impact the tax rate in future
periods. As of December 31, 2004 we have foreign tax
credits of approximately $10 million, expiring in 2010
through 2012 against which we recorded no valuation allowances.
Additionally, we have recorded net deferred tax assets for
foreign net operating losses and other deferred tax assets of
approximately $16 million, most of which have an indefinite
expiration period. Should we not be able to utilize all or a
portion of these credits and losses, our effective tax rate
would be negatively impacted.
|
|
|
Net Earnings and Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in millions, except per share) | |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
Net earnings per share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Average diluted shares
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
Income from continuing operations decreased $22.9 million
in 2004 to $20.2 million, or $0.36 per diluted share.
In addition to the factors discussed above regarding operating
income, 2004 income from continuing
37
operations was also impacted by increases in the effective tax
rate, as compared to 2003, and losses on derivative contracts.
Income from continuing operations increased $10.4 million
in 2003 to $43.1 million, or $0.78 per diluted share.
In addition to the factors discussed above regarding operating
income, 2003 income from continuing operations was also impacted
by decreased tax expense, as compared to 2002. Earnings per
share in 2003 were negatively impacted by a 5.9% higher average
diluted share count.
The 2004 increase in average diluted shares reflected the
issuance of stock awards and the dilutive effects of an increase
in our stock price. The 2003 increase in average diluted shares
reflects the full year weighted average impact from the equity
offering completed in April 2002 to finance the IFC acquisition.
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
68.3 |
|
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (expense) declined to
$15.1 million in 2004, which reflects a slight decrease in
pension plan asset returns and a decline in currency translation
adjustments, as compared to 2003. Other comprehensive income
(expense) improved to income of $68.3 million in 2003
from an expense of $11.0 million in 2002, which reflects
the strengthening of the Euro, improved pension plan asset
returns and improved hedging results.
We conduct our business through three business segments that
represent our major product areas. We evaluate segment
performance and allocate resources based on each segments
operating income excluding special items, such as restructuring
and integration costs related to the IFC acquisition. We believe
that special items, while indicative of efforts to integrate IFC
in our business, do not reflect ongoing business results. We
believe investors and other users of our financial statements
can better evaluate and analyze historical and future business
trends if special items are excluded from each segments
operating income. Operating income before special items is not a
recognized measure under GAAP and should not be viewed as an
alternative to, or a better indicator of, GAAP measures of
performance. Effective January 1, 2004, we realigned
certain small sites between segments. Accordingly, the segment
information for all periods presented herein has been reported
under our revised organizational structure. See Note 18 to
our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report for further discussion of our segments. The key operating
results for our three business segments, FPD, FCD and FSD are
discussed below.
|
|
|
Flowserve Pump Division Segment Results |
Through FPD, we design, manufacture, distribute and service
engineered and industrial pumps and pump systems, replacement
parts and related equipment, principally to industrial markets.
FPD has 27 manufacturing facilities worldwide, of which nine are
located in North America, 10 in Europe, and eight in
South America and Asia. FPD also has 65 service centers,
which are either free standing or co-located in a manufacturing
facility. In 2004, FPD had sales of $1.3 billion, of which
approximately 43% were from oil and gas, 20% power, 10% water,
8% chemical and 19% general industries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pump Division |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Bookings
|
|
$ |
1,339.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,207.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,123.8 |
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,329.8 |
|
|
|
1,164.6 |
|
|
|
1,181.5 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
341.3 |
|
|
|
282.9 |
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
Segment operating income
|
|
|
110.1 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
|
|
|
121.3 |
|
Segment operating income as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
Backlog (at period end)
|
|
|
575.8 |
|
|
|
569.6 |
|
|
|
495.5 |
|
38
Bookings in 2004 increased by $74.0 million, or 6.1%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $58 million,
as compared with 2003. The increase is due to additional
bookings of $40.5 million resulting from our acquisition of
the remaining 75% of TKL in March 2004, and an increase in
aftermarket bookings. Aftermarket bookings represented 46.3% of
total FPD bookings in 2004 as compared with 44.3% in 2003, as
our primary served markets for the oil and gas and chemicals
industries experienced growth and operated at near capacity
levels due to continued increases in crude oil prices.
Bookings in 2003 decreased by $1.3 million, or 0.1%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $85 million,
as compared with 2002. Our EMA bookings increased approximately
7.2%, but was offset by a decline in North and South America
bookings in 2003 of 2.5% and 19.4%, respectively, due to several
large non-recurring projects that were substantially completed
in 2002.
Sales in 2004 increased by $105.8 million, or 9.1%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $59 million as
compared with 2003. Sales improved in all regions and were most
active in our core oil and gas markets. Water projects,
especially those focusing on desalination, improved and chemical
markets remained strong despite increasing feedstock prices. Of
the 9.1% increase, 3.0% was directly attributable to increased
sales from TKL. Offsetting these favorable sales was decreased
business in our North American water market, where our sales
were $14.5 million lower than the previous year as FPD was
more selective in bidding opportunities.
Sales in 2003 decreased by $95.4 million, or 8.1%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $79 million as
compared with 2002. Sales from North and South America were
lower by $81.9 million and $12.6 million,
respectively. In North America, lower sales in 2003 were
primarily attributable to a reduction in large project business
in the U.S. and Canada. These declines in large project business
were mostly offset by currency translation benefits of
approximately $79 million.
Gross profit margin increased to 25.7% in 2004 as compared with
24.3% in 2003. This increase is primarily a result of increased
sales, which favorably impacts our absorption of fixed costs, a
higher mix of historically more profitable general industrial
products and services and increased productivity. These were
partially offset by an increase in incentive compensation of
$7.4 million included in cost of sales.
Gross profit margin decreased to 24.3% in 2003 as compared with
26.7% in 2002. This is primarily a result of the decrease in
sales, which unfavorably impacts our absorption of fixed costs,
as well as lower aftermarket shipments into the Middle East and
Venezuela.
Operating income in 2004 increased by $17.2 million, or
20.0%, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$7 million, as compared with 2003. In addition to the
increased sales and gross profit margin discussed above,
operating income also increased due to $2.9 million in
operating income resulting from the acquisition of TKL in March
2004 and a gain of $8.5 million from the involuntary
conversion of patterns that were lost in a fire at one of our
foundries. These were slightly offset by an increase in
incentive compensation of $7.4 million included in cost of
sales as discussed above and an incremental increase in
incentive compensation of $9.1 million included in SG&A.
Operating income in 2003 decreased by $44.4 million, or
36.6%, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$9 million, as compared with 2002. The decrease is
primarily a result of the decrease in gross profit margin
discussed above.
|
|
|
Flow Control Division Segment Results |
Through FCD, we design, manufacture and distribute industrial
valves, manual valves, control valves, nuclear valves, actuators
and related equipment, and provide a variety of flow
control-related services. We manufacture valves and actuators
through five major manufacturing plants in the U.S. and 17 major
manufacturing plants outside the U.S. We have 51 valve
service centers, of which 34 are related to GSG, that are
generally free standing and principally based in the
U.S. FCD had 2004 sales of $954.5 million, of which
approximately 26% were from chemical, 15% power, 16% oil and
gas, 3% water and 40% general industries. As a result of our
2002 acquisition of the flow control division of Invensys plc,
we believe we are one of the worlds leading suppliers of
valves and related products and services to the chemical
industry. Based on independent industry sources, we believe that
we are the second largest industrial valve supplier on a global
basis. We
39
believe that our comprehensive portfolio of valve products and
services is a key source of our competitive advantage. Further,
our focus on service and severe corrosion and erosion
applications is a key competency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flow Control Division | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Bookings
|
|
$ |
967.8 |
|
|
$ |
890.5 |
|
|
$ |
747.5 |
|
|
$ |
889.7 |
|
Sales
|
|
|
954.5 |
|
|
|
881.4 |
|
|
|
727.5 |
|
|
|
884.8 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
273.0 |
|
|
|
262.0 |
|
|
|
204.2 |
|
|
|
257.0 |
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
Segment operating income (before special items)
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
Integration expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Restructuring expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustment for inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (after special items)
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Segment operating income (after special items) as a percentage
of sales
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Backlog (at period end)
|
|
|
227.6 |
|
|
|
215.5 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
Bookings in 2004 increased by $31.9 million, or 3.6%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $45 million,
as compared with 2003. The increase is a result of strength in
the chemical, oil and gas, and general services segments of the
market. Bookings in 2003 increased by $80.8 million, or
10.8%, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$62 million, as compared with 2002. The increase is
primarily due to the full year impact of the IFC acquisition of
$155 million partially offset by weaknesses in the
chemical, power and general industrial markets. Approximately
70% of FCD bookings are in these markets, which declined in both
2003 and 2002. Bookings in 2003 declined 6.9%, excluding
currency benefits of approximately $62 million, as compared
to pro forma 2002 bookings, reflecting weakness in the chemical,
power and general industrial markets in 2003.
Sales in 2004 increased by $29.6 million, or 3.4%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $43 million,
as compared with 2003. The increase is attributable to many of
the major valve markets beginning to recover from several years
of decline. Growth was particularly strong in the Asia Pacific
region. Sales volumes in 2004 were positively affected by
increased customer demand for valve products and services in the
power, chemical and general industrial sectors of the business.
Sales in 2003 increased by $92.3 million, or 12.7%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $62 million,
as compared with 2002. The increase is primarily due to full
year impact of the IFC acquisition of approximately
$141 million. This increase is partially offset by a
decrease in volumes due to weakness in the power and chemicals
markets. Sales in 2003 declined 7.3%, excluding currency
benefits of approximately $62 million, as compared to pro
forma 2002 sales, reflecting reduced customer demand for valve
products and services in the chemical, power and general
industrial markets in 2003.
Gross profit margin decreased to 28.6% in 2004 as compared to
29.7% in 2003 resulting primarily from a $14.1 million
charge to cost of sales for the increase in the reserve for
obsolete and slow moving inventory. Our inventory reserve
increased in 2004 primarily as a consequence of increases in
reserves for inventory products acquired in the IFC acquisition.
Our product marketing strategies for certain acquired IFC
product lines did not produce the results we had originally
anticipated, which resulted in recognition of an additional
reserve for obsolete and slow moving inventory. We continue to
monitor inventory levels and movements and, based on our
experience, may record changes to the inventory reserves, if
needed. The decrease in 2004 gross profit margin is also due to
a $2.7 million increase in annual incentive compensation
included in cost of sales. Gross profit margin increased to
29.7% in 2003 as compared to 28.1% in 2002 due to approximately
$10 million in synergy benefits from the IFC acquisition
reflected in cost of sales. For 2003 these benefits are
partially offset by the impact of lower unit volumes and an
unfavorable mix of product sales. Gross profit margin of 29.7%
was greater than pro forma 2002 gross profit margin of 29.0% due
to the realization of synergy benefits in 2003 from the IFC
acquisition.
40
Operating income (before special items) in 2004 decreased by
$6.0 million, or 9.8%, excluding currency benefits of
approximately $4 million, as compared with 2003. The
decrease results primarily from a $14.1 million charge to
income for the increase in the provision for obsolete and slow
moving inventory as discussed above. The decrease is also due to
the $2.7 million increase in incentive compensation
included in cost of sales discussed above and an incremental
$7.6 million increase in incentive compensation included in
SG&A. Operating income (before special items) in 2003
increased by $12.9 million, or 30.6%, excluding currency
benefits of approximately $6 million, as compared with
2002. The increase primarily reflects a full year effect of the
IFC acquisition. The improvement in 2003 also reflects estimated
synergy benefits from the IFC acquisition of approximately
$10 million reflected in cost of sales as discussed above,
and incremental synergy benefits of approximately
$5 million reflected in SG&A. Special items during 2003
and 2002 are all associated with the acquisition and integration
of IFC into FCD. Compared to the pro forma 2002 operating income
(before special items), 2003 operating income (before special
items), excluding currency benefits of approximately
$6 million, increased 2.2%.
|
|
|
Flow Solutions Division Segment Results |
Through FSD, we design, manufacture and distribute mechanical
seals, sealing systems and parts and provide related services,
principally to industrial markets. FSD has seven manufacturing
operations, four of which are located in North America, two are
in Europe and one is in Singapore. FSD operates 62 QRCs
worldwide, including 24 such sites in North America, 14 in
Europe, and the remainder located in South America and
Asia. FSD had 2004 sales of $394 million, of which
approximately 30% were from oil and gas, 27% chemical and 43%
general industries. Our ability to turn around engineered seal
products within 72 hours from the customers request,
through design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and
delivery, is our major source of competitive advantage. Based on
independent industry sources, we believe that we are the second
largest mechanical seal supplier on a global basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flow Solutions Division |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Bookings
|
|
$ |
395.0 |
|
|
$ |
361.1 |
|
|
$ |
343.2 |
|
Sales
|
|
|
394.0 |
|
|
|
357.7 |
|
|
|
348.6 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
170.3 |
|
|
|
160.1 |
|
|
|
151.0 |
|
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
44.8 |
% |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
Segment operating income
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
Segment operating income as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Backlog (at period end)
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Bookings in 2004 increased by $22.6 million, or 6.2%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $11 million,
as compared with 2003. Bookings in 2003 increased by
$3.4 million, or 1.0%, excluding currency benefits of
approximately $15 million, as compared with 2002. The
bookings improvement in both years reflects FSDs emphasis
on end user business and its success in establishing longer-term
customer alliance programs, including fixed fee alliances,
despite weakened market conditions. Fixed fee alliances are
contractual agreements with customers wherein the customer pays
us a fixed amount each period (usually monthly) for the term of
the agreement. In return for this fixed cost, the customer is
entitled to new seals, repairs, upgraded equipment, replacements
and maintenance services as defined within the scope of each
agreement. We believe that this emphasis combined with
heightened levels of service, reliability and innovation, has
contributed to an increase in market share in 2004, 2003 and
2002. We are currently implementing this end user strategy in
our other divisions.
Sales in 2004 increased by $25.2 million, or 7.0%,
excluding currency benefits of approximately $11 million,
as compared with 2003. As discussed above, continuous focused
improvements in our end user customer business, as well as
meeting our strategic growth initiatives, led FSD to increased
shipments in all regions in 2004. Sales in 2003 decreased by
$4.9 million, or 1.4%, excluding currency benefits of
approximately $14 million, as compared with 2002. The
decrease is due to slightly weaker business conditions.
41
Gross profit margin for FSD decreased to 43.2% in 2004 as
compared to 44.8% in 2003 primarily due to a $4.1 million
increase in annual incentive compensation included in cost of
sales, increases in worldwide metals pricing, and a charge to
cost of sales resulting from an increase in the reserve for slow
moving inventory. Gross profit margin increased to 44.8% in 2003
as compared to 43.3% in 2002 primarily as a result of a
$2.4 million decrease in annual incentive compensation
included in cost of sales. The improvement in 2003 also reflects
the impact of CIP initiative projects, which resulted in cost
savings, and increases in plant efficiencies resulting from
bringing previously outsourced production in-house.
Operating income in 2004 decreased by $3.7 million, or
5.0%, excluding currency benefits of approximately
$2 million, as compared with 2003. The decrease in
operating income is primarily a result of the decrease in gross
profit margin discussed above and an increase in SG&A,
resulting from an increase in annual incentive compensation of
$4.1 million. Operating income in 2003 increased by
$5.9 million, or 9.1%, excluding currency benefits of
approximately $3 million, as compared to 2002. The
improvement in 2003 primarily reflects the increase in gross
profit margin discussed above. Operating income as a percentage
of sales increased to 20.7% in 2003 from 18.5% in 2002 due
primarily to cost of sales savings resulting from the CIP
initiative.
RESTRUCTURING AND ACQUISITION RELATED CHARGES
|
|
|
Restructuring Costs IFC |
In conjunction with the IFC acquisition during 2002, we
initiated a restructuring program designed to reduce costs and
eliminate excess capacity by closing 18 valve facilities,
including 10 service facilities, and reducing sales and related
support personnel. Our actions, some of which were approved and
committed to in 2002 with the remaining actions approved and
committed to in 2003, resulted in a gross reduction of
847 positions and a net reduction of 633 positions. Net
position eliminations represent the gross positions eliminated
from the closed facilities offset by positions added at the
receiving facilities, which are required to produce the products
transferred into the receiving facilities.
We established a restructuring program reserve of
$11.0 million upon acquisition of IFC, and increased the
reserve by a total of $9.6 million in the latter half of
2002. We recognized additional accruals of $4.5 million in
2003 for this program, primarily related to the closure of
certain valve service facilities and the related reductions in
workforce. Based upon revised forecasts of costs to be incurred,
we recognized a reduction of $2.3 million to the IFC
restructuring reserve during 2004. Since the portion of the
reserve affected by the estimate was created through goodwill
recognition, the reduction to the reserve was recorded via a
decrease to goodwill. Cash expenditures against the accrual were
$3.4 million in 2004, $11.6 million in 2003 and
$4.2 million in 2002. The remaining accrual of
$3.6 million reflects payments made in 2005 and beyond for
severance obligations due to terminated personnel in Europe of
$2.1 million as well as lease and other contract
termination and other exit costs of $1.5 million.
Cumulative costs of $7.2 million associated with the
closure of our facilities through December 31, 2003, have
been recognized as restructuring expense in operating results,
whereas cumulative costs associated with the closure of IFC
facilities of $17.9 million, including related deferred
taxes of $6.2 million, became part of the purchase price
allocation of the transaction. The effect of these closure costs
increased the amount of goodwill otherwise recognizable as a
result of the IFC acquisition.
42
The following illustrates activity related to the IFC
restructuring reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Severance | |
|
Exit Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Balance created on June 5, 2002
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
Additional accruals
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Cash expenditures
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
Additional accruals
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
Cash expenditures
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
Cash expenditures
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also incurred acquisition-related integration expense in 2003
and 2002 in conjunction with the acquisition of IFC, which is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in | |
|
|
millions) | |
Personnel and related costs
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
Transfer of product lines
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFC integration expense
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash expense
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
Non-cash expense
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFC integration expense
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition-related activities resulted in integration costs
as categorized above and further defined as follows. Personnel
and related costs include payroll, benefits, consulting fees,
and retention and integration performance bonuses paid to our
employees and contractors for the development, management and
execution of the integration plan. Transfer of product lines
includes costs associated with the transfer of product lines as
well as realignment required in the receiving facilities. Asset
impairments reflect the loss on disposal of property, plant and
equipment at the IFC facilities closed and disposal of inventory
for discontinued product lines when the remaining facilities
were combined. The other category includes costs associated with
information technology integration, legal entity consolidations,
legal entity name changes, signage, new product literature and
other. None of these other integration expense items
individually exceeded $0.5 million.
|
|
|
Remaining Restructuring and Integration Costs
IFC |
We have largely completed our restructuring and integration
programs related to IFC, except for payments for certain
outstanding European activities. We expect to incur no
additional restructuring and integration costs in connection
with these programs. Payments from the restructuring accrual
will continue into 2005 and beyond due to the timing of
severance obligations committed to in Europe.
43
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
267.5 |
|
|
$ |
181.3 |
|
|
$ |
249.0 |
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(557.2 |
) |
Net cash flows (used) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(250.6 |
) |
|
|
(162.8 |
) |
|
|
327.6 |
|
Cash generated by operations and borrowings available under our
existing revolving line of credit are our primary sources of
short-term liquidity. Our sources of operating cash include the
sale of our products and services and the reduction of our
working capital, particularly accounts receivable and
inventories. Our cash balance at December 31, 2004 was
$63.8 million, compared to $53.5 million in 2003 and
$49.0 million in 2002.
The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities in
2004 primarily relates to a net reduction in working capital,
primarily as a result of increases in accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and retirement obligations and other liabilities.
The decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities in
2003 as compared to 2002 primarily relates to pension
contributions, income taxes and outflows related to the IFC
integration. In 2003, contributions to U.S. pension plans
were $27.0 million, compared with $4.6 million in
2002. We increased our pension contributions in 2003 as a result
of an increase in the number of employees due to the acquisition
of IFC and increased funding requirement due to the
underperformance of underlying plan assets in 2002.
Contributions to our U.S. pension plan were
$15.3 million in 2004. In 2002, we also benefited from
receipt of a $23.2 million U.S. income tax refund
compared with $4.9 million received in 2003. Cash outflows
related to the IFC integration were $27.2 million in 2003
compared with $19.3 million in 2002.
Working capital reductions provided operating cash flow of
$152.5 million in 2004, compared with $70.1 million in
2003 and $120.6 million in 2002. The reduction in working
capital for 2004 reflects increases of $46.6 million in
accounts payable due to deferred payment of invoices at year-end
in 2004, and $32.1 million in accrued liabilities due
primarily to an increase of approximately $44 million in
the bonus accrual for 2004. The reduction in working capital for
2004 also reflects our continued emphasis on improving accounts
receivable collections and reducing inventory. Accounts
receivable reductions in 2004 generated $39.4 million of
cash flow compared with $23.8 million of cash flow in 2003
and $67.8 million in 2002. The improvement in accounts
receivable primarily reflects improved collections and the
impact of the accounts receivable securitization of
$48.7 million discussed below. In addition, incremental
factoring of certain
non-U.S. receivables
used $3.4 million in 2004, and contributed
$15.5 million in 2003 and $32.1 million in 2002.
Our goal for days sales receivables outstanding
(DSO) is 60 days. For the fourth quarter of
2004, we achieved a DSO of 66 days as compared to
70 days for the same period in 2003. Including the effect
of the securitization, DSO improved to 60 days at
December 31, 2004. For reference purposes based on 2004
sales, an improvement of one day could provide approximately
$8 million in cash. Inventory reductions contributed
$25.5 million of cash flow for 2004 compared with
$29.4 million of cash flow for 2003 and $36.4 million
in 2002. The majority of the inventory reduction was in
project-related work in process inventory required to support
shipments of products in backlog, offset in part by an increase
in raw materials. As a result of inventory reductions, inventory
turns were 5.2 times at December 31, 2004, compared with
4.5 times and 4.4 times at December 31, 2003 and 2002
respectively. For reference purposes based on 2004 data, an
improvement of one turn could yield approximately
$65 million in cash.
Cash outflows for investing activities were $14.1 million
and $26.6 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively, due
primarily to capital expenditures. Cash outflows of
$557.2 million in 2002 primarily represent the acquisition
of IFC for $535 million, net of cash acquired.
Cash outflows for financing activities were $250.6 million
in 2004 compared with $162.8 million in 2003 and with
inflows of $327.6 million in 2002. The change in 2004
results primarily from increased mandatory
44
repayments of long-term debt triggered by the GMBU divestiture,
the issuance of the EIB credit facility and accounts receivables
securitization. The change in 2003 results from the absence of
equity offerings in 2003 as compared with 2002.
Our cash needs for the next 12 months are expected to be
substantially similar to 2004, except for a decrease in debt
payments required under our New Credit Facilities partially
offset by an increase in pension contributions. We believe cash
flows from operating activities, combined with availability
under our revolving line of credit and our existing cash
balances, will be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash flow
needs for the next 12 months. However, cash flows from
operations could be adversely affected by economic, political
and other risks associated with sales of our products,
operational factors, competition, fluctuations in foreign
exchange rates and fluctuations in interest rates, among other
factors. We believe that cash flows from operating activities
and our expectation of continuing availability to draw upon our
revolving credit agreements are also sufficient to meet our cash
flow needs for the periods exceeding the next 12 months.
We generated $6.8 million and $16.9 million of cash
flow related to the exercise of employee stock options in 2004
and 2002, respectively, which is reflected in financing
activities of the consolidated statement of cash flows. Amounts
generated from the exercise of employee stock options in 2003
were not significant.
|
|
|
Payments for Acquisitions |
On May 2, 2002, we completed our acquisition of IFC for a
contractual purchase price of $535 million, subject to
adjustment pursuant to the terms of the purchase and sale
agreement. A reduction of $2.2 million was agreed to and
settled during the fourth quarter of 2003, which yielded a final
contractual purchase price of $532.8 million. The reduction
related to the finalization of balances at the date of
acquisition for cash, related party activity and tax payments.
In addition, we incurred $6.1 million of costs associated
with consummation of the acquisition, including investment
banking, legal, actuarial and accounting fees. The total
purchase price including such costs was $538.9 million.
After acquiring IFC, one of the worlds foremost
manufacturers of valves, actuators and associated flow control
products, we believe that we are the worlds second largest
manufacturer of valves. We financed the acquisition and
associated transaction costs by issuing 9.2 million shares
of common stock in April 2002 for net proceeds of approximately
$276 million and through new borrowings under our senior
secured credit facilities.
The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on estimated fair value at the date of
the acquisition. We substantially completed the purchase price
allocation of IFC during 2003 and expect no further revisions.
These final allocations included $45 million for
amortizable intangibles, $25 million of indefinite lived
intangible assets and $304 million recorded as goodwill.
The operating results of IFC have been included in the
consolidated statements of operations from May 2, 2002, the
date of acquisition.
We regularly evaluate acquisition opportunities of various
sizes. The cost and terms of any financing to be raised in
conjunction with any acquisition, including our ability to raise
economical capital, is a critical consideration in any such
evaluation.
In March 2004, we acquired the remaining 75% interest in TKL for
approximately $12 million. We paid for the acquisition with
cash generated by operations. Prior to the acquisition, we held
a 25% interest in TKL. As a result of this acquisition, we
strengthened our product offering in the mining industry,
broadened our manufacturing capacity in the Asia Pacific region
and gained foundry capacity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
45
Capital expenditures were funded primarily by operating cash
flows and, to a lesser extent, by bank borrowings. For each of
the three years, capital expenditures were invested in new and
replacement machinery and equipment, information technology and
acquisition integration activities, including structures and
equipment required at receiving facilities. In each year,
capital expenditures were less than depreciation expense due to
excess capacity and the upgrading of equipment through
integration processes. Capital expenditures in 2004 include
approximately $5 million for the purchase of a building we
previously leased for the manufacture of valves. In 2005, our
capital expenditures focused on new product development,
information technology infrastructure and cost reduction
opportunities and are expected to be approximately
$45 million to $50 million. Certain of our facilities
may face capacity constraints in the foreseeable future, which
may lead to higher capital expenditure levels.
Debt, including capital lease obligations, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Term Loan Tranche A:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar Tranche, interest rate of 5.02% in 2004 and
3.74% in 2003
|
|
$ |
76,240 |
|
|
$ |
200,004 |
|
|
Euro Tranche, interest rate of 4.69% in 2004 and 4.65% in 2003
|
|
|
13,257 |
|
|
|
12,292 |
|
Term Loan Tranche C, interest rate of 5.20% in 2004 and
4.00% in 2003
|
|
|
233,851 |
|
|
|
465,473 |
|
Senior Subordinated Notes net of discount, interest rate of
12.25%:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar denominated
|
|
|
187,004 |
|
|
|
186,739 |
|
|
Euro denominated
|
|
|
87,484 |
|
|
|
80,998 |
|
EIB loan, interest rate of 2.39%
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable securitization and factoring obligations
|
|
|
17,635 |
|
|
|
4,543 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
701,844 |
|
|
|
950,801 |
|
Less amounts due within one year
|
|
|
44,098 |
|
|
|
71,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt due after one year
|
|
$ |
657,746 |
|
|
$ |
879,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 8, 2000, we entered into senior credit facilities
comprised of a $275.0 million Tranche A term loan, a
$475.0 million Tranche B term loan and a
$300.0 million revolving line of credit, hereinafter
collectively referred to as our 2000 Credit
Facilities. In connection with our acquisition of IFC in
May 2002, we amended and restated our 2000 Credit Facilities to
provide for (1) an incremental $95.3 million
Tranche A term loan and (2) a $700.0 million
Tranche C term loan. The proceeds of the incremental
Tranche A term loan and the Tranche C term loan were
used to finance a portion of the acquisition purchase price and
to repay in full the Tranche B term loan.
Borrowings under our 2000 Credit Facilities bore interest at a
rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate
(which was based on the prime rate most recently announced by
the administrative agent under our 2000 Credit Facilities or the
Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2) London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), plus, in the case of
Tranche A term loan and loans under the revolving line of
credit, an applicable margin determined by reference to the
ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, and, in the case
of Tranche C term loan, an applicable margin based on our
long-term debt ratings.
46
On August 12, 2005, we entered into New Credit Facilities
comprised of a $600.0 million term loan maturing on
August 10, 2012 and a $400.0 million revolving line of
credit, which can be utilized to provide up to
$300.0 million in letters of credit, expiring on
August 12, 2010. We used the proceeds of borrowings under
our New Credit Facilities to refinance our 12.25% Senior
Subordinated Notes and indebtedness outstanding under our 2000
Credit Facilities. Further, we replaced the letter of credit
agreement that guaranteed our EIB credit facility
(described below) with a letter of credit issued as part of the
New Credit Facilities.
Borrowings under our New Credit Facilities bear interest at a
rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate
(which is based on greater of the prime rate most recently
announced by the administrative agent under our New Credit
Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or
(2) LIBOR plus an applicable margin determined by reference
to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, which as
of September 30, 2005 was 1.75% for LIBOR borrowings.
On April 14, 2004, we and one of our European subsidiaries,
Flowserve B.V., entered into an agreement with EIB, pursuant to
which EIB agreed to loan us up to
70 million,
with the ability to draw funds in multiple currencies, to
finance in part specified research and development projects
undertaken by us in Europe. Borrowings under the EIB credit
facility bear interest at a fixed or floating rate of interest
agreed to by us and EIB with respect to each borrowing under the
facility. Loans under the EIB credit facility are subject to
mandatory prepayment, at EIBs discretion, upon the
occurrence of certain events, including a change of control or
prepayment of certain other indebtedness. In addition, the EIB
credit facility contains covenants that, among other things,
limit our ability to dispose of assets related to the financed
project and require us to deliver to EIB our audited annual
financial statements within 30 days of publication. In
August 2004, we borrowed $85 million at a floating interest
rate based on 3-month
U.S. LIBOR that resets quarterly. As of December 31,
2004, the interest rate was 2.39%. The maturity of the loan is
June 15, 2011, but may be repaid at any time without
penalty.
Additional discussion of our 2000 Credit Facilities, New Credit
Facilities, and EIB credit facility is included in Note 12
to our consolidated financial statements, included in this
Annual Report.
We have entered into interest rate and currency swap agreements
to hedge our exposure to cash flows related to the credit
facilities discussed above. These agreements are more fully
described in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated Notes |
In 2000, we issued a principal amount of $290 million
U.S. dollar tranche and
100 million
Euro tranche of our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes, with
an original issue discount resulting in a 12.50% yield. In 2001,
we repurchased $101.5 million of the US dollar tranche
notes and
35.0 million
of the Euro tranche notes with the proceeds of an equity
offering. As discussed above, in the third quarter of 2005 we
repaid all of the remaining Senior Subordinated Notes, together
with accrued interest thereon and a prepayment penalty, using
the proceeds of borrowings under our New Credit Facilities.
|
|
|
Debt Prepayments and Repayments |
The following summarizes our repayment of indebtedness
obligations under our 2000 Credit Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Scheduled repayment
|
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
Mandatory repayment
|
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional prepayment
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
163.1 |
|
|
|
170.0 |
|
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
47
Under our 2000 Credit Facilities, we were required to use the
proceeds of asset sales and new debt issuance, among other
things, to pay down the principal amount outstanding. In
addition to mandatory repayments, we made optional prepayments
of principal from excess cash generated from operations.
Further, under our 2000 Credit Facilities, we were required to
use a portion of our excess cash flow generated from operations
during any fiscal year to repay term loans outstanding
thereunder. Based on the annual calculations performed as of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, no repayments were due
with respect to excess cash flow for the years then ended due to
the high level of optional debt prepayment during the respective
years.
The loans under our New Credit Facilities are subject to
mandatory repayment with, in general:
|
|
|
|
|
100% of the net cash proceeds of asset sales; and |
|
|
|
Unless we attain and maintain investment grade credit ratings: |
|
|
|
|
|
75% of our excess cash flow, subject to a reduction based on the
ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA; |
|
|
|
50% of the proceeds of any equity offerings; and |
|
|
|
100% of the proceeds of any debt issuances (subject to certain
exceptions). |
We may prepay loans under our New Credit Facilities in whole or
in part, without premium or penalty.
We incurred $9.3 million in fees related to the new
facilities, of which $0.3 million were expensed in 2005.
Prior to the refinancing, we had $11.8 million of
unamortized deferred loan costs related to the 2000 Credit
Facilities and the Senior Subordinated Notes. Based upon the
final syndicate of financial institutions for the New Credit
Facilities, we expensed $10.5 million of these unamortized
deferred loan costs in 2005. In addition to the total loan costs
of $10.8 million that were expensed, we recorded a charge
of $16.5 million for premiums paid to call the Senior
Subordinated Notes, for a total loss on extinguishment of
$27.3 million recorded in 2005. The remaining
$9.0 million of fees related to the new facilities were
capitalized and combined with the remaining $1.3 million of
previously unamortized deferred loan costs for a total of
$10.3 million in deferred loan costs included in other
assets, net. These costs will be amortized over the term of the
New Credit Facilities.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable Securitization |
In October 2004, Flowserve US Inc., one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, and Flowserve Receivables Corporation
(FRC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Flowserve US
Inc., entered into a receivables purchase agreement
(RPA) with two third party financial institutions
whereby FRC could obtain up to $75 million in financing on
a revolving basis by securitizing certain
U.S.-based trade
receivables.
To obtain financing, Flowserve US Inc. transferred eligible
receivables to FRC, which was formed solely for this accounts
receivable securitization program. Pursuant to the RPA, FRC then
sold undivided purchaser interests in these receivables to the
third party financial institutions. Flowserve US Inc. continued
to service the receivables for a servicing fee of 0.5% of the
average net receivable balance. No servicing liability was
recognized at December 31, 2004 because the amount was
immaterial due to the short term average collection period of
the securitized receivables. FRC has no recourse against
Flowserve US Inc. for failure of the debtors to pay when due. As
of December 31, 2004, FRC had secured $60 million in
financing under the program. The proceeds were used to repay
$16 million and $44 million of Tranche A and
Tranche C bank term loans, respectively, outstanding under
our 2000 Credit Facilities. At the time the purchaser interests
were sold, $48.7 million of the receivables transferred to
FRC were removed from FRCs financial statements, and FRC
further recorded short-term debt of $11.3 million.
Borrowings under the RPA in excess of $11.3 million are
excluded from our debt balance as presented in the consolidated
balance sheets, but included for purposes of covenant
calculations under the 2000 Credit Facilities.
On October 31, 2005, we terminated the RPA. In connection
with this, we borrowed approximately $48 million under our
New Credit Facilities and repurchased outstanding receivable
interests from the third
48
party financial institutions. See additional discussion of our
accounts receivable securitization program in Note 12 to
our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable Factoring |
Through our European subsidiaries, we engage in non-recourse
factoring of certain accounts receivable. The various agreements
have different terms, including options for renewal and mutual
termination clauses. Under our 2000 Credit Facilities, such
factoring was generally limited to $50 million, based on
due date of the factored receivables. The limit on factoring was
raised to $75 million under the New Credit Facilities
entered into in August 2005. See additional discussion of our
accounts receivable factoring program in Note 6 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
Debt Covenants and Other Matters |
Our 2000 Credit Facilities that have now been refinanced, the
letter of credit facility guaranteeing our obligations under the
EIB credit facility, and the agreements governing our domestic
receivables program each required us to deliver to creditors
thereunder our audited annual consolidated financial statements
within a specified number of days following the end of each
fiscal year. In addition, the indentures governing our
12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes required us to timely file
with the SEC our annual and quarterly reports. As a result of
the 2004 Restatement and the new obligations regarding internal
controls attestation under Section 404, we did not timely
issue our financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the quarterly periods ended
June 30, 2004, September 30, 2004, March 31,
2005, June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005, and were
unable to timely file with the SEC our Annual Report on
Form 10-K and
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for such
periods. Prior to the refinancing of our 2000 Credit Facilities
and the replacement of the standby letter of credit facility, we
obtained waivers thereunder extending the deadline for the
delivery of our financial statements to the lenders under our
2000 Credit Facilities and the letter of credit facility
guaranteeing the EIB credit facility and, as a result of such
waivers, were not in default due to the delay in the delivery of
our financial statements. We did not seek or obtain a waiver
under the indentures governing our 12.25% Senior
Subordinated Notes with respect to our inability to timely file
with the SEC the required reports and, prior to the refinancing
of our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes, were in default
thereunder. However, our debt is properly classified as
non-current in our balance sheet as we have demonstrated our
ability and intent to obtain new long-term credit facilities in
August 2005.
We have determined, utilizing our restated financial
information, that on multiple occasions we did not comply with
some of the financial covenants in our 2000 Credit Facilities,
which are no longer in effect. We believe that we could have
undertaken readily available actions to maintain compliance or
obtained a waiver or amendment to the 2000 Credit Facilities had
the new restated results then been known. We have complied with
all other non-financial covenants under our 2000 Credit
Facilities. We believe that these covenant violations have no
impact on our New Credit Facilities and that the amounts
outstanding under the 2000 Credit Facilities are properly
classified in our consolidated balance sheet.
Our New Credit Facilities contain covenants requiring us to
deliver to lenders leverage and interest coverage financial
covenants and our audited annual and unaudited quarterly
financial statements. Under the leverage covenant, the maximum
permitted leverage ratio steps down beginning with the fourth
quarter of 2006, with a further step-down beginning with the
fourth quarter of 2007. Under the interest coverage covenant,
the minimum required interest coverage ratio steps up beginning
with the fourth quarter of 2006, with a further
step-up beginning with
the fourth quarter of 2007. Compliance with these financial
covenants under our New Credit Facilities is tested quarterly,
and we have complied with the financial covenants as of
September 30, 2005. Delivery of the December 31, 2004
audited consolidated financial statements is required by
December 31, 2005 and delivery of the December 31,
2005 audited financial statements by May 30, 2006. We have
received a waiver from our lenders to deliver the
December 31, 2004 audited financial statements by
February 28, 2006. Further, we are required to furnish
within 50 days of the end of each of the first three
quarters of each year our consolidated balance sheet, and
related statements of operations, shareholders equity and
cash flows.
49
Our New Credit Facilities also contain covenants restricting our
and our subsidiaries ability to dispose of assets, merge,
pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock and
indebtedness, incur indebtedness and guarantees, create liens,
enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses, make certain
investments or acquisitions, enter into sale and leaseback
transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates, make
capital expenditures, engage in any business activity other than
our existing business or any business activities reasonably
incidental thereto. With the waiver for delivery of the
December 31, 2004 audited financial statements, we are
currently in compliance with all debt covenants under the New
Credit Facilities.
COMMON STOCK OFFERINGS
During 2002, we financed the acquisition of IFC and associated
transaction costs with a combination of bank financing and net
proceeds of approximately $276 million received from the
issuance of 9.2 million shares of common stock during April
2002.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The following table presents a summary of our contractual
obligations at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Within | |
|
|
|
Beyond | |
|
|
|
|
1 Year(3) | |
|
2-3 Years | |
|
4-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Long-term debt(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
|
$ |
99.2 |
|
|
$ |
198.1 |
|
|
$ |
359.5 |
|
|
$ |
700.4 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
|
Purchase obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
84.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
|
Non-inventory
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(1) |
After giving effect to the refinancing, the termination of our
accounts receivable securitization agreement, an optional
prepayment of approximately $20 million that we made in
December 2005, and a mandatory repayment of
$10.9 million that we made in January 2006 using the
net proceeds from the sale of GSG, our scheduled long-term debt
obligations are $1.5 million due within one year,
$5.7 million due within two to three years,
$11.4 million due within four to five years, and
$635.4 million due beyond five years. |
|
(2) |
Interest payments on scheduled long-term debt obligations under
our New Credit Facilities are estimated to be $55.0 million
due within one year, $86.4 million due within two to three
years, $84.4 million due within four to five years, and
$92.4 million due beyond five years. These estimates are
based on fixed or synthetically fixed rate debt and floating
rate debt assuming a base rate of three-month LIBOR as of
December 31, 2005. |
|
(3) |
We have no minimum pension funding requirements in 2005, but we
made voluntary contributions to our U.S. pension plan of
approximately $43 million in 2005. |
The following table presents a summary of our commercial
commitments at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment Expiration by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Within | |
|
|
|
Beyond | |
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
2-3 Years | |
|
4-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Standby letters of credit/bank guarantees
|
|
$ |
120.7 |
|
|
$ |
71.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
200.2 |
|
Surety bonds
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
We expect to satisfy these commitments through performance under
our contracts.
50
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OBLIGATIONS
Our pension plans and postretirement benefit plans are accounted
for using actuarial valuations required by
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions. We consider accounting for retirement
plans critical because management is required to make
significant subjective judgments about a number of actuarial
assumptions, including discount rates, salary growth, long-term
return on plan assets, retirement, turnover, health care cost
trend rates and mortality rates. Depending on the assumptions
and estimates used, the pension and postretirement benefit
expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a
material effect on reported earnings. In addition, the
assumptions can materially affect accumulated benefit
obligations and future cash funding.
We and certain of our subsidiaries have defined benefit pension
plans and defined contribution plans for regular full-time and
part-time employees. The defined benefit pension plan in the
U.S. is the Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan and the
defined contribution plan is the Flowserve Corporation
Retirement Savings Plan.
Approximately 64% of total defined benefit pension plan assets
and 55% of benefit obligations are related to the U.S. plan
as of December 31, 2004. The assets for the U.S. plan
are held in a single trust with a common asset allocation.
Unless specified otherwise, the references in this section are
to total plans (i.e., the U.S. plan together with
international plans).
Benefits under our defined benefit pension plans are based
primarily on years of credited service and on participants
compensation. Assets under our defined benefit plans consist
primarily of equity and fixed-income securities. At
December 31, 2004, the fair market value of plan assets for
our defined benefit plans increased to $276.3 million from
$233.0 million at December 31, 2003. Assets were
allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plan | |
|
Non-U.S. Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Asset Category |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
52% |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
31% |
|
|
|
35% |
|
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
48% |
|
Other
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Non-U.S. plans in
2003 were adjusted to reflect certain
non-U.S. pension
plans that were not actuarially determined under GAAP in prior
years. |
The projected benefit obligation for our defined benefit pension
plans was $488.7 million and $420.3 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
None of our common stock is directly held by these plans.
We sponsor defined benefit postretirement health care plan
covering most current retirees and a limited number of future
retirees in the U.S. This plan provides for medical and
dental benefits and is administered through insurance companies.
We fund the plan as benefits are paid, such that the plans hold
no assets in any period presented. Accordingly, we have no
investment strategy or targeted allocations for plan assets. The
benefits under the plan are not available to new employees or
most existing employees.
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for our
defined benefit postretirement health care plan was
$88.7 million and $92.2 million as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
|
Accrual Accounting and Significant Assumptions |
Consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 87, we
account for pension benefits using the accrual method,
recognizing pension expense before the payment of benefits to
retirees. The accrual method of
51
accounting for pension benefits necessarily requires actuarial
assumptions concerning future events that will determine the
amount and timing of the benefit payments.
Our key assumptions used in calculating our cost of pension
benefits are the discount rate, the rate of compensation
increase, and the expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets. We, in consultation with our actuaries, evaluate the key
actuarial assumptions and other assumptions used in calculating
the cost of pension benefits, such as discount rate, expected
return on plan assets for funded plans, life expectancy of
participants and assumed rate of wage increases, and determine
such assumptions on December 31 of each year to calculate
liability information as of that date and pension expense for
the following year. Depending on the assumptions used, the
pension expense could vary within a range of outcomes and have a
material effect on reported earnings. In addition, the
assumptions can materially affect accumulated benefit
obligations and future cash funding. Actual results in any given
year may differ from those estimated because of economic and
other factors.
The assumed discount rate used for determining future pension
obligations is based on indices of
AA-rated corporate
bonds, except for two foreign locations which use government
bonds. The assumed rate of compensation increase used for
determining future pension obligations reflects an estimate of
the change in actual future compensation levels due to general
price levels, productivity, seniority and other factors.
In 2004, net pension expense for our defined benefit pension
plans included in income from continuing operations was
$22.9 million compared to $20.0 million in 2003 and
$14.2 million in 2002. The postretirement benefit expense
for the postretirement health care plan was $3.8 million in
2004 compared to $4.1 million in 2003 and $5.5 million
in 2002.
The following are assumptions related to our defined benefit
pension plans for the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plan |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
3.04 |
% |
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term rate of return on assets
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
6.86 |
% |
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
The following provides a sensitivity analysis of alternative
assumptions on the U.S. qualified and aggregate
non-U.S. pension
plans and U.S. postretirement plans.
Effect of Discount Rate Changes and Constancy of Other
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase | |
|
Decrease | |
|
|
of 0.5% | |
|
of 0.5% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
U.S. defined benefit pension plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on pension expense
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
Effect on Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
Non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on pension expense
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
Effect on Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
15.6 |
|
U.S. Postretirement medical plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on postretirement medical expense
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
Effect on Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
52
Effect of Changes in the Expected Return on Assets and
Constancy of Other Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase | |
|
Decrease | |
|
|
of 0.5% | |
|
of 0.5% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
U.S. defined benefit pension plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on pension expense
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
Effect on Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on pension expense
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
Effect on Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
U.S. Postretirement medical plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on postretirement medical expense
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Effect on Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
As discussed below, GAAP provides that differences between
expected and actual returns are recognized over the average
future service of employees.
At December 31, 2004, we lowered our assumed discount rate
for U.S. plan from 6.25% to 5.75% and our average rate for
non-U.S. plans
from 5.5% to 5.1%. We maintained our average assumed rate of
compensation increase at 4.5% and 3.0% for U.S. and
non-U.S. plans,
respectively. The reduction in the discount rate had the effect
of increasing the present value of benefit obligations and,
accordingly, will have the effect of increasing pension expense
for 2005.
Following many years of strong performance, the global equity
market fell sharply in 2000 through 2002 (e.g., the S&P 500
declined by a cumulative 37.6%). This was reversed in 2003
through 2004 (e.g., the S&P 500 rose by a cumulative
42.7%). We reduced the expected rate of return on U.S. plan
assets from 8.75% in 2004 to 8.25% for 2005. This revision will
have the effect of increasing pension expense for 2005.
We expect that the net pension expense for our defined benefit
pension plans included in earnings before income taxes will be
approximately $4.5 million higher in 2005 than the
$22.9 million in 2004, reflecting, among other things, the
decrease in the assumed discount rate. We expect the 2005
expense for the postretirement health care plan to be
$1.0 million.
We have used the same assumed discount rates of 5.75% and 6.25%
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, in calculating
our cost of pension benefits and our cost of other
postretirement benefits for U.S. plans.
U.S. health care costs for the retiree population are
assumed to increase 7.0% in 2005 and then trend down to an
expected increase of 5.0% per year by 2007. If actual costs
are higher than those assumed, this will likely put modest
upward pressure on our expense for retiree health care.
On December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003 (the Medicare Act). The effects of the Medicare
Act are reflected in 2004 net periodic postretirement
benefit cost (a reduction of $0.7 million) and accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2004 (a
reduction of $4.5 million).
|
|
|
Delayed Recognition of Actuarial Gains and Losses |
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, unrecognized net actuarial
losses for our defined benefit plans were $132.2 million
and $113.8 million, respectively, based on the fair market
value of plan assets. These unrecognized net actuarial losses
reflect in large part the steady reduction of the
weighted-average discount rate over the years.
SFAS No. 87 provides for delayed recognition of
actuarial gains and losses, including amounts arising from
changes in the estimated plan benefit obligations due to changes
in the assumed discount rate, differences between the actual and
expected returns on plan assets, and other assumption changes.
53
SFAS No. 87 requires that unrecognized net actuarial
gain or loss, determined based on the market-related value of
plan assets (which differs from fair market value and is a
calculated value that recognizes changes in fair value in a
systematic and rational manner over five years), be amortized in
pension expense for the year to the extent that such
unrecognized net actuarial loss or gain exceeds 10% of the
greater of the projected benefit obligation or the
market-related value of plan assets at the beginning of the
year. These net gains and losses are recognized as pension
expense prospectively over a period that approximates the
average remaining service period of active employees expected to
receive benefits under the plans to the extent that they are not
offset by losses and gains in subsequent years.
For example at December 31, 2004, the unrecognized net
actuarial loss for the U.S. plan subject to amortized
recognition, determined based on the market-related value of
plan assets, was $89.8 million. This amount exceeded 10% of
the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market
related value of plan assets by $62.2 million. Unless
offset by future unrecognized gains from higher discount rates
or higher than expected returns on plan assets, amortization of
this unrecognized loss is expected to increase pension expense
for each of the following 13 years by approximately
$5 million per year, which amount is reflected in the
higher expense expected in 2005.
In the event the fair market value of pension plan assets of a
particular plan is less than the accumulated benefit obligation
for such plan at year-end, GAAP may require an additional
minimum liability, and in such circumstances, a reduction in
shareholders equity or an establishment of an intangible
asset. At December 31, 2004, the fair market value of our
defined benefit pension plan assets was $276.3 million and
the related accumulated benefit obligation was
$473.6 million. We recognized an additional minimum
liability of $97.4 million at December 31, 2004, which
was offset by a $62.1 million charge in other comprehensive
income included in stockholders equity, a
$34.6 million deferred tax asset, and a $0.7 million
reduction in the intangible asset. At December 31, 2003,
the fair market value of our defined benefit pension plan assets
was $233.0 million and the related accumulated benefit
obligation was $410.5 million. We recognized an additional
minimum liability of $84.2 million at December 31,
2003, which was offset by a $53.9 million charge in other
comprehensive income included in shareholders equity, a
$29.5 million deferred tax asset, and $0.8 million
reduction in the intangible asset.
Our funding policy for defined benefit plans is to contribute at
least the amounts required under applicable laws and local
customs. We contributed $23.4 million, $34.7 million,
and $9.1 million to our defined benefit plans in 2004, 2003
and 2002, respectively. In 2005, we contributed approximately
$43 million to our qualified U.S. pension plan, and we
estimate contributing approximately $9 million to our
non-U.S. pension
plans.
For further discussions on retirement benefits, see Note 13
to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report.
OUR CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires the use of estimates and assumptions to
determine reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses and the disclosure of related contingent
assets and liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are
based upon information available at the time of the estimates or
assumptions, including our historical experience, where
relevant. The most significant estimates made by management
include timing and amount of revenue recognition, allowance for
doubtful accounts, inventory costing and related fair value
allowances, deferred tax asset realization, restructuring
charges and expected payments reflected in related reserves,
legal and environmental claims estimates, warranty provisions,
pension and postretirement benefits obligations and the fair
value of indefinite-lived assets (including goodwill) and other
long-lived assets. The significant estimates are reviewed
quarterly by management with oversight by our Disclosure Control
Committee, an internal committee comprised of members of senior
management, and the Disclosure Control Committee presents its
views to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Because
54
of the uncertainty of factors surrounding the estimates,
assumptions and judgments used in the preparation of our
financial statements, actual results may differ from the
estimates, and the difference may be material.
Our critical accounting policies are those policies that are
both most important to our financial condition and results of
operations and require the most difficult, subjective or complex
judgments on the part of management in their application, often
as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the
following represent our critical accounting policies. For a
summary of all of our significant accounting policies, see
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in
this Annual Report. Management and our external auditors have
discussed our critical accounting policies with the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors.
Revenues for products and short-term contracts are recognized
based on the shipping terms agreed to with the customer and
fulfillment of all but inconsequential or perfunctory actions
required, which is generally the point of title transfer. If the
customer order requires formal acceptance, revenue is not
recognized until formal acceptance has been received. For
contracts containing multiple products, each having separable
value, we generally recognize revenue on individual product
shipments equal to the shipped products pro rata share of
the contracts fair value upon the fulfillment of all but
inconsequential or perfunctory actions of the individual product
shipment. For multiple deliverables under a single contract or
arrangement, such as product delivery and installation, we
separate the fair value of the product from the installation and
recognize revenue on each element independently upon fulfillment
of all but inconsequential or perfunctory actions. Our estimates
mainly relate to the fair value determination of the underlying
services or products. Revenue on service contracts is recognized
after the services have been rendered and accepted by the
customer. All revenue for products, short-term projects and
service contracts require, prior to recognition, the persuasive
evidence of an arrangement, a fixed or determinable sales price
and reasonable assurance of collectibility.
Revenue for long-term large contracts (which we define as longer
than nine-months in duration, with contract values over $750,000
and progress billings from the customer) are recorded on the
percentage of completion method calculated on a
cost-to-cost basis, in
instances where reliable cost estimates exist. Percentage of
completion revenue represents less than 5% of our consolidated
revenues for each year presented, and is most prevalent in FPD.
The percentage of completion method of revenue recognition
requires us to prepare estimates of costs to complete contracts
in progress, and in doing so we make judgments to evaluate
contingencies such as potential variances in scheduled delivery
and the cost of materials, labor costs and productivity, the
impact of change orders, potential warranty liabilities and
liquidated damage claims, contract disputes, and achievement of
contractual performance standards. Changes in total estimated
contract costs and resultant contract losses, if any, are
recognized in the period in which they are determined.
Revenue generated under fixed fee service and repair contracts
are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
contract. These contracts can range in duration, but generally
extend for five years. Fixed fee service and repair contracts
represent less than 5% of our consolidated revenue for each year
presented, and are most prevalent in FSD.
In certain instances, we provide guaranteed completion dates
under the terms of our contracts. Failure to meet schedule or
agreed upon delivery dates can result in unrealized incentive
fees or non-recoverable costs. In instances where the payments
of such costs are likely, we perform project profitability
analysis using such costs to reduce revenues realizable, which
could cause estimated project costs to exceed projected revenues
realized from the project. In such instances, we would record
reserves to cover such excesses in the period they are
determined, which would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial position. In instances where the
reduced revenues still exceed costs, the incurrence of the costs
generally reduces profitability of the project at the time of
subsequent revenue recognition. Our reported results would
change if different estimates were used for contract costs or if
different estimates were used for contractual contingencies.
55
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts |
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
estimates of the amount of uncollectible accounts receivable.
The amount of the allowance is determined principally based upon
the aging of the receivable, as well as on customer credit
history, significant customer disputes, outstanding industry and
market segment information, economic trends and conditions,
credit reports and customer financial condition.
We consider our collection history and specifically known
uncollectible accounts in establishing our allowance. Customer
credit issues, customer bankruptcies, general economic
conditions or other matters largely beyond our control can
affect the collectibility of our accounts receivable. If our
customers financial conditions worsened or if customer
disputes increased beyond levels currently provided for, we
might be required to recognize additional allowances or incur
additional write-offs, which would adversely impact our results
of operation, cash flows and financial position.
Our credit risk may be mitigated by our large number of
customers across many different geographic regions. For all of
2003 and most of 2004, we had a credit insurance policy for many
of our European subsidiaries, whereby we were entitled to
remuneration from the third party insurer, net of deductible, in
instances where customers covered by this policy were unable to
pay. We cancelled this policy in late 2004 due to minimal claims
sought.
|
|
|
Inventories and Related Reserves |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We
primarily determine cost for the majority of our
U.S. inventories by the
last-in, first-out
method and for other inventories by the
first-in, first-out
method. We estimate the market value of our inventory based on
an assessment of recent or committed sales prices, and provide
for excess and obsolete inventories based on historical usage,
estimated future demand and related pricing. In determining
excess quantities, we consider recent sales activity, related
margins and market positioning of our products. These estimates
are generally not subject to significant volatility, due to the
long life cycles of our product lines, except for product
rationalizations generally associated with acquisition
integration programs. However, factors beyond our control, such
as demand levels, technological advances and pricing
competition, could change from period to period. If such factors
had an adverse effect on us, we might be required to reduce the
value of our inventory, which would adversely affect our results
of operations, cash flows and financial position.
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation |
We recognize valuation allowances to reduce the carrying value
of deferred tax assets to amounts that we expect are more likely
than not to be realized. Our valuation allowances primarily
relate to the deferred tax assets established for certain tax
credit carryforwards, net operating and capital loss
carryforwards for U.S. and
non-U.S. subsidiaries,
and we evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets by
assessing the related valuation allowance and by adjusting the
amount of these allowances, if necessary. We assess such factors
as our forecast of future taxable income and available tax
planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net
deferred tax assets in determining the sufficiency of our
valuation allowances. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable
income in the applicable tax jurisdictions could affect the
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets and could result in
an increase in our effective tax rate on future earnings.
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits
by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often
result in proposed assessments. Significant judgment is required
in determining income tax provisions and evaluating tax
positions. We establish reserves for open tax years for certain
positions that are subject to challenge by various tax
authorities. The consolidated tax provision and related accruals
include the impact of such reasonably estimable losses and
related interest as deemed appropriate. We believe we have
adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcome
related to these matters, and our future results may include
favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax
liabilities. To the
56
extent that the expected tax outcome of these matters changes,
such changes in estimate will impact the income tax provision in
the period in which such determination is made.
|
|
|
Restructuring and Integration Expense |
Restructuring and integration expenses have generally been
recognized in conjunction with our acquisitions. Such expenses
reflect many estimates including costs pertaining to employee
severance payments, fulfillment of outstanding contractual
obligations and other matters associated with exiting a
facility. Restructuring costs related to facilities and
employees of acquired businesses generally become a component of
goodwill, whereas non-acquisition related restructuring costs
are recorded as restructuring expense in the consolidated
statements of operations. Integration costs are recognized as a
reduction to the results of operations as a component of current
earnings. Reserves created for each restructuring plan are
assessed quarterly and adjusted for any revisions of cost
estimates or other changes in planned restructuring activities.
Prior to January 1, 2003, we recognized restructuring
reserves when the related restructuring plans had been both
approved and communicated to affected employees. In conjunction
with adopting SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, on
January 1, 2003, we now record restructuring reserves as
the related liability is incurred.
|
|
|
Legal and Environmental Accruals |
The costs relating to legal and environmental liabilities are
estimated and liabilities recorded when it is both probable that
a loss has been incurred and such loss is estimable. We have a
formal process for assessing the facts and recording any
required reserves on a case-by-case basis. Assessments of legal
and environmental reserves are based on information obtained
from our independent and in-house experts, including recent
legal decisions and loss experience in similar situations. The
recorded legal reserves are susceptible to changes due to new
developments regarding the facts and circumstances of each
matter, changes in political environments, legal venue and other
factors. Recorded environmental reserves could change based on
further analysis of our properties, technological innovation and
regulatory environment changes.
Warranty obligations are based upon product failure rates,
materials usage and service delivery costs, an analysis of all
identified or expected claims and an estimate of the cost to
resolve such claims. The estimates of expected claims are
generally a factor of historical claims and known product
issues. Warranty obligations based on these factors are adjusted
based on historical sales trends for the preceding
24 months. Changes in claim rates, differences between
actual and expected warranty costs, sales trends, and facility
rationalization activities could impact warranty obligation
estimates, which might have adverse effects to our consolidated
results of operations and financial position.
|
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefits Obligations |
Determination of the value of our pension and postretirement
benefits liabilities is based on actuarial valuations. Inherent
in these valuations are key assumptions which are assessed
annually in the fourth quarter and which include:
|
|
|
|
|
discount rates; |
|
|
|
expected return on plan assets for funded plans; |
|
|
|
life expectancy of participants; |
|
|
|
assumed rate of wage increases; and |
|
|
|
assumed rate of health care cost increases. |
We evaluate, in conjunction with our professional advisors,
prevailing market conditions in countries where plans are
maintained, including appropriate rates of return, interest
rates and medical inflation rates. Specifically for our
U.S. plan, we assess such market factors as changes in the
cash balance interest crediting
57
rate, borrowing rates for investment grade corporate and
industrial companies, assumptions used by Fortune
500 companies, our actual wage increases in recent years,
expected rates of return for each targeted asset class held by
the plans and return premiums generated by active investment
management. For the
non-U.S. plans we
perform similar analyses, but also factor in local laws and
requirements. We also compare our significant assumptions with
our peers and discuss our key assumptions, prior to their
incorporation into actuarial calculations, with the Finance
Committee of our Board of Directors. We evaluate the funded
status of each retirement plan using current assumptions and
determine the appropriate funding level considering applicable
regulatory requirements, tax deductibility, reporting
considerations, cash flow requirements and other factors.
|
|
|
Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
and Other Long-Lived Assets |
Our business acquisitions typically generate goodwill and other
intangible assets, which affect prospective amortization expense
and possible impairment expense we might incur. We test the
value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment as of December 31 each year or whenever events
or circumstances indicate such assets may be impaired.
Impairment losses for goodwill are recognized whenever the
implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value.
Impairment losses for intangibles are recognized whenever the
estimated fair value is less than the carrying value. The test
for goodwill impairment involves significant judgment in
estimating projections of fair value generated through future
performance of each of the reporting units, which correlate to
our operating segments. The test of indefinite-lived intangibles
involves significant judgment in estimating projections of
future sales levels. In calculating the fair value of the
reporting units using the present value of expected future cash
flows, we rely on a number of factors including operating
results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated
future cash flows and market data used in discounting those cash
flows. Inherent uncertainties exist in determining and applying
such factors. The net realizable value of other long-lived
assets, including property, plant and equipment, is reviewed
periodically, when indicators of potential impairments are
present, based upon an assessment of the estimated future cash
flows related to those assets, utilizing methodologies similar
to that for goodwill and indefinite-lived assets. Additional
considerations related to our long-lived assets include expected
maintenance and improvements, changes in expected uses and
ongoing operating performance and utilization.
Due to uncertain market conditions and potential changes in
strategy and product portfolio, it is possible that forecasts
used to support asset carrying values may change in the future,
which could result in non-cash charges that would adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
We have presented the information about accounting
pronouncements not yet implemented in Note 1 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
SUMMARY OVERVIEW OF 2005
We experienced strengthening in our 2005 markets and we remain
optimistic about our markets and our performance over the
long-term, considering that the economic opportunities for many
of our geographic and core industrial markets have improved in
2005 however, these increases will be offset by additional
professional fees related to closing our 2004 audit and other
costs as discussed below. As a result of these factors, our
revenues are expected to increase from 2004, excluding currency
fluctuations. For additional discussion on our markets, see the
Business Overview section of this Managements
Discussion and Analysis. As noted below our bookings have
increased 13.9% for the year ending December 31, 2005 as
compared to the same period in 2004. However, as a booking
represents a contract that can be modified or canceled, there is
no guarantee that the increase in bookings will result in the
same increase in revenues.
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
increase |
Bookings |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
(decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cumulative amounts in millions) |
First quarter
|
|
$ |
662.8 |
|
|
$ |
712.6 |
|
|
|
7.5% |
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
1,333.0 |
|
|
|
1,435.8 |
|
|
|
7.7% |
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
1,997.7 |
|
|
|
2,230.1 |
|
|
|
11.6% |
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
2,657.4 |
|
|
|
3,026.1 |
|
|
|
13.9% |
|
We expect our operating income to increase in 2005 as compared
with 2004. Our operating income in 2005 will benefit from a
number of operational improvement programs, including
procurement and the CIP initiative, as well as other operational
improvements in several of our facilities. In addition,
continuation of our end user strategy, selective contract
bidding and an increase in our quick turnaround products, which
historically are more profitable, should also positively
contribute to our operating income in 2005. However, a number of
significant costs and certain other expenses will negatively
impact our operating income in 2005. These include increased
professional fees related to the completion of the 2004
Restatement and 2004 audit, Section 404 assessment, IRS tax
audit, senior executive transition costs, loss associated with
the refinancing of our debt, non-cash expenses related to
modifications of our stock plans and higher wage and benefit
costs due to inflation.
At December 31, 2004, 69% of our debt was fixed rate debt.
Following the refinancing of the 2000 Credit Facilities and the
12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes in August 2005, 100% of our
debt carried a floating rate of interest. As of
December 31, 2005 we had $410 million of derivative
contracts to convert a portion of floating interest rates to
fixed interest rates to reduce our exposure to interest rate
volatility. As a result of our refinancing and lower levels of
debt in 2005, we expect our interest expense will be lower in
2005 as compared to 2004. However, this decrease will be more
than offset by losses on debt extinguishment incurred in
connection with the refinancing.
We expect our effective tax rate to be significantly lower in
2005 than in 2004 due to lower levels of dividend repatriation.
The 2005 effective tax rate is dependent upon the mix of
earnings between our domestic and international locations, our
tax planning strategies and our ability to utilize foreign tax
credits and other factors. For a discussion of the factors
impacting our 2004 effective tax rate of 66.2%, see the
Results of Operations section of this
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Assuming these factors occurred as we have described, we expect
that net earnings and net earnings per share to improve in 2005.
However, because our year-end close procedures are not yet
completed, our actual results could differ from those described
above.
We generated sufficient cash from operations to fund our
business, capital expenditures, pension plan contribution
obligations and costs of compliance, and we continue to reduce
debt levels. We expect to improve working capital utilization by
reducing DSO and increasing inventory turns. However, the amount
of cash generated from working capital could be dependent on the
level of revenues and other factors. Capital expenditures in
2005 are primarily focused on new product development, new
production and service facilities, information technology
infrastructure and cost reduction opportunities and should
approximate $45 million to $50 million. While current
pension regulations allow us significant latitude in the amount
of contributions, we contributed approximately $43 million
to our qualified U.S. pension plan in 2005. We made scheduled
repayments and optional prepayments under the New Credit
Facilities in 2005 of $1.5 million and approximately
$20 million, respectively. We expect to comply with our
leverage and interest coverage financial covenants under our New
Credit Facilities in 2005. See the Liquidity and Capital
Resources section of this Managements Discussion and
Analysis for further discussion of our debt covenants.
59
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
Market risks associated with financial instruments
We have market risk exposure arising from changes in interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rate movements.
We enter into forward contracts to hedge our risks associated
with transactions denominated in currencies other than the local
currency of the facility engaging in the transaction. Our risk
management and derivatives policy specifies the conditions under
which we may enter into derivative contracts. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had approximately
$139 million and $75 million, respectively, of
notional amount in outstanding forward contracts with third
parties. At December 31, 2004, the maximum length of any
forward contract currently in place was 17 months.
Certain of our forward contracts do not qualify for hedge
accounting. The fair value of these outstanding forward
contracts at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was an asset of
$3.4 million and $4.7 million, respectively.
Unrealized gains (losses) from the changes in the fair value of
these forward contracts of $(2.5) million,
$1.6 million and $2.9 million, net of tax, for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated
statements of operations. The fair value of outstanding forward
contracts qualifying for hedge accounting was a liability of
$2.3 million at both December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Unrealized gains (losses) from the changes in the fair value of
qualifying forward contracts and the associated underlying
exposures of $(0.2) million, $0.5 million, and $24,000
net of tax, as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, are included in accumulated other comprehensive
loss in the consolidated statements of shareholders equity.
Also as part of our risk management program, we enter into
interest rate swap agreements to hedge exposure to floating
interest rates on certain portions of our debt. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had $125.0 million and
$215.0 million, respectively, of notional amount in
outstanding interest rate swaps with third parties. At
December 31, 2004, the maximum length of any interest rate
contract currently in place was approximately two years. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair value of the interest
rate swap agreements was a liability of $3.4 million and
$7.6 million, respectively.
During 2004, we entered into a compound derivative contract to
hedge the exposure to both currency translation and interest
rate risks associated with our EIB loan. The notional amount of
the derivative was $85 million, and it served to convert
floating rate interest rate risk to a fixed rate, as well as
U.S. dollar currency risk to Euros. The derivative matures
in 2011. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of this
derivative was a liability of $15.9 million. This
derivative contract did not qualify for hedge accounting. The
unrealized loss on the derivative and the foreign translation
gain on the underlying loan aggregate to a net loss of
$5.1 million, which is included in other expense (income),
net in the consolidated statements of operations.
We are exposed to risk from credit-related losses resulting from
nonperformance by counterparties to our financial instruments.
We perform credit evaluations of our counterparties under
forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements and expect
all counterparties to meet their obligations. We have not
experienced credit losses from our counterparties. Additionally,
we are exposed to risk of derivatives not qualifying for hedge
accounting.
Our earnings are impacted by changes in short-term interest
rates as a result of borrowings under our 2000 Credit
Facilities, which bear interest based on floating rates. At
December 31, 2004, after the effect of interest rate swaps,
we had approximately $216 million of variable rate debt
obligations outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of
4.9%. A hypothetical change of 100-basis points in the interest
rate for these borrowings, assuming constant variable rate debt
levels, would have changed interest expense by approximately
$2.2 million for 2004.
We employ a foreign currency hedging strategy to minimize
potential losses in earnings or cash flows from unfavorable
foreign currency exchange rate movements. These strategies also
minimize potential gains from favorable exchange rate movements.
Foreign currency exposures arise from transactions, including
firm commitments and anticipated transactions, denominated in a
currency other than an entitys functional
60
currency and from foreign-denominated revenues and profits
translated back into U.S. dollars. Based on a sensitivity
analysis at December 31, 2004, a 10% adverse change in the
foreign currency exchange rates could impact our results of
operations by $9.1 million.
An analysis of the estimated impact by currency follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on Net |
Currency |
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Euro
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Indian rupee
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
British pound
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Canadian dollar
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Mexican peso
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Venezuelan bolivar
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Australian dollar
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Argentinean peso
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Brazilian real
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Swedish krona
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging related transactions, recorded to other comprehensive
income (expense), net of deferred taxes, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Expense) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Reclassification to earnings for settlements during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts
|
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(106 |
) |
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
|
|
4,336 |
|
Change in fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
(6,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
|
$ |
1,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
$ |
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following amounts, net of deferred taxes, represent the
expected recognition into earnings for hedging contracts based
on their fair values at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
Swaps |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
2005
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
2006
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We incurred foreign currency translation gains of
$23.2 million, $55.4 million and $37.1 million,
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These currency gains
primarily reflect strengthening of the Euro versus the
U.S. dollar.
61
|
|
|
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Flowserve
Corporation
We have completed an integrated audit of Flowserve
Corporations 2004 consolidated financial statements and of
its internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are
presented below.
Consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Flowserve
Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement
schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company has restated its 2003 and 2002
consolidated financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, we have audited managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that Flowserve
Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because the
Company did not maintain (1) an effective control
environment, (2) effective monitoring controls to determine
the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting
and related policies and procedures, (3) effective controls
over certain of its
period-end financial
close and reporting processes, (4) effective segregation of
duties over automated and manual transaction processes,
(5) effective controls over the preparation, review and
approval of account reconciliations, (6) effective controls
over the complete and accurate recording and monitoring of
intercompany accounts, (7) effective controls over the
recording of journal entries, both recurring and non-recurring,
(8) effective controls over the existence, completeness and
accuracy of fixed assets and related depreciation and
amortization expense, (9) effective controls over the
completeness and accuracy of revenue, deferred revenue, accounts
receivable and accrued liabilities, (10) effective controls
over the completeness, accuracy, valuation and existence of its
inventory and related cost of sales accounts,
(11) effective controls over the completeness and accuracy
of its reporting of certain
non-U.S. pension
plans, (12) effective controls over the complete and
accurate recording of rights and obligations associated with its
accounts receivable factoring and securitization transactions,
(13) effective controls over the accounting for certain
derivative transactions, (14) effective controls over the
accounting for equity investments, (15) effective controls
over the accounting for income taxes, including income taxes
payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the
related income tax provision, (16) effective controls over
the accounting for mergers and acquisitions, (17) effective
controls over the completeness and accuracy of certain accrued
liabilities and the related operating expense accounts,
(18) effective controls over the completeness, accuracy and
validity of payroll and accounts payable
62
disbursements to ensure that they were adequately reviewed and
approved prior to being recorded and reported,
(19) effective controls over the completeness, accuracy and
validity of spreadsheets used in its financial reporting process
to ensure that access was restricted to appropriate personnel,
and that unauthorized modification of the data or formulas
within spreadsheets was prevented, and (20) effective
controls over the accuracy, valuation and disclosure of the
goodwill and intangible asset accounts and the related
amortization and impairment expense accounts, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on managements assessment and on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial
reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An
audit of internal control over financial reporting includes
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The
following material weaknesses have been identified and included
in managements assessment as of December 31, 2004:
(1) The Company did not maintain an effective control
environment because of the following material weaknesses:
|
|
|
(a) The Company did not effectively communicate the
importance of controls throughout the company or set an adequate
tone around control consciousness. |
|
|
(b) The Company did not maintain a sufficient complement of
personnel with an appropriate level of accounting and tax
knowledge, experience and training in the application of GAAP
commensurate with its financial reporting requirements. |
|
|
(c) The Company failed to implement adequate assignment of
authority and responsibility and the necessary lines of
communication between operations and accounting and financial
staff and personnel. Specifically, there was inadequate sharing
of financial information within and across the corporate and |
63
|
|
|
divisional offices and other operating facilities to adequately
raise issues to the appropriate level of accounting and
financial reporting personnel. |
|
|
(d) The Company did not maintain an effective anti-fraud
program designed to detect and prevent fraud relating to
(i) an effective whistle-blower program,
(ii) consistent background checks of personnel in positions
of responsibility, and (iii) an ongoing program to manage
identified fraud risks. |
|
|
(e) The Company did not maintain an adequate level of
control consciousness as it relates to the establishment and
update of its policies and procedures with respect to the
primary components of information technology general controls.
This resulted in either not having adequate controls designed
and in place or not achieving operating effectiveness over
controls in systems development, software change management,
computer operations and security, which the Company refers to as
information technology general controls. This
contributed to the material weakness discussed in item 4
below. |
The control environment sets the tone of an organization,
influences the control consciousness of its people, and is the
foundation of all other components of internal control over
financial reporting. Each of these control environment material
weaknesses contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in
items 2 through 20 below.
(2) The Company did not maintain effective monitoring
controls to determine the adequacy of its internal control over
financial reporting and related policies and procedures because
of the following material weaknesses:
|
|
|
(a) The Companys policies and procedures with respect
to the review, supervision and monitoring of its accounting
operations throughout the organization were either not designed
and in place or not operating effectively. |
|
|
(b) The Company did not maintain an effective internal
audit function. Specifically, there was an insufficient
complement of personnel with an appropriate level of experience,
training and lines of reporting to allow internal audit to
function effectively in determining the adequacy of its internal
control over financial reporting and monitoring the ongoing
effectiveness thereof. |
Each of these material weaknesses relating to the monitoring of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting
contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in items 3
through 20 below.
(3) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
certain of its period-end financial close and reporting
processes. Specifically, the Company did not maintain effective
controls over the preparation and review of the interim and
annual consolidated financial statements, which resulted in the
following material weaknesses:
|
|
|
(a) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the period-end consolidation process. Specifically, the Company
did not maintain effective controls to ensure that it identified
and accumulated all required supporting information to ensure
the completeness and accuracy of the consolidated financial
statements and that balances and disclosures reported in the
consolidated financial statements reconciled to the underlying
supporting schedules and accounting records. This control
deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in the
Companys annual 2002 consolidated financial statements,
the interim and annual 2003 consolidated financial statements
and the interim consolidated financial statements for the first
quarter of 2004 which have been corrected in the restatement of
the Companys consolidated financial statements for each of
these periods (the restatement of the annual 2002, the annual
and interim 2003 and the 2004 first quarter consolidated
financial statements is collectively referred to as the
2004 restatement) and (ii) adjustments,
including audit adjustments, to the 2004 annual and second,
third and fourth quarters consolidated financial statements
(collectively referred to as the 2004 adjustments). |
|
|
(b) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the translation of its subsidiary financial statements
denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. This
control deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in the
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments. |
64
(4) The Company did not maintain effective segregation of
duties over automated and manual transaction processes.
Specifically, the Company did not maintain effective controls
over the granting, maintenance and monitoring of access to
financial systems and data. Certain information technology
personnel had unrestricted access to financial applications,
programs and data beyond that needed to perform their individual
job responsibilities and without any independent monitoring. In
addition, certain financial personnel in the Companys
purchasing, payables, production and inventory control
departments had incompatible duties that allowed for the
creation, review and processing of certain financial data
without independent review and authorization. This control
deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts. This control deficiency did not result in adjustments
to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
(5) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the preparation, review and approval of account reconciliations.
Specifically, the Company did not have effective controls over
the completeness and accuracy of supporting schedules for
substantially all financial statement account reconciliations.
This control deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in
the Companys consolidated financial statements which have
been corrected in the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004
adjustments.
(6) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the complete and accurate recording and monitoring of
intercompany accounts. Specifically, effective controls were not
designed and in place to ensure that intercompany balances were
completely and accurately classified and reported in the
Companys underlying accounting records and to ensure
proper elimination as part of the consolidation process. This
control deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in the
Companys consolidated financial statements which have been
corrected in the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004
adjustments.
(7) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the recording of journal entries, both recurring and
non-recurring. Specifically, effective controls were not
designed and in place to ensure that journal entries were
properly prepared with sufficient support or documentation or
were reviewed and approved to ensure the accuracy and
completeness of the journal entries recorded. This control
deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in the
Companys consolidated financial statements which have been
corrected in the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004
adjustments.
(8) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the existence, completeness and accuracy of fixed assets and
related depreciation and amortization expense. Specifically,
effective controls were not designed and in place for the
periodic physical verification of fixed assets and the selection
of appropriate useful lives for plant and equipment and
amortization periods for leasehold improvements. This control
deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in the
Companys consolidated financial statements which have been
corrected in the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004
adjustments.
(9) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the completeness and accuracy of revenue, deferred revenue,
accounts receivable and accrued liabilities. Specifically, the
Company failed to recognize revenue using the
percentage-of-completion
method for certain long-term contracts in accordance with GAAP.
Also, effective controls were not designed and in place to
ensure that sales orders were authorized, complete, accurate and
recorded on a timely basis. Furthermore, review and approval
procedures were not effective to ensure that invoices or
customer credit and credit memoranda adjustments were
completely, timely and accurately applied to customer receivable
accounts and that unapplied cash receipts were properly
identified as unclaimed third party property. This control
deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in the
Companys consolidated financial statements which have been
corrected in the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004
adjustments.
(10) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the completeness, accuracy, valuation and existence of its
inventory and related cost of sales accounts. Specifically, the
Companys controls with respect to the accuracy of product
costing, job order closeout, accounting for cost accumulation on
long-term contracts and certain inventory management processes,
including obsolete and slow-moving inventory identification,
lower-of-cost-or-market
and LIFO inventory valuation were not effective. Also, the
Company did not maintain effective controls over the accurate
and timely recording of inventory receipts and shipments.
65
Furthermore, the Company did not maintain effective controls
over the accuracy and completeness of periodic physical counts
of inventory quantities. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(11) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the completeness and accuracy of its reporting of certain
non-U.S. pension
plans. Specifically, the Company failed to obtain actuarial
valuations for certain of its
non-U.S. pension
plans to ensure that it properly accounted for and reported
pension expense and related obligations for certain
non-U.S. pension
plans in accordance with GAAP. This control deficiency resulted
in (i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(12) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the complete and accurate recording of rights and obligations
associated with its accounts receivable factoring and
securitization transactions. Specifically, effective controls
were not designed and in place to ensure that the gain and loss
on each receivable sale, the receivable balance and the
associated accretion of interest, and recording of fees
associated with the securitization facility were accurate and
complete. This control deficiency primarily affected accounts
receivable, debt due within one year, and interest expense, net.
This control deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in
the Companys fourth quarter and annual consolidated
financial statements for 2003 which have been corrected in the
restatement of the consolidated financial statements for each of
these periods and (ii) adjustments, including audit
adjustments, to the fourth quarter and annual consolidated
financial statements for 2004.
(13) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
accounting for certain derivative transactions. Specifically,
the Company did not adequately document the criteria for
measuring hedge effectiveness at the inception of certain
derivative transactions and did not subsequently evaluate and
document the ongoing effectiveness of certain foreign currency
forward contracts in order to qualify for hedge accounting
treatment. This control deficiency affected accounts receivable,
long-term debt, other expense, other comprehensive income and
accumulated other comprehensive income. This control deficiency
resulted in (i) misstatements in the Companys
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(14) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the accounting for equity investments. Specifically, the Company
did not maintain effective controls with respect to adjusting
for differences between GAAP and the accounting standards used
in certain foreign countries. This control deficiency affected
other assets, net and selling, general and administrative
expense. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(15) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the accounting for income taxes, including income taxes payable,
deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related
income tax provision. Specifically, the Company did not maintain
effective controls over the accuracy and completeness of the
components of the income tax provision calculations and related
deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, and over the
monitoring of the differences between the income tax basis and
the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities to
effectively reconcile the differences to the reported deferred
income tax balances. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(16) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Specifically, the
controls with respect to the application of purchase accounting,
including the establishment of deferred taxes, were ineffective
and resulted in errors in the allocation of the purchase price
to the underlying assets acquired, including goodwill, and
liabilities assumed. This primarily affected property, plant and
equipment, deferred income tax assets and liabilities, goodwill
and long-term liabilities. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
66
(17) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the completeness and accuracy of certain accrued liabilities and
the related operating expense accounts. Specifically, effective
controls were not designed and in place to ensure the
completeness, accuracy and timeliness of the recording of
accrued liabilities and related expenses at period end. This
control deficiency primarily affected accrued warranty
obligations,
non-U.S. litigation
contingencies, sales tax liabilities, self-insurance reserves,
liabilities for goods received not invoiced, and related
operating expenses. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(18) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the completeness, accuracy and validity of payroll and accounts
payable disbursements to ensure that they were adequately
reviewed and approved prior to being recorded and reported. This
control deficiency primarily affected accounts payable and
accrued liabilities. This control deficiency did not result in
any adjustments to the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
(19) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the completeness, accuracy and validity of spreadsheets used in
its financial reporting process to ensure that access was
restricted to appropriate personnel, and that unauthorized
modification of the data or formulas within spreadsheets was
prevented. This control deficiency affects substantially all
financial statement accounts and resulted in
(i) misstatements in the Companys consolidated
financial statements which have been corrected in the 2004
restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
(20) The Company did not maintain effective controls over
the accuracy, valuation and disclosure of the goodwill and
intangible asset accounts and the related amortization and
impairment expense accounts. Specifically, effective controls
were not designed and in place to ensure that an adequate
periodic impairment analysis was conducted, reviewed, and
approved in order to identify and record impairments as required
under GAAP and that periodic amortization expense was accurately
and completely recorded and reported. This control deficiency
resulted in (i) misstatements in the Companys
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 restatement and (ii) the 2004 adjustments.
Additionally, each of the control deficiencies described in
items 1 through 20 above could result in a misstatement of the
aforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result
in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Management has determined that each of the control deficiencies
in items 1 through 20 above constitutes a material weakness.
These material weaknesses were considered in determining the
nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit
of the 2004 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion
regarding the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on
those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Flowserve
Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established
in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the
effects of the material weaknesses described above on the
achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Flowserve
Corporation has not maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 13, 2006
67
FLOWSERVE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
63,759 |
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
485,070 |
|
|
|
505,949 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
401,672 |
|
|
|
412,374 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
81,225 |
|
|
|
64,585 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
17,943 |
|
|
|
26,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,049,669 |
|
|
|
1,062,521 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
450,302 |
|
|
|
443,864 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
865,351 |
|
|
|
871,960 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
10,430 |
|
|
|
31,741 |
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
158,003 |
|
|
|
169,084 |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
100,281 |
|
|
|
101,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,634,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
314,787 |
|
|
$ |
250,614 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
349,525 |
|
|
|
286,433 |
|
|
Debt due within one year
|
|
|
44,098 |
|
|
|
71,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
708,410 |
|
|
|
608,082 |
|
Long-term debt due after one year
|
|
|
657,746 |
|
|
|
879,766 |
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities
|
|
|
397,655 |
|
|
|
370,201 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $1.25 par value
|
|
|
72,018 |
|
|
|
72,018 |
|
|
|
Shares authorized 120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued 57,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
472,180 |
|
|
|
477,443 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
434,328 |
|
|
|
410,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978,526 |
|
|
|
959,589 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 2,146 and 2,775 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(48,171 |
) |
|
|
(62,575 |
) |
Deferred compensation obligation
|
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
7,445 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(66,914 |
) |
|
|
(81,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
870,225 |
|
|
|
822,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,634,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
68
FLOWSERVE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
2,638,199 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,228,036 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,859,383 |
|
|
|
1,667,148 |
|
|
|
1,561,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
778,816 |
|
|
|
705,411 |
|
|
|
666,335 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
623,035 |
|
|
|
540,845 |
|
|
|
478,220 |
|
|
Integration expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
Restructuring expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623,035 |
|
|
|
563,492 |
|
|
|
498,746 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
155,781 |
|
|
|
141,919 |
|
|
|
167,589 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(81,016 |
) |
|
|
(84,206 |
) |
|
|
(95,480 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment
|
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(11,237 |
) |
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(14,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,548 |
) |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
59,624 |
|
|
|
55,897 |
|
|
|
62,365 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
39,470 |
|
|
|
12,789 |
|
|
|
29,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
20,154 |
|
|
|
43,108 |
|
|
|
32,696 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
24,200 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
69
FLOWSERVE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
24,200 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
21,414 |
|
|
|
57,917 |
|
|
|
36,518 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability effects, net of tax
|
|
|
(8,211 |
) |
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
(45,146 |
) |
|
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
|
15,082 |
|
|
|
68,288 |
|
|
|
(10,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
39,282 |
|
|
$ |
112,751 |
|
|
$ |
23,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
70
FLOWSERVE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year End December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
|
$ |
72,018 |
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
|
$ |
72,018 |
|
|
|
48,414 |
|
|
$ |
60,518 |
|
|
Sale of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,200 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
|
$ |
72,018 |
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
|
$ |
72,018 |
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
|
$ |
72,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL IN EXCESS OF PAR VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
477,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
477,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
211,113 |
|
|
Stock activity under stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Sale of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,032 |
|
|
Tax benefit associated with the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
472,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
477,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
477,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2002, as previously reported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
344,588 |
|
|
Restatement adjustments to net earnings prior to January 1,
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1 (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
410,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
365,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
330,906 |
|
|
Net earnings (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31 (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
434,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
410,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
365,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TREASURY STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1
|
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
|
$ |
(62,575 |
) |
|
|
(2,794 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,809 |
) |
|
|
(3,622 |
) |
|
$ |
(82,718 |
) |
|
Stock activity under stock plans
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
14,404 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
18,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31
|
|
|
(2,146 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,171 |
) |
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
|
$ |
(62,575 |
) |
|
|
(2,794 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION OBLIGATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,260 |
|
|
Increases to obligation for new deferrals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
Compensation obligations satisfied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2002, as previously reported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(142,137 |
) |
|
Restatement adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive loss
prior to January 1, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1 (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(81,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(150,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(139,307 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (As
restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,518 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability effect, net of tax (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,146 |
) |
|
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31 (As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(81,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(150,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2002, as previously reported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
399,624 |
|
|
Restatement adjustments prior to January 1, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance January 1 (As restated)
|
|
|
54,839 |
|
|
$ |
822,463 |
|
|
|
54,820 |
|
|
$ |
708,557 |
|
|
|
44,792 |
|
|
$ |
388,772 |
|
|
Net changes in shareholders equity (As restated)
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
47,762 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
113,906 |
|
|
|
10,028 |
|
|
|
319,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance December 31 (As restated)
|
|
|
55,468 |
|
|
$ |
870,225 |
|
|
|
54,839 |
|
|
$ |
822,463 |
|
|
|
54,820 |
|
|
$ |
708,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
71
FLOWSERVE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Cash flows Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
24,200 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
62,465 |
|
|
|
61,640 |
|
|
|
55,808 |
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
10,691 |
|
|
|
10,528 |
|
|
|
8,667 |
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
4,971 |
|
|
|
5,149 |
|
|
|
Write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs and discount
|
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
5,842 |
|
|
|
Other direct costs of long-term debt repayment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss on the disposition of fixed assets
|
|
|
(6,937 |
) |
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(7,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock compensation expense
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
39,394 |
|
|
|
23,822 |
|
|
|
67,834 |
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
25,535 |
|
|
|
29,407 |
|
|
|
36,358 |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
8,895 |
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
17,206 |
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
(16,058 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
46,586 |
|
|
|
16,985 |
|
|
|
(2,592 |
) |
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
32,059 |
|
|
|
(5,290 |
) |
|
|
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities
|
|
|
25,025 |
|
|
|
(17,070 |
) |
|
|
31,092 |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred taxes
|
|
|
(3,575 |
) |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
|
267,501 |
|
|
|
181,304 |
|
|
|
249,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(45,241 |
) |
|
|
(28,788 |
) |
|
|
(30,875 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
12,593 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
Payments for acquisitions net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(9,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities
|
|
|
(14,077 |
) |
|
|
(26,581 |
) |
|
|
(557,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
98,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794,876 |
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(355,570 |
) |
|
|
(164,000 |
) |
|
|
(683,923 |
) |
|
Payment of prepaid financing fees
|
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
(1,767 |
) |
|
|
(6,080 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,925 |
|
|
Net proceeds from stock option activity
|
|
|
6,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(250,605 |
) |
|
|
(162,798 |
) |
|
|
327,648 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
7,418 |
|
|
|
12,606 |
|
|
|
8,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
10,237 |
|
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
|
27,491 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
53,522 |
|
|
|
48,991 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
63,759 |
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
$ |
48,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (net of refunds)
|
|
$ |
35,630 |
|
|
$ |
37,728 |
|
|
$ |
4,895 |
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
74,996 |
|
|
$ |
78,662 |
|
|
$ |
87,923 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
72
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003 AND FOR THE
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
|
|
1. |
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ACCOUNTING
DEVELOPMENTS |
We produce engineered and industrial pumps, industrial valves,
control valves, nuclear valves, valve actuators and precision
mechanical seals, and provide a range of related flow management
services worldwide, primarily for the process industries.
Equipment manufactured and serviced by us is predominantly used
in industries that deal with
difficult-to-handle and
corrosive fluids as well as environments with extreme
temperatures, pressure, horsepower and speed. Our businesses are
affected by economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries
where our products are sold and serviced, by the cyclical nature
of the petroleum, chemical, power, water and other industries
served, by the relationship of the U.S. dollar to other
currencies and by the demand for and pricing of our
customers products.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts
to conform with the current period presentation.
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of our company and our
wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. Minority interests have
been recognized for all majority-owned consolidated
subsidiaries. Intercompany profits, transactions and balances
among consolidated entities have been eliminated. Investments in
unconsolidated affiliated companies, which represent
non-controlling ownership interests between 20% and 50%, are
accounted for using the equity-method basis, which approximates
our equity interest in their underlying equivalent net book
value under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). Investments in
interests where we owned less than 20% of the investee are
accounted for by the cost method, whereby income is only
recognized in the event of dividend receipt. Investments
accounted for by the cost method are tested annually for
impairment.
Use of Estimates The process of preparing
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts
of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
Management believes its estimates and assumptions are
reasonable; however, actual results may differ materially from
such estimates. The most significant estimates and assumptions
made by management are used in determining:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue, net of liquidated damages and other delivery penalties; |
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts; |
|
|
|
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventories; |
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowances and tax reserves; |
|
|
|
Restructuring reserves; |
|
|
|
Legal and environmental accruals; |
|
|
|
Warranty accruals; |
|
|
|
Insurance reserves; |
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations; and |
|
|
|
Valuation of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and
other long-lived assets. |
Revenue Recognition Revenues are recognized
based on the shipping terms agreed to with the customer and
fulfillment of all but inconsequential or perfunctory actions
required, which is generally the point of title transfer. If the
customer order requires formal acceptance, revenue is not
recognized until formal acceptance has been received. For
contracts containing multiple products, each having separable
value, we generally recognize revenue on individual product
shipments equal to the shipped products pro rata share of
the contracts fair value upon the fulfillment of all but
inconsequential or perfunctory actions of the individual product
shipment. For multiple deliverables under a single contract or
arrangement, such as product delivery
73
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and installation, we separate the fair value of the product from
the installation and recognize revenue on each element
independently upon fulfillment of all but inconsequential or
perfunctory actions. Our estimates mainly relate to the fair
value determination of the underlying services or products.
Shipping charges billed to customers are included in sales and
the related shipping costs are included in cost of sales in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue on service contracts is recognized after services have
been rendered and accepted by the customer. In addition, our
policy requires prior to shipment the persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, a fixed or determinable sales price and reasonable
assurance of collectibility. Revenue for long-term contracts,
which we define as contracts longer than nine-months in
duration, with contract values over $750,000 and progress
billings from the customer, are recorded on the percentage of
completion method calculated on a
cost-to-cost basis.
Percentage of completion revenue represents less than 5% of our
consolidated revenues for each year presented. Revenues
generated under fixed fee service and repair contracts, are
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
contract. These contracts can range in duration, but generally
extend for five years. Fixed fee service and repair contracts
represent less than 5% of consolidated revenue for each year
presented.
In certain instances, we provide guaranteed completion dates
under the terms of our contracts. Failure to meet schedule or
agreed upon delivery dates can result in unrealized incentive
fees or non-recoverable costs. In instances where the payments
of such costs are likely, we perform project profitability
analysis using such costs to reduce revenues realizable, which
could cause estimated project costs to exceed projected revenues
realized from the project. In such instances, we would record
reserves to cover such excesses in the period they are
determined, which would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial position. In instances where the
reduced revenues still exceed costs, the incurrence of the costs
generally reduces profitability of the project at the time of
subsequent revenue recognition. Our reported results would
change if different estimates were used for contract costs or if
different estimates were used for contractual contingencies.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit
Risk Accounts receivable are stated net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts of $8.7 million and
$18.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. In 2004, $3.2 million was reclassified to
other assets, net along with the underlying long-term
receivable. Also in 2004, $3.5 million of the allowance for
doubtful accounts was included with the accounts receivable sold
under our securitization program, which is more fully described
in Note 12.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is established based on
estimates of the amount of uncollectible accounts receivable,
which is determined principally based upon the aging of the
receivable, but also customer credit history, industry and
market segment information, economic trends and conditions,
credit reports, and customer financial condition. Customer
credit issues, customer bankruptcies or general economic
conditions can also affect the estimates.
Credit risks are mitigated by the diversity of customers in our
customer base across many different geographic regions and
performing creditworthiness analyses on such customers.
Additionally, we maintained until late 2004 a credit insurance
policy for our European subsidiaries. Under the policy, we
generally received funds from the third party insurer, net of
deductible, in instances where customer receivables covered by
the policy went unpaid. We terminated this policy in 2004 due to
minimal claims sought.
As of December 31, 2004, and 2003, we do not believe that
we have any significant concentrations of credit risk.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower-of-cost or
market. Cost is determined for principally all
U.S. inventories by the
last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method and for
non-U.S. inventories
by the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Reserves for excess and
obsolete inventories are based upon our assessment of market
conditions for our products determined by historical usage and
estimated future demand. Due to the long life cycle of our
products, we carry spare parts inventories that have
historically low usage rates and provide reserves for such
inventory based on demonstrated usage.
74
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income Taxes, Deferred Taxes and Tax Valuation
Allowances We account for income taxes under the
asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases
and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are calculated using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the
enactment date. Valuation allowances reflect the likelihood of
the recoverability of any such assets. We record valuation
allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax
assets that may not be realized based upon our analysis of
existing deferred tax assets, net operating losses and tax
credits by jurisdiction and expectations of our ability to
utilize these tax attributes through a review of past, current
and estimated future taxable income and establishment of tax
strategies. These estimates could be impacted by changes in the
amount and geographical source of future income and the results
of implementation or alteration of tax planning strategies.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes requires
us to provide deferred taxes for the temporary differences
associated with our investment in foreign subsidiaries which
have a financial reporting basis that exceeds tax basis unless
we can assert permanent reinvestment in foreign jurisdictions
pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion
(APB) No. 23, Accounting for Income
Taxes Special Areas. Financial reporting basis
and tax basis differences in investments in foreign subsidiaries
consist of both unremitted earnings and losses as well as
foreign currency translation adjustments. During the year ended
December 31, 2001, we ceased our ability to make the APB
No. 23 permanent reinvestment assertion. For 2001 and
during each of the three years reported in the period ended
December 31, 2004, we have not recognized any net deferred
tax assets attributable to unremitted earnings or foreign
currency translation adjustments in our foreign subsidiaries
with excess financial reporting basis due to estimated excess
foreign tax credits and other attributes.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the 2004 Act) was signed into law, creating a
temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate
accumulated income earned outside the U.S. at an effective tax
rate of 5.25% versus the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%.
Although we repatriated dividends during 2004 pursuant to a
dividend reinvestment plan, we have not recognized the lower tax
rate on these dividends in our financial statements due to
uncertainties surrounding the realizability of this benefit. To
the extent this uncertainty is favorably resolved in a future
reporting period, the benefit associated with these dividends
will be recognized in that period.
Tax Reserves The amount of income taxes we
pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state, and foreign
tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments.
Significant judgment is required in determining income tax
provisions and evaluating tax positions. We establish reserves
for open tax years for certain positions that are subject to
challenge by various tax authorities. The consolidated tax
provision and related accruals include the impact of such
reasonably estimable losses and related interest as deemed
appropriate. We believe we have adequately provided for any
reasonably foreseeable outcome related to these matters. To the
extent that the likely tax outcome of these matters changes,
such changes in estimate will impact the income tax provision in
the period in which such determination is made.
Restructuring and Integration Expense
Restructuring and integration expenses have generally been
recognized in conjunction with our acquisitions. Such expenses
reflect many estimates including costs pertaining to employee
severance payments, fulfillment of outstanding contractual
obligations and other
75
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
matters associated with exiting a facility. Restructuring costs
related to facilities and employees of acquired businesses
generally become a component of goodwill, whereas
non-acquisition related restructuring costs are recorded as
restructuring expense in the consolidated statements of
operations. Integration costs are recognized as a reduction to
the results of operations as a component of current earnings.
Reserves created for each restructuring plan are assessed
quarterly and adjusted for any revisions of cost estimates or
other changes in planned restructuring activities. Prior to
January 1, 2003, we recognized restructuring reserves when
the related restructuring plans had been both approved and
communicated to affected employees. In conjunction with adopting
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit or Disposal Activities, on January 1, 2003, we
now record restructuring reserves as the related liability is
incurred.
Warranty Accruals Warranty obligations are
based upon product failure rates, materials usage, and service
delivery costs, an analysis of all identified or expected
claims, and an estimate of the cost to resolve such claims. The
estimates of expected claims are generally a factor of
historical claims and known product issues. Warranty obligations
based on these factors are adjusted based on historical sales
trends for the preceding 24 months. Changes in claim rates,
differences between actual and expected warranty costs, sales
trends, and facility rationalization activities could impact
warranty obligation estimates, which might have adverse effects
to our consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Insurance Accruals Insurance accruals are
recorded for wholly or partially self-insured risks such as
medical benefits and workers compensation based upon an
analysis of our claim loss history, insurance deductibles,
policy limits, and other factors. The estimates are based upon
information received from actuaries, insurance company
adjusters, independent claims administrators, or other
independent sources. Changes in claims and differences between
actual and expected claim losses could impact future accruals.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Obligations Determination of the pension and
postretirement benefits obligations is based on estimates made
by management in consultation with independent actuaries and
investment advisors. Inherent in these valuations are key
assumptions including discount rates, expected return on plan
assets, life expectancy, and assumed rate of increase in wages
or in health care costs. Current market conditions, including
changes in rates of returns, interest rates and medical
inflation rates, are considered in selecting these assumptions.
Changes in the related pension and postretirement benefit costs
may occur in the future due to changes in the assumptions used
and changes resulting from fluctuations in our relative plan
participants.
Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and
Other Long-Lived Assets The value of goodwill
and indefinite-lived intangible assets is tested for impairment
at December 31 or whenever events or circumstances indicate
such assets may be impaired. The test for goodwill impairment
involves significant judgment in estimating projections of fair
value, using the present value of expected future cash flows,
generated through future performance of each of our reporting
units, which correlate to our operating segments. We consider
each of our operating segments to constitute a business with
discrete financial information that management regularly
reviews. The test for impairment of our indefinite-lived
intangibles involves estimating projections of future sales
levels. During 2004, due to declining sales levels in selected
product families acquired from Invensys plc, which are included
in our Flow Control Division, we recorded a trademark impairment
charge of approximately $1.0 million, which is included in
selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. The net realizable value
of other long-lived assets, including property, plant and
equipment, is reviewed periodically, when indicators of
potential impairments are present, based upon an assessment of
the estimated future cash flows related to those assets.
Due to uncertain market conditions and potential changes in
strategy and product portfolio, it is possible that forecasts
used to support asset carrying values may change in the future,
which could result in non-cash charges that would adversely
affect our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
76
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Foreign Currency Translation Assets and
liabilities of our foreign affiliates are translated to
U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing on the balance
sheet date, while income and expenses are translated at average
rates for each month. Translation gains and losses are generally
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Transaction and translation gains and losses arising from
intercompany balances are reported as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive loss when the underlying transaction stems
from a long-term equity investment or from debt designated as
not due in the foreseeable future. Otherwise, we recognize
transaction gains and losses arising from intercompany
transactions as a component of income. Where intercompany
balances are not long-term investment related or not designated
as due beyond the foreseeable future, we may mitigate risk
associated with foreign currency fluctuations by entering into
forward exchange contracts. See Note 10 for further
discussion of these forward exchange contracts.
Transactional currency gains and losses arising from
transactions outside of our sites functional currencies
and changes in fair value of forward contracts that do not
qualify for hedge accounting are included in our consolidated
results of operations. For the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, we recognized approximately
$(11.3) million, $(2.0) million and $1.0 million
of such amounts in other (expense) income, net on the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation At December 31,
2004, we have several stock-based employee compensation plans,
which we account for under the recognition and measurement
principles of APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations. For 2004 and
prior years, no stock-based employee compensation cost is
reflected in net earnings for stock option grants, as all
options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to
or in excess of the market value of the underlying common stock
on the date of grant. Should we elect to modify any of our
existing stock option awards, APB No. 25, as interpreted by
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Financial Interpretation (FIN) No. 44,
Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation, requires us to recognize the intrinsic value
of the underlying options at the date the modification becomes
effective. Modifications could include accelerated vesting, a
reduction in exercise prices or extension of the exercise period.
Awards of restricted stock are valued at the market price of our
common stock on the grant date and recorded as unearned
compensation within shareholders equity. The unearned
compensation is amortized to compensation expense over the
vesting period of the restricted stock. We have unearned
compensation of $5.2 million, $0.9 million and
$1.1 million at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. These amounts will be recognized into net earnings
in prospective periods.
77
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and
earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, to all stock-based employee
compensation, calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except |
|
|
per share amounts) |
Net earnings, as reported
|
|
$ |
24,200 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
Restricted stock compensation expense included in net earnings,
net of tax
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value method for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
|
|
(3,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$ |
23,098 |
|
|
$ |
41,652 |
|
|
$ |
31,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
The above pro forma disclosures may not be representative of
effects for future years, since the determination of the fair
value of stock options granted includes an expected volatility
factor and additional option grants are expected to be made each
year. See Note 9 for additional discussion of the
assumptions inherent in the calculation of stock-based employee
compensation expense in the above table.
Business Combinations All business
combinations referred to in these financial statements used the
purchase method of accounting, under which we allocate the
purchase price to the identifiable tangible and intangible
assets, recognizing goodwill when the purchase price exceeds
fair value of such identifiable assets.
Short-Term Investments We place temporary
cash investments with financial institutions and, by policy,
invest in those institutions and instruments that have minimal
credit risk and market risk. These investments, with an original
maturity of three months or less when purchased, are classified
as cash equivalents. They are highly liquid and principal values
are not subject to significant risk of change due to interest
rate fluctuations.
Property, Plant, and Equipment, and
Depreciation Property, plant and equipment are
stated at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation. The
useful lives of leasehold improvements are the lesser of the
remaining lease term or the useful life of the improvement. When
assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, their costs and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and any resulting gains or losses are included in the operations
for the period. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line
method based on the estimated useful lives of the depreciable
assets. The estimated useful lives of the assets are:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
10 to 40 years |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
3 to 7 years |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 12 years |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
3 to 25 years |
|
Costs related to repairs and maintenance are expensed as
incurred.
Intangible Assets Intangible assets,
excluding trademarks which are considered to have an indefinite
life, consist primarily of engineering drawings, distribution
networks, software, patents and other items that are
78
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
being amortized over their estimated useful lives generally
ranging from 3 to 40 years. These assets are reviewed for
impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate impairment
may have occurred.
Deferred Loan costs Deferred loan costs,
consisting of fees and other expenses associated with debt
financing, are amortized over the term of the related debt using
the straight-line method, which approximates the effective
interest method. Additional amortization is recorded in periods
where optional or mandatory repayments on debt are made.
Legal and Environmental Accruals Legal and
environmental reserves are recorded based upon a case-by-case
analysis of the facts, circumstances, legal obligations and
related costs. The costs relating to legal and environmental
liabilities are estimated and recorded when it is probable that
a loss has been incurred and such loss is estimable. Assessments
of legal and environmental costs are based on information
obtained from our independent and in-house experts and our loss
experience in similar situations. The estimates may change in
the future due to new developments regarding the facts and
circumstances of each matter.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities We enter
into forward contracts for purposes of hedging certain
transactions denominated in foreign currencies. As part of our
risk management strategy, we also enter into interest rate swap
agreements for the purpose of hedging our exposure to floating
interest rates on certain portions of our debt. We also enter
into compound interest rate and foreign currency financial
derivatives that mitigate our risk associated with interest rate
and foreign exchange volatility. We have a risk-management and
derivatives policy outlining the conditions under which we can
enter into financial derivative transactions.
We employ a foreign currency hedging strategy to minimize
potential losses in earnings or cash flows from unfavorable
foreign currency exchange rate movements. These strategies also
minimize potential gains from favorable exchange rate movements.
Foreign currency exposures arise from transactions, including
firm commitments and anticipated transactions, denominated in a
currency other than an entitys functional currency and
from foreign-denominated income and expense translated into
U.S. dollars. The primary currencies to which we have
exposure are the Euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, Mexican
peso, Japanese yen, Singapore dollar, Brazilian real, Australian
dollar, Argentinean peso and Venezuelan bolivar.
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their
fair value. At the inception of a new derivative contract, our
policy requires us to designate the derivative as (1) a
hedge of (a) a forecasted transaction or (b) the
variability of cash flows that are to be received or paid in
connection with a recognized asset or liability (a cash
flow hedge); or (2) a foreign currency fair value or
cash flow hedge (a foreign currency hedge). Changes
in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective,
documented, designated, and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to
the extent that the hedge is effective, are recorded in other
comprehensive loss, until earnings are affected by the
variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. Changes in
the fair value of foreign currency hedges are recorded in other
comprehensive loss since they satisfy the accounting criteria
for a cash flow hedge. Any hedge ineffectiveness (which
represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of
the derivative do not mirror the change in the cash flow of the
forecasted transaction) is recorded in current period earnings.
Certain financial derivatives did not qualify for hedge
accounting and accordingly were deemed ineffective. The changes
in their fair values are recognized in other
(expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of
operations for all periods presented. For effective hedges, the
changes in the value of the hedged item are also recorded as a
component of other comprehensive loss, if the underlying has
been recognized on the balance sheet. Upon settlement, realized
gains and losses are recognized in other (expense) income,
net in the consolidated statements of operations.
Our policy requires us to document all relationships between
hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk
management objective and strategy for undertaking those various
hedge transactions. This process includes linking all
derivatives that are designated as fair value, cash flow or
foreign currency hedges to (1) specific assets and
liabilities on the balance sheet or (2) specific firm
commitments or forecasted transactions. We also assess (both at
the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis) whether the
79
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been
highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash
flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be
expected to remain highly effective in future periods. Failure
to adequately document relationships and objectives at the
inception of the hedge would prevent us from applying hedge
accounting. Failure to demonstrate effectiveness in offsetting
exposures retroactively or prospectively would cause us to deem
the hedge ineffective.
We discontinue hedge accounting when:
|
|
|
|
|
we deem the hedge to be ineffective and determine that the
designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no
longer appropriate; |
|
|
|
the derivative no longer effectively offsets changes in the cash
flows of a hedged item (such as firm commitments or contracts); |
|
|
|
the derivative expires, terminates or is sold; or |
|
|
|
occurrence of the contracted or committed transaction is no
longer probable, or will not occur in the originally expected
period. |
When hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains
outstanding, we carry the derivative at its estimated fair value
on the balance sheet, recognizing changes in the fair value in
current period earnings. If a cash flow hedge becomes
ineffective, any deferred gains or losses on the cash flow hedge
remain in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the
exposure relating to the item underlying the hedge is
recognized. If it becomes probable that a hedged forecasted
transaction will not occur, deferred gains or losses on the
hedging instrument are recognized in earnings immediately.
Research and Development Expense Research and
development costs are charged to expense when incurred.
Aggregate research and development costs included in selling,
general and administrative expenses were $25.2 million,
$24.9 million and $23.9 million in 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Costs incurred for research and development
primarily include salaries and benefits and consumable supplies,
as well as, rent, professional fees, utilities, and the
depreciation of property and equipment used in research and
development activities.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments The
carrying amounts of our financial instruments approximate fair
value at December 31, 2004, except for our debt, which had
a carrying value of $702 million and an estimated fair
value of $736 million. The debt had a carrying value of
$951 million and an estimated fair value of
$995 million at December 31, 2003.
We determine the fair value of our fixed rate debt by applying
the open market discount or premium to the principal
outstanding. We consider our variable rate debt to have fair
values that approximate its carrying value, based upon an
assessment of the underlying borrowing spreads.
80
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Earnings Per Share Basic and diluted earnings
per share are calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except |
|
|
per share amounts) |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
20,154 |
|
|
$ |
43,108 |
|
|
$ |
32,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$ |
24,200 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share weighted
average shares
|
|
|
55,071 |
|
|
|
55,139 |
|
|
|
51,836 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share weighted
average shares adjusted for dilutive securities
|
|
|
55,650 |
|
|
|
55,250 |
|
|
|
52,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Options outstanding with an exercise price greater than the
average market price of the common stock were not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share. The weighted
average number of such options totaled 1,102,818, 2,578,638 and
1,171,411 for 2004 and 2003, and 2002 respectively.
|
|
|
Pronouncements Implemented |
In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which
addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities
(VIEs) by business enterprises that are the primary
beneficiaries. A VIE is an entity: 1) that does not have
sufficient equity investment at risk to permit it to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support, or
2) whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a
controlling financial interest, or 3) whose equity
investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their
economic interests, and the activities of the entity involve or
are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately
small voting interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the
enterprise that has the majority of the risks or rewards
associated with the VIE. We believe we have no interests in VIEs
that require disclosure or consolidation under
FIN No. 46(R), and therefore its implementation had no
significant effect on our consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) No. 106-2, Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the
Medicare Act). The Medicare Act provides for certain
federal subsidies on drug benefits provided under retiree health
plans. In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we adopted FSP
No. 106-2, retroactive to December 8, 2003, the date
of the enactment of the Medicare Act. The expected subsidy
reduced our accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by
approximately $4.5 million, which we recognized as a
reduction in the unrecognized net actuarial loss and will be
amortized over the average remaining service life of the
employees eligible for postretirement benefits. The adoption of
FSP No. 106-2 reduced our net periodic postretirement cost
by approximately $0.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
81
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented |
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. SFAS No. 123(R)
requires compensation costs related to share-based payment
transactions to be recognized in the financial statements. With
limited exceptions, the amount of the compensation cost is to be
measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or
liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards are
to be re-measured each reporting period. Compensation cost will
be recognized over the period that an employee provides service
in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123(R) is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure and
supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R) is
effective for public companies as of the first interim or annual
reporting period of the first fiscal year beginning after
June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in
the first quarter of 2006 using the modified prospective
transition method. The adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R)s fair value method could have a
material impact on our future consolidated results of
operations, although it will have no impact on our overall
financial position. Had we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in
prior periods, the impact would have approximated the impact of
SFAS No. 123 as described in the pro forma net
earnings and earnings per share disclosure above. The ultimate
amount of expense associated with the adoption of this
pronouncement will be based, among other things, on grants of
stock options vested at the date of adoption and their fair
value at the date of grant. We are still evaluating the impact
of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on our results of
operations in 2006.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4.
SFAS No. 151 amends Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4 and seeks to
clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials by
requiring those items to be recognized as current period
charges. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that
fixed production overheads be allocated to conversion costs
based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
SFAS No. 151 is effective prospectively for inventory
costs incurred in fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151 to
have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, which addresses
the measurement of exchanges of non-monetary assets.
SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value
measurement for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive
assets, which was previously provided by APB No. 29,
Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, and
replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have
commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a
non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future
cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as
a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect the
adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material effect on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
SFAS No. 154 establishes new standards on accounting
for changes in accounting principles. All such changes must be
accounted for by retrospective application to the financial
statements of prior periods unless it is impracticable to do so.
SFAS No. 154 replaces APB No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Periods.
However, it carries forward the guidance in those pronouncements
with respect to accounting for changes in estimates, changes in
the reporting entity and the correction of errors.
SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and
error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005, with early adoption permitted for
changes and corrections made in years beginning after
June 1, 2005. The application of SFAS No. 154
does not affect the transition provisions of any existing
pronouncements, including those that are in the transition phase
as of the effective date of SFAS No. 154. We do not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 154 to have a material
effect on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
82
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In April 2005, the FASB issued FIN No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations. FIN No. 47 clarifies that the term
conditional asset retirement obligation as used in
SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, requiring companies to recognize a liability
for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation that may be
conditional on a future event if the fair value of the liability
can be reasonably estimated. FIN No. 47 is effective
as of the end of fiscal years ending after December 15,
2005. We do not expect the adoption of FIN No. 47 to
have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
Although there are no other final pronouncements recently issued
that we have not adopted and that we expect to impact reported
financial information or disclosures, accounting promulgating
bodies have a number of pending projects which may directly
impact us. We continue to evaluate the status of these projects
and as these projects become final, we will provide disclosures
regarding the likelihood and magnitude of their impact, if any.
For the errors discussed below, we restated our consolidated
financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 presented herein.
Since the impact of the restatement also affected periods prior
to 2002, we restated prior periods, the impact of which is
reflected as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of
January 1, 2002. In addition, the errors impacted the first
quarter of 2004 and each of the quarterly periods in 2003. The
restated amounts for these quarters are presented in
Note 20.
Certain errors identified relate to periods prior to 2002 and
were recorded as an aggregate adjustment of $13.7 million
to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2002. This
amount mainly consists of corrections resulting from
intercompany reconciliations and tax matters as described
further below.
The following table sets forth the nature of significant
restatement errors and their impact on the previously reported
net earnings:
Summary of Restatement Issues Affecting Net Earnings
For the Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
Net earnings, as previously reported
|
|
$ |
52,888 |
|
|
$ |
45,497 |
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
(4,326 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
Long-term contract accounting
|
|
|
(3,225 |
) |
|
|
(3,082 |
) |
Intercompany reconciliations
|
|
|
(3,081 |
) |
|
|
(3,552 |
) |
Pension expense
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
Fixed assets and intangibles
|
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
Financial derivatives
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
Unclaimed property
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(2,028 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(6,635 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
Tax matters
|
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
(6,061 |
) |
Tax impact of restatement corrections
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings, as restated
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Valuation We corrected our
financial statements for inconsistencies in the application of
our accounting policy for obsolete and slow moving inventory,
errors in our LIFO calculations, and errors in adjusting for
lower-of-cost-or-market
considerations. The inconsistencies related to (i) obsolete
and slow
83
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
moving inventory mainly resulting from limitations in our
systems and processes that did not effectively identify excess
inventory quantities; and (ii) the inventories of acquired
businesses where our identification of slow moving items was not
performed timely. The errors in LIFO and
lower-of-cost-or-market
resulted from inaccurate calculations.
Long-Term Contract Accounting We identified
one long-term contract that was accounted for using the
percentage of completion method in which we did not include the
estimated cost of the work performed by subcontractors as part
of our total estimated costs in determining the percentage of
completion accounting for the overall contract. We also
identified a long-term contract in which costs related to the
contracts were not recorded in the appropriate periods and
resulted in corrections to cost of sales in prior periods.
Intercompany Reconciliations Our accounting
for intercompany transactions was adversely affected by
information technology system conversions, acquisitions, and
changes in corporate processes for recording intercompany
transactions. Our initial analysis of intercompany transactions
was expanded to include an assessment of intercompany balance
differences at each of the reporting dates. Certain reconciling
items were identified through this assessment that required
adjustment to the consolidated statements of operations.
Pension Expense As part of a comprehensive
review of our pension plans, we identified errors in the
accounting for
non-U.S. pension
plans. Certain plan obligations had not been measured at the
actuarially determined present value, which resulted in errors
in our annual pension expense and related liabilities.
Fixed Assets and Intangibles As part of a
comprehensive physical observation and assessment of fixed
assets, we identified errors in our fixed asset processes
related to disposals and abandonments that were not recorded in
our accounting records necessitating adjustments to report the
gains or losses on disposal in the appropriate periods. We also
identified errors that resulted from not adjusting for the
impact of purchase accounting within the general ledgers at
certain locations of recently acquired businesses, amortization
of leasehold improvements over periods in excess of the related
lease terms, and errors in the amortization of intangible
assets. These errors affected amounts reported for fixed assets,
goodwill, other intangible assets, depreciation and
amortization, loss on disposals, and foreign currency
translation accounts.
Financial Derivatives We identified errors in
our accounting for financial derivatives related to foreign
currency forward exchange contracts, which consisted of
incorrectly recording unrealized gains and losses in other
comprehensive loss for certain contracts that did not meet the
criteria for hedge accounting. We also identified errors related
to the recording of balances underlying the financial
derivatives.
Unclaimed Property We identified errors in
accounting for unclaimed property primarily for unapplied cash
and customer credits related to accounts receivable and for
checks issued to vendors and to other payees that were not
presented for payment. We previously recorded such items as
income and removed these amounts from our balance sheet
accounts. The correction reinstates such amounts within accrued
liabilities as we began a process of filing with various states
under voluntary disclosure agreements.
Other We identified other errors as part of
the restatement where the individual impact on net earnings was
not as significant, which resulted from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
errors in the original allocation of the purchase price for
acquired businesses to property, plant and equipment, goodwill,
accrued liabilities and deferred income taxes; |
|
|
|
errors in reconciliations of account balances; |
|
|
|
errors in accounting for equity investments that were based on
foreign accounting standards rather than U.S. GAAP; and |
|
|
|
other errors which were not deemed individually significant for
separate disclosure. |
Tax Matters Due to significant employee
turnover, information technology system limitations, corporate
legal restructurings, several multinational acquisitions, and
inadequate reconciliations, we identified
84
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
errors in the amounts recorded in current and deferred income
taxes. We undertook a process to identify our tax basis amounts,
for both domestic and international locations, and performed a
comprehensive review of our purchase accounting for recent
acquisitions. This process included a detailed compilation of
our book and tax differences at each of the reporting dates, as
well as reconciliations of our income tax payable accounts to
tax returns, as filed or as amended.
We also identified errors that occurred in applying purchase
accounting to businesses acquired, including income tax
liabilities arising in years prior to the acquisitions, which
were corrected in the related balance sheet accounts. We also
identified errors in our U.S. federal income tax returns
filed for 1999 through 2001 as a result of an Internal Revenue
Service examination of those years. We amended our tax returns
for those years and reflected the impact of those amendments
within current and deferred domestic income tax balance sheet
accounts at each of the reporting dates through
December 31, 2004.
Tax Impact of Restatement Corrections The
restatement corrections were analyzed to determine which amounts
had a corresponding impact on our provision for income taxes and
the result is reflected as the tax impact of restatement
corrections.
The following table presents the impact of the restatement
adjustments, further described below, and of the business
classified as discontinued operations in 2004 that is described
in Note 3, on our consolidated statements of operations for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:
Consolidated Statements of Operations Information
for the Years Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
with |
|
|
|
with |
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share) |
Sales
|
|
$ |
2,404,371 |
|
|
$ |
2,396,962 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,251,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,253,741 |
|
|
$ |
2,228,036 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,681,950 |
|
|
|
1,687,075 |
|
|
|
1,667,148 |
|
|
|
1,573,478 |
|
|
|
1,581,262 |
|
|
|
1,561,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
722,421 |
|
|
|
709,887 |
|
|
|
705,411 |
|
|
|
677,670 |
|
|
|
672,479 |
|
|
|
666,335 |
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
539,782 |
|
|
|
543,171 |
|
|
|
540,845 |
|
|
|
477,433 |
|
|
|
481,089 |
|
|
|
478,220 |
|
|
Integration expense
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
Restructuring expense
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
159,992 |
|
|
|
144,069 |
|
|
|
141,919 |
|
|
|
179,711 |
|
|
|
170,864 |
|
|
|
167,589 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(84,206 |
) |
|
|
(84,206 |
) |
|
|
(84,206 |
) |
|
|
(95,480 |
) |
|
|
(95,480 |
) |
|
|
(95,480 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(11,237 |
) |
|
|
(11,237 |
) |
|
|
(11,237 |
) |
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(4,590 |
) |
|
|
(4,548 |
) |
|
|
(4,548 |
) |
|
|
(3,241 |
) |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
73,835 |
|
|
|
58,047 |
|
|
|
55,897 |
|
|
|
72,301 |
|
|
|
65,640 |
|
|
|
62,365 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
20,947 |
|
|
|
13,584 |
|
|
|
12,789 |
|
|
|
26,804 |
|
|
|
30,881 |
|
|
|
29,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
52,888 |
|
|
|
44,463 |
|
|
|
43,108 |
|
|
|
45,497 |
|
|
|
34,759 |
|
|
|
32,696 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
52,888 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
45,497 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
with |
|
|
|
with |
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share) |
Net earnings per share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our restatement corrects the consolidated statements of
operations for the following errors:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales decreased $7.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 and increased $2.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2002, primarily due to an error in
the application of percentage of completion accounting for one
long-term contract that includes subcontractors
($4.2 million decrease in 2003), and errors that reported
sales in a period later than determined in accordance with GAAP
($2.8 million decrease in 2003 and $2.6 million
increase in 2002) and errors in other account reconciliations
($0.4 million decrease in 2003). |
|
|
|
Cost of sales increased for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2002, primarily due to errors in the following (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Inventory valuation
|
|
$ |
4,326 |
|
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
Intercompany reconciliations
|
|
|
2,468 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
Pension expense
|
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
411 |
|
Long-term contract accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
Unclaimed property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
Other (mainly errors in account reconciliations)
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
$ |
7,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense increased for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, primarily due to
errors in the following (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed assets and intangibles
|
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
Intercompany reconciliations
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
Unclaimed property
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Long-term contract accounting
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pension expense
|
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
Other (mainly errors in account reconciliations)
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net decreased $2.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002 primarily due to errors in
the accounting for foreign currency forward contracts that did
not meet the criteria for hedge accounting ($2.9 million in
2002) and other individually insignificant errors. |
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes decreased $7.4 million and
increased $4.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively, primarily due to
corrections in deferred tax accounts and the income tax effect
of the errors described above. Included in this was
$5.4 million and $2.0 million for the years 2003 and
2002 respectively, due to the tax impact on the restatement
items. In addition, there was $2.0 million and
($6.1) million for the years 2003 and 2002 respectively,
due to tax matters, primarily a correction in our deferred tax
accounts. |
The following table presents the impact of the restatement
adjustments on our consolidated statements of comprehensive
income for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
52,888 |
|
|
$ |
44,463 |
|
|
$ |
45,497 |
|
|
$ |
34,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
36,827 |
|
|
|
57,917 |
|
|
|
23,267 |
|
|
|
36,518 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
7,706 |
|
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
(42,947 |
) |
|
|
(45,146 |
) |
Cash flow hedging activity, net of tax
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
|
45,422 |
|
|
|
68,288 |
|
|
|
(19,841 |
) |
|
|
(10,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
98,310 |
|
|
$ |
112,751 |
|
|
$ |
25,656 |
|
|
$ |
23,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Errors identified relating to periods prior to January 1,
2002, are reflected in beginning retained earnings in the
accompanying consolidated statements of shareholders
equity and consist of errors similar to those described above.
The effect of correcting these errors decreased beginning
retained earnings as of January 1, 2002, by
$13.7 million, net of tax.
The errors identified in the balance sheet at December 31,
2003, described below, mainly resulted from
(i) misapplication of purchase accounting for businesses
acquired; (ii) not recording adjustments resulting from
reconciling intercompany balances; (iii) not actuarially
determining
non-U.S. pension
obligations and accounting for them in accordance with GAAP;
(iv) incorrect deferred tax asset and liability balances;
(v) not recording liabilities (including liabilities for
purchased intellectual property, litigation and tax penalties);
(vi) recording the effect of the foreign currency
translations relating to the restatement; and
(vii) recording the adjustments to the consolidated
statements of operations set forth above. The errors in applying
purchase accounting resulted from incorrectly accounting for
deferred taxes in the acquisitions of Ingersoll Dresser Pump Co.
(IDP) in 2000 and the Flow Control Division of
Invensys plc (IFC) in 2002 and accounting for
foreign currency translations relating to the IDP acquisition in
2000 where fair value
step-ups for property,
plant and equipment were not pushed down to the local entity,
which impacted recording subsequent asset disposals,
depreciation and the related foreign currency translation
effects.
87
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the impact of the restatement
adjustments, further described below, and of the business
classified as discontinued operations that is described in
Note 3, on our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2003:
Consolidated Balance Sheet Information
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
with |
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Assets |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
499,873 |
|
|
|
509,872 |
|
|
|
505,949 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
435,946 |
|
|
|
418,047 |
|
|
|
412,374 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
79,083 |
|
|
|
64,585 |
|
|
|
64,585 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
22,610 |
|
|
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
26,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,091,034 |
|
|
|
1,062,521 |
|
|
|
1,062,521 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
440,324 |
|
|
|
445,469 |
|
|
|
443,864 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
871,466 |
|
|
|
871,960 |
|
|
|
871,960 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
138,072 |
|
|
|
31,741 |
|
|
|
31,741 |
|
Other intangibles assets, net
|
|
|
167,282 |
|
|
|
169,084 |
|
|
|
169,084 |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
92,475 |
|
|
|
99,737 |
|
|
|
101,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,800,653 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
262,553 |
|
|
|
253,926 |
|
|
|
250,614 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
283,538 |
|
|
|
283,121 |
|
|
|
286,433 |
|
|
Debt due within one year
|
|
|
66,492 |
|
|
|
71,035 |
|
|
|
71,035 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
20,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
632,658 |
|
|
|
608,082 |
|
|
|
608,082 |
|
Long-term debt due after one year
|
|
|
879,766 |
|
|
|
879,766 |
|
|
|
879,766 |
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities
|
|
|
467,481 |
|
|
|
370,201 |
|
|
|
370,201 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
820,748 |
|
|
|
822,463 |
|
|
|
822,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,800,653 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,680,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restatement of the consolidated balance sheet corrects for
the following errors:
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net, increased $10.0 million at
December 31, 2003, primarily from recording an accounts
receivable factoring arrangement in one foreign location,
previously reported as a sale, as a secured borrowing
($4.5 million), errors in accounting for one long-term
contract ($4.0 million), and errors in account
reconciliations and other individually insignificant items
($1.5 million). |
88
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net decreased $17.9 million at
December 31, 2003, primarily due to errors in the following
(in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term contract accounting
|
|
$ |
(9,507 |
) |
Inventory valuation obsolete and slow moving
|
|
|
(2,421 |
) |
Inventory valuation LIFO
|
|
|
(1,947 |
) |
Inventory valuation lower of cost or market
adjustment
|
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
Intercompany reconciliations
|
|
|
(806 |
) |
Other adjustments to correct reconciliation of underlying records
|
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net
|
|
$ |
(17,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other decreased $6.1 million primarily
due to reclassification in tax matters ($6.4 million)
partially offset by other reconciling items ($0.3 million). |
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred tax assets decreased
$14.5 million and $106.3 million at December 31,
2003, respectively, to correct errors in recording deferred
taxes for purchase accounting, the tax effects of restatement
errors, and the tax effects of errors in accumulated other
comprehensive loss. Non-current deferred tax assets have been
primarily restated to properly net assets and liabilities. See
also decrease in non-current deferred tax liability. |
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net increased $5.1 million
at December 31, 2003, to correct the accounting for foreign
currency translations relating to the IDP acquisition where fair
value was not pushed down to the local entities general
ledgers, disposals and abandonment of assets, depreciation and
amortization due to disposals and excessive amortization periods
for leasehold improvements and errors in account
reconciliations. These corrections were due to errors in the
following (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation impact of push-down accounting
|
|
$ |
11,960 |
|
Disposals and abandonments
|
|
|
(7,867 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
5,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill increased $0.5 million at December 31, 2003,
primarily to correct purchase accounting related to the
acquisitions of IDP in 2000 and IFC in 2002. These corrections
were due to errors in the following (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany reconciliations
|
|
$ |
(7,133 |
) |
Fixed assets
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,226 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles, net increased $1.8 million at
December 31, 2003, primarily to correct the accounting for
purchased intellectual property. |
|
|
|
Other assets, net increased $7.3 million at
December 31, 2003, to reclassify over-funded pension plans
to assets ($11.5 million), partially offset by the write
down of the value of equity investments based on GAAP conforming
adjustments ($3.6 million) and other reconciling items
($0.6 million). |
|
|
|
Accounts payable decreased $8.6 million at
December 31, 2003, to record the adjustments resulting from
intercompany account reconciliations ($10.1 million) and
other reconciling items ($0.2 million) partially offset by
an accrual on long-term contract costs ($1.7 million). |
89
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities decreased $0.4 million at
December 31, 2003, to correct errors in the following (in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
$ |
(7,823 |
) |
Intercompany reconciliations
|
|
|
(708 |
) |
Purchased intellectual property
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
Unclaimed property
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
Financial derivatives
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
Other accruals
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt due within one year increased $4.5 million at
December 31, 2003, to correct the accounts receivable
factoring arrangement as a secured borrowing rather than as a
sale. |
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred tax liabilities decreased
$20.1 million and $101.9 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2003, to correct errors in deferred taxes, the
tax effects of errors in the restatement and the tax effects of
errors in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Non-current
deferred tax liabilities have been primarily restated to
properly net assets and liabilities. See also decrease in
non-current deferred tax assets. |
|
|
|
Retirement obligations and other liabilities increased by
$4.6 million at December 31, 2003, excluding the
decrease of $101.9 million in non-current deferred tax
liabilities discussed above, primarily to reclassify over-funded
pension plans to other assets, net as described above
($11.5 million) offset by correcting the actuarially
determined obligations and accounting for several
non-U.S. pension
plans in accordance with GAAP and the related liabilities that
meet the criteria of a defined benefit plan ($5.8 million)
and other reconciling items ($1.1 million). |
Our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, were also restated for the
items discussed above. The following table presents the major
subtotals in our 2003 and 2002 consolidated statements of cash
flows and the related impact of the restatement adjustments
discussed above:
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Information
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Net cash flows provided (used) by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
184,019 |
|
|
$ |
181,304 |
|
|
$ |
248,852 |
|
|
$ |
249,028 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(26,581 |
) |
|
|
(26,581 |
) |
|
|
(557,222 |
) |
|
|
(557,222 |
) |
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(165,767 |
) |
|
|
(162,798 |
) |
|
|
328,078 |
|
|
|
327,648 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
12,606 |
|
|
|
12,606 |
|
|
|
8,037 |
|
|
|
8,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
|
4,531 |
|
|
|
27,745 |
|
|
|
27,491 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
49,245 |
|
|
|
48,991 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
$ |
53,522 |
|
|
$ |
49,245 |
|
|
$ |
48,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The footnotes contained in these consolidated financial
statements also reflect the impact of the restatement discussed
in this footnote.
|
|
3. |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
In November 2004, we sold our Government Marine Business Unit
(GMBU), a business within our Flowserve Pump
Division (FPD), to Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical
Corporation for approximately $28 million, generating a
pre-tax gain of $7.4 million after the allocation of
approximately $8 million of FPD goodwill and
$1 million of intangible assets. GMBU, which provided pump
technology and service for U.S. Navy submarines and
aircraft carriers, did not serve our core market and represented
only a small part of our total pump business. We used net
proceeds from the disposition of GMBU to reduce our outstanding
indebtedness. As a result of this sale, we have presented the
assets, liabilities and results of operations of the GMBU as
discontinued operations for all periods included.
GMBU generated the following results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Sales
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Pretax gain from sale of discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMBUs assets and liabilities have been reclassified to
prepaid expenses and other, property, plant and equipment, net,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities to reflect discontinued
operations. As of December 31, 2003, GMBUs assets and
liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We acquired the remaining 75% interest in Thompsons, Kelly and
Lewis, Pty. Ltd (TKL) an Australian manufacturer and
supplier of pumps, during March 2004. The incremental interests
acquired were accounted for as a step acquisition and TKLs
results of operations have been consolidated since the date of
acquisition. The estimated fair value of the net assets acquired
(including approximately $2.2 million of cash acquired)
exceeded the cash paid of $12 million and, accordingly, no
goodwill was recognized. The 2004 consolidated statement of
operations includes 2004 TKL sales of $35 million and the
2004 consolidated balance sheet includes TKL assets of
approximately $31 million at December 31, 2004.
Invensys Flow Control On May 2, 2002, we
completed the acquisition of Invensys plcs flow control
division (IFC) for a contractual purchase price of
$535 million, subject to adjustment pursuant to the terms
of the purchase and sale agreement. This purchase price was
subsequently reduced by $2.2 million in the fourth quarter
of 2003, which yielded a final contractual purchase price of
$532.8 million. The reduction related to the finalization
of balances at the date of acquisition for cash, related party
activity and tax payments. In addition, we incurred
$6.1 million of costs associated with consummation of the
acquisition including fees for investment banking, legal,
actuarial and accounting services. The aggregate purchase price
for IFC, including such fees was $538.9 million.
The operating results of IFC have been included in the
consolidated statements of operations since the date of
acquisition. The purchase price was allocated to assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair value at the
date of acquisition. IFC manufactures valves, actuators, and
associated flow control products, and provides us with a more
balanced mix of sales among pumps, valves and seals as well as a
more diversified geographic and end market mix. The table below
reflects unaudited pro forma results as if the IFC acquisition
had taken place at the beginning of 2002, including estimated
purchase accounting adjustments and financing costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
thousands, |
|
|
except per |
|
|
share amounts) |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
2,385,373 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
182,650 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
46,903 |
|
Net earnings per share basic
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
The pro forma information does not purport to represent what our
consolidated results of operations actually would have been had
such transactions or events occurred on the dates specified, or
to project our consolidated results of operations for any future
period.
92
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the IFC acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
Current assets
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
Non-current assets, excluding goodwill
|
|
|
185 |
|
Goodwill(1)
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities(2)
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes $151.2 million that we consider deductible for
income tax purposes. |
|
(2) |
Represents $90 million of current liabilities reduced by
$6.1 million of transaction costs incurred. |
|
|
5. |
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS |
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for
impairment at December 31 or whenever events or
circumstances indicate impairment may exist. Impairment for
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles is assessed at the
reporting unit level. We consider each of our three operating
segments to constitute distinct reporting units and, therefore,
assess impairment at the operating segment level.
The following table provides information about our changes in
2004 to intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
Gross |
|
Change Due |
|
Disposals/ |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(Years) |
|
Amount |
|
to Currency |
|
Impairment |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except years) |
Finite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering drawings(2)
|
|
|
10-22.5 |
|
|
$ |
82,383 |
|
|
$ |
676 |
|
|
$ |
(1,397 |
) |
|
$ |
81,662 |
|
|
$ |
(18,371 |
) |
|
Distribution networks
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
(4,034 |
) |
|
Software
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
|
Patents
|
|
|
9.5-15.5 |
|
|
|
28,396 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,181 |
|
|
|
(8,640 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
3-40 |
|
|
|
13,532 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,023 |
|
|
|
(10,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,911 |
|
|
$ |
1,952 |
|
|
$ |
(1,397 |
) |
|
$ |
144,466 |
|
|
$ |
(44,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets Trademarks(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
(979 |
) |
|
$ |
59,255 |
|
|
$ |
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides information about our changes in
2003 to intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
Gross |
|
Change Due |
|
Price |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(Years) |
|
Amount |
|
to Currency |
|
Allocation(1) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except years) |
Finite-lived intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering drawings(2)
|
|
|
10-22.5 |
|
|
$ |
81,010 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,383 |
|
|
$ |
(13,665 |
) |
|
Distribution networks
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
(3,121 |
) |
|
Software
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
Patents
|
|
|
9.5-15.5 |
|
|
|
26,871 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,396 |
|
|
|
(5,520 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
3-40 |
|
|
|
13,150 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,532 |
|
|
|
(8,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
140,631 |
|
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,911 |
|
|
$ |
(32,517 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets Trademarks(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,258 |
|
|
$ |
(799 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,286 |
) |
|
$ |
59,173 |
|
|
$ |
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We recorded $3.3 million of adjustments between trademarks
and goodwill resulting from refinements in the purchase price
allocation for the IFC acquisition during the allocation period
of the transaction. |
|
(2) |
Engineering drawings represent the estimated fair value
associated with specific product and component schematics. These
assets have been recognized as a result of our acquisitions of
IFC and IDP and were valued based upon independent third party
appraisals. |
|
(3) |
Accumulated amortization for indefinite-lived intangible assets
relates to amounts recorded prior to the implementation date of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. |
|
(4) |
During 2004, we evaluated the fair value of our trademarks and
recorded an impairment charge of $979,000 related to one of the
trademarks we acquired from IFC. This charge is included in
selling, general and administrative expense on the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. |
The following schedule outlines actual amortization recognized
during 2004 and an estimate of future amortization based upon
the finite-lived intangible assets owned at December 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in |
|
|
thousands) |
Actual for year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
10,691 |
|
Estimate for year ending December 31, 2005
|
|
|
9,907 |
|
Estimate for year ending December 31, 2006
|
|
|
9,907 |
|
Estimate for year ending December 31, 2007
|
|
|
9,140 |
|
Estimate for year ending December 31, 2008
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
Estimate for year ending December 31, 2009
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
54,267 |
|
94
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve | |
|
Flow | |
|
Flow | |
|
|
|
|
Pump | |
|
Solutions | |
|
Control | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Balance January 1, 2003 (As restated)
|
|
$ |
470,180 |
|
|
$ |
29,512 |
|
|
$ |
326,150 |
|
|
$ |
825,842 |
|
Refinements to IFC purchase price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,612 |
|
|
|
31,612 |
|
Resolution of tax contingencies
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,492 |
) |
|
|
(2,592 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
9,870 |
|
|
|
16,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003 (As restated)
|
|
$ |
473,554 |
|
|
$ |
32,266 |
|
|
$ |
366,140 |
|
|
$ |
871,960 |
|
Reduction in restructuring reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,272 |
) |
|
|
(2,272 |
) |
Resolution of tax contingencies
|
|
|
(7,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
(6,939 |
) |
Sale of GMBU
|
|
|
(7,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,824 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
Currency translation
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
6,710 |
|
|
|
9,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
459,896 |
|
|
$ |
33,618 |
|
|
$ |
371,837 |
|
|
$ |
865,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
FACTORING OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE |
Through our European subsidiaries, we engage in non-recourse
factoring of certain accounts receivable. The various agreements
have different terms, including options for renewal and mutual
termination clauses. Under our 2000 Credit Facilities as
described in Note 12, such factoring was generally limited
to $50 million, based on the due date of the factored
receivables. The limit on factoring was raised to
$75 million under the New Credit Facilities, which were
entered into in August 2005, and are fully described in
Note 12.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, we had
received, using end of period exchange rates, a U.S. dollar
equivalent of approximately $26 million and
$24 million, respectively, in cash from our most
significant factoring agreement, which represents the
factors purchase of $32 million and $30 million
of our receivables, respectively.
Additionally, we maintain numerous other individually less
significant factoring agreements. In the aggregate, the total
cash received from the factoring of receivables under these
agreements totaled $20 million and $25 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. One of these
agreements was determined to represent a leveraged borrowing, as
opposed to a sale of receivables. Accordingly, we have reported
the aggregate cash received from this facility as a component of
short-term debt in the amount of $6.4 million and
$4.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
In 2004, under all of our factoring agreements worldwide, we
recognized, using year-end exchange rates, losses of
approximately $2.0 million in factoring receivables, which
compares with a total loss of $1.6 million and
$0.2 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market. Cost is
determined for principally all U.S. inventories by the LIFO
method and for
non-U.S. inventories
by the FIFO method.
95
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories and the method of determining costs were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
129,472 |
|
|
$ |
115,695 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
201,368 |
|
|
|
229,049 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
223,785 |
|
|
|
230,234 |
|
Less progress billings
|
|
|
(59,048 |
) |
|
|
(92,490 |
) |
Less excess and obsolete reserve
|
|
|
(60,829 |
) |
|
|
(43,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,748 |
|
|
|
439,134 |
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
(33,076 |
) |
|
|
(26,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inventory
|
|
$ |
401,672 |
|
|
$ |
412,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of inventory accounted for by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
FIFO
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
During 2004, 2003 and 2002 we recognized expenses of
$26.0 million, $22.5 million and $13.5 million,
respectively, for obsolete and excess inventory. These expenses
are included in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of
operations.
|
|
8. |
RESTRUCTURING AND ACQUISITION RELATED CHARGES |
Restructuring Costs IFC In
conjunction with the IFC acquisition during 2002, we initiated a
restructuring program designed to reduce costs and eliminate
excess capacity by closing 18 valve facilities, including 10
service facilities, and reducing sales and related support
personnel. Our actions, some of which were approved and
committed to in 2002 with the remaining actions approved and
committed to in 2003, resulted in a gross reduction of 847
positions and a net reduction of 633 positions. Net position
eliminations represent the gross positions eliminated from the
closed facilities offset by positions added at the receiving
facilities, which are required to produce the products
transferred into the receiving facilities.
We established a restructuring program reserve of
$11.0 million upon acquisition of IFC, and increased the
reserve by a total of $9.6 million in the latter half of
2002. We recognized additional accruals of $4.5 million in
2003 for this program, primarily related to the closure of
certain valve service facilities and the related reductions in
workforce. Based upon revised forecasts of costs to be incurred,
we recognized a reduction of $2.3 million to the IFC
restructuring reserve during 2004. Since the portion of the
reserve affected by the estimate was created through goodwill
recognition, the reduction to the reserve was recorded via a
decrease to goodwill. Cash expenditures against the accrual were
$3.4 million in 2004, $11.6 million in 2003, and
$4.2 million in 2002. The remaining accrual of
$3.6 million reflects payments made in 2005 and payments
expected thereafter for severance obligations due to terminated
personnel in Europe of $2.1 million as well as lease and
other contract termination and other exit costs of
$1.5 million.
Cumulative costs of $7.2 million associated with the
closure of our facilities through December 31, 2003, have
been recognized as restructuring expense in operating results,
whereas cumulative costs associated with the closure of IFC
facilities of $17.9 million, including related deferred
taxes of $6.2 million, became part of the purchase price
allocation of the transaction. The effect of these closure costs
increased the amount of goodwill otherwise recognizable as a
result of the IFC acquisition.
96
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following illustrates activity related to the IFC
restructuring reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Severance | |
|
Exit Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Balance created on June 5, 2002
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
Additional accruals
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Cash expenditures
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
Additional accruals
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
Cash expenditures
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
Cash expenditures
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration Costs IFC We also
incurred acquisition-related integration expense during 2003 and
2002 in conjunction with IFC, which is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Personnel and related costs
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
Transfer of product lines
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFC integration expense
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash expense
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
Non-cash expense
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFC integration expense
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition-related activities resulted in integration costs
as categorized above and further defined as follows. Personnel
and related costs include payroll, benefits, consulting fees,
and retention and integration performance bonuses paid to our
employees and contractors for the development, management and
execution of the integration plan. Transfer of product lines
includes costs associated with the transfer of product lines as
well as realignment required in the receiving facilities. Asset
impairments reflect the loss on disposal of property, plant and
equipment at the IFC facilities closed and disposal of inventory
for discontinued product lines when the remaining facilities
were combined. The other category includes costs associated with
information technology integration, legal entity consolidations,
legal entity name changes, signage, new product literature and
other. None of these other integration expense items
individually exceeded $0.5 million.
Remaining Restructuring and Integration Costs
IFC We have largely completed our restructuring
and integration programs related to IFC, except for payments for
certain outstanding European activities. We expect to incur no
additional restructuring and integration expenses in connection
with these programs. Payments from the restructuring accrual
will continue into 2005 and beyond due to the timing of
severance obligations committed to in Europe.
97
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
9. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS |
Restricted Stock and Stock Option Plans The
Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (the
2004 Plan), which was established on April 21,
2004, authorized the issuance of up to 3,500,000 shares of
common stock through grants of restricted stock, stock options
and other equity-based awards. Of the 3,500,000 shares of
common stock that have been authorized under the 2004 Plan,
3,217,653 remain available for issuance. In addition to the 2004
Plan, we maintain other shareholder-approved plans that permit
the issuance of our common stock through grants of various
equity-based awards. As of December 31, 2004, approximately
111,611 shares of common stock remained available for stock
option grants under these other plans. Options granted to
officers, other employees and directors allow for the purchase
of common shares at or above the fair market value of our stock
on the date the options are granted, although no options have
been granted above fair market value. Generally, options,
whether granted under the 2004 Plan or one of the other
previously approved plans, become exercisable over a staggered
period ranging from one to five years (most typically from one
to three years). Options generally expire ten years from the
date of the grant or within a short period of time following the
termination of employment or cessation of services by an option
holder; however, as described in greater detail below, the
expiration provisions relating to certain outstanding option
awards were modified during 2005.
Information concerning stock options issued to officers, other
employees and directors under all plans is presented in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Number of shares under option:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of year
|
|
|
3,096,317 |
|
|
$ |
21.72 |
|
|
|
2,878,251 |
|
|
$ |
22.41 |
|
|
|
3,402,318 |
|
|
$ |
21.86 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
234,520 |
|
|
|
23.03 |
|
|
|
403,820 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
|
|
|
371,356 |
|
|
|
25.09 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(323,904 |
) |
|
|
19.09 |
|
|
|
(28,500 |
) |
|
|
17.39 |
|
|
|
(739,232 |
) |
|
|
20.74 |
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(186,773 |
) |
|
|
24.81 |
|
|
|
(157,254 |
) |
|
|
27.94 |
|
|
|
(156,191 |
) |
|
|
23.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of year
|
|
|
2,820,160 |
|
|
$ |
21.93 |
|
|
|
3,096,317 |
|
|
$ |
21.72 |
|
|
|
2,878,251 |
|
|
$ |
22.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of year
|
|
|
2,269,979 |
|
|
$ |
21.98 |
|
|
|
2,184,113 |
|
|
$ |
22.10 |
|
|
|
1,791,764 |
|
|
$ |
22.75 |
|
98
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted average, remaining contractual life of options
outstanding at December 31, 2004 is 4.0 years.
Additional information relating to the ranges of options
outstanding at December 31, 2004, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
Range of Exercise |
|
Remaining |
|
Number |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Number |
|
Exercise Price |
Prices per Share |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Outstanding |
|
per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - 11.82
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
$11.82 - 15.76
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
|
|
62,759 |
|
|
|
13.39 |
|
|
|
62,759 |
|
|
|
13.39 |
|
$15.76 - 19.70
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
|
1,512,292 |
|
|
|
18.43 |
|
|
|
1,285,033 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
$19.70 - 23.63
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
286,784 |
|
|
|
22.99 |
|
|
|
55,264 |
|
|
|
22.80 |
|
$23.63 - 27.57
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
658,169 |
|
|
|
26.06 |
|
|
|
566,767 |
|
|
|
26.25 |
|
$27.57 - 31.51
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
216,300 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
216,300 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
$31.51 - 35.45
|
|
|
7.30 |
|
|
|
12,600 |
|
|
|
32.12 |
|
|
|
12,600 |
|
|
|
32.12 |
|
$35.45 - 39.39
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
69,680 |
|
|
|
35.88 |
|
|
|
69,680 |
|
|
|
35.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,820,160 |
|
|
$ |
21.93 |
|
|
|
2,269,979 |
|
|
$ |
21.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of pro forma information regarding net earnings and
earnings per share as if we had accounted for our stock options
granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, under a fair value
method is presented in Note 1. The options granted had a
weighted average fair value per share on the grant date of
$10.83 in 2004, $8.93 in 2003 and $11.70 in 2002. For purposes
of pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the options
is amortized to expense over the options vesting periods.
The fair value for these options at the date of
grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The assumptions used in calculating the expense for stock option
awards are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock volatility
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
|
|
46.1 |
% |
|
|
45.6 |
% |
Average expected life (years)
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Since the determination of the fair value of all options granted
includes an expected volatility factor and additional option
grants are expected each year, the above pro forma disclosures
may not be representative of effects for future years.
Restricted Stock Plans In addition to the
2004 Plan, we also have restricted stock plans that authorize us
to grant up to 5,569 additional shares of common stock or units
with rights commensurate with restricted stock to employees and
non-employee directors. In general, the restrictions on the
shares and units do not expire for a minimum of one year and a
maximum of ten years and are subject to forfeiture during the
restriction period. Most typically, restricted share grants have
staggered vesting periods over one to three years from grant
date. The intrinsic value of the shares and units, which is
typically the product of share price at the date of grant and
the number of shares and units granted, is amortized on a
straight-line basis to compensation expense over the periods in
which the restrictions lapse. Any cumulative recognized expense
related to restricted stock or units forfeited is reversed upon
forfeiture, at which time the forfeited grant is recorded in
treasury stock.
99
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information regarding the
restricted stock plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares and units granted during the year
|
|
|
288,447 |
|
|
|
39,275 |
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per share
|
|
$ |
23.00 |
|
|
$ |
17.20 |
|
|
$ |
27.20 |
|
Compensation expense, net of forfeitures of previously
recognized expense (in thousands)
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
608 |
|
|
$ |
719 |
|
Unexpired shares and units with unmet restrictions at
December 31
|
|
|
317,799 |
|
|
|
94,543 |
|
|
|
79,232 |
|
Modifications During 2005, we made a number
of modifications to our stock plans, including the acceleration
of certain restricted stock grants and outstanding options, as
well as the extension of the exercise period associated with
certain outstanding options. These modifications resulted from
severance agreements with former executives and from our
decision to temporarily suspend option exercises. As a result of
the modifications primarily associated with the severance
agreements with former executives, we recorded additional
stock-based compensation expense in 2005 of approximately
$7 million based upon the intrinsic values of the awards on
the dates the modifications were made.
On June 1, 2005, we took action to extend to
December 31, 2006, the regular term of certain options
granted to employees, including executive officers, qualified
retirees and directors, which were scheduled to expire in 2005.
Subsequently, we took action on November 4, 2005, to extend
the exercise date of these options, and options expiring in
2006, to January 1, 2009. We thereafter concluded, however,
that recent regulatory guidance issued under section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code might cause the recipients of the
extended options to become subject to unintended adverse tax
consequences under section 409A. Accordingly, effective
December 14, 2005, the Organization and Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors partially rescinded, in
accordance with the regulations, the extensions of the regular
term of these options, to provide as follows:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
the regular term of options otherwise expiring in 2005 will
expire 30 days after the options first become exercisable
when our SEC filings have become current and an effective SEC
Form S-8
Registration Statement has been filed with the SEC, and |
|
|
|
(ii) the regular term of options otherwise expiring in 2006
will expire on the later of: |
|
|
|
(1) 75 days after the regular term of the option as
originally granted expires, or |
|
|
(2) December 31, 2006 (assuming the options become
exercisable in 2006 for the reasons included in (i) above). |
These extensions are subject to our shareholders approving
certain applicable plan amendments at our next annual
shareholders meeting, tentatively scheduled for April
2006. If shareholders do not approve the plan amendments as
currently posed in our proxy statement, these extension actions
will become void. If such plan amendments are approved at our
next annual shareholder meeting, the extensions will be
considered as a stock modification for financial reporting
purposes subject to the recognition of a non-cash compensation
charge in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R).
The earlier extension actions also extended the option exercise
period available following separation from employment for
reasons of death, disability and termination not for cause or
certain voluntary separations. These separate extensions were
partially rescinded at the December 14, 2005, meeting of
the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, and as so revised are currently effective and not
subject to shareholder approval. The exercise period available
following such employment separations has been extended to the
later of (i) 30 days after the options first became
exercisable when our SEC filings have
100
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
become current and an effective SEC
Form S-8
Registration Statement has been filed with the SEC, or
(ii) the period available for exercise following separation
from employment under the terms of the option as originally
granted. This extension is considered for financial reporting
purposes as a stock modification subject to the recognition of a
non-cash compensation charge in accordance with APB No. 25,
of approximately $1 million in 2005. The extension of the
exercise period following separation from employment does not
apply to option exercise periods governed by a separate
separation contract or agreement.
|
|
10. |
DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES |
We enter into forward contracts to hedge our risks associated
with transactions denominated in currencies other than the local
currency of the operation engaging in the transaction. Our risk
management and derivatives policy specifies the conditions under
which we may enter into derivative contracts. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had approximately
$139.3 million and $75.1 million, respectively, of
notional amount in outstanding forward contracts with third
parties. At December 31, 2004, the maximum length of any
forward contract currently in place was 17 months.
Certain of our forward contracts do not qualify for hedge
accounting. The fair value of these outstanding forward
contracts at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was an asset of
$3.4 million and $4.7 million, respectively.
Unrealized gains (losses) from the changes in the fair value of
these forward contracts of approximately $(2.5) million,
$1.6 million, and $2.9 million, net of tax, for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
are included in other (expense) income, net in the
consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of
outstanding forward contracts qualifying for hedge accounting
was a liability of $2.3 million at both December 31,
2004 and 2003. Unrealized gains (losses) from the changes in the
fair value of qualifying forward contracts and the associated
underlying exposures of $(0.2) million, $0.5 million,
and $24,000, net of tax, as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively, are included in other comprehensive income
(expense) in the consolidated statements of
shareholders equity.
Also as part of our risk management program, we enter into
interest rate swap agreements to hedge exposure to floating
interest rates on certain portions of our debt. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had $125.0 million and
$215.0 million, respectively, of notional amount in
outstanding interest rate swaps with third parties. At
December 31, 2004, the maximum length of any interest rate
contract currently in place was approximately two years. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair value of the interest
rate swap agreements was a liability of $3.4 million and
$7.6 million, respectively.
During 2004, we entered into a compound derivative contract to
hedge exposure to both currency translation and interest rate
risks associated with our European Investment Bank
(EIB) loan. The notional amount of the derivative
was $85 million, and it served to convert floating rate
interest rate risk to a fixed rate, as well as U.S. dollar
currency risk to Euros. The derivative matures in 2011. At
December 31, 2004, the fair value of this derivative was a
liability of $15.9 million. This derivative contract did
not qualify for hedge accounting. The unrealized loss on the
derivative, offset with the foreign translation gain on the
underlying loan aggregate to $5.1 million, and are included
in other (expense) income, net in the consolidated
statements of operations.
We are exposed to risk from credit-related losses resulting from
nonperformance by counterparties to our financial instruments.
We perform credit evaluations of our counterparties under
forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements and expect
all counterparties to meet their obligations. We have not
experienced credit losses from our counterparties. Additionally,
we are exposed to risk of our derivative contracts not
qualifying for hedge accounting.
101
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Hedging related transactions recorded to other comprehensive
income (expense), net of deferred taxes, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Reclassification to earnings for settlements during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts
|
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(106 |
) |
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
|
|
4,336 |
|
Change in fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
(6,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31
|
|
$ |
1,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
$ |
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following amounts, net of deferred taxes, represent the
expected recognition into earnings for hedging contracts based
on their fair values at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Contracts |
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions) |
2005
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
2006
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. DETAILS OF CERTAIN CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET CAPTIONS
The following tables present financial information of certain
consolidated balance sheet captions.
Accounts Receivable, net Accounts receivable,
net were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Trade receivables
|
|
$ |
333,334 |
|
|
$ |
427,527 |
|
Current portion of residual interest on securitized receivables
|
|
|
80,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
79,860 |
|
|
|
97,063 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(8,694 |
) |
|
|
(18,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$ |
485,070 |
|
|
$ |
505,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, $6.1 million of receivables were reclassified to
other assets, net including the related reserve of
$3.2 million. Also in 2004, $3.5 million of the
allowance for doubtful accounts was included with the accounts
receivable sold under our securitization program, which is more
fully described in Note 12.
102
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net Property,
plant and equipment, net were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Land
|
|
$ |
67,531 |
|
|
$ |
63,115 |
|
Buildings, improvements, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
416,560 |
|
|
|
392,034 |
|
Machinery, equipment, capital leases, and construction in
progress
|
|
|
430,338 |
|
|
|
400,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
914,429 |
|
|
|
855,700 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(464,127 |
) |
|
|
(411,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
450,302 |
|
|
$ |
443,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for continuing operations in the amount of
$47.4 million, $45.3 million and $41.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, is included in cost of sales in the consolidated
statements of operations, with the remaining depreciation
expense included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Other Assets, net Other assets, net were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
$ |
34,260 |
|
|
$ |
34,419 |
|
Prepaid financing fees
|
|
|
13,163 |
|
|
|
15,790 |
|
Deferred compensation funding
|
|
|
33,516 |
|
|
|
31,493 |
|
Other
|
|
|
19,342 |
|
|
|
19,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
$ |
100,281 |
|
|
$ |
101,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Liabilities Accrued liabilities were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Wages, compensation and other benefits
|
|
$ |
148,386 |
|
|
$ |
99,899 |
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
15,379 |
|
|
|
14,409 |
|
Commissions and royalties
|
|
|
27,879 |
|
|
|
17,585 |
|
Progress billings in excess of accumulated costs
|
|
|
17,363 |
|
|
|
16,172 |
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
27,683 |
|
|
|
19,176 |
|
Professional services
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
5,441 |
|
Legal and environmental matters
|
|
|
18,954 |
|
|
|
27,052 |
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
Income tax
|
|
|
9,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
73,040 |
|
|
|
72,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
349,525 |
|
|
$ |
286,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other accrued liabilities includes insurance, state and local
taxes, lease obligations, freight and other items, none of which
individually exceed 5% of current liabilities.
Retirement Obligations and Other Liabilities
Retirement obligations and other liabilities were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Retirement obligations
|
|
$ |
291,917 |
|
|
$ |
275,922 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
23,091 |
|
|
|
34,474 |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
8,579 |
|
|
|
6,859 |
|
Derivative contracts
|
|
|
15,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
58,194 |
|
|
|
52,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
397,655 |
|
|
$ |
370,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities includes minority interest,
reserves for legal and environmental matters, reserves for
uncertain tax positions and other items, none of which
individually exceed 5% of non-current liabilities.
|
|
12. |
DEBT AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS |
Debt, including capital lease obligations, consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Term Loan Tranche A:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar Tranche, interest rate of 5.02% in 2004 and
3.74% in 2003
|
|
$ |
76,240 |
|
|
$ |
200,004 |
|
|
Euro Tranche, interest rate of 4.69% in 2004 and 4.65% in 2003
|
|
|
13,257 |
|
|
|
12,292 |
|
Term Loan Tranche C, interest rate of 5.20% in 2004 and
4.00% in 2003
|
|
|
233,851 |
|
|
|
465,473 |
|
Senior Subordinated Notes net of discount, interest rate of
12.25%:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar denominated
|
|
|
187,004 |
|
|
|
186,739 |
|
|
Euro denominated
|
|
|
87,484 |
|
|
|
80,998 |
|
EIB loan, interest rate of 2.39%
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable securitization and factoring obligations
|
|
|
17,635 |
|
|
|
4,543 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
701,844 |
|
|
|
950,801 |
|
Less amounts due within one year
|
|
|
44,098 |
|
|
|
71,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt due after one year
|
|
$ |
657,746 |
|
|
$ |
879,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Scheduled maturities of the 2000 Credit Facilities (as described
below), including capital lease obligations, for the next five
years and beyond are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Subordinated |
|
|
|
Capital Leases |
|
|
|
|
Term Loans |
|
Notes |
|
EIB Loan |
|
& Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
2005
|
|
$ |
25,990 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,108 |
|
|
$ |
44,098 |
|
2006
|
|
|
65,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
65,738 |
|
2007
|
|
|
34,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,039 |
|
2008
|
|
|
132,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
132,194 |
|
2009
|
|
|
66,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
66,287 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,488 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
323,348 |
|
|
$ |
274,488 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,008 |
|
|
$ |
701,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After giving effect to the refinancing, the termination of our
accounts receivable securitization agreement an optional
prepayment of approximately $20 million that we made at the
end of 2005 and a mandatory repayment of $10.9 million that
we made in January 2006 using the net proceeds from the sale of
GSG, our scheduled long-term debt obligations are
$1.5 million due in 2005, $0 due in 2006, $5.7 million
per year due in 2007, 2008 and 2009, and $635.4 million due
thereafter.
2000 Credit Facilities As of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, our credit facilities were
comprised of a $300 million revolving line of credit and
Tranche A and Tranche C term loans. Tranche A
consisted of a U.S. dollar denominated Tranche and a
Euro denominated tranche, the latter of which was a term note
due in 2006. We refer to these credit facilities collectively as
our 2000 Credit Facilities. During 2004, we made scheduled
principal payments of $27.5 million, mandatory principal
repayments of $167.9 million, and optional principal
prepayments of $160.0 million. In 2003, we made scheduled
principal payments of $0.9 million and optional principal
prepayments of $163.1 million. Since they typically result
from payments in advance of scheduled payments both mandatory
repayments and optional prepayments cause us to recognize a loss
on the early write-off of prepaid financing costs.
The following summarizes our repayment of obligations under the
2000 Credit Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions) | |
Scheduled payment
|
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
Mandatory repayment
|
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional prepayment
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
163.1 |
|
|
|
170.0 |
|
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Borrowings under our 2000 Credit Facilities bore interest at a
rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate
(which was based on the prime rate most recently announced by
the administrative agent under our 2000 Credit Facilities or the
Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or (2) London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), plus, in the case of
Tranche A term loan and loans under the revolving line of
credit, an applicable margin determined by reference to the
ratio of our total debt to consolidated Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization
(EBITDA), and, in the case of Tranche C term
loan, an applicable margin based on our long-term debt ratings.
In addition, we paid our lenders under our revolving line of
credit a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the
unutilized portion of the revolving line of credit and letter of
credit fees with respect to each standby letter of credit
outstanding under the 2000 Credit Facilities equal to a spread
based on the applicable margin in effect for LIBOR borrowings
under the revolving line of credit. At December 31, 2004
and 2003, we had no amounts outstanding under the revolving line
of
105
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
credit. We had outstanding letters of credit of
$51.3 million and $42.7 million at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively, which reduced our borrowing
capacity to $248.7 million and $257.3 million,
respectively.
The 2000 Credit Facilities were collateralized by substantially
all of our U.S. assets and a pledge of 65% of the stock of
certain foreign subsidiaries.
The Tranche A and Tranche C loans, which were amended
and restated in connection with the IFC acquisition, had final
maturities of June 2006 and June 2009, respectively.
Senior Subordinated Notes At
December 31, 2004, we had $188.5 million and
65.0 million
(equivalent to approximately $88 million at
December 31, 2004 exchange rates) in face value of Senior
Subordinated Notes outstanding. The Senior Subordinated Notes
were originally issued in 2000 at a discount to yield 12.50%,
but have a coupon rate of 12.25%. Interest on these notes was
payable semi-annually in February and August. In August 2005,
all remaining Senior Subordinated Notes outstanding were called
by us at 106.125% of face value as specified in the loan
agreement and repaid, along with accrued interest.
New Credit Facilities On August 12,
2005, we entered into New Credit Facilities comprised of a
$600 million term loan expiring on August 10, 2012 and
a $400 million revolving line of credit, which can be
utilized to provide up to $300 million in letters of
credit, expiring on August 12, 2010. We refer to these
credit facilities collectively as our New Credit Facilities. The
proceeds of borrowings under our New Credit Facilities were used
to call our 12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes and retire our
indebtedness outstanding under our 2000 Credit Facilities. We
also replaced the letter of credit agreement guaranteeing our
obligations under the EIB credit facility described below with a
letter of credit issued under the new revolving line of credit.
We incurred $9.3 million in fees related to the new
facilities, of which $0.3 million were expensed in 2005.
Prior to the refinancing, we had $11.8 million of
unamortized deferred loan costs related to the 2000 Credit
Facilities and the Senior Subordinated Notes. Based upon the
final syndicate of financial institutions for the New Credit
Facilities, we expensed $10.5 million of these unamortized
deferred loan costs in 2005. In addition to the total loan costs
of $10.8 million that were expensed, we recorded a charge
of $16.5 million for premiums paid to call the Senior
Subordinated Notes, for a total loss on extinguishment of
$27.3 million recorded in 2005. The remaining
$9.0 million of fees related to the new facilities were
capitalized and combined with the remaining $1.3 million of
previously unamortized deferred loan costs for a total of
$10.3 million in deferred loan costs included in other
assets, net. These costs will be amortized over the term of the
New Credit Facilities.
Borrowings under our New Credit Facilities bear interest at a
rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate
(which is based on greater of the prime rate most recently
announced by the administrative agent under our New Credit
Facilities or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) or
(2) LIBOR plus an applicable margin determined by reference
to the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, which at
September 30, 2005 was 1.75% for LIBOR borrowings. In
addition, we pay lenders under the New Credit Facilities a
commitment fee equal to a percentage, determined by reference to
the ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA, of the
unutilized portion of the revolving line of credit, and letter
of credit fees with respect to each financial standby letter of
credit outstanding under our New Credit Facilities equal to a
percentage based on the applicable margin in effect for LIBOR
borrowings under the new revolving line of credit. The fee for
performance standby letters of credit is 0.5% lower than the fee
for financial standby letters of credit.
In connection with the New Credit Facilities, during 2005 we
entered into $275 million of notional amount of interest
rate swaps to hedge exposure of floating interest rates. Of this
total notional amount of $275 million, $130 million
carried a start date of September 30, 2005 and
$145 million carried a start date of December 30,
2005. These swaps, combined with the $135 million of
interest rates swaps held by us at the time of the refinancing,
total $410 million of notional amount of interest rate
swaps outstanding at December 31, 2005.
106
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our obligations under the New Credit Facilities are
unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by
substantially all of our existing and subsequently acquired or
organized domestic subsidiaries. In addition, prior to our
obtaining and maintaining investment grade credit ratings, our
and the guarantors obligations under the New Credit
Facilities are collateralized by substantially all of our and
the guarantors assets.
The loans under our New Credit Facilities are subject to
mandatory repayment with, in general:
|
|
|
|
|
100% of the net cash proceeds of asset sales; and |
|
|
|
Unless we attain and maintain investment grade credit ratings: |
|
|
|
|
|
75% of our excess cash flow, subject to a reduction based on the
ratio of our total debt to consolidated EBITDA; |
|
|
|
50% of the proceeds of any equity offerings; and |
|
|
|
100% of the proceeds of any debt issuances (subject to certain
exceptions). |
We may prepay loans under our New Credit Facilities in whole or
in part, without premium or penalty.
Our New Credit Facilities contain, among other things, covenants
restricting our and our subsidiaries ability to dispose of
assets, merge, pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock
and indebtedness, incur indebtedness and guarantees, create
liens, enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses, make
certain investments or acquisitions, enter into sale and
leaseback transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates,
make capital expenditures, or engage in any business activity
other than our existing business. Our New Credit Facilities also
contain covenants requiring us to deliver to lenders our audited
annual and unaudited quarterly financial statements and leverage
and interest coverage financial covenants. The New Credit
Facilities require delivery of the December 31, 2004
audited financial statements by December 31, 2005 and
delivery of the December 31, 2005 audited annual financial
statements by May 30, 2006. We have received a waiver from
our lenders to deliver the December 31, 2004 audited annual
financial statements by February 28, 2006. Further, we are
required to furnish within 50 days of the end of each
interim quarter of each year our unaudited consolidated balance
sheet and related statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows. Under the leverage covenant, the maximum
permitted leverage ratio steps down beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2006, with a further step-down beginning in the
fourth quarter of 2007. Under the interest coverage covenant,
the minimum required interest coverage ratio steps up beginning
in the fourth quarter of 2006, with a further
step-up beginning in
the fourth quarter of 2007. Compliance with these financial
covenants under our New Credit Facilities is tested quarterly.
We complied with the covenants as of September 30, 2005.
Our New Credit Facilities include events of default usual for
these types of credit facilities, including nonpayment of
principal or interest, violation of covenants, incorrectness of
representations and warranties, cross defaults and cross
acceleration, bankruptcy, material judgments, ERISA events,
actual or asserted invalidity of the guarantees or the security
documents, and certain changes of control of our company. The
occurrence of any event of default could result in the
acceleration of our and the guarantors obligations under
the New Credit Facilities.
EIB Credit Facility On April 14, 2004,
we and one of our European subsidiaries, Flowserve B.V., entered
into an agreement with EIB, pursuant to which EIB agreed to loan
us up to
70 million,
with the ability to draw funds in multiple currencies, to
finance in part specified research and development projects
undertaken by us in Europe. Borrowings under the EIB credit
facility bear interest at a fixed or floating rate of interest
agreed to by us and EIB with respect to each borrowing under the
facility. Loans under the EIB credit facility are subject to
mandatory repayment, at EIBs discretion, upon the
occurrence of certain events, including a change of control or
prepayment of certain other indebtedness. In addition, the EIB
credit facility contains covenants that, among other things,
limit our ability to dispose of assets related to the financed
project and require us to deliver to EIB our audited annual
financial statements within 30 days of publication.
107
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our obligations under the EIB credit facility are guaranteed by
a letter of credit outstanding under our New Credit Facilities.
In August 2004 we borrowed $85 million at a floating
interest rate based on
3-month U.S. LIBOR
that resets quarterly. As of December 31, 2004, the
interest rate was 2.39%. The maturity of the amount drawn is
June 15, 2011, but may be repaid at any time without
penalty. Concurrent with borrowing the $85 million we
entered into a derivative contract with a third party financial
institution, swapped this principal amount to
70.6 million
and fixed the LIBOR portion of the interest rate to a fixed
interest rate of 4.19% through the scheduled repayment date. We
have not applied hedge accounting to the derivative contract,
and the change in fair value of approximately $5.1 million
is included in other (expense) income, net in our
consolidated statements of operations.
Accounts Receivable Securitization In October
2004, Flowserve US Inc., one of our wholly owned subsidiaries,
and Flowserve Receivables Corporation (FRC), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Flowserve US Inc., entered into
a receivables purchase agreement (RPA) with Jupiter
Securitization Corporation (Jupiter) and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, NA) whereby
FRC could obtain up to $75 million in financing on a
revolving basis by securitizing certain
U.S.-based trade
receivables.
To obtain financing, Flowserve US Inc. transferred certain
receivables to FRC, which was formed solely for this accounts
receivable securitization program. Pursuant to the RPA, FRC then
sold undivided purchaser interests in these receivables to
Jupiter, which then pooled these interests with other unrelated
interests and issued short-term commercial paper, which was
repaid from cash flows generated by collections on the
receivables. Flowserve US Inc. continued to service the
receivables for a servicing fee of 0.5% of the average net
receivable balance. No servicing liability was recognized at
December 31, 2004 because the amount was immaterial due to
the short-term average collection period of the securitized
receivables. FRC has no recourse against Flowserve US Inc. for
failure of the debtors to pay when due. As of December 31,
2004, FRC had secured $60 million in financing under the
program. The proceeds were used to repay $16 million and
$44 million of Tranche A and Tranche C bank term
loans, respectively, outstanding under our 2000 Credit
Facilities.
We account for this transaction in accordance with
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities-a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.
Under this guidance and in conjunction with the initial
transaction, Flowserve US Inc. transferred $121.4 million
of receivables (net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of
$6.0 million), which included $2.9 million of
long-term receivables (net of an allowance for doubtful accounts
of $3.2 million) to FRC, and FRC incurred a loss of
$0.2 million on the subsequent sale of purchaser interests
to Jupiter. At the time the purchaser interests were sold to
Jupiter, $48.7 million of the receivables transferred to
FRC were removed from FRCs financial statements, and FRC
further recorded short-term debt of $11.3 million.
Borrowings under the facility in excess of $11.3 million
are excluded from our debt balance in the consolidated balance
sheets but included for purposes of covenant calculations under
the 2000 Credit Facilities.
FRC retains a subordinate interest in the receivables, which
represents the amount in excess of purchaser interests
transferred to Jupiter. The short-term portion of
$80.6 million of this subordinate interest is included in
accounts receivable, net on the consolidated balance sheet. The
long-term portion of $2.9 million of this subordinate
interest is included in the other assets, net on the
consolidated balance sheet. FRCs subordinate interest in
the receivables at the time of the initial transaction was
$61.6 million, of which $2.9 million was classified as
long-term. Our retained interest in the receivables is recorded
at the present value of its estimated net realizable value.
Calculation of the retained interest in the receivables at the
time of the initial transaction and at December 31, 2004 is
based on an assumed days sales outstanding (DSO) of
60 days and a discount rate of 4.7% based on our borrowing
rate under the 2000 Credit Facilities.
108
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During 2004 Flowserve US Inc. transferred $376.2 million
(net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $6.7 million)
of receivables to FRC which then sold undivided purchaser
interests in the receivables to Jupiter. In 2004, FRC collected
$232.5 million in cash that was used to purchase additional
receivables from Flowserve US Inc. and return invested capital
to Flowserve US Inc. Losses on the sales of purchaser interests
totaled $0.6 million in 2004. FRC also recorded interest
expense of $0.1 million in 2004 related to the
$11.3 million in debt recognized pursuant to
SFAS No. 140.
Varying the DSO assumption and the discount rate assumption by
20% resulted in an immaterial change in the retained interest
and the loss on sale.
On October 31, 2005, we terminated the RPA. In connection
with this, we borrowed approximately $48 million under our
New Credit Facilities and repurchased outstanding receivable
interests from Jupiter. FRC recorded a loss of $2.0 million
for purchaser interests sold in 2005 and recognized interest
expense of $0.3 million related to the $11.3 million
of debt recorded pursuant to SFAS No. 140.
Accounts Receivable Factoring One of our
manufacturing plants in Europe maintains a receivable factoring
program with its local bank. This factoring program is
structured whereby the ownership of the underlying receivable is
not transferred to the bank. Thus, the amounts advanced to us
under this program are treated as short-term debt. These
Euro-denominated amounts total $6.4 million and
$4.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, and we paid interest at rates of 2.33% and 2.72%,
respectively. A description of this and other receivables
factoring agreements is more fully presented in Note 6.
Debt Covenants and Other Matters The
provisions of our New Credit Facilities require us to meet or
exceed specified defined financial covenants, including a
leverage ratio, and an interest coverage ratio. Further, the
provisions of these and other debt agreements generally limit or
restrict indebtedness, liens, sale and leaseback transactions,
asset sales and payment of dividends, capital expenditures, and
other activities.
The New Credit Facilities require delivery of the
December 31, 2004 audited annual financial statements by
December 31, 2005 and delivery of the December 31,
2005 audited annual financial statements by May 30, 2006.
We have received a waiver from our lenders to deliver the
December 31, 2004 audited financial statements by
February 28, 2006. Further, we are required to furnish
within 50 days of the end of the first three quarters of
each year its consolidated balance sheet and related statements
of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows.
Our 2000 Credit Facilities required us to submit audited annual
financial statements to the lenders within 100 days of
year-end. As a consequence of delays stemming from the
restatement of our consolidated financial statements, we were
unable to provide the audited financial statements within the
specified period of time. We have determined that on multiple
occasions, utilizing our restated financial information, we did
not comply with some of the financial covenants in our 2000
Credit Facilities. We believe that we could have undertaken
readily available actions to maintain compliance or obtained a
waiver or amendment of the 2000 Credit Facilities had the new
restated results been known.
The scheduled maturities under the 2000 Credit Facilities due in
2006 and beyond are properly classified as non-current
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as we demonstrated
our ability and intent to obtain new long-term credit facilities
in August 2005.
Operating Leases We have non-cancelable
operating leases for certain offices, service and quick response
centers, certain manufacturing and operating facilities,
machinery, equipment and automobiles. Rental expense relating to
operating leases was $19.7 million in 2004,
$22.0 million in 2003 and $23.0 million in 2002.
109
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable
operating leases are:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
19,367 |
|
2006
|
|
|
15,034 |
|
2007
|
|
|
9,903 |
|
2008
|
|
|
7,535 |
|
2009
|
|
|
6,407 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
16,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
74,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
RETIREMENT AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS |
We sponsor several noncontributory defined benefit pension
plans, covering substantially all U.S. employees and
certain
non-U.S. employees,
which provide benefits based on years of service, job grade
levels, and type of compensation. Retirement benefits for all
other covered employees are provided through contributory
pension plans, cash balance pension plans and
government-sponsored retirement programs. All funded defined
benefit pension plans receive funding based on independent
actuarial valuations to provide for current service and an
amount sufficient to amortize unfunded prior service over
periods not to exceed 30 years, with funding falling within
the legal limits proscribed by prevailing regulation. We also
maintain unfunded defined benefit plans which, as permitted by
local regulations, receive funding only when benefits become due.
We use a measurement date of December 31 for all of our
worldwide pension plans and for our postretirement medical plans.
U.S. Defined Benefit Plans We maintain
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans in the
U.S. The qualified plan provides coverage for substantially
all full-time U.S. employees who receive benefits, up to an
earnings threshold specified by the U.S. Department of
Labor. The qualified plan is designed to operate as a cash
balance arrangement, under which the accumulated benefit
obligation is equivalent to the projected benefit obligation.
The non-qualified plans primarily cover a small number of
employees including current and former members of senior
management, providing them with benefit levels equivalent to
other participants, but which are otherwise limited by
U.S. Department of Labor rules.
Net defined benefit pension expense for the U.S. defined
benefit pension plans (including both qualified and
non-qualified plans) was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
13,876 |
|
|
$ |
13,473 |
|
|
$ |
13,050 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
|
15,802 |
|
|
|
15,970 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(17,306 |
) |
|
|
(17,187 |
) |
|
|
(18,874 |
) |
Settlement and curtailment of benefits
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
(1,296 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. pension expense
|
|
$ |
13,766 |
|
|
$ |
11,964 |
|
|
$ |
9,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The settlement and curtailment expense in 2004 is associated
with a number of employees eligible for the non-qualified plan
leaving our company.
The following table reconciles the U.S. defined benefit
plans funded status to amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
271,208 |
|
|
$ |
258,137 |
|
Plan assets, at fair value
|
|
|
176,573 |
|
|
|
170,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(94,635 |
) |
|
|
(87,551 |
) |
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
96,859 |
|
|
|
89,575 |
|
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
(12,276 |
) |
|
|
(13,639 |
) |
Intangible asset
|
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
(780 |
) |
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(53,668 |
) |
|
|
(48,273 |
) |
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
(30,071 |
) |
|
|
(26,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net U.S. pension liability
|
|
$ |
(94,495 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are assumptions related to the U.S. defined
benefit pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term rate of return on assets
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
The expected long-term rate of return on assets was determined
by assessing the rates of return for each targeted asset class,
return premiums generated by active portfolio management and by
comparison of rates utilized by other companies.
During 2004, we increased our minimum pension liability by
$5.4 million, net of tax, compared with a reduction in 2003
of $2.3 million, net of tax, as a component of other
comprehensive income (expense). The increase in the liability
primarily resulted from the increase in accumulated benefit
obligations due to lower discount rates along with lower than
anticipated plan asset returns during 2004.
Based on the results of pension plan and asset returns during
2004 and on the anticipated future return, we retained the
assumed rate of return of such assets of 8.75% for 2004.
We also reduced the discount rate from 6.25% at
December 31, 2003, to 5.75% at December 31, 2004, to
reflect the current interest rate environment and the expected
benefit payment streams. We regularly evaluate assumptions for
asset returns and discount rates based on a variety of factors.
111
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of the changes in the
U.S. defined benefit plans pension obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Beginning benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
258,137 |
|
|
$ |
246,715 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
13,876 |
|
|
|
13,473 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
|
15,802 |
|
Curtailment of benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
Plan amendments
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
9,006 |
|
|
|
8,521 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(25,269 |
) |
|
|
(26,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
271,208 |
|
|
$ |
258,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefits obligations
|
|
$ |
271,068 |
|
|
$ |
258,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the U.S. defined
benefit pension plans assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Beginning plan assets
|
|
$ |
170,586 |
|
|
$ |
141,048 |
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
15,927 |
|
|
|
29,161 |
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
15,329 |
|
|
|
26,991 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(25,269 |
) |
|
|
(26,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending plan assets
|
|
$ |
176,573 |
|
|
$ |
170,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004, we contributed $15 million to the
U.S. defined benefit pension plans. This payment exceeded
the minimum funding requirements mandated by the
U.S. Department of Labor rules. During 2004, returns on
pension plan assets were less than anticipated.
Although we are still working with our actuaries to determine
estimated funding beyond 2005, the following table summarizes
the expected cash activity for the U.S. defined benefit
pension plans in the future (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions 2005
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
Benefit payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
2010-2014
|
|
|
142 |
|
112
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The asset allocation for the U.S. defined benefit pension
plans at the end of 2004 and 2003, and the target allocation for
2005, by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Actual Plan | |
|
|
Target | |
|
Assets at | |
|
|
Allocation | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Asset Category |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
65% |
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
65% |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
31% |
|
|
|
35% |
|
Other
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
We do not believe that any of our common stock is directly held
by our plans. Our investment strategy is to invest in various
securities in order to pay retirement benefits to plan
participants while minimizing our cash contributions over the
life of the plan. This is accomplished by preserving capital
through diversified investments in high quality instruments and
earning a long-term rate of return consistent with an acceptable
degree of risk, while taking into account the liquidity needs of
the plan.
Our investment policy is to invest approximately 65% of plan
assets in equity securities, 30% in fixed income securities and
5% in other assets. Within each investment category, assets are
allocated to various investment styles. Professional money
management firms manage all assets, and we engage a consultant
to assist in evaluating these activities. We periodically review
the investment policy, generally in conjunction with an asset
and liability study. We also regularly rebalance the actual
allocation to our target investment allocation.
Non-U.S. Defined
Benefit Plans We maintain defined benefit
pension plans, which cover some or all of the employees in the
following countries: Austria, Canada, France, Germany, India,
Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom.
Net defined benefit pension expense for
non-U.S. pension
plans was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
3,423 |
|
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
7,709 |
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4,407 |
) |
|
|
(3,696 |
) |
|
|
(3,958 |
) |
Settlement and curtailment of benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. pension expense
|
|
$ |
9,092 |
|
|
$ |
7,992 |
|
|
$ |
4,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following summarizes the net pension liability for
non-U.S. plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
217,538 |
|
|
$ |
162,150 |
|
Plan assets, at fair value
|
|
|
99,728 |
|
|
|
62,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(117,810 |
) |
|
|
(99,743 |
) |
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
35,387 |
|
|
|
24,222 |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(8,434 |
) |
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
(4,519 |
) |
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-U.S. pension liability
|
|
$ |
(95,376 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles the
non-U.S. pension
plans funded status to amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Plans with assets in excess of benefit obligations (included in
other assets, net)
|
|
$ |
12,363 |
|
|
$ |
11,470 |
|
Plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets
(included in retirement obligations and other liabilities)
|
|
|
(107,739 |
) |
|
|
(95,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-U.S. pension liability
|
|
$ |
(95,376 |
) |
|
$ |
(83,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are assumptions related to the
non-U.S. defined
benefit pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003(1) | |
|
2002(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term rate of return on assets
|
|
|
6.86 |
% |
|
|
7.32 |
% |
|
|
8.11 |
% |
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The assumptions for
non-U.S. plans
have been adjusted to reflect weighted average effects of
assumptions on plans included in the restatement, which is more
fully described in Note 2. |
Many of our
non-U.S. defined
benefit plans are unfunded, as permitted by local regulation.
The expected long-term rate of return on assets for funded plans
was determined by assessing the rates of return for each asset
class and return premiums generated by active investment
management.
During 2004, we increased our
non-U.S. minimum
pension liability by $2.8 million, net of deferred tax,
compared with a $6.2 million, net of deferred tax, decrease
in 2003 as a component of other comprehensive income (expense).
The increase in the liability resulted primarily from the
increase in accumulated benefit obligation due to lower discount
rates during 2004.
114
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the
non-U.S. plans
defined benefit pension obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Beginning benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
162,150 |
|
|
$ |
134,225 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
7,709 |
|
Employee contributions
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
Acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
19,342 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
Curtailment of benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
17,737 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(9,287 |
) |
|
|
(9,336 |
) |
Currency exchange impact
|
|
|
14,334 |
|
|
|
22,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
217,538 |
|
|
$ |
162,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefits obligations
|
|
$ |
202,494 |
|
|
$ |
152,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Acquisitions represent obligations for transfers of former IFC
employees into Flowserve plans, which formally occurred during
2004. |
The following is a reconciliation of the
non-U.S. plans
defined benefit pension assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Beginning plan assets
|
|
$ |
62,407 |
|
|
$ |
51,557 |
|
Return on plan assets
|
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
4,647 |
|
Employee contributions
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
Currency exchange impact
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
7,085 |
|
Acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(9,287 |
) |
|
|
(9,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending plan assets
|
|
$ |
99,728 |
|
|
$ |
62,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Acquisitions represent obligations for transfers of former IFC
employees into Flowserve plans, which formally occurred during
2004. |
115
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the expected cash activity for
the
non-U.S. defined
benefit plans in the future (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions 2005
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Benefit payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
2010-2014
|
|
|
44 |
|
The asset allocation for the
non-U.S. defined
benefit pension plans at the end of 2004 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
of Plan | |
|
|
Assets at | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
Asset Category |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
45% |
|
|
|
52% |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
48% |
|
Other
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
|
|
We do not believe that any of our common stock is held directly
by these plans. Our funded
non-U.S. defined
benefit pension plans are principally located in Canada and the
United Kingdom. In all cases, our investment strategy for these
plans is to invest in various securities in order to pay
retirement benefits to plan participants while minimizing
required cash contributions over the life of the plan. This is
accomplished by preserving capital through diversification in
high quality investments and earning a long-term rate of return
consistent with an acceptable degree of risk and the legal
requirements of the particular country, while taking into
account the liquidity needs of the plan.
Asset allocation differs by plan based upon the plans
projected benefit obligation to participants as well as the
results of asset and liability studies that are conducted for
each plan. Professional money management firms manage all plan
assets and we engage consultants in each country to assist in
evaluation of these activities.
Defined Benefit Plans with Accumulated Benefit Obligations in
Excess of Plan Assets The following summarizes
key pension plan information regarding plans whose accumulated
benefit obligations exceed the fair value of their respective
plan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
393,758 |
|
|
$ |
368,109 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
387,634 |
|
|
|
363,275 |
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
188,340 |
|
|
|
184,062 |
|
Postretirement Medical Plans We sponsor
several defined benefit postretirement health care plans
covering most current retirees and a limited number of future
retirees in the U.S. These plans provide for medical and
dental benefits and are administered through insurance companies
and health maintenance organizations. The plans include
participant contributions, deductibles, co-insurance provisions
and other limitations and are integrated with Medicare and other
group plans. We fund the plans as benefits are paid and
116
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
we incur health maintenance organization premiums, such that the
plans hold no assets in any period presented. Accordingly, we
have no investment strategy or targeted allocations for plan
assets. Benefits under our postretirement medical plans are not
available to new employees or most existing employees.
Net postretirement benefit expense is comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
|
|
5,838 |
|
|
|
6,839 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
(3,149 |
) |
|
|
(3,275 |
) |
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit expense
|
|
$ |
3,825 |
|
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
|
$ |
5,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of the accumulated
postretirement benefits obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
Beginning accumulated postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
92,227 |
|
|
$ |
91,670 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
|
|
5,838 |
|
Curtailment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
3,162 |
|
Net benefits paid
|
|
|
(8,597 |
) |
|
|
(8,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending accumulated postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
88,731 |
|
|
$ |
92,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2002, we renegotiated certain union contracts which
limited our obligation for postretirement medical costs. The
reduction in postretirement medical costs in the affected union
contracts began in 2003.
The following table presents the components of postretirement
benefit amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
$ |
88,731 |
|
|
$ |
92,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$ |
(88,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(92,227 |
) |
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
|
|
(16,848 |
) |
|
|
(19,997 |
) |
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
20,905 |
|
|
|
22,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
$ |
(84,674 |
) |
|
$ |
(89,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following presents expected benefit payments for future
periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected | |
|
Medicare | |
|
|
Cash Flows | |
|
Subsidy | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
8,788 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
2006
|
|
|
9,233 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
2007
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
2008
|
|
|
8,982 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
2009
|
|
|
8,657 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
2010-2014
|
|
|
38,911 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
The following are assumptions related to the postretirement
benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed ranges for the annual rates of increase in per
capita costs for periods prior to Medicare were 8.0% for 2004,
9.0% for 2003 and 10.0% for 2002, with a gradual decrease to
5.0% for 2007 and future years.
Assumed heath care cost trend rates have an effect on the
amounts reported for the postretirement medical plans. A
one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effect on the 2004 reported
amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase | |
|
1% Decrease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
5,258 |
|
|
$ |
(4,438 |
) |
Effect on service cost plus interest cost
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
We made contributions to the postretirement medical plans to pay
benefits of $8.6 million in 2004, $8.3 million in 2003
and $8.0 million in 2002. Because the postretirement
medical plans are unfunded, we make contributions as the covered
individuals claims are approved for payment. Accordingly,
contributions during any period are directly correlated to the
benefits paid.
Defined Contribution Plans We sponsor several
defined contribution plans covering substantially all U.S. and
Canadian employees and certain other
non-U.S. employees.
Employees may contribute to these plans, and these contributions
are matched in varying amounts by us, including opportunities
for discretionary matching contributions by us. Defined
contribution plan expense was $6.8 million in 2004,
$3.6 million in 2003 and $4.0 million in 2002.
Participants in the U.S. defined contribution plan have the
option to invest in our common stock and discretionary
contributions by us are typically funded with our common stock;
therefore, the plans assets include such holdings of our common
stock.
|
|
14. |
LEGAL MATTERS AND CONTINGENCIES |
We are a defendant in a large number of pending lawsuits (which
include, in many cases, multiple claimants) that seek to recover
damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to
asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or distributed by
us in the past. Any such products were encapsulated
118
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and used only as components of process equipment, and we do not
believe that any emission of respirable asbestos fibers occurred
during the use of this equipment. We believe that a high
percentage of the applicable claims are covered by applicable
insurance or indemnities from other companies.
In June 2002, we were sued by Ruhrpumpen, Inc.
(Ruhrpumpen) who alleged antitrust violations,
conspiracy, fraud and breach of contract claims arising out of
our December 2000 sale to Ruhrpumpen of a plant in Tulsa,
Oklahoma and a license for eight defined pump lines. Ruhrpumpen
subsequently amended its complaint to add Mr. Ronald F.
Shuff, our Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, and
two other employees as individual defendants. Trial was held in
the matter during March 2004. At the end of the trial,
Mr. Shuff and the two other employees were dismissed from
the lawsuit. On or about May 26, 2004, and before receiving
a ruling from the court as to the remaining claims, the parties
entered into a confidential settlement agreement resolving all
of their pending disputes.
On February 4, 2004, we received an informal inquiry from
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
requesting the voluntary production of documents and information
related to our February 3, 2004 announcement that we would
restate our financial results for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and the full years 2002, 2001 and 2000.
On June 2, 2004, we were advised that the SEC had issued a
formal order of private investigation into issues regarding this
restatement and any other issues that arise from the
investigation. We continue to cooperate with the SEC in this
matter.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, related
lawsuits were filed in federal court in the Northern District of
Texas (the Court), alleging that we violated federal
securities laws. Since the filing of these cases, which have
been consolidated, the lead plaintiff has amended its complaint
several times. The lead plaintiffs current pleading is the
fifth consolidated amended complaint (Complaint).
The Complaint alleges that federal securities violations
occurred between February 6, 2001 and September 27,
2002 and names as defendants Mr. C. Scott Greer, our former
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Ms. Renée J. Hornbaker, our former Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, and Banc of
America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, which
served as underwriters for two of our public stock offerings
during the relevant period. The Complaint asserts claims under
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and
Rule 10b-5
thereunder, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1933. The lead plaintiff seeks unspecified
compensatory damages, forfeiture by Mr. Greer and
Ms. Hornbaker of unspecified incentive-based or
equity-based compensation and profits from any stock sales, and
recovery of costs. On November 22, 2005, the Court entered
an order denying the defendants motions to dismiss the
Complaint on the pleadings in their entirety. The case is
currently set for trial on March 27, 2007. We continue to
believe that the lawsuit is without merit and are vigorously
defending the case.
On October 6, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was
filed purportedly on our behalf in the 193rd Judicial
District of Dallas County, Texas. The lawsuit names as
defendants Mr. Greer, Ms. Hornbaker, and current board
members Hugh K. Coble, George T. Haymaker, Jr., William C.
Rusnack, Michael F. Johnston, Charles M. Rampacek, Kevin E.
Sheehan, Diane C. Harris, James O. Rollans and Christopher A.
Bartlett. We are named as a nominal defendant. Based primarily
on the purported misstatements alleged in the above-described
federal securities case, the plaintiff asserts claims against
the defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control,
gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust
enrichment. The plaintiff alleges that these purported
violations of state law occurred between April 2000 and the date
of suit. The plaintiff seeks on our behalf an unspecified amount
of damages, injunctive relief and/or the imposition of a
constructive trust on defendants assets, disgorgement of
compensation, profits or other benefits received by the
defendants from us, and recovery of attorneys fees and
costs. We strongly believe that the suit was improperly filed
and have filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case.
119
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On February 7, 2006, we received a subpoena from the SEC
regarding goods and services that we delivered to Iraq from 1996
through 2003 during the United Nations Oil-for-Food Program. We
are in the process of reviewing and responding to the subpoena
and intend to cooperate with the SEC. We believe that other
companies in our industry (as well as in other industries) have
received similar subpoenas and requests for information.
We have been involved as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at former public waste disposal sites that may
be subject to remediation under pending government procedures.
The sites are in various stages of evaluation by federal and
state environmental authorities. The projected cost of
remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged fair
share allocation, is uncertain and speculative until all
studies have been completed and the parties have either
negotiated an amicable resolution or the matter has been
judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties
who have similarly been identified, and the identification and
location of additional parties is continuing under applicable
federal or state law. Many of the other parties identified are
financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay
their share of the remediation costs. Based on our information
about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the
environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it
is likely that ultimate remediation liability costs for each
site will be apportioned among all liable parties, including
site owners and waste transporters, according to the volumes
and/or toxicity of the wastes shown to have been disposed of at
the sites. We believe that our exposure for existing disposal
sites will be less than $100,000.
We are also a defendant in several other lawsuits, including
product liability claims, that are insured, subject to the
applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on currently available information, we believe
that we have adequately accrued estimated probable losses for
such lawsuits. We are also involved in a substantial number of
labor claims, including one case where we had a confidential
settlement reflected in our 2004 results.
Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be
quantified with absolute certainty, we have established reserves
covering these exposures, which we believe to be reasonable
based on past experience and available facts. While additional
exposures beyond these reserves could exist, they currently
cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate these
potential contingent loss exposures and, if they develop,
recognize expense as soon as such losses become probable and can
be reasonably estimated.
We are also involved in ordinary routine litigation incidental
to our business, none of which we believe to be material to our
business, operations or overall financial condition. However,
resolutions or dispositions of claims or lawsuits by settlement
or otherwise could have a significant impact on our operating
results for the reporting period in which any such resolution or
disposition occurs.
As a consequence of all legal matters, including settlements of
both publicly disclosed litigation and otherwise, we recognized
expense of approximately $17 million in 2004,
$25 million in 2003 and $4 million in 2002.
120
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have recorded reserves for product warranty claims that are
included in both current and non-current liabilities. The
following is a summary of the activity in the warranty reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Balance January 1
|
|
$ |
19,233 |
|
|
$ |
15,899 |
|
|
$ |
13,754 |
|
|
Accruals for warranty expense
|
|
|
32,487 |
|
|
|
27,409 |
|
|
|
21,266 |
|
|
Settlements made
|
|
|
(23,974 |
) |
|
|
(24,075 |
) |
|
|
(19,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31
|
|
$ |
27,746 |
|
|
$ |
19,233 |
|
|
$ |
15,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each share of common stock contains a preferred stock purchase
right. These rights are not currently exercisable and trade in
tandem with the common stock. The rights become exercisable and
trade separately in the event of certain significant changes in
common stock ownership or on the commencement of certain tender
offers that, in either case, may lead to a change in control.
Upon becoming exercisable, the rights provide shareholders the
opportunity to acquire a new series of the preferred stock to be
then automatically issued at a pre-established price. In the
event of certain forms of our acquisition, the rights also
provide our shareholders the opportunity to purchase shares of
the acquirers common stock from the acquirer at a
50% discount from the current market value. The rights are
redeemable for $0.022 per right by us at any time prior to
becoming exercisable and will expire in August 2006.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
(8,808 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,109 |
) |
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
53,117 |
|
|
|
29,536 |
|
|
|
22,443 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
51,324 |
|
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
12,702 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
8,384 |
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
(13,450 |
) |
|
|
(9,796 |
) |
|
|
8,050 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
$ |
(11,854 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,796 |
) |
|
$ |
16,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision
|
|
$ |
39,470 |
|
|
$ |
12,789 |
|
|
$ |
29,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the
statutory corporate rate due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
Statutory federal income tax at 35%
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
Foreign impact, net
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Change in valuation allowances
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
State and local income taxes, net
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Extraterritorial income exclusion
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Meals and entertainment
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
39.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2004 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to Extraterritorial Income
(ETI) exclusion benefits of $4.9 million and
$23.3 million of net tax impact from foreign operations
resulting from approximately $85 million in foreign
earnings repatriation to pay down U.S. debt and increases
in worldwide tax reserves.
The 2003 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to ETI exclusion benefits of
$2.5 million, changes in valuation allowances of
$5.5 million primarily relating to foreign tax credits and
the net impact of
non-U.S. operations
of $2.2 million.
The 2002 effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to ETI exclusion benefits of
$4.7 million and higher non-US statutory tax rates.
SFAS No. 109 requires us to provide deferred taxes for
the temporary differences associated with our investment in
foreign subsidiaries which have a financial reporting basis that
exceeds tax basis unless we can assert permanent reinvestment in
foreign jurisdictions pursuant to APB No. 23. Financial
reporting basis and tax basis differences in investments in
foreign subsidiaries consist of unremitted earnings and losses
as well as foreign currency translation adjustments.
During the year ended December 31, 2001, we ceased our
ability to make the APB No. 23 permanent reinvestment
assertion. For 2001 and during each of the three years reported
in the period ended December 31, 2004, we have not
recognized any net deferred tax assets attributable to
unremitted earnings or foreign currency translation adjustments
in our foreign subsidiaries with excess financial reporting
basis due to estimated excess foreign tax credits and other
attributes. We had cash and deemed dividend distributions from
our foreign subsidiaries that resulted in the recognition of
approximately $20 million and $8 million of income tax
expense during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. As we have not recorded a benefit for the excess
foreign tax credits associated with deemed repatriation of
unremitted earnings, these credits are not available to offset
the liability associated with these dividends.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the 2004 Act) was signed into law, creating a
temporary incentive for U.S. multinationals to repatriate
accumulated income earned outside the U.S. pursuant to
qualified dividend reinvestment plans at an effective tax rate
of 5.25% versus the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%.
During 2004, we repatriated approximately $46 million (as
part of the $85 million discussed above) pursuant to a
dividend reinvestment plan. We have not recognized the lower tax
rate on these dividends in our financial statements due to
uncertainties surrounding the realization of this benefit and
122
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
interpretation of the 2004 Act. To the extent this uncertainty
is favorably resolved in a future reporting period, the benefit
associated with these dividends will be recognized in that
period.
The 2004 Act also provides for a phase out of the existing ETI
exclusion for foreign export sales, as it was viewed to be
inconsistent with the international trade protocols set by the
European Union. This phase out provides that the benefit for our
otherwise qualifying export sales in 2005 and 2006 will be
limited to approximately 80% and 60%, respectively. As a
replacement for the loss of the ETI export incentive, the
2004 Act provides a deduction from income for qualified
domestic production activities, which will be phased in from
2005 through 2010. The impact of Internal Revenue Code
section 199 manufacturing deduction to our future tax rate
has not yet been quantified. Under the guidance of FSP
No. FAS 109-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 109 to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the tax deduction on
qualified production activities will be treated as a special
deduction as described in SFAS No. 109. As such, the
special deduction will be reported in the period in which the
deduction is claimed on our tax return.
We establish reserves for open tax years for certain positions
that are subject to challenge by various tax authorities. Based
on events occurring in 2004, we increased total reserves
approximately $11 million, for non-U.S. tax exposures
primarily related to debt equity structures and transfer pricing.
We record valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount
of deferred tax assets that may not be realized based upon our
analysis of existing deferred tax assets, net operating losses
and tax credits by jurisdiction and expectations of our ability
to utilize these tax attributes through a review of past,
current and estimated future taxable income and establishment of
tax strategies. The net increase in state valuation allowances
of $4.6 million is reflected net of other state impacts in the
rate reconciliation above. Similarly, changes in valuation
allowances related to foreign net operating losses and deferred
tax assets are reported as a portion of the net foreign impact
to the overall effective tax rate. During 2004 there were no
significant changes in foreign valuation allowances. We
decreased valuation allowances by $2.0 million for foreign tax
credit carryforwards as a result of utilization of credits in
2004 and due to the extension of the carryover period to
10 years pursuant to the 2004 Act.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the
consolidated deferred tax assets and liabilities were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Deferred tax assets related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefits
|
|
$ |
78,869 |
|
|
$ |
73,495 |
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
43,081 |
|
|
|
39,076 |
|
|
Compensation accruals
|
|
|
35,157 |
|
|
|
23,420 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
26,351 |
|
|
|
13,504 |
|
|
Credit carryforwards
|
|
|
16,660 |
|
|
|
24,945 |
|
|
Loss on dispositions
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
Warranty and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
28,288 |
|
|
|
28,883 |
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14,488 |
|
|
|
6,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
243,392 |
|
|
|
215,738 |
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(34,208 |
) |
|
|
(30,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
209,184 |
|
|
|
185,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Deferred tax liabilities related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(49,732 |
) |
|
|
(53,661 |
) |
|
Goodwill and Intangibles
|
|
|
(39,653 |
) |
|
|
(32,505 |
) |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain
|
|
|
(33,717 |
) |
|
|
(22,517 |
) |
|
Foreign losses subject to recapture
|
|
|
(10,699 |
) |
|
|
(11,562 |
) |
|
Foreign equity investments
|
|
|
(6,819 |
) |
|
|
(3,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(140,620 |
) |
|
|
(123,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$ |
68,564 |
|
|
$ |
61,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have approximately $254 million of U.S. and foreign net
operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2004. Of this
total, $148 million are state net operating losses, most of
which are reserved with a valuation allowance. Net operating
losses generated in the U.S., if unused, will begin to expire in
2005, with the majority expiring in 2016. The majority of our
non-U.S. net
operating losses carry forward without expiration. Additionally,
we have approximately $10 million of foreign tax credit
carryforwards at December 31, 2004, expiring in 2010
through 2012 for which no valuation allowance reserves have been
recorded.
Earnings (loss) before income taxes comprised:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
U.S.
|
|
$ |
(40,363 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,451 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,308 |
) |
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
99,987 |
|
|
|
57,348 |
|
|
|
81,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
59,624 |
|
|
$ |
55,897 |
|
|
$ |
62,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. |
BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION |
We are principally engaged in the worldwide design, manufacture,
distribution and service of industrial flow management
equipment. We provide pumps, valves and mechanical seals
primarily for the petroleum industry, chemical-processing
industry, power-generation industry, water industry, general
industry and other industries requiring flow management products.
We have the following three divisions, each of which constitutes
a business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pump Division; |
|
|
|
Flow Solutions Division; and |
|
|
|
Flow Control Division. |
Each division manufactures different products and is defined by
the type of products and services provided. Each division has a
President, who reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer,
and a Division Controller, who reports directly to our Chief
Accounting Officer. For decision-making purposes, our
Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior
executive management use financial information
124
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
generated and reported at the division level. Our corporate
headquarters does not constitute a separate division or business
segment.
We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on
each segments operating income excluding special items,
such as restructuring and integration costs related to the IFC
acquisition. We believe that special items, while indicative of
efforts to integrate acquired companies such as IFC and IDP into
our business, do not reflect ongoing business results. We
believe investors and other users of our financial statements
can better evaluate and analyze historical and future business
trends if special items are excluded from each segments
operating income. Operating income before special items is not a
recognized measure under GAAP and should not be viewed as an
alternative to, or a better indicator of, GAAP measures of
performance.
Amounts classified as All Other include the corporate
headquarters costs and other minor entities that do not
constitute separate segments. Intersegment sales and transfers
are recorded at cost plus a profit margin, with the margin on
such sales eliminated with consolidation.
Effective January 1, 2004, we realigned certain small sites
between segments. Accordingly, the segment information for all
periods presented herein has been reported under our revised
organizational structure.
The following is a summary of the financial information of the
reportable segments reconciled to the amounts reported in the
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve | |
|
Flow | |
|
Flow | |
|
Reportable | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Pump | |
|
Solutions | |
|
Control | |
|
Segments | |
|
All Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$ |
1,323,399 |
|
|
$ |
360,333 |
|
|
$ |
949,157 |
|
|
$ |
2,632,889 |
|
|
$ |
5,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,638,199 |
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
|
33,648 |
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
|
45,336 |
|
|
|
(45,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income(1)
|
|
|
110,113 |
|
|
|
72,573 |
|
|
|
59,590 |
|
|
|
242,276 |
|
|
|
(86,495 |
) |
|
|
155,781 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
31,703 |
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
|
31,062 |
|
|
|
68,675 |
|
|
|
4,481 |
|
|
|
73,156 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,365,416 |
|
|
|
172,089 |
|
|
|
1,001,847 |
|
|
|
2,539,352 |
|
|
|
94,684 |
|
|
|
2,634,036 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
18,815 |
|
|
|
3,581 |
|
|
|
14,298 |
|
|
|
36,694 |
|
|
|
8,547 |
|
|
|
45,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve | |
|
Flow | |
|
Flow | |
|
Reportable | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Pump | |
|
Solutions | |
|
Control | |
|
Segments | |
|
All Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Year ended December 31, 2003:
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$ |
1,159,108 |
|
|
$ |
333,441 |
|
|
$ |
874,055 |
|
|
$ |
2,366,604 |
|
|
$ |
5,955 |
|
|
$ |
2,372,559 |
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
5,531 |
|
|
|
24,239 |
|
|
|
7,380 |
|
|
|
37,150 |
|
|
|
(37,150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (before special items)(2)
|
|
|
85,898 |
|
|
|
73,901 |
|
|
|
61,091 |
|
|
|
220,890 |
|
|
|
(56,324 |
) |
|
|
164,566 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
30,469 |
|
|
|
6,662 |
|
|
|
29,029 |
|
|
|
66,160 |
|
|
|
6,008 |
|
|
|
72,168 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,319,510 |
|
|
|
169,555 |
|
|
|
1,014,133 |
|
|
|
2,503,198 |
|
|
|
177,314 |
|
|
|
2,680,512 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
10,350 |
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
11,814 |
|
|
|
25,888 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
28,788 |
|
125
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve | |
|
Flow | |
|
Flow | |
|
Reportable | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
Pump | |
|
Solutions | |
|
Control | |
|
Segments | |
|
All Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Year ended December 31, 2002:
(As restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$ |
1,176,098 |
|
|
$ |
325,381 |
|
|
$ |
720,216 |
|
|
$ |
2,221,695 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
2,228,036 |
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
5,394 |
|
|
|
23,264 |
|
|
|
7,247 |
|
|
|
35,905 |
|
|
|
(35,905 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (before special items)(3)
|
|
|
121,254 |
|
|
|
64,641 |
|
|
|
42,241 |
|
|
|
228,136 |
|
|
|
(34,781 |
) |
|
|
193,355 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
29,562 |
|
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
22,357 |
|
|
|
59,069 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
64,475 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,322,805 |
|
|
|
172,708 |
|
|
|
976,105 |
|
|
|
2,471,618 |
|
|
|
168,255 |
|
|
|
2,639,873 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
12,166 |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
11,105 |
|
|
|
26,315 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
30,875 |
|
|
|
(1) |
There were no special items in 2004. |
|
(2) |
Special items reflect costs incurred by Flow Control Division in
association with the IFC acquisition including integration
expense of $19.8 million and restructuring expense of
$2.9 million. |
|
(3) |
Special items reflect costs incurred by Flow Control Division in
association with the IFC acquisition including a
$5.2 million negative purchase accounting adjustment
associated with the required
write-up and sale of
inventory (recorded as a cost of sales), integration expense of
$16.2 million and restructuring expense of
$4.3 million. |
Segment operating income before special items can be reconciled
to the consolidated amounts as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
(As restated) |
|
|
Profit |
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Total segment operating income (before special items)
|
|
$ |
155,781 |
|
|
$ |
164,566 |
|
|
$ |
193,355 |
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
79,074 |
|
|
|
80,128 |
|
|
|
92,932 |
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
14,375 |
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Loss on debt repayment and extinguishment
|
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
11,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustment associated with the required
write-up of inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,240 |
|
|
Integration expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
Restructuring expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,157 |
|
|
|
108,669 |
|
|
|
130,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$ |
59,624 |
|
|
$ |
55,897 |
|
|
$ |
62,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information We attribute sales to
different geographic areas based on the facilities
locations. Long-lived assets are classified based on the
geographic area in which the assets are located and
126
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
exclude deferred tax assets categorized as non-current. Sales
and long-lived assets by geographic area are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived | |
|
|
|
|
Sales | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Assets | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
United States
|
|
$ |
1,122,063 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,037,394 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
1,151,561 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
454,043 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
Other(1)
|
|
|
364,575 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$ |
2,638,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,573,937 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived | |
|
|
|
|
Sales | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Assets | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
United States
|
|
$ |
1,092,922 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,078,881 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
995,688 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
% |
|
|
438,872 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
Other(1)
|
|
|
283,949 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
68,497 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$ |
2,372,559 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,586,250 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived | |
|
|
|
|
Sales | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Assets | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
United States
|
|
$ |
1,146,031 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,081,212 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
789,668 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
398,914 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
Other(1)
|
|
|
292,337 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
64,747 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total
|
|
$ |
2,228,036 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,544,873 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes Canada, South America and Asia Pacific. No individual
geographic segment within this group represents 10% or more of
consolidated totals. |
|
(2) |
Net sales to international customers, including export sales
from the United States, represented 63%, 60% and 55% in 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively. |
Major Customer Information We have a large
number of customers across a large number of manufacturing and
service facilities and do not believe that we have sales to any
individual customer that represent 10% or more of consolidated
sales for any of the years presented.
127
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
19. |
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
The following presents the components of accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net of related tax effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(As restated) | |
|
(As restated) | |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
(2,384 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,798 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,715 |
) |
Minimum pension liability effects
|
|
|
(62,102 |
) |
|
|
(53,891 |
) |
|
|
(62,388 |
) |
Cash flow hedging activity
|
|
|
(2,428 |
) |
|
|
(4,307 |
) |
|
|
(6,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(66,914 |
) |
|
$ |
(81,996 |
) |
|
$ |
(150,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present a summary of the changes in
accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Before-Tax | |
|
|
|
After-Tax | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Income Tax | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
27,320 |
|
|
$ |
(5,906 |
) |
|
$ |
21,414 |
|
Minimum pension liability effects
|
|
|
(13,300 |
) |
|
|
5,089 |
|
|
|
(8,211 |
) |
Cash flow hedging activity
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
$ |
16,451 |
|
|
$ |
(1,369 |
) |
|
$ |
15,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Before-Tax | |
|
|
|
After-Tax | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Income Tax | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
74,534 |
|
|
$ |
(16,617 |
) |
|
$ |
57,917 |
|
Minimum pension liability effects
|
|
|
12,146 |
|
|
|
(3,649 |
) |
|
|
8,497 |
|
Cash flow hedging activity
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
$ |
89,724 |
|
|
$ |
(21,436 |
) |
|
$ |
68,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Before-Tax | |
|
|
|
After-Tax | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Income Tax | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
53,158 |
|
|
$ |
(16,640 |
) |
|
$ |
36,518 |
|
Minimum pension liability effects
|
|
|
(68,863 |
) |
|
|
23,717 |
|
|
|
(45,146 |
) |
Cash flow hedging activity
|
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (expense)
|
|
$ |
(19,300 |
) |
|
$ |
8,323 |
|
|
$ |
(10,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
20. |
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) |
The following presents a summary of the unaudited quarterly data
for 2004 and 2003, restated to give effect to the adjustments
described in Note 2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
4th |
|
3rd |
|
2nd |
|
1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Previously |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
As Restated |
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in millions, except per share data) |
Sales
|
|
$ |
732.5 |
|
|
$ |
652.1 |
|
|
$ |
648.5 |
|
|
$ |
611.4 |
|
|
$ |
610.8 |
|
|
$ |
605.1 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
208.4 |
|
|
|
193.8 |
|
|
|
197.7 |
|
|
|
178.1 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
|
178.9 |
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (basic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
Quarter |
|
4th | |
|
3rd | |
|
2nd | |
|
1st | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
As Restated | |
|
|
|
As Restated | |
|
|
|
As Restated | |
|
|
|
As Restated | |
|
|
As | |
|
|
|
with | |
|
As | |
|
|
|
with | |
|
As | |
|
|
|
with | |
|
As | |
|
|
|
with | |
|
|
Previously | |
|
As | |
|
Discontinued | |
|
Previously | |
|
As | |
|
Discontinued | |
|
Previously | |
|
As | |
|
Discontinued | |
|
Previously | |
|
As | |
|
Discontinued | |
|
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Operations | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Operations | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Operations | |
|
Reported | |
|
Restated | |
|
Operations | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in millions, except per share data) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
660.1 |
|
|
$ |
658.6 |
|
|
$ |
651.2 |
|
|
$ |
565.6 |
|
|
$ |
561.8 |
|
|
$ |
556.0 |
|
|
$ |
614.4 |
|
|
$ |
614.3 |
|
|
$ |
608.2 |
|
|
$ |
564.3 |
|
|
$ |
562.3 |
|
|
$ |
557.2 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
199.4 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
188.0 |
|
|
|
172.7 |
|
|
|
168.7 |
|
|
|
168.6 |
|
|
|
181.8 |
|
|
|
182.4 |
|
|
|
181.4 |
|
|
|
168.6 |
|
|
|
168.5 |
|
|
|
167.4 |
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
Earnings per share (basic)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Earnings per share (diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
FLOWSERVE
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The significant fourth quarter adjustments for 2004 pretax were
to record: (i) litigation accrual of $4.8 million,
(ii) unclaimed property of $4.0 million,
(iii) sales tax reserve of $3.6 million, (iv) a
charge to cost of sales to increase inventory reserves by
$13.9 million and (v) annual bonus reserve
finalization increase of $5.5 million.
The significant fourth quarter adjustment to 2003 pretax was to
record a charge to cost of sales to increase inventory reserves
by $2.5 million.
In March 2005 we obtained consents from our major lenders that
enhanced our flexibility under our 2000 Credit Facilities to
among other things permit the August 2005 refinancing of our
2000 Credit Facilities and the repurchase of our
12.25% Senior Subordinated Notes. See Note 12 for
further discussion of the New Credit Facilities and the
retirement of the 2000 Credit Facilities and the Senior
Subordinated Notes, including a discussion of cash paid and
expenses recognized pursuant to the refinancing.
To promote continuity of senior management, in March 2005 our
Board of Directors approved a Transitional Executive Security
Plan, which provides cash and stock-based incentives to key
management personnel to remain employed by us for the near term.
As a result of this plan, we recorded additional compensation
expenses in 2005 of approximately $3 million. See
Transitional Executive Security Plan in Item 11
of this Annual Report for a detailed discussion on this plan.
During 2005, we made a number of modifications to our stock
plans, including the acceleration of certain restricted stock
grants and outstanding options, as well as the extension of the
exercise period associated with certain outstanding options.
These modifications resulted from severance agreements with
former executives and from our decision to temporarily suspend
option exercises. See Note 9.
As a result of the severance and executive search payments
related to the management changes of approximately
$2 million, expenses under the Transitional Executive
Security Plan described above and stock compensation expense
resulting from the modification of our stock option plans
described above, we recorded total incremental compensation
expense of approximately $12 million in 2005.
In the first quarter of 2005, we made a definitive decision to
sell certain non-core service operations, collectively called
the General Services Group (GSG) and engaged an
investment banking firm to commence marketing. As a result, we
reclassified the operation to discontinued operations in the
first quarter of 2005. Sales for GSG were $116 million in
2004. Total assets at December 31, 2004 ascribed to GSG
were approximately $63 million. We performed an impairment
analysis of long-lived assets on a held and used basis, and
concluded that no impairment was warranted as of
December 31, 2004. GSG was sold on December 31, 2005
for approximately $16 million in gross cash proceeds,
subject to final working capital adjustments, while retaining
approximately $12 million of net accounts receivable. We
used approximately $11 million of the net cash proceeds to
reduce our indebtedness. In 2005, we recorded an impairment loss
of approximately $31 million related to GSG.
130
|
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) are controls and other procedures
that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the
information that we are required to disclose in the reports that
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report, our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31,
2004. In making this evaluation, our management considered the
matters relating to the restatement of our financial statements,
and the material weaknesses discussed below. Based on this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of
December 31, 2004.
In light of the material weaknesses described below, we
performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure
that our consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report were prepared in accordance with GAAP. These
measures included, among other things, expansion of our year-end
closing procedures, including the consolidation process, and
dedication of significant internal resources and external
consultants to scrutinize account analyses and reconciliations
at a detailed level. As a result of these and other expanded
procedures as described in Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations we concluded that the consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report present fairly, in all
material respects, our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management, under the supervision of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
GAAP. Internal control over financial reporting includes
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
|
|
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the
Company; and |
|
|
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the Companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with existing policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
131
Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, our management conducted an assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on the framework and criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In
connection with managements assessment of our internal
control over financial reporting described above, management has
identified the following material weaknesses in our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
(1) We did not maintain an effective control environment
because of the following material weaknesses: |
|
|
|
(a) We did not effectively communicate the importance of
controls throughout our Company or set an adequate tone around
control consciousness. |
|
|
(b) We did not maintain a sufficient complement of
personnel with an appropriate level of accounting and tax
knowledge, experience and training in the application of GAAP
commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. |
|
|
(c) We failed to implement adequate assignment of authority
and responsibility and the necessary lines of communication
between operations and accounting and financial staff and
personnel. Specifically, there was inadequate sharing of
financial information within and across our corporate and
divisional offices and other operating facilities to adequately
raise issues to the appropriate level of accounting and
financial reporting personnel. |
|
|
(d) We did not maintain an effective anti-fraud program
designed to detect and prevent fraud relating to (i) an
effective whistle-blower program, (ii) consistent
background checks of personnel in positions of responsibility,
and (iii) an ongoing program to manage identified fraud
risks. |
|
|
(e) We did not maintain an adequate level of control
consciousness as it relates to the establishment and update of
our policies and procedures with respect to the primary
components of information technology general controls. This
resulted in either not having adequate controls designed and in
place or not achieving operating effectiveness over controls in
systems development, software change management, computer
operations and security, which we refer to as information
technology general controls. This contributed to the
material weakness discussed in item 4 below. |
The control environment sets the tone of an organization,
influences the control consciousness of its people, and is the
foundation of all other components of internal control over
financial reporting. Each of these control environment material
weaknesses contributed to the material weaknesses discussed in
items 2 through 20 below.
|
|
|
(2) We did not maintain effective monitoring controls to
determine the adequacy of our internal control over financial
reporting and related policies and procedures because of the
following material weaknesses: |
|
|
|
(a) Our policies and procedures with respect to the review,
supervision and monitoring of our accounting operations
throughout the organization were either not designed and in
place or not operating effectively. |
|
|
(b) We did not maintain an effective internal audit
function. Specifically, there was an insufficient complement of
personnel with an appropriate level of experience, training and
lines of reporting to allow internal audit to function
effectively in determining the adequacy of our internal control
over financial reporting and monitoring the ongoing
effectiveness thereof. |
Each of these material weaknesses relating to the monitoring of
our internal control over financial reporting contributed to the
material weaknesses discussed in items 3 through 20 below.
132
|
|
|
(3) We did not maintain effective controls over certain of
our period-end financial close and reporting processes.
Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls over the
preparation and review of the interim and annual consolidated
financial statements, which resulted in the following material
weaknesses. |
|
|
|
(a) We did not maintain effective controls over the
period-end consolidation process. Specifically, we did not
maintain effective controls to ensure that we identified and
accumulated all required supporting information to ensure the
completeness and accuracy of the consolidated financial
statements and that balances and disclosures reported in the
consolidated financial statements reconciled to the underlying
supporting schedules and accounting records. This control
deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in our annual
2002 consolidated financial statements, our interim and annual
2003 consolidated financial statements and our interim
consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of 2004
which have been corrected in the restatement of our consolidated
financial statements for each of these periods (the restatement
of our annual 2002, our annual and interim 2003 and our 2004
first quarter consolidated financial statements is collectively
referred to as the 2004 Restatement) and
(ii) adjustments, including audit adjustments, to our 2004
annual and second, third and fourth quarters consolidated
financial statements (collectively referred to as the 2004
Adjustments). |
|
|
(b) We did not maintain effective controls over the
translation of our subsidiary financial statements denominated
in currencies other than U.S. dollars. This control
deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in our
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 Restatement and (ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
|
(4) We did not maintain effective segregation of duties
over automated and manual transaction processes. Specifically,
we did not maintain effective controls over the granting,
maintenance and monitoring of access to financial systems and
data. Certain information technology personnel had unrestricted
access to financial applications, programs and data beyond that
needed to perform their individual job responsibilities and
without any independent monitoring. In addition, certain
financial personnel in our purchasing, payables, production and
inventory control departments had incompatible duties that
allowed for the creation, review and processing of certain
financial data without independent review and authorization.
This control deficiency affects substantially all financial
statement accounts. This control deficiency did not result in
adjustments to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(5) We did not maintain effective controls over the
preparation, review and approval of account reconciliations.
Specifically, we did not have effective controls over the
completeness and accuracy of supporting schedules for
substantially all financial statement account reconciliations.
This control deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in
our consolidated financial statements which have been corrected
in the 2004 Restatement and (ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(6) We did not maintain effective controls over the
complete and accurate recording and monitoring of intercompany
accounts. Specifically, effective controls were not designed and
in place to ensure that intercompany balances were completely
and accurately classified and reported in our underlying
accounting records and to ensure proper elimination as part of
the consolidation process. This control deficiency affects
substantially all financial statement accounts and resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(7) We did not maintain effective controls over the
recording of journal entries, both recurring and non-recurring.
Specifically, effective controls were not designed and in place
to ensure that journal entries were properly prepared with
sufficient support or documentation or were reviewed and
approved to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the journal
entries recorded. This control deficiency affects substantially
all financial statement accounts and resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
133
|
|
|
(8) We did not maintain effective controls over the
existence, completeness and accuracy of fixed assets and related
depreciation and amortization expense. Specifically, effective
controls were not designed and in place for the periodic
physical verification of fixed assets and the selection of
appropriate useful lives for plant and equipment and
amortization periods for leasehold improvements. This control
deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in our
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 Restatement and (ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(9) We did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness and accuracy of revenue, deferred revenue, accounts
receivable and accrued liabilities. Specifically, we failed to
recognize revenue using the
percentage-of-completion
method for certain long-term contracts in accordance with GAAP.
Also, effective controls were not designed and in place to
ensure that sales orders were authorized, complete, accurate and
recorded on a timely basis. Furthermore, review and approval
procedures were not effective to ensure that invoices or
customer credit and credit memoranda adjustments were
completely, timely and accurately applied to customer receivable
accounts and that unapplied cash receipts were properly
identified as unclaimed third party property. This control
deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in our
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 Restatement and (ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(10) We did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness, accuracy, valuation and existence of our inventory
and related cost of sales accounts. Specifically, our controls
with respect to the accuracy of product costing, job order
closeout, accounting for cost accumulation on long-term
contracts and certain inventory management processes, including
obsolete and slow-moving inventory identification,
lower-of-cost-or-market
and LIFO inventory valuation were not effective. Also, we did
not maintain effective controls over the accurate and timely
recording of inventory receipts and shipments. Furthermore, we
did not maintain effective controls over the accuracy and
completeness of periodic physical counts of our inventory
quantities. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(11) We did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness and accuracy of our reporting of certain
non-U.S. pension
plans. Specifically, we failed to obtain actuarial valuations
for certain of our
non-U.S. pension
plans to ensure that we properly accounted for and reported
pension expense and related obligations for certain
non-U.S. pension
plans in accordance with GAAP. This control deficiency resulted
in (i) misstatements in our consolidated financial
statements which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(12) We did not maintain effective controls over the
complete and accurate recording of rights and obligations
associated with our accounts receivable factoring and
securitization transactions. Specifically, effective controls
were not designed and in place to ensure that the gain and loss
on each receivable sale, the receivable balance and the
associated accretion of interest, and recording of fees
associated with the securitization facility were accurate and
complete. This control deficiency primarily affected accounts
receivable, debt due within one year, and interest expense, net.
This control deficiency resulted in (i) misstatements in
our fourth quarter and annual consolidated financial statements
for 2003 which have been corrected in the restatement of our
consolidated financial statements for each of these periods and
(ii) adjustments, including audit adjustments, to our
fourth quarter and annual consolidated financial statements for
2004. |
|
|
(13) We did not maintain effective controls over accounting
for certain derivative transactions. Specifically, we did not
adequately document the criteria for measuring hedge
effectiveness at the inception of certain derivative
transactions and did not subsequently evaluate and document the
ongoing effectiveness of certain foreign currency forward
contracts in order to qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
This control deficiency affected accounts receivable, long-term
debt, other expense, other comprehensive income and accumulated
other comprehensive income. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
134
|
|
|
(14) We did not maintain effective controls over the
accounting for equity investments. Specifically, we did not
maintain effective controls with respect to adjusting for
differences between GAAP and the accounting standards used in
certain foreign countries. This control deficiency affected
other assets, net and selling, general and administrative
expense This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(15) We did not maintain effective controls over our
accounting for income taxes, including income taxes payable,
deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the related
income tax provision. Specifically, we did not maintain
effective controls over the accuracy and completeness of the
components of the income tax provision calculations and related
deferred income taxes and income taxes payable, and over the
monitoring of the differences between the income tax basis and
the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities to
effectively reconcile the differences to the reported deferred
income tax balances. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(16) We did not maintain effective controls over our
accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Specifically, the
controls with respect to the application of purchase accounting,
including the establishment of deferred taxes, were ineffective
and resulted in errors in the allocation of the purchase price
to the underlying assets acquired, including goodwill, and
liabilities assumed. This primarily affected property, plant and
equipment, deferred income tax assets and liabilities, goodwill
and long-term liabilities. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(17) We did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness and accuracy of certain accrued liabilities and the
related operating expense accounts. Specifically, effective
controls were not designed and in place to ensure the
completeness, accuracy and timeliness of the recording of
accrued liabilities and related expenses at period end. This
control deficiency primarily affected our accrued warranty
obligations,
non-U.S. litigation
contingencies, sales tax liabilities, self-insurance reserves,
liabilities for goods received not invoiced, and related
operating expenses. This control deficiency resulted in
(i) misstatements in our consolidated financial statements
which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(18) We did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness, accuracy and validity of payroll and accounts
payable disbursements to ensure that they were adequately
reviewed and approved prior to being recorded and reported. This
control deficiency primarily affected our accounts payable and
accrued liabilities. This control deficiency did not result in
any adjustments to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(19) We did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness, accuracy and validity of spreadsheets used in our
financial reporting process to ensure that access was restricted
to appropriate personnel, and that unauthorized modification of
the data or formulas within spreadsheets was prevented. This
control deficiency affects substantially all financial statement
accounts and resulted in (i) misstatements in our
consolidated financial statements which have been corrected in
the 2004 Restatement and (ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
|
|
(20) We did not maintain effective controls over the
accuracy, valuation and disclosure of our goodwill and
intangible asset accounts and the related amortization and
impairment expense accounts. Specifically, effective controls
were not designed and in place to ensure that an adequate
periodic impairment analysis was conducted, reviewed, and
approved in order to identify and record impairments as required
under GAAP and that periodic amortization expense was accurately
and completely recorded and reported. This control deficiency
resulted in (i) misstatements in our consolidated financial
statements which have been corrected in the 2004 Restatement and
(ii) the 2004 Adjustments. |
135
Each of the control deficiencies described in items 1 through 20
above could result in a misstatement of the aforementioned
accounts or disclosures that would result in a material
misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial
statements that would not be prevented or detected.
Management has determined that each of the control deficiencies
in items 1 through 20 above constitutes a material weakness.
As a result of the material weaknesses described above, our
management concluded that as of December 31, 2004, we did
not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework, issued by the COSO.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included
herein.
Plan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses
In response to the identified material weaknesses, our
management, with oversight from our audit committee, has
dedicated significant resources, including the engagement of
external consultants to support management in its efforts to
improve our control environment and to remedy the identified
material weaknesses. These ongoing efforts are focused on
(i) expanding our organizational capabilities to improve
our control environment; (ii) implementing process changes
to strengthen our internal control and monitoring activities;
and (iii) implementing adequate information technology
general controls.
From a control environment and organizational perspective, in
addition to assembling a new senior management team, we, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
appointed a Chief Compliance Officer; |
|
|
|
expanded and strengthened our internal audit organization, which
now reports directly to our audit committee, by hiring
additional senior audit staff as well as increasing the number
of external consultants engaged by our internal audit
organization; |
|
|
|
expanded our accounting policy and controls organization by
creating and filling new positions with qualified accounting and
finance personnel, including the director of accounting policy
and controls, director of financial reporting and corporate
accounting, director of company level, corporate and antifraud
controls and director of site controls; |
|
|
|
redefined certain job requirements for our finance employees and
established a team, led by a newly hired senior manager, focused
on developing and implementing improvements in our finance
function; |
|
|
|
re-staffed our senior tax positions and expanded our tax
compliance and audit staff, including creating and filling the
position of a European tax director; |
|
|
|
centralized our information technology management structure to
provide more effective monitoring and control capabilities for
information technology general controls over financial reporting
as such controls relate to database, security, application and
infrastructure change management; and |
|
|
|
initiated a rotation program designed to increase cross-border
skills of our accounting personnel and communication within our
global accounting organizations through rotation of our
U.S. manager level finance personnel in our foreign
locations and our foreign manager level finance personnel in the
U.S. |
In addition to strengthening our control environment and
organizational capabilities, we have implemented several process
changes designed to strengthen our internal control and
monitoring activities, including:
|
|
|
|
|
enhanced our GAAP review and application procedures, pursuant to
which our corporate accounting policy and controls organization
(i) periodically reviews our accounting policies,
(ii) where appropriate, makes enhancements to our
accounting policies and improves or formalizes documentation of
such |
136
|
|
|
|
|
policies, and (iii) communicates our accounting policies to
our financial and accounting personnel on a company-wide basis; |
|
|
|
created a centrally managed Internal Control Financial Review
Program that encompasses analytical reviews, internal control
questionnaires, antifraud matrices and site visits by key
finance management and internal audit personnel across multiple
locations; |
|
|
|
improved communication and disclosure procedures by
(i) instituting monthly global conference calls held by our
Chief Accounting Officer to communicate current transactions,
events and trends to corporate, division and site finance
managers, (ii) conducting global accounting conferences and
training, and discussions of policy and procedures, revenue
recognition and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements,
(iii) expanding our financial statement review and
certification process for our annual and quarterly reports filed
with the SEC, and (iv) enhancing the features of our
site-level financial disclosure checklist and automating the
checklist response tracking; |
|
|
|
enhanced policies and procedures designed to detect and prevent
fraud, including ethics programs initiated under the guidance of
our Ethics and Compliance Committee; and |
|
|
|
addressed key financial control activities where segregation of
duty issues were identified. |
Furthermore, to address the material weaknesses related to our
information technology systems and applications, in addition to
reorganizing our information technology management structure as
discussed above, we, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
enhanced our policies, procedures and communication of the
importance of control consciousness around general computer and
application controls, including data retention and documentation
of data and system changes; |
|
|
|
centralized network access and security and enhanced intrusion
detection and virus and spam safeguards of our firewalls; |
|
|
|
centralized and upgraded our Local Area Network management; |
|
|
|
migrated additional Information Technology operations to our
data centers to streamline Information Technology management of
our application systems; |
|
|
|
completed the first phase of a multi-site implementation of a
new financial control and reporting system in Latin America; |
|
|
|
migrated four of our locations with aging Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) systems to systems with stronger
internal controls; and |
|
|
|
implemented enhancements to our access control password
mechanisms, including stronger password parameters and employee
status reviews. |
We believe that the foregoing actions have improved and will
continue to improve our internal control over financial
reporting, as well as our disclosure controls and procedures.
However, we do not believe that all of the material weaknesses
described above will be remediated by December 31, 2005,
our next reporting as of date under Sarbanes-Oxley
Section 404. Accordingly, we expect to report that our
internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure
controls and procedures remain ineffective as of
December 31, 2005. Furthermore, certain of these
remediation efforts, primarily associated with our information
technology infrastructure and related controls, will require
significant ongoing effort and investment. Our management, with
the oversight of our audit committee, will continue to identify
and take steps to remedy known material weaknesses as
expeditiously as possible and enhance the overall design and
capability of our control environment. As a further commitment
to strengthening our organization, we have (i) separated
the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors to strengthen our corporate governance
structure and (ii) re-emphasized ethics throughout our
organization and distributed an enhanced Code of Business
Conduct to all of our U.S. employees, posted foreign
language versions of our Code of Business Conduct on our website
and enhanced the features of our global ethics hotline. We
intend to further expand
137
our internal audit, accounting policy and controls and tax
compliance capabilities by attracting additional talent and
enhancing training in such matters. We also intend to take
additional measures to reduce the complexity and increase
standardization, usability, efficiency, security and
effectiveness of our information technology systems.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER CORPORATE OFFICERS
OF THE REGISTRANT |
Our Board of Directors consists of 10 members, who are
divided into three classes. Directors are elected for three-year
terms. The terms for members of each class end in successive
years.
The Board of Directors has determined, after considering all the
relevant facts and circumstances, that each member of the Board
of Directors is independent, as independence is
defined by the revised listing standards of the NYSE, with the
exception of Mr. Lewis M. Kling. Mr. Kling is not
considered independent as he serves as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company.
Non-management directors regularly schedule executive sessions
in which non-management directors meet without the presence of
management. The presiding director of such executive sessions is
Kevin E. Sheehan. Interested parties may communicate with
the non-management directors by submitting a letter addressed to
Non-management Directors c/o Ronald F. Shuff, Vice
President, Secretary and General Counsel at Flowserve
Corporation, 5215 N. OConnor Blvd.,
Ste. 2300, Irving, Texas 75039.
The table below sets forth the names and ages of each of our
directors, executive officers and certain other officers, as
well as the positions and offices held by such persons. A
summary of the background and experience of each of these
individuals is set forth after the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Andrew J. Beall
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President and President of Flow Solutions Division |
Deborah K. Bethune
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President, Tax |
Mark A. Blinn
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Mark D. Dailey
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer |
Paul W. Fehlman
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Treasurer |
Thomas E. Ferguson
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Vice President and President of Flowserve Pump Division |
Richard J. Guiltinan, Jr.
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
John H. Jacko, Jr.
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President, Marketing and Communications |
Linda P. Jojo
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Information Officer |
Lewis M. Kling
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Thomas L. Pajonas
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President and President of Flow Control Division |
Joseph R. Pinkston, III
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources |
Jerry Rockstroh
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President, Supply Chain and Continuous Improvement Process |
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Ronald F. Shuff
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel |
Christopher A. Bartlett
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director |
Hugh K. Coble
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Director |
Diane C. Harris
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
George T. Haymaker, Jr.
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Director |
Michael F. Johnston
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
Charles M. Rampacek
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director |
James O. Rollans
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
William C. Rusnack
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director |
Kevin E. Sheehan
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director |
Andrew J. Beall has served as our Vice
President and President of Flow Solutions Division since May
2003. From 1994 to 2003, Mr. Beall served in a number of
key U.S. and international management positions with our Company
and its predecessor, The Duriron Company, including as Vice
President of Flowserve Pump Division, Flow Solutions Division
and Flow Control Division in Latin America from 1999 to May 2003.
Deborah K. Bethune has served as our Vice
President, Tax, since November 2004. Prior to that, she served
with Electronic Data Systems Corporation for 17 years,
where she held several tax positions, most recently as the
Director of International Taxes for the Americas and Asia
Pacific regions.
Mark A. Blinn has served as our Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2004. He
served as Chief Financial Officer of FedEx Kinkos Office
and Print Services, Inc. from February 2003 to September
2004, and as Vice President and Treasurer of Kinkos, Inc.
from 2002 to January 2003. Mr. Blinn also served as Vice
President and Chief Accounting Officer of Centex Corporation
from 1999 to 2002.
Mark D. Dailey has served as our Vice
President since February 2005 and Chief Compliance Officer since
June 2005. He served as our Vice President, Supply Chain and
Continuous Improvement, from 1999 through January 2005.
Mr. Dailey was Vice President, Supply Chain, and held other
supply chain management positions from 1992 to 1999 for the
North American Power Tools Division of The Black and Decker
Corporation.
Paul W. Fehlman has served as our Vice
President and Corporate Treasurer since April 2005. He served as
our Director of Financial Services and Assistant Treasurer from
July 2000 to March 2005.
Thomas E. Ferguson has served as our Vice
President and President of Flowserve Pump Division since 2003.
He was President of Flow Solutions Division from 2000 to 2002,
Vice President and General Manager of Flow Solutions Division
North America from 1999 to 2000, and Vice President of Marketing
and Technology for Flow Solutions Division from 1997 to 1999.
Richard J. Guiltinan, Jr. has served as
our Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
since June 2004. Prior to that, he served as a consultant to
Chevron on three multinational restructuring and merger
integration projects in 2003 and 2002. From 1985 to 2001,
Mr. Guiltinan served in accounting and financial management
positions at Caltex Corporation, including as Chief Financial
Officer from February 2000 to November 2001.
John H. Jacko, Jr. has served as our
Vice President, Marketing and Communications, since November
2002. He served as Division Vice President of FPD Marketing and
Customer Management from November 2001 to November 2002.
Mr. Jacko was Vice President of Customer and Product
Support for the Engines and Systems Business and held other
management roles at Honeywell Aerospace from 1999 to 2001. He
was also Vice President of Sales and Service, Commercial
Transport, and held other management roles at Allied Signal
Aerospace from 1995 to 1999.
139
Linda P. Jojo has served as our Vice
President and Chief Information Officer since July 2004. Prior
to that, she served as Chief Information Officer of GE Silicones
Division of General Electric Corporation from 2000 to 2004 and
held other management positions at General Electric Corporation
from 1991 to 2000.
Lewis M. Kling has served as our President,
Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors
since August 2005. Prior to August 2005, he served as our Chief
Operating Officer from July 2004 to July 2005. Before joining
our Company, he served as Group President and Corporate Vice
President of SPX Corporation from October 1999 to January 2004.
Mr. Kling also served as President of Dielectric
Communications, a division of General Signal Corporation,
purchased by SPX Corporation, from June 1997 to October 1999.
Thomas L. Pajonas has served as our Vice
President and President of Flow Control Division since May 2004.
He served as Managing Director from January 2004 to May 2004 and
as Senior Vice President from August 1999 to December 2003 of
the Worldwide Power Segment Business of Alstom, Inc.
Joseph R. Pinkston, III has served as
our Vice President, Human Resources, since September 2005. Prior
to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources of
Unisource Worldwide from March 2003 to December 2004.
Mr. Pinkston also served as Vice President, Human Resources
of Russell Corporation from December 2001 to February 2003 and
as Vice President, Human Resources of Hussmann
International, Inc. from March 1995 to October 2001.
Jerry Rockstroh has served as our Vice President
of Supply Chain and Continuous Improvement Process since
September 2005, and as our Vice President of Supply Chain from
February to August 2005. From September 1983 to February 2005,
he served in various executive level positions within different
business units of AlliedSignal/ Honeywell, including as World
Wide Vice President of Operations & Integrated Supply
Chain.
Ronald F. Shuff has served as our Vice
President since 1990 and Secretary and General Counsel since
1988.
Christopher A. Bartlett has served as a
director since 2002 and serves as a member of the Organization
and Compensation Committee. He was formerly a director from 1988
to 1993. Dr. Bartlett is an Emeritus Professor of Business
Administration at Harvard University. Prior to his academic
career, he was a general manager of Baxter Travenols
French subsidiary and a consultant at McKinsey & Co.
Currently, Dr. Bartlett serves as a Chief Executive Officer
advisor and management consultant on international strategic and
organizational issues to several major corporations.
Hugh K. Coble has served as a director since
1994 and serves as a member of the Organization and Compensation
Committee. He is Vice Chairman, Emeritus, of Fluor Corporation,
a major engineering and construction firm. Mr. Coble was a
director of Fluor Corporation from 1984 and Vice Chairman from
1994 until his retirement in 1997. He joined Fluor Corporation
in 1966 and was Group President of Fluor Daniel, Inc., a
subsidiary of Fluor Corporation, from 1986 to 1994.
Mr. Coble is also a director of Beckman Coulter, Inc.,
a company that sells medical instruments.
Diane C. Harris has served as a director
since 1993 and serves as a member of the Finance Committee. She
is President of Hypotenuse Enterprises, Inc., a merger and
acquisition service and corporate development outsourcing
company. Ms. Harris was Vice President of Corporate
Development of Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated, an optics
and health care products company, from 1981 to 1996, when she
left to lead Hypotenuse Enterprises, Inc. She was a
director of the Association for Corporate Growth from 1993 to
1998 and its elected President from 1997 to 1998.
Ms. Harris is also a director of The Monroe Fund, an
investment company.
George T. Haymaker, Jr. has served as a
director since 1997. He serves as Chairman of the Organization
and Compensation Committee and as a member of the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Haymaker has been
non-executive Chairman of the Board of Kaiser Aluminum
Corporation, a company that is principally a producer of
semi-fabricated aluminum products, since 2001 and non-executive
Chairman of the Board of Safelite Auto Glass, a provider of
automobile replacement glass, since 2000. Mr. Haymaker
140
was Chairman of the Board of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation from
1994 until May 2001 (non-executive Chairman after January 2000)
and its Chief Executive Officer from 1994 to 1999. Before
joining Kaiser Aluminum in 1993 as its President and Chief
Operating Officer, Mr. Haymaker worked with a private
partner in the acquisition and redirection of several metal
fabricating companies. He was Executive Vice President of
Alumax, Inc. from 1984 to 1986 and was Vice President,
International Operations for Alcoa, Inc. from 1982 to 1984.
Mr. Haymaker is also a director of CII Carbon, L.L.C., a
supplier of calcined coke for aluminum smelters, a director of
Mid-America Holdings, Ltd., an aluminum extruder, a director of
360 Networks Corporation, a provider of telecommunication
services, a director of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.,
a global supplier of automotive and commercial wheels, brakes
and other auto suspension components, and a director of SCP Pool
Corp., a distributor of swimming pool and related products.
Michael F. Johnston has served as a director
since 1997. He serves as Chairman of the Finance Committee and
as a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee. Mr. Johnston is currently the Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Visteon Corporation, an
automotive components supplier, and has served there as
Visteons President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Operating Officer at various times since 2000. Before joining
Visteon, Mr. Johnston was employed by Johnson
Controls, Inc., a company serving the automotive and
building services industry, as President of North America/Asia
Pacific, Automotive Systems Group, from 1999 to 2000, President
of Americas Automotive Group from 1997 to 1999 and in other
senior management positions since 1991. He is also a director of
Visteon and a director of Whirlpool Corporation, an appliance
manufacturer.
Charles M. Rampacek has served as a director
since 1998. He serves as the Chairman of the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee and as a member of the Audit
Committee. Mr. Rampacek is currently a business and
management consultant in the energy industry. Mr. Rampacek
served as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Probex Corporation (Probex), an
energy technology company providing proprietary oil recovery
services, from 2000 to 2003. From 1996 to 2000,
Mr. Rampacek served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of
Lyondell-Citgo
Refining, L.P., a manufacturer of petroleum products. From
1982 to 1995, he held various executive positions with
Tenneco Inc. and its energy related subsidiaries, including
President of Tenneco Gas Transportation Company, Executive Vice
President of Tenneco Gas Operations and Senior Vice President of
Refining. On January 24, 2005, John H. Litzler,
Chapter 7 Trustee for Probex Fluids Recovery, Inc., a
subsidiary of Probex, and Kenmore Construction Company, Inc.,
filed a complaint against the former officers and directors of
Probex in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District
of Texas. The complaint requested recovery of certain costs and
damages related to a used lube oil sales contract that was
entered into in early 2003 prior to the filing of Chapter 7
bankruptcy by Probex Fluids Recovery, Inc. The complaint was
defended under Probexs director and officer insurance by
AIG and settlement was reached in December 2005. The settlement
agreement and release was submitted to the bankruptcy trustee in
January 2006 for final resolution. On February 25, 2005,
Cambridge Strategies Group, LLC (Cambridge), filed a
complaint against former officers of Probex in the
160th Judicial District Court in Dallas, Texas. The
complaint requested recovery of funds that Cambridge had loaned
Probex well prior to the filing of Chapter 7 bankruptcy by
Probex. The complaint is currently being defended under
Probexs director and officer insurance by AIG. On
August 31, 2005, John H. Litzler, Chapter 7 Trustee
for Probex Fluids Recovery, Inc., a subsidiary of Probex, filed
a complaint against noteholders of a series of 7% Senior
Convertible Notes of Probex Fluids Recovery, Inc., in the United
States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas. The
complaint requested recovery of certain proceeds from the sale
of Probex Fluids Recovery, Inc. assets that had been previously
distributed to the noteholders, of which Charles M. Rampacek was
one. Mr. Rampacek reached settlement in December 2005, and
the settlement agreement and release was submitted to the
bankruptcy trustee in January 2006 for final resolution.
James O. Rollans has served as a director
since 1997. He serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee and
as a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee. He is an independent Corporate Director and Corporate
Financial Advisor. Mr. Rollans was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Fluor Signature Services, a subsidiary of
Fluor Corporation from 1999 to 2001. He served as Senior Vice
President of Fluor Corporation from 1992 to 1999, as its Chief
Financial Officer from 1998 to 1999 and from 1992 to 1994, as
its Chief Administrative Officer from 1994 to 1998 and as its
Vice President of Corporate
141
Communications from 1982 to 1992. Mr. Rollans is also a
director of Encore Credit Corporation, a mortgage finance
company, and a director of Advanced Medical Optics, Inc., a
developer and manufacturer of ophthalmic surgical and contact
lens care products.
William C. Rusnack has served as a director since
1997 and serves as a member of the Audit Committee. He is
currently a private investor and independent corporate director.
Mr. Rusnack was President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Operating Officer and director of Premcor from 1998 to 2002.
Before joining Premcor, Mr. Rusnack served for
31 years with Atlantic Richfield Company, or ARCO, an
integrated petroleum company, most recently as Senior Vice
President of ARCO from 1990 to 1998 and President of ARCO
Products Company from 1993 to 1998. He is also a director of
Sempra Energy, an energy services company and a director of
Peabody Energy, a coal producing company.
Kevin E. Sheehan has served as a director since
1990, is the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
and also serves as a member of the Finance Committee. He served
as our Interim Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
from April 2005 to August 2005. He is Managing Director of CID
Capital, a venture capital firm that concentrates on early-stage
and high-growth entrepreneurial companies. He has been a
Managing Director at CID Capital since January 1994. Before
joining CID Capital, Mr. Sheehan was employed by Cummins
Engine Company, a manufacturer of diesel engines and related
components, for 22 years. He served at Cummins Engine
Company as Vice President, Components Group, from 1986 to 1993,
Vice President, Worldwide Parts and Service from 1983 to 1986
and Vice President, Computer Systems and Telecommunications,
from 1980 to 1983.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee is composed of three directors, all of whom
meet the independence standards set forth in the SEC rules and
regulations and the NYSE listing requirements. The members of
the Audit Committee are Charles M. Rampacek, James O.
Rollans and William C. Rusnack. Our Board of Directors has
determined that Mr. Rollans, a former Chief Financial
Officer of Fluor Corporation, is a qualified audit committee
financial expert under the SEC rules and regulations and has
accounting or related financial management expertise for
purposes of the NYSE listing requirements. The remainder of the
Audit Committee Members (Mr. Rampacek and Mr. Rusnack)
are financially literate for purposes of the SEC rules and
regulations and the NYSE listing requirements.
Governance Guidelines
Our Board of Directors has adopted Self-Governance Guidelines. A
copy of such guidelines is available on our website at
www.flowserve.com. In addition, a copy of such guidelines
is available in print to any shareholder who submits a written
request to Michael E. Conley, Vice President of Investor
Relations, Flowserve Corporation,
5215 N. OConnor Blvd., Suite 2300, Irving,
Texas 75039.
Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct applicable to all of
our employees. In addition, our Board of Directors has adopted
and each director has executed a Code of Ethics for our Board of
Directors, and our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, and other
senior financial managers performing similar functions have
adopted and executed a Financial Management Code of Ethics that
specifically relates to their financial reporting duties. A copy
of each of the foregoing codes is available on our website at
www.flowserve.com. In addition, a copy of each of the
foregoing Codes is available in print to any shareholder who
submits a written request to Michael E. Conley, Vice President
of Investor Relations, Flowserve Corporation,
5215 N. OConnor Blvd., Suite 2300, Irving,
Texas 75039. We intend to disclose any change to our Financial
Management Code of Ethics or our Code of Ethics for our Board of
Directors, or the grant of any waiver of any ethics provision in
such Codes to any specified director, officer or manager,
through the filing of a Current Report on
Form 8-K with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and posting of any such
change or grant of waiver on our website at www.flowserve.com.
142
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
requires directors and executive officers to file reports with
the SEC regarding their ownership of Company stock and any
changes in their beneficial ownership. Based on our records, we
believe that all of these reports were filed on a timely basis
during 2004.
|
|
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
This section sets forth certain information with respect to the
compensation earned by the individual who served as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company during 2004 and five other
individuals who served as the most highly compensated executive
officers of the Company during 2004 (collectively, the
Named Executive Officers). The compensation of the
executive officers of the Company includes annual incentive plan
awards and other awards that are determined by reference to the
Companys operating performance. The Company has not yet
finalized its financial statements for 2005, its last completed
fiscal year, and, as a result, the definitive compensation of
its executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers,
for 2005 cannot be determined at this time. Accordingly, this
Annual Report does not present executive compensation for 2005.
Such information will be included in the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, which will be filed with the
SEC at a subsequent date.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
Payouts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual |
|
Stock |
|
Underlying |
|
LTIP |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Compensation |
|
Award(s) |
|
Options |
|
Payouts |
|
Compensation |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
($)(4)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beall, Andrew J.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
234,923 |
|
|
|
212,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,750 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,420 |
|
|
Vice President and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
192,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
President of Flow |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions Division(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferguson, Thomas E.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
319,615 |
|
|
|
256,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,880 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
Vice President and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
296,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,250 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
President of Flowserve |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
232,542 |
|
|
|
103,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,361 |
|
|
Pump Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greer, C. Scott
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
787,670 |
|
|
|
917,700 |
|
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
732,800 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,347 |
|
|
Former Chairman of |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
776,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
the Board, President |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
710,439 |
|
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
and Chief Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hornbaker, Renée J.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
209,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
636,915 |
|
|
Former Vice |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
345,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,545 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
317,769 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,497 |
|
|
Financial Officer(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kling, Lewis M
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
238,462 |
|
|
|
371,469 |
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
|
|
1,070,420 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,816 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer(9) |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuff, Ronald F.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
289,770 |
|
|
|
194,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,500 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,516 |
|
|
Vice President, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
277,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
Secretary and |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
262,477 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,492 |
|
|
General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Salary, annual bonus and long-term payouts may be deferred at
the election of the named executive officer until retirement.
Annual bonus and long-term payouts may also be received in the
form of Company stock held in a Rabbi Trust. |
143
|
|
(2) |
Amounts shown include tax adjustment payments on relocation
allowances for Mr. Kling, tax adjustment payments on the
forgiveness of loans for Mr. Greer and the imputed interest
income thereon (see footnote 5 below) and tax adjustment
payments for Mr. Bealls service in Mexico prior to
becoming Vice President and President of Flow Solutions
Division. The only other type of Other Annual Compensation was
in the form of perquisites. The cost incurred by the Company
during the presented years for various perquisites provided to
each of the Named Executive Officers is not included as Other
Annual Compensation, because the amount did not exceed the
lesser of $50,000 or 10% of such executive officers salary
and bonus of any of the years. |
|
(3) |
On July 9, 2004, Mr. Kling was granted an award of
46,000 shares of our restricted stock, of which
40,000 shares of restricted stock will vest on July 9,
2007 and the remaining 6,000 shares will vest in three
equal annual installments on July 9, 2005, July 9,
2006 and July 9, 2007, respectively. Additionally, on
July 15, 2004, the following awards of our restricted stock
were granted: Mr. Beall 7,500 shares;
Mr. Ferguson 7,200 shares;
Mr. Greer 32,000 shares; and
Mr. Shuff 5,000 shares. The shares of
restricted stock granted on July 15, 2004 vest in three
equal one-third increments for each Named Executive Officer
commencing on July 15, 2005, except that one-third of
Mr. Greers shares became fully vested on
June 30, 2005 and the remaining two-thirds of
Mr. Greers shares were forfeited pursuant to the
terms of a Separation and Release Agreement entered into between
Mr. Greer and the Company. See Employment and Change
in Control Arrangements below. The value of such shares
shown is based on the closing price of the common stock of the
Company on the date of grant. The total number of shares of
unvested restricted stock held as of December 31, 2004 and
the value of such shares based on the closing price of the
common stock of the Company at December 31, 2004 of $27.54
is set forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beall, Andrew J.
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
206,550 |
|
Ferguson, Thomas E.
|
|
|
22,200 |
|
|
$ |
611,388 |
|
Greer, C. Scott(a)
|
|
|
32,000 |
(a) |
|
$ |
881,280 |
(a) |
Hornbaker, Renée J.
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Kling, Lewis M.
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,266,840 |
|
Shuff, Ronald F.
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
137,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Pursuant to the terms of a Separation and Release Agreement
entered into between Mr. Greer and the Company, one-third
of Mr. Greers restricted shares became vested on
June 30, 2005 and the remaining two-thirds of his shares
were forfeited. |
|
|
|
The restricted shares are eligible to receive dividends;
however, the Company currently does not declare or pay dividends
on its common stock. |
|
|
(4) |
The Companys contributions to the 401(k) savings plan for
the following officers in 2004 were: Mr. Beall
$7,551; Mr. Ferguson $8,200;
Ms. Hornbaker $5,803;
Mr. Kling $4,616; and
Mr. Shuff $7,752. Life insurance premiums paid
by the Company for the following officers in 2004 were:
Mr. Beall $869; Mr. Ferguson
$1,310; Mr. Greer $7,200;
Ms. Hornbaker $1,286;
Mr. Kling $1,200; and
Mr. Shuff $1,764. The amount reflected for
Ms. Hornbaker includes severance payments of $351,800
pursuant to a Separation and Release Agreement entered into
between Ms. Hornbaker and the Company on August 3,
2004, and also includes lump-sum distributions of accrued
benefits under the Companys pension and retirement plans
of $278,026. Mr. Greer and Ms. Hornbaker will also
receive lump-sum distributions of accrued benefits under the
Companys pension and retirement plans in 2005 and 2006, as
described under Pension Plans below. |
|
(5) |
Upon joining the Company in July 1999, Mr. Greer received
an interest-free loan in the amount of $325,738 in payment for
the loss of equity in his home upon relocation, with 20% of the
loan forgiven for each of his four full years of service since
July 1999. The 2004 amount includes $65,147 for Mr. Greer,
which reflects the remaining 20% of the loan that was forgiven. |
|
(6) |
Mr. Beall began serving as Vice President and President of
Flow Solutions Division in May 2003. |
144
|
|
(7) |
Effective April 4, 2005, Mr. Greer resigned as the
Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to the terms of a Separation and Release Agreement
entered into between Mr. Greer and the Company on
April 4, 2005. Mr. Greer remained as an employee of
the Company until June 30, 2005. See Employment and
Change in Control Arrangements. As of April 4, 2005,
Kevin E. Sheehan became the Companys Interim President and
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and served
until the appointment of Mr. Kling as President and Chief
Executive Officer on August 1, 2005. Mr. Sheehan
continues to serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board. |
|
(8) |
Effective June 15, 2004, Ms. Hornbaker resigned as the
Companys Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to the terms of a Separation and Release Agreement
entered into between Ms. Hornbaker and the Company on
August 3, 2004. Ms. Hornbaker remained as an employee
of the Company until July 30, 2004. See Employment
and Change in Control Arrangements. In October 2004, Mark
A. Blinn was appointed as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company. |
|
(9) |
Mr. Kling joined the Company in July 2004 as Chief
Operating Officer. He became President and Chief Executive
Officer and an appointed member of the Board of Directors, on
August 1, 2005. See Employment and Change in Control
Arrangements below. |
2004 STOCK OPTION GRANTS
The following chart shows the number of stock options granted in
2004 to the Named Executive Officers of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Assumed Annual Rates | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock Price | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
of Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation For Option | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Options to | |
|
|
|
|
|
Term(4) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted(1)(2)(3) | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beall, Andrew J.
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
$ |
22.90 |
|
|
|
07/15/14 |
|
|
$ |
108,013 |
|
|
$ |
273,725 |
|
Ferguson, Thomas E.
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
22.90 |
|
|
|
07/15/14 |
|
|
|
129,615 |
|
|
|
328,470 |
|
Greer, C. Scott
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
22.90 |
|
|
|
07/15/14 |
|
|
|
259,230 |
(5) |
|
|
656,940 |
(5) |
Hornbaker, Renée J.
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Kling, Lewis M.
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
23.27 |
|
|
|
07/09/14 |
|
|
|
1,125,328 |
|
|
|
2,809,229 |
|
Shuff, Ronald F.
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
22.90 |
|
|
|
07/15/14 |
|
|
|
122,414 |
|
|
|
310,222 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All options have an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of common stock of the Company on the date of grant and a
10-year life. They also
have certain limited rights which, in general,
provide for a cash payment of the value of the option in the
event of a change in control of the Company. |
|
(2) |
The figures reported above include incentive option grants for
2004 as follows: Mr. Beall 0;
Mr. Ferguson 9,000; Mr. Greer
4,366; Ms. Hornbaker -0; Mr. Kling 4,297
and Mr. Shuff 4,691. All other options
granted were non-qualified. |
|
(3) |
Annual option grants become exercisable on a pro rata basis in
three installments commencing on the first anniversary of the
grant date, and in regard to incentive stock options, to the
extent at which they are allowed to do so subject to Internal
Revenue Service valuation limits. |
|
(4) |
The calculation of potential realizable value assumes annual
growth rates for each of the grants shown over their
10-year option term and
are not suggested to be indicative of projected results. For
example, a $22.90 per share price with a 5% annual growth
rate results in a stock price of $37.30 per share and a 10%
rate results in a price of $59.40 per share. Actual gains,
if any, on stock option exercises are dependent on the future
performance of the stock. |
|
(5) |
Only one-third of these option shares vested and Mr. Greer
forfeited the remaining option shares pursuant to the terms and
conditions of his Separation and Release Agreement. The
potential realizable value presented above only relates to
one-third of Mr. Greers 2004 Stock Option Grant. |
145
2004 AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following chart shows the number and value of stock options,
both exercisable and unexercisable, as of December 31, 2004
for each named executive officer of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money Options | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at Fiscal Year-End | |
|
at Fiscal Year-End | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beall, Andrew J.
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
26,080 |
|
|
|
14,500 |
|
|
$ |
138,888 |
|
|
$ |
87,840 |
|
Ferguson, Thomas E.
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
25,067 |
|
|
|
70,002 |
|
|
|
170,491 |
|
Greer, C. Scott
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
755,001 |
|
|
|
108,999 |
(2) |
|
|
6,537,073 |
(2) |
|
|
607,687 |
(2) |
Hornbaker, Renée J.
|
|
|
12,400 |
(1) |
|
$ |
60,350 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Kling, Lewis M.
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
320,250 |
|
Shuff, Ronald F.
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
62,740 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
262,722 |
|
|
|
97,880 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All shares upon exercise were immediately sold. |
|
(2) |
Under the terms of Mr. Greers Separation and Release
Agreement, 54,333 shares were forfeited which represented
$320,854 of the value of the unexercised
in-the-money options at
the end of fiscal year 2004. |
PENSION PLANS
The Company provides pension benefits to executive officers
under the Companys qualified cash balance
defined benefit pension plan (the Qualified Plan)
and its non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plans
(the Non-qualified Plans). The Non-qualified Plans
provide benefits that plan participants cannot receive under the
Qualified Plan due to Internal Revenue Code (the
Code) limits. Since July 1, 1999, when the
Companys pension plan was converted to the cash balance
design, Qualified Plan participants accrue contribution credits
based on age and years of service at the rate of 3% to 7% for
qualified earnings up to the Social Security wage base and at
the rate of 6% to 12% for qualified earnings in excess of the
Social Security wage base. Qualified earnings include salary and
annual incentive payments. For executive officers, including the
executives listed below, contribution percentages are increased
by 5% under provisions of the Non-qualified Plan. Non-qualified
Plan participants also earn interest on the accrued cash benefit
amount in their plan accounts. The following executives (except
Mr. Beall, Mr. Greer and Mr. Kling) also received
certain transitional benefits in their Qualified Plan account
balances when the Company converted to the cash balance plan.
The estimated annual retirement annuities for the following
officers at age 65 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Reaching | |
|
Age 65 | |
Executive Officer |
|
Age 65 | |
|
Annual Annuity(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beall, Andrew J.
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
$ |
260,070 |
|
Ferguson, Thomas E.
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
$ |
430,512 |
|
Greer, C. Scott(2)
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Hornbaker, Renée J.(3)
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Kling, Lewis M.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
89,275 |
|
Shuff, Ronald F.
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
$ |
231,277 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The estimated annual pension benefits shown assume:
(a) annual bonuses for all Named Executive Officers equal
to bonus at target; (b) a 5.25% interest factor;
(c) retirement at age 65; and (d) a 4.5% annual
increase in current salary until age 65. |
|
(2) |
Effective April 4, 2005, Mr. Greer resigned as the
Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to the terms of a Separation and Release Agreement
entered into between Mr. Greer and the Company on
April 4, 2005. Mr. Greer remained as an employee of
the Company until June 30, 2005. See Employment and
Change in Control Arrangements. In connection with his
resignation, Mr. Greer received in 2005 lump-sum
distributions of certain accrued benefits under the Qualified
Plan |
146
|
|
|
and the Non-qualified Plans of $807,857, representing the
actuarial present value of such accrued benefits. He will
receive additional lump-sum distributions of $183,020 in 2006,
representing the actuarial present value of his remaining
accrued benefits. |
|
(3) |
Effective June 15, 2004, Ms. Hornbaker resigned as the
Companys Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to the terms of an agreement and general release
entered into between Ms. Hornbaker and the Company on
August 3, 2004. Ms. Hornbaker remained as an employee
of the Company until July 30, 2004. See Employment
and Change in Control Arrangements. In connection with her
resignation, Ms. Hornbaker received in 2004 lump-sum
distributions of certain accrued benefits under the Qualified
Plan and the Non-qualified Plans of $278,026, representing the
actuarial present value of such accrued benefits. She also
received an additional lump-sum distributions of $124,359 in
2005, representing the actuarial present value of her remaining
accrued benefits. |
DIRECTORS COMPENSATION
Effective as of January 1, 2004, non-employee directors
received an annual retainer with an aggregate target value of
$85,000 per year, excluding chairman and committee service
retainers. The cash portion of the annual retainer is $35,000
and the equity portion has a target grant valuation of $50,000.
The equity portion is provided in the form of restricted common
stock of the Company having a $50,000 fair market valuation at
the time of grant. Voting rights accompany such restricted
stock, which fully vests after one year. This restricted stock
is also subject to a holding period prohibiting resale, which is
the shorter of five years from the date of grant or one year
after the director ceases service on the Board of Directors.
Directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual
compensation. Interest is paid in cash deferrals. Directors who
elect to defer the cash portion of their annual compensation in
the form of Company stock receive a 15% premium on deferred
amounts.
Committee chairmen and committee members also receive
supplemental service retainers. The payout payments are
presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental | |
|
Supplemental | |
Board Committee |
|
Service Retainer | |
|
Chairman Retainer | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Committee
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
Finance Committee
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
Organization and Compensation Committee
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
In July 2004, the Organization and Compensation Committee
approved supplemental compensation to Mr. James O.
Rollans for his service on a special subcommittee to monitor the
Companys closing of its 2003 financial statements. The
supplemental compensation was awarded in recognition of his
services performed beyond his regular Board and committee
duties, responsibilities and expectations. The supplemental
compensation was based on the number of days Mr. Rollans
performed these services and on a per diem payment of $3,500.
For these services, Mr. Rollans received supplemental
compensation of $98,000 in cash.
Mr. Kevin E. Sheehan began serving as the
non-executive Chairman of the Board of the Company on
August 1, 2005. In addition to the retainers noted above,
on October 12, 2005, the Organization and Compensation
Committee proposed and the full Board of Directors approved the
payment to Mr. Sheehan of $100,000 annually, beginning
August 1, 2005, for his service as non-executive Chairman
of the Board of Directors, which is in addition to his regular
Board retainer and supplemental compensation which
Mr. Sheehan receives for serving as a Board member and a
committee member. Mr. Sheehan will receive this additional
compensation on a quarterly basis, in accordance with the
pre-established director compensation cycles, which will be
deferred in 2005 in the form of Company common stock until his
termination of service.
On October 12, 2005, the Organization and Compensation
Committee also approved supplemental compensation to specified
directors for their service on special subcommittees formed
during 2005 for the Companys search of, and transition to,
a new Chief Executive Officer. The supplemental compensation was
awarded in recognition of services performed by those directors
beyond their regular Board and committee
147
duties, responsibilities and expectations. The services
performed included the negotiation of the Separation and Release
agreement for the Companys former Chief Executive Officer,
the development of a special senior management retention plan
during the search for the new Chief Executive Officer, special
recruiting work related to identifying, interviewing and
evaluating new candidates for the Chief Executive Officer
position, and the negotiation of a new employment agreement with
Lewis M. Kling in connection with his appointment as Chief
Executive Officer. The supplemental compensation was based on
the number of days each director performed these services and on
a per diem payment of $3,500. For the services mentioned above,
each director named below received the supplemental compensation
set forth opposite his name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental | |
Director |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
Charles M. Rampacek
|
|
$ |
87,500 |
|
George T. Haymaker, Jr.
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
Hugh K. Coble
|
|
$ |
28,000 |
|
Kevin E. Sheehan
|
|
$ |
12,250 |
|
William C. Rusnack
|
|
$ |
56,000 |
|
The fees noted above were paid in addition to regular Board
service retainers. Each director listed above deferred his
compensation in 2005 in the form of Company common stock until
his termination of service, except for William C. Rusnack, who
received his payment in cash.
EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Employment Agreement with Mr. Kling
The Company entered into an employment agreement with
Lewis M. Kling as of July 28, 2005.
Mr. Klings agreement provides that, subject to
certain terms and conditions, Mr. Kling is employed by the
Company as its President and Chief Executive Officer beginning
on August 1, 2005 and ending on July 31, 2008, with
automatic renewal for one-year periods. Prior to his appointment
as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kling served
as the Companys Chief Operating Officer since joining the
Company in July 2004. Under the agreement, Mr. Kling
receives an annual base salary of $850,000, subject to increase
based on annual reviews. He is also eligible to receive an
annual bonus, based on the attainment of certain performance
targets established by the Organization and Compensation
Committee, ranging from 0% to 200% of his base salary, as well
to participate in any benefit and incentive plans of the Company
on terms no less favorable than those applicable to other senior
executives. Additionally, he is entitled to the vesting of 20%
of any nonqualified pension benefit that is not yet then vested,
provided that he remains employed through July 31, 2008. As
of July 28, 2005, Mr. Klings participation in
the Companys Transitional Executive Security Plan was
terminated and no payments are due to him under that plan. In
lieu of his participation in the Transitional Executive Security
Plan, the Company made a special one-time lump-sum payment to
Mr. Kling of $520,000.
On July 28, 2005, Mr. Kling was granted options under
his employment agreement to acquire up to 69,748 shares of
the Companys common stock at an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant and
40,800 shares of restricted common stock under the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan.
If the Company terminates Mr. Klings employment other
than for cause (as defined in the agreement), death or
disability (as defined in the agreement) or Mr. Kling
terminates his employment for good reason (as defined in the
agreement) and Mr. Kling has executed and not revoked a
release of claims against the Company: (i) the Company will
pay to Mr. Kling within 30 days after his employment
terminates a lump-sum cash amount equal to the sum of
(A) (I) the sum of his annual base salary at the time of
termination and (II) the annual bonus earned by him for the
bonus year preceding the year in which his employment terminates
and (B) a pro-rata portion of the target bonus based on the
number of days of service during the bonus year occurring prior
to termination of employment; (ii) all stock-based awards
held by Mr. Kling that have not yet vested or otherwise
become unrestricted shall immediately vest or become
unrestricted in full; (iii) the target payment under all
dollar-denominated, performance-based long-term incentive
compensation
148
programs shall be paid to Mr. Kling in a lump sum in cash
within 30 days; and (iv) Mr. Kling shall become fully
vested in any nonqualified pension benefit that is not yet
vested. Also, provided that Mr. Kling has been continuously
employed by the Company for three years (including service prior
to July 28, 2005), Mr. Kling (or his current spouse,
as the case may be) shall be entitled to purchase health benefit
coverage for Mr. Kling and his current spouse substantially
similar to that available under the Companys health
benefit programs at the cost to the Company of providing such
coverage to its actively employed senior executives through,
respectively, the period of Mr. Klings and his
current spouses eligibility for coverage under Medicare.
If Mr. Klings employment is terminated for cause or
Mr. Kling terminates his employment without good reason,
the agreement will terminate without further obligations to
Mr. Kling other than the Companys indemnification
obligation to Mr. Kling and the payment to Mr. Kling
of the sum of (i) his annual base salary through the date
his employment terminates, (ii) any payments that have
become vested or that are otherwise due in accordance with the
terms of any employee benefit, incentive or compensation plan,
and (iii) any reimbursable expenses incurred by
Mr. Kling, in each case to the extent theretofore unpaid
(collectively, Accrued Compensation).
If Mr. Klings employment is terminated by reason of
his death or disability, the agreement will terminate without
further obligations to Mr. Kling other than (i) the
Companys indemnification obligation to Mr. Kling,
(ii) the payment of Accrued Compensation, (iii) all
stock-based awards that have not yet vested or otherwise become
unrestricted shall immediately become vested or otherwise
unrestricted in full (iv) the target payment under all
dollar-denominated, performance-based long-term incentive
compensation programs will be paid to Mr. Kling (or his
estate or beneficiary, as applicable) and
(v) Mr. Kling shall become fully vested in any
nonqualified pension benefit that is not yet then vested.
Separation and Release Agreements
The Company entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Greer, the Companys former Chief Executive
Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, effective as of
July 1, 1999. On April 4, 2005, Mr. Greer
resigned as the Companys President and Chief Executive
Officer and as a director (including his capacity as Chairman of
the Board). His employment agreement included the following
compensation: (i) annual base salary equal to $787,670 for
2004; (ii) minimum annual bonus opportunity of no less than
75% of base salary; (iii) participation in the
Companys Long-Term Incentive Plan; and (iv) an
interest-free loan of $325,738, which was forgiven after the
completion of five years of employment with the Company, in
recognition of his willingness to promptly relocate and
resulting loss of equity on his prior home.
In connection with Mr. Greers resignation, the
Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with
Mr. Greer as of April 4, 2005. Pursuant to the
agreement, from April 5, 2005 through June 30, 2005
Mr. Greer continued to be an employee of the Company
performing such duties as requested by the Board of Directors.
During such time, he was entitled to receive the same
compensation as payable under his employment agreement and
existing compensation programs of the Company. As a condition
for Mr. Greer executing a release of claims against the
Company, the Company paid Mr. Greer a $810,000 transition
allowance. All options and restricted stock held by
Mr. Greer and subject to vesting after June 30, 2005
and on or before July 17, 2005 became vested on
June 30, 2005, and the options held by him remain
exercisable until the later of (i) December 31, 2006,
or (ii) if the Company is unable to sell stock due to
securities laws or other restrictions on that date, 90 days
after the date when stock can be issued by the Company, but not
beyond the expiration of the options. Mr. Greer is also
entitled to a furnished office, with telephone and computer
service, and secretarial support for the period beginning
April 5, 2005 and ending June 30, 2006, as well as
reimbursement for certain transition-related fees in an amount
not exceeding $25,000. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Greer
is restricted from competing with the Company for a one-year
period.
149
The Company entered into a Separation and Release Agreement with
Ms. Hornbaker as of July 26, 2004, pursuant to which
Ms. Hornbaker resigned as the Companys Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer effective June 15, 2004.
Pursuant to the agreement, Ms. Hornbaker received her then
current base salary for 12 months totaling $351,800 less
applicable withholding taxes. She also received any vested
benefits in the Companys benefit, incentive or
compensation plans
Change-In-Control Arrangements
The Company maintains an executive severance plan covering key
management, officers and executive officers of the Company,
providing certain employment termination benefits. These
benefits become irrevocable and are paid in the event that
covered employment is terminated immediately prior to or within
two years after a
change-in-control of
the Company. These termination benefits include the following
payments: (i) three times the sum of the managers or
officers base salary and the average of target awards
under incentive plans; (ii) immediate vesting of
non-exercisable stock-based compensation;
(iii) continuation of participation in certain employee
benefit plans for up to three years; and (iv) full
reimbursement for certain potential excise tax liabilities.
Transitional Executive Security Plan
A search for a new Chief Executive Officer was conducted by a
transition committee of the Board of Directors of the Company
following the agreement between the Board and C. Scott Greer,
former President and Chief Executive Officer, not to renew
Mr. Greers employment agreement with the Company. The
Board of Directors adopted a Transitional Executive Security
Plan effective as of March 14, 2005, to promote continuity
in management during this transition period. The Board of
Directors concluded that the Plan was appropriate and desirable
to promote management stability while the Company was
experiencing increased bookings and stronger business conditions
in many of it markets. The Board of Directors was optimistic
about the Companys business prospects and decided to adopt
the Plan as a special incentive to retain and motivate the
senior management staff during the Chief Executive Officer
search period.
The Plan provides for two mutually exclusive benefits. First,
the Company will pay a cash lump sum equal to 12 months
base pay to any participant who remains employed by the Company
through the first anniversary of the date as of which a new
Chief Executive Officer commences employment with the Company.
Mr. Kling, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, was
appointed on August 1, 2005. Second, the Company will pay a
cash lump sum equal to 18 months base pay to any
participant whose employment is terminated by the Company
without cause (as defined in the Plan) before such date (unless
such participant is entitled to benefits under a change in
control severance plan maintained by the Company). In addition,
for any participant who is eligible for such a severance payment
under the Plan, the Company will provide continued welfare
benefits for nine months (reduced by benefits from any
subsequent employer), and all outstanding equity awards granted
to the Participant will immediately vest in full and generally
remain exercisable (if applicable) for a period of 180 day
following termination of employment. In either case, the payment
of benefits is conditioned upon a customary release of claims by
the Participant.
The following executive officers of the Company participate in
the Plan: Andrew J. Beall, Mark A. Blinn, Mark D. Dailey, Thomas
E. Ferguson, John H. Jacko, Linda P. Jojo, Thomas L. Pajonas and
Ronald F. Shuff. Certain other corporate officers of the
Company also participate in the Plan. The Organization and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company,
which administers the Plan, may name additional participants
from time to time.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
During 2004, the members of the Organization and Compensation
Committee were Christopher A. Bartlett, Hugh H. Coble, George T.
Haymaker, Jr., Michael F. Johnston and Kevin E. Sheehan.
None of the members of the Organization and Compensation
Committee was at any time during 2004 an officer or
150
employee of the Company. No member of the Organization and
Compensation Committee serves as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one
or more executive officers serving as a member of the
Companys Board of Directors or Organization and
Compensation Committee.
|
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth common stock ownership of members
of the Board of Directors and each Named Executive Officer of
the Company, and all of directors and executive officers as a
group as of February 6, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable Stock | |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Percent of Company | |
Name |
|
Options(1) | |
|
Owned(2)(3)(4) | |
|
Common Stock(5) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Christopher A. Bartlett
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
14,630 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Andrew J. Beall
|
|
|
38,942 |
|
|
|
70,705 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Hugh K. Coble
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
31,750 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas E. Ferguson
|
|
|
34,888 |
|
|
|
81,860 |
|
|
|
* |
|
C. Scott Greer(6)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Diane C. Harris
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
|
36,886 |
|
|
|
* |
|
George T. Haymaker, Jr.
|
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
36,345 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Renée J. Hornbaker(6)
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael F. Johnston
|
|
|
11,203 |
|
|
|
34,113 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lewis M. Kling
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
113,341 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Charles M. Rampacek
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
39,136 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James O. Rollans
|
|
|
12,491 |
|
|
|
35,323 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William C. Rusnack
|
|
|
10,879 |
|
|
|
28,792 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kevin E. Sheehan
|
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
41,932 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ronald F. Shuff
|
|
|
75,818 |
|
|
|
146,422 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group (19
individuals)
|
|
|
227,421 |
|
|
|
711,235 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Represents shares that the directors and Named Executive
Officers had a nominal right, subject to the exercise suspension
discussed below, to acquire within 60 days of
February 6, 2006 through the exercise of stock options
under a Company stock option plan. These stock option shares are
not currently exercisable due to the temporary suspension of our
stock option exercise program, as a result of which current
employees, including executive officers, qualified retirees and
our directors are unable to exercise their vested options. The
stock option exercise program was temporarily suspended due to
the fact that we were not able to timely file our annual and
quarterly periodic reports with the SEC, which made it
impossible to issue registered shares upon option exercises.
During the suspension period, each such person disclaims
beneficial ownership of such shares subject to such options. |
|
(2) |
For non-employee directors, the figures above include shares
deferred under the Director Deferral Plan and/or a Flowserve
Restricted Stock Plan over which they have no voting power as
follows: Mr. Bartlett 9,043;
Mr. Coble 23,950; Ms. Harris
25,698; Mr. Haymaker 23,745;
Mr. Johnston 21,926;
Mr. Rampacek 23,636;
Mr. Rollans 22,136;
Mr. Rusnack 9,113; and
Mr. Sheehan 25,820. |
151
|
|
(3) |
For Named Executive Officers, the aggregate figures above
include shares deferred under either an Executive Compensation
Plan and/or a Flowserve Restricted Stock Plan over which they
have no voting power as follows: Mr. Ferguson
2,829; Mr. Greer 0;
Ms. Hornbaker 0; and Mr. Shuff
30,123. |
|
(4) |
The number of shares owned includes shares for exercisable stock
options, which are presented in the first column and discussed
in note (1) above. |
|
(5) |
Based on the number of outstanding shares on February 6,
2006 (56,218,606 shares). |
|
(6) |
On April 4, 2005, Mr. Greer resigned as the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and as a
director (including his capacity as Chairman of the Board).
Ms. Hornbaker resigned as the Companys Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer effective June 15, 2004.
Therefore, Mr. Greers and Ms. Hornbakers
shares are not included in the current ownership table reported
above. |
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5% OF COMPANY STOCK
The following shareholders reported to the SEC that they
beneficially own more than 5% of common stock of the Company. We
know of no other shareholder holding 5% or more of Company
common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Company | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Shares Owned | |
|
Common Stock(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC(2)
725 South Figueroa Street, 39th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5439
|
|
|
6,428,400 |
|
|
|
11.43 |
% |
Gabelli Asset Management, Inc.(3)
One Corporate Center
Rye, NY 10580
|
|
|
4,979,051 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
% |
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.(4)
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401
|
|
|
3,575,377 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
Franklin Resources, Inc.(5)
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906
|
|
|
3,347,420 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
% |
Pioneer Global Asset Management S.p.A.(6)
Galleria San Carlo 6
20122 Milan, Italy
|
|
|
2,930,195 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Based on the number of outstanding shares on February 6,
2006 (56,218,606 shares). |
|
(2) |
As reported on Schedule 13G dated November 9, 2005,
Hotchkis and Wiley Capital Management, LLC has sole voting power
as to 5,865,000 shares and sole dispositive power as to
6,428,400 shares, but disclaims beneficial ownership of
such securities. |
|
(3) |
As reported on Schedule 13D/A dated January 25, 2006,
Gabelli Investors, Inc. and affiliated entities have sole voting
power as to 4,782,751 shares and sole dispositive power as
to 4,979,051 shares. |
|
(4) |
As reported on Schedule 13G dated February 9, 2005,
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. has sole voting power as to
3,575,377 shares, but disclaims beneficial ownership of
such securities. |
|
(5) |
As reported on Schedule 13G dated February 11, 2005,
Franklin Advisors, Inc. has sole voting power and sole
dispositive power as to 2,361,600 shares and Franklin
Templeton Portfolio Advisors, Inc. has sole voting and sole
dispositive power as to 985,820 shares. |
|
(6) |
As reported on Schedule 13G dated April 20, 2005,
Pioneer Global Asset Management S.p.A. has sole voting power and
sole dispositive power as to all 2,930,195 shares. |
152
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining | |
|
|
Number of Securities to | |
|
Weighted-average | |
|
Available for Future Issuance Under | |
|
|
Be Issued Upon Exercise | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Equity Compensation Plans | |
|
|
of Outstanding Options, | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
(Excluding Securities Reflected in | |
Plan Category |
|
Warrants, and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
2,820,160 |
|
|
$ |
21.93 |
|
|
|
3,334,833 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Total
|
|
|
2,820,160 |
|
|
$ |
21.93 |
|
|
|
3,334,833 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plan) is the only plan or arrangement that
(i) provides for equity-based payments and (ii) has
not otherwise been approved by shareholders.
The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain experienced
employees and increase the identity of interests of such
employees with those of the Companys shareholders by
rewarding achievement of long-term goals and objectives. The
Plan became effective on October 1, 2000.
Only full-time salaried executives of the Company and its
subsidiaries are eligible to participate. The Organization and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible
for administering the Plan, including establishing performance
goals and determining the number of performance units which have
been earned at the end of each performance cycle, which is the
period of years selected by the Organization and Compensation
Committee during which performance is measured, based upon the
Companys performance in relation to the established
performance goals. If the Company achieves 100% of its
performance goals, then the participant will receive the entire
target award. If the Companys performance falls short or
exceeds such goals, the award may be less than or more than the
target award, up to a maximum of 200% of the target award.
Awards under the Plan are paid in kind in shares of common stock
of the Company or deferred shares or a combination thereof for a
performance cycle. Except as otherwise may be provided for in
relation to deferred shares, the number of shares issued as
payment is based upon a determination of the shares
current market value on the February 1 next following the
end of the applicable performance cycle or such other date as is
selected by the Organization and Compensation Committee. In the
event of a termination of employment due to retirement, death,
disability or reassignment to a non-participating position prior
to the expiration of the performance cycle, the value of an
award is prorated. All awards not yet earned upon a
participants termination of employment for any reason
other than retirement, death, disability or reassignment to a
non-participating position will be forfeited, unless the
Organization and Compensation Committee, at its discretion,
decides to make whole or partial payments.
|
|
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
None.
|
|
ITEM 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee
Information
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, (PwC), began serving as
the Companys independent accounting firm in 2000. In this
role, PwC audits the financial statements of the Company. The
chart below summarizes the fees for professional services
incurred by the Company for the audits of its 2004 and 2003
financial statements and other fees billed to the Company by PwC
in 2004 and 2003. In general, the Company retains PwC for
services that are logically related to or natural extensions of
the annual audit.
153
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
AUDIT FEES
|
|
$ |
31,053,831 |
|
|
$ |
4,804,088 |
|
AUDIT RELATED FEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Plan Audits
|
|
|
220,137 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Readiness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL AUDIT RELATED FEES
|
|
|
220,137 |
|
|
|
264,700 |
|
TAX FEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
182,079 |
|
|
|
385,560 |
|
|
Consulting/ Advisory
|
|
|
304,496 |
|
|
|
140,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL TAX FEES
|
|
|
486,575 |
|
|
|
525,810 |
|
ALL OTHER FEES
|
|
|
10,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FEES
|
|
$ |
31,770,890 |
|
|
$ |
5,594,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the audit and non-audit
fees described above for the year ended December 31, 2004
in accordance with the Audit Committees pre-approval
policy.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee pre-approves all services, whether audit or
non-audit, provided by the PwC and all related fees, which are
itemized for the annual audit and non-audit services. The Audit
Committee focuses on any matters that may affect the scope of
the audit or PwCs independence and to that end receives
certain representations from PwC regarding their independence
and permissibility under the applicable laws and regulations of
non-audit services provided by PwC to the Company. The Audit
Committee also pre-approves the internal audit plan for the
Company and the scope and timing of the external audit plan for
the Company.
The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval authority to
the Chairman of the Audit Committee to the extent allowed by
law. In the case of any delegation, the Chairman must disclose
all pre-approval determinations to the full Audit Committee as
soon as possible after such determinations have been made.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) Documents filed as a part of this Annual Report:
|
|
|
1. Consolidated Financial Statements |
The following consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto are filed as part of this annual report on
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
62 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
68 |
|
For each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
69 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
70 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
71 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
72 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
73 |
|
154
|
|
|
2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules |
The following consolidated financial statement schedule is filed
as part of this Annual Report:
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Financial statement schedules not included in this Annual Report
have been omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
The following exhibits are either filed herewith or incorporated
by reference to the designated document previously filed with
the SEC:
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Purchase Agreement by and among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve
RED Corporation, IDP Acquisition, LLC and Ingersoll-Rand
Company, dated as of February 9, 2000, filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000. |
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 14, 2000, to the
Purchase Agreement dated as of February 9, 2000, by and
among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve RED Corporation, IDP
Acquisition, LLC and Ingersoll-Rand Company, filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys report on Form 8-K,
dated as of July 19, 2000. |
|
2 |
.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Flowserve Corporation, Forest
Acquisition Sub., Inc. and Innovative Valve Technologies, Inc.,
dated as of November 18, 1999, filed as
Exhibit 99(c)(1) to the Schedule 14 D-1 Tender Offer
Statement and Statement on Schedule 13-D, dated as of
November 22, 1999. |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
1988 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Duriron
Company, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1988. |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
1989 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989. |
|
3 |
.3 |
|
1996 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation,
filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
|
3 |
.4 |
|
April 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed as part of Annex VI to the Joint Proxy
Statement/ Prospectus, which is part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-4, dated June 19, 1997. |
|
3 |
.5 |
|
July 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the Quarter ended
June 30, 1997. |
|
3 |
.6 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, as restated
December 31, 1987, and as further amended effective
April 26, 2004, filed as Exhibit 3.9 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003. |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Lease agreement and indenture, dated as of January 1, 1995
and bond purchase agreement, dated January 27, 1995, in
connection with an 8% Taxable Industrial Development Revenue
Bond, City of Albuquerque, New Mexico. (Relates to a class of
indebtedness that does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the
Company. The Company will furnish a copy of the documents to the
Commission upon request.) |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1986 between the
Company and Bank One, N.A., as Rights Agent, which includes as
Exhibit B thereto the Form of Rights Certificate, filed as
Exhibit 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form 8-A on August 13, 1986. |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Amendment, dated August 1, 1996, to Rights Agreement, filed
as Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996. |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 1, 1998, to the
Rights Agreement dated as of August 13, 1986, and amended
as of August 1, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Form 8-A/A, dated June 11, 1998. |
155
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Rate Swap Agreement in the amount of $25,000,000 between the
Company and National City Bank, dated November 14, 1996,
filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Rate Swap Agreement in the amount of $25,000,000 between the
Company and Key Bank National Association, dated
October 28, 1996, filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996. |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Senior
Executives, as amended and restated effective October 1,
2000, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000.* |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Supplemental Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987.* |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Director Deferral Plan, as amended and
restated effective October 1, 2000, filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
First Master Benefit Trust Agreement dated October 1,
1987, filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1987.* |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the First Master Benefit
Trust Agreement dated October 1, 1987, filed as
Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.* |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to First Master Benefit
Trust Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993.* |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Second Master Benefit Trust Agreement dated October 1,
1987, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1987.* |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
First Amendment to Second Master Benefit Trust Agreement,
filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.* |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective
October 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan as amended and
restated effective January 1, 1997, filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.* |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Second Amendment to the 1989 Stock Option
Plan as previously amended and restated, filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Flowserve Corporation 1989 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1989 Restricted Stock Plan (the 1989
Restricted Stock Plan) as amended and restated, effective
January 1, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996.* |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Restricted Stock Plan as
amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997.* |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Flowserve Corporation 1989 Restricted
Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1989 Restricted Stock Dividend Plan,
effective October 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Retirement Compensation Plan for Directors
(Director Retirement Plan), filed as
Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988.* |
156
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Director Retirement Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.* |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
The Companys Benefit Equalization Pension Plan (the
Equalization Plan), filed as Exhibit 10.16 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1989.* |
|
10 |
.20 |
|
Amendment No. 1, dated December 15, 1992 to the
Equalization Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1992.* |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Executive Equity Incentive Plan as amended
and restated, effective July 21, 1999, filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.22 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.23 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective
June 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
Executive Life Insurance Plan of The Duriron Company, Inc.,
filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.* |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Executive Long-Term Disability Plan of The Duriron Company, Inc,
filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.* |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, included as
Exhibit A to the Companys 1997 Proxy Statement, filed
on March 17, 1997.* |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
First Amendment to the Flowserve Corporation 1997 Stock Option
Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Flowserve Corporation 1997 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Flowserve Corporation 1997 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.30 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan, included as
Exhibit A to the Companys 1999 Proxy Statement, filed
on March 15, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation 1999 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.32 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Flowserve Corporation 1999 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.33 |
|
BW/IP International, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
as amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter entered March 31, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.34 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1998 Restricted Stock Plan, included as
Appendix A to the Companys 1999 Proxy Statement,
filed on April 9, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.35 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation 1998
Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.36 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Flowserve Corporation 1998
Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.37 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Flowserve Corporation 1998 Restricted
Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.38 |
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Flowserve Corporation 1998
Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2001.* |
|
10 |
.39 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1998 Restricted Stock Dividend Plan
(effective October 1, 2000), filed as Exhibit 10.38 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.* |
157
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.40 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective July 1, 1999, between the
Company and C. Scott Greer, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.41 |
|
Amendment to Master Benefit Trust Agreement, filed as
Exhibit 10.45 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.42 |
|
Executive Severance Arrangement, filed as Exhibit 10.45 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001.* |
|
10 |
.43 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Executive Officers Change In Control
Severance Plan, effective January 1, 2002, filed as
Exhibit 10.46 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.44 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Officer Change In Control Severance Plan,
effective January 1, 2002, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.45 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Key Management Change In Control Severance
Plan, effective January 1, 2002, filed as
Exhibit 10.48 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.46 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation Flex
Health & Welfare Plan, as amended and restated,
effective December 1, 2002, filed as Exhibit 10.49 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.47 |
|
2002 Restricted Stock Unit Plan, effective December 1,
2002, filed as Exhibit 10.51 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.* |
|
10 |
.48 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Senior Management Retirement Plan,
effective July 1, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.49 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,
effective July 1, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Performance Unit Plan, effective
January 1, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.54 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.51 |
|
Finance Contract, dated April 19, 2004 entered into by and
among the Company, Flowserve B.V. and European Investment Bank,
filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Report on
Form 8-K, dated as of March 18, 2005. |
|
10 |
.52 |
|
Letter Amendment to Finance Contract, dated July 2, 2004,
filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Report on
Form 8-K, dated as of March 18, 2005. |
|
10 |
.53 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2005, among the
Company, the lenders referred therein, and Bank of America,
N.A., as swingline lender, administrative agent and collateral
agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Report
on Form 8-K, dated as of August 17, 2005. |
|
10 |
.54 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Flowserve US Inc. and
Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation, dated
November 1, 2004 (filed herewith). |
|
10 |
.55 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Transitional Executive Security Plan,
effective as of March 14, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Report on Form 8-K dated as of
March 17, 2005. |
|
10 |
.56 |
|
Separation and Release Agreement between the Company and C.
Scott Greer, dated April 4, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.57 |
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Kevin E. Sheehan,
dated April 1, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.58 |
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Lewis M. Kling,
dated July 28, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Report on Form 8-K, dated August 3,
2005. |
|
10 |
.59 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (filed herewith).* |
158
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.60 |
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.61 |
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.62 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan,
dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.63 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Incentive Compensation
Plan for Key Employees as Amended and Restated, effective as of
January 1, 1992, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.64 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc., Long-Term Incentive Plan
as Restated November 1, 1993, dated December 14, 2005
(filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.65 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. 1996-1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.66 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. First Master Benefit
Trust Agreement, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.67 |
|
Amendment to Flowserve Corporation Amended and Restated Director
Cash Deferral Plan, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.68 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Retirement Compensation
Plan for Directors, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.69 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Amended and Restated
Director Deferral Plan, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.70 |
|
Amendment to Flowserve Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan,
dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.71 |
|
Amendment and Waiver, dated December 20, 2005 and effective
December 23, 2005, to that certain Credit Agreement, dated
as of August 12, 2005, among the Company, the financial
institutions from time to time party thereto, and Bank of
America, N.A., as Swingline Lender, Administrative Agent
and Collateral Agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
December 30, 2005. |
|
10 |
.72 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2005 between
the Company, Furmanite Worldwide Inc., a unit of Xanser Corp.
and certain subsidiaries of Furmanite, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Report on Form 8-K,
dated as of January 6, 2006. |
|
14 |
.1 |
|
Flowserve Financial Management Code of Ethics adopted by the
Companys principal executive officer and CEO, principal
financial officer and CFO, principal accounting officer and
controller, and other senior financial managers filed as
Exhibit 14.1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith). |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (filed herewith). |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
* |
Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements
required to be filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
159
Forward-Looking Information is Subject to Risk and
Uncertainty
This Annual Report includes forward-looking statements. Forward
looking statements are all statements that are not statements of
historical facts and include, without limitation, statements
relating to our business strategy and statements of
expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies and
anticipated developments concerning our industry, business,
operations and financial performance and condition. The words
believe, seek, anticipate,
plan, estimate, expect,
intend, project, forecast,
predict, potential,
continue, will, may,
could, should, and other words of
similar meaning are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements made in this Annual
Report are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that, in some cases, are beyond
our control. These risks, uncertainties and factors may cause
our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry
results and market trends, to be materially different from any
future results, performance, achievements or trends expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Important risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results
to differ from these forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed under
Item 1. Business Risk Factors above
and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
delays in future reports of the Companys management and
outside auditors on the companys internal control over
financial reporting and related certification; |
|
|
|
continuing delays in the Companys filing of its periodic
public reports and any SEC, NYSE or debt rating agencies
actions resulting therefrom; |
|
|
|
the possibility of adverse consequences of the pending
securities litigation and SEC investigations; |
|
|
|
the possibility of adverse consequences of governmental tax
audits of the Companys tax returns, including the IRS
audit of the companys U.S. tax returns for the years
2002 through 2004; |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to convert bookings, which are not
subject to nor computed in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, into revenues at acceptable, if any,
profit margins, since such profit margins cannot be assured nor
be necessarily assumed to follow historical trends; |
|
|
|
changes in the financial markets and the availability of capital; |
|
|
|
changes in the already competitive environment for the
Companys products or competitors responses to the
Companys strategies; |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to integrate acquisitions into its
management and operations; |
|
|
|
political risks, military actions or trade embargoes affecting
customer markets, including the continuing conflict in Iraq and
its potential impact on Middle Eastern markets and global
petroleum producers; |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to comply with the laws and
regulations affecting its international operations, including
the U.S. export laws, and the effect of any noncompliance; |
|
|
|
the health of the petroleum, chemical, power and water
industries; |
|
|
|
economic conditions and the extent of economic growth in the
U.S. and other countries and regions; |
|
|
|
unanticipated difficulties or costs associated with the
implementation of systems, including software; |
|
|
|
the Companys relative geographical profitability and its
impact on the Companys utilization of foreign tax credits; |
|
|
|
the recognition of significant expenses associated with
realigning operations of acquired companies with those of
Flowserve; |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to meet the financial covenants and
other requirements in its debt agreements; |
|
|
|
any terrorist attacks and the response of the U.S. to such
attacks or to the threat of such attacks; |
160
|
|
|
|
|
technological developments in the Companys products as
compared with those of its competitors; |
|
|
|
changes in prevailing interest rates and the Companys
effective interest costs; and |
|
|
|
adverse changes in the regulatory climate and other legal
obligations imposed on the Company. |
It is not possible to foresee or identify all the factors that
may affect our future performance or any forward-looking
information, and new risk factors can emerge from time to time.
Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual
results.
All forward-looking statement included in this Annual Report are
based on information available to us on the date of this Annual
Report. We undertake no obligation to revise our update any
forward-looking statement or disclose any facts, events or
circumstances that occur after the date hereof that may affect
the accuracy of any forward-looking statement.
161
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on the 13th day of February,
2006.
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION (Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis M. Kling |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE |
|
TITLE |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lewis M. Kling
Lewis M. Kling |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn
Mark A. Blinn |
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Richard J.
Guiltinan, Jr.
Richard J.
Guiltinan, Jr. |
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ James O. Rollans
James O. Rollans |
|
Director, Chairman of Audit Committee, Member of Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Charles M. Rampacek
Charles M. Rampacek |
|
Director, Chairman of Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee, Member of Audit Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ William C. Rusnack
William C. Rusnack |
|
Director, Member of Audit Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Michael F. Johnston
Michael F. Johnston |
|
Director, Chairman of Finance Committee, Member of Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Diane C. Harris
Diane C. Harris |
|
Director, Member of Finance Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE |
|
TITLE |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin E. Sheehan
Kevin E. Sheehan |
|
Chairman of the Board, Director, Member of Finance Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Christopher A. Bartlett
Christopher A. Bartlett |
|
Director, Member of Organization and Compensation Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ George T. Haymaker, Jr.
George T.
Haymaker, Jr. |
|
Director, Chairman of Organization and Compensation Committee,
Member of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
|
February 13, 2006 |
163
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
Column C |
|
Column D |
|
Column E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
Other Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to Cost |
|
Acquisitions and |
|
Deductions |
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning of Year |
|
and Expenses |
|
Related Adjustments |
|
From Reserve |
|
End of Year |
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts(a):
|
|
$ |
18,641 |
|
|
$ |
2,516 |
|
|
$ |
3,200 |
|
|
$ |
(15,663 |
) |
|
$ |
8,694 |
|
|
Inventory reserves(b):
|
|
$ |
43,354 |
|
|
$ |
26,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,525 |
) |
|
$ |
60,829 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance(c):
|
|
$ |
30,330 |
|
|
$ |
8,754 |
|
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
$ |
(6,112 |
) |
|
$ |
34,208 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts(a):
|
|
$ |
20,569 |
|
|
$ |
4,251 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,179 |
) |
|
$ |
18,641 |
|
|
Inventory reserves(b):
|
|
$ |
40,929 |
|
|
$ |
22,495 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
(20,533 |
) |
|
$ |
43,354 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance(c):
|
|
$ |
23,606 |
|
|
$ |
10,120 |
|
|
$ |
3,021 |
|
|
$ |
(6,417 |
) |
|
$ |
30,330 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts(a):
|
|
$ |
20,419 |
|
|
$ |
3,716 |
|
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
|
$ |
(5,989 |
) |
|
$ |
20,569 |
|
|
Inventory reserves(b):
|
|
$ |
42,768 |
|
|
$ |
13,453 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(15,292 |
) |
|
$ |
40,929 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance(c):
|
|
$ |
15,296 |
|
|
$ |
6,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,786 |
|
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
|
$ |
23,606 |
|
|
|
(a) |
Deductions from reserve represent accounts written off net of
recoveries and reductions due to improved aging of receivables. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Deductions from reserve represent inventory disposed of or
written off. |
|
(c) |
|
Deductions from reserve result from the expiration or
utilization of foreign tax credits previously reserved. |
F-1
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Purchase Agreement by and among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve
RED Corporation, IDP Acquisition, LLC and Ingersoll-Rand
Company, dated as of February 9, 2000, filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000. |
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 14, 2000, to the
Purchase Agreement dated as of February 9, 2000, by and
among Flowserve Corporation, Flowserve RED Corporation, IDP
Acquisition, LLC and Ingersoll-Rand Company, filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys report on Form 8-K,
dated as of July 19, 2000. |
|
2 |
.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Flowserve Corporation, Forest
Acquisition Sub., Inc. and Innovative Valve Technologies, Inc.,
dated as of November 18, 1999, filed as
Exhibit 99(c)(1) to the Schedule 14 D-1 Tender Offer
Statement and Statement on Schedule 13-D, dated as of
November 22, 1999. |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
1988 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Duriron
Company, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1988. |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
1989 Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989. |
|
3 |
.3 |
|
1996 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation,
filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
|
3 |
.4 |
|
April 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed as part of Annex VI to the Joint Proxy
Statement/ Prospectus, which is part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-4, dated June 19, 1997. |
|
3 |
.5 |
|
July 1997 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the Quarter ended
June 30, 1997. |
|
3 |
.6 |
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, as restated
December 31, 1987, and as further amended effective
April 26, 2004, filed as Exhibit 3.9 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003. |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Lease agreement and indenture, dated as of January 1, 1995
and bond purchase agreement, dated January 27, 1995, in
connection with an 8% Taxable Industrial Development Revenue
Bond, City of Albuquerque, New Mexico. (Relates to a class of
indebtedness that does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the
Company. The Company will furnish a copy of the documents to the
Commission upon request.) |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1986 between the
Company and Bank One, N.A., as Rights Agent, which includes as
Exhibit B thereto the Form of Rights Certificate, filed as
Exhibit 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form 8-A on August 13, 1986. |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Amendment, dated August 1, 1996, to Rights Agreement, filed
as Exhibit 4.5 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996. |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 1, 1998, to the
Rights Agreement dated as of August 13, 1986, and amended
as of August 1, 1996, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Companys Form 8-A/A, dated June 11, 1998. |
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Rate Swap Agreement in the amount of $25,000,000 between the
Company and National City Bank, dated November 14, 1996,
filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Rate Swap Agreement in the amount of $25,000,000 between the
Company and Key Bank National Association, dated
October 28, 1996, filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996. |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Senior
Executives, as amended and restated effective October 1,
2000, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000.* |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Supplemental Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987.* |
165
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Director Deferral Plan, as amended and
restated effective October 1, 2000, filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
First Master Benefit Trust Agreement dated October 1, 1987,
filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1987.* |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the First Master Benefit Trust Agreement
dated October 1, 1987, filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993.* |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to First Master Benefit Trust Agreement,
filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.* |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Second Master Benefit Trust Agreement dated October 1,
1987, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1987.* |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
First Amendment to Second Master Benefit Trust Agreement, filed
as Exhibit 10.26 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.* |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective
October 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1989 Stock Option Plan as amended and
restated effective January 1, 1997, filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.* |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Second Amendment to the 1989 Stock Option
Plan as previously amended and restated, filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Flowserve Corporation 1989 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1989 Restricted Stock Plan (the 1989
Restricted Stock Plan) as amended and restated, effective
January 1, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996.* |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1989 Restricted Stock Plan as
amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997.* |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Flowserve Corporation 1989 Restricted
Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1989 Restricted Stock Dividend Plan,
effective October 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Retirement Compensation Plan for Directors
(Director Retirement Plan), filed as
Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1988.* |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Director Retirement Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.21 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.* |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
The Companys Benefit Equalization Pension Plan (the
Equalization Plan), filed as Exhibit 10.16 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1989.* |
|
10 |
.20 |
|
Amendment No. 1, dated December 15, 1992 to the
Equalization Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1992.* |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Executive Equity Incentive Plan as amended
and restated, effective July 21, 1999, filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.* |
166
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.22 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as
Exhibit 10.23 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, effective
June 1, 2000, filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
Executive Life Insurance Plan of The Duriron Company, Inc.,
filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.* |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Executive Long-Term Disability Plan of The Duriron Company, Inc,
filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.* |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, included as
Exhibit A to the Companys 1997 Proxy Statement, filed
on March 17, 1997.* |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
First Amendment to the Flowserve Corporation 1997 Stock Option
Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Flowserve Corporation 1997 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Flowserve Corporation 1997 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.30 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan, included as
Exhibit A to the Companys 1999 Proxy Statement, filed
on March 15, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation 1999 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.32 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Flowserve Corporation 1999 Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.33 |
|
BW/IP International, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
as amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter entered March 31, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.34 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1998 Restricted Stock Plan, included as
Appendix A to the Companys 1999 Proxy Statement, filed on
April 9, 1998.* |
|
10 |
.35 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation 1998
Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.36 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Flowserve Corporation 1998
Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.37 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Flowserve Corporation 1998 Restricted
Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.38 |
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Flowserve Corporation 1998
Restricted Stock Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2001.* |
|
10 |
.39 |
|
Flowserve Corporation 1998 Restricted Stock Dividend Plan
(effective October 1, 2000), filed as Exhibit 10.38 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.40 |
|
Employment Agreement, effective July 1, 1999, between the
Company and C. Scott Greer, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1999.* |
|
10 |
.41 |
|
Amendment to Master Benefit Trust Agreement, filed as
Exhibit 10.45 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.* |
|
10 |
.42 |
|
Executive Severance Arrangement, filed as Exhibit 10.45 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001.* |
|
10 |
.43 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Executive Officers Change In Control
Severance Plan, effective January 1, 2002, filed as
Exhibit 10.46 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.* |
167
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.44 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Officer Change In Control Severance Plan,
effective January 1, 2002, filed as Exhibit 10.47 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.45 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Key Management Change In Control Severance
Plan, effective January 1, 2002, filed as
Exhibit 10.48 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.46 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Flowserve Corporation Flex
Health & Welfare Plan, as amended and restated,
effective December 1, 2002, filed as Exhibit 10.49 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.47 |
|
2002 Restricted Stock Unit Plan, effective December 1,
2002, filed as Exhibit 10.51 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.* |
|
10 |
.48 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Senior Management Retirement Plan,
effective July 1, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.49 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,
effective July 1, 1999, filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Performance Unit Plan, effective
January 1, 2001, filed as Exhibit 10.54 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002.* |
|
10 |
.51 |
|
Finance Contract, dated April 19, 2004 entered into by and
among the Company, Flowserve B.V. and European Investment Bank,
filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Companys Report on
Form 8-K, dated as of March 18, 2005. |
|
10 |
.52 |
|
Letter Amendment to Finance Contract, dated July 2, 2004,
filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Companys Report on
Form 8-K, dated as of March 18, 2005. |
|
10 |
.53 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2005, among the
Company, the lenders referred therein, and Bank of America,
N.A., as swingline lender, administrative agent and collateral
agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Report
on Form 8-K, dated as of August 17, 2005. |
|
10 |
.54 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Flowserve US Inc. and
Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation, dated
November 1, 2004 (filed herewith). |
|
10 |
.55 |
|
Flowserve Corporation Transitional Executive Security Plan,
effective as of March 14, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Report on Form 8-K dated as of
March 17, 2005. |
|
10 |
.56 |
|
Separation and Release Agreement between the Company and C.
Scott Greer, dated April 4, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.57 |
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Kevin E. Sheehan,
dated April 1, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.58 |
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Lewis M. Kling,
dated July 28, 2005, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
August 3, 2005. |
|
10 |
.59 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.60 |
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.61 |
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the
Companys 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.62 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan,
dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.63 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Incentive Compensation
Plan for Key Employees as Amended and Restated, effective
January 1, 1992, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.64 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc., Long-Term Incentive Plan
as Restated November 1, 1993, dated December 14, 2005
(filed herewith).* |
168
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NO. |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.65 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. 1996-1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.66 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. First Master Benefit
Trust Agreement, dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.67 |
|
Amendment to Flowserve Corporation Amended and Restated Director
Cash Deferral Plan, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.68 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Retirement Compensation
Plan for Directors, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.69 |
|
Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc. Amended and Restated
Director Deferral Plan, dated December 14, 2005 (filed
herewith).* |
|
10 |
.70 |
|
Amendment to Flowserve Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan,
dated December 14, 2005 (filed herewith).* |
|
10 |
.71 |
|
Amendment and Waiver, dated December 20, 2005 and effective
December 23, 2005, to that certain Credit Agreement, dated
as of August 12, 2005, among the Company, the financial
institutions from time to time party thereto, and Bank of
America, N.A., as Swingline Lender, Administrative Agent
and Collateral Agent, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Report on Form 8-K, dated as of
December 30, 2005. |
|
10 |
.72 |
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 31, 2005 between
the Company, Furmanite Worldwide Inc., a unit of Xanser Corp.
and certain subsidiaries of Furmanite, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Report on Form 8-K,
dated as of January 6, 2006. |
|
14 |
.1 |
|
Flowserve Financial Management Code of Ethics adopted by the
Companys principal executive officer and CEO, principal
financial officer and CFO, principal accounting officer and
controller, and other senior financial managers filed as
Exhibit 14.1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Company (filed herewith). |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (filed herewith). |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
* |
Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements
required to be filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
169
exv10w54
Exhibit
10.54
EXECUTION VERSION
ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
by and between
Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation,
a Delaware corporation
and
Flowserve US Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
November 1, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
1. |
|
DEFINITIONS |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
PURCHASE AND SALE |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Closing
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Purchase and Sale; Deliverables
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Excluded Assets
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Purchase Price; Payment; Assumed Liabilities; Excluded
Liabilities; Allocation
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Closing Balance Sheet
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
Fairfield Assets
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Intellectual Property Assets Transfer
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
Adjustments As a Result of the Closing Date
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Adjustment of Purchase Price
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
3. |
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER |
|
13 |
|
|
|
(a)
|
Organization
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Authorization; Enforceability
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Government Approvals
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Fixed Assets; Properties; Liens
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Condition of Assets
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
Taxes
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Current Employees
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
Labor Relations
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
Compliance With Legal Requirements
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
Legal Proceedings; Orders
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
Absence of Certain Changes and Events
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
Intellectual Property Assets
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
Contracts; No Defaults
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
(p)
|
Insurance
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
(q)
|
Leased Real Property
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
(r)
|
Brokerage
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
(s)
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
(t)
|
Accounts Payable; Contracts with Suppliers
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
(u)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
Environmental Status; Permits
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
(w)
|
Purchased Assets
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
(x)
|
No Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
(y)
|
Disclosure
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4. |
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Organization
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Authorization; Enforceability
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Government Approvals
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Economic Ability
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Brokerage
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
5. |
COVENANTS OF SELLER |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Access and Investigation
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Conduct of Business
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Required Approvals
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
No Negotiation
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Additional Information
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
Confidentiality
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Reasonable Efforts
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
Non Solicitation; Non-Interference
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Notice of Events or Circumstances
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
6. |
COVENANTS OF BUYER |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Required Approvals
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Employees
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Confidentiality
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Reasonable Efforts
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Notices and Consents
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
Notice of Events or Circumstances
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
7. |
CONDITIONS TO BUYERS OBLIGATIONS |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Accuracy of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Sellers Performance
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Officers Certificate
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Secretarys Certificate
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Governmental Consents
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
No Injunctions
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Conveyances
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
Technology Transfer Agreement
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Lease Assignment
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
Transition Services Agreement
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
Supply Agreement
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
Physical Inventory
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
8. |
CONDITIONS TO SELLERS OBLIGATIONS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Accuracy of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Buyers Performance
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Officers Certificate
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Secretarys Certificate
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
Governmental Consents
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
No Injunctions
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Purchase Price
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
Assumption Agreement
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Lease Assignment
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
Technology Transfer Agreement
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
Transition Services Agreement
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
Supply Agreement
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
Guaranty
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
(n |
) |
Resale Certificate
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
POST-CLOSING COVENANTS |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
Further Assurances
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b |
) |
Retention of Records
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c |
) |
Novations of Government Contracts
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d |
) |
Employment Tax Filings
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e |
) |
Failure to Obtain Consents or Novations
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f |
) |
Warranty Claims of the Business
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
10.
|
|
NONCOMPETITION
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
Noncompetition
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b |
) |
Breach
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c |
) |
Severability
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
11. |
|
TERMINATION AND ABANDONMENT |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
Termination
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b |
) |
No Waiver
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c |
) |
Return of Information
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
INDEMNIFICATION |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
Indemnification Definitions
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b |
) |
Indemnity by Seller
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c |
) |
Indemnity by Buyer
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d |
) |
Actions Related to Indemnifiable Claims
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e |
) |
Deductible; Limits on Indemnification
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f |
) |
Survival of Representations, Warranties and Covenants
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g |
) |
Third-Party Claims Against Buyer Indemnified Parties
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h |
) |
Third-Party Claims Against Seller Indemnified Parties
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i |
) |
Indemnification Limitations
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j |
) |
Sole Remedy
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
13. |
|
MISCELLANEOUS |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a |
) |
Expenses
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b |
) |
Public Announcements
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c |
) |
Confidentiality
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d |
) |
Notices
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e |
) |
Entire Agreement
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f |
) |
Waiver and Amendment
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g |
) |
No Third Party Rights or Remedies Beneficiary
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h |
) |
Severability
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i |
) |
Headings and Interpretation
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j |
) |
Governing Law
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k |
) |
Dispute Resolution
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l |
) |
Assignment
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(m |
) |
Taxes
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n |
) |
Attorneys Fees
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o |
) |
Counterparts
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(p |
) |
Bulk Transfer Laws
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q |
) |
Waiver of Jury Trial
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
iii
|
|
|
EXHIBITS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A -
|
|
Assumption Agreement |
Exhibit B -
|
|
Financial Statements |
Exhibit C -
|
|
Technology Transfer Agreement |
Exhibit D -
|
|
Lease Assignment |
Exhibit E -
|
|
Supply Agreement |
Exhibit F -
|
|
Transition Services Agreement |
Exhibit G -
|
|
Bill of Sale |
Exhibit H -
|
|
Guaranty |
|
|
|
SCHEDULES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule 1.1
|
|
Products |
Schedule 1.2
|
|
Patterns |
Schedule 2(b)(i)(C)
|
|
Tangible Personal Property |
Schedule 2(b)(i)(I)
|
|
Leases of Equipment and Personal Property |
Schedule 2(c)(i)
|
|
Certain Excluded Assets |
Schedule 2(d)(iii)
|
|
Assumed Contracts and Other Obligations |
Schedule 3(b)
|
|
Conflicts |
Schedule 3(d)
|
|
Governmental Approvals |
Schedule 3(e)
|
|
Scheduled Liens |
Schedule 3(g)
|
|
Condition of Assets |
Schedule 3(h)
|
|
Taxes |
Schedule 3(i)
|
|
Current Employees |
Schedule 3(j)
|
|
Labor Disputes |
Schedule 3(k)
|
|
Legal Requirements |
Schedule 3(l)
|
|
Legal Proceedings |
Schedule 3(m)
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes and Events |
Schedule 3(n)
|
|
Intellectual Property Assets Exceptions |
Schedule 3(o)(i)
|
|
Contracts |
Schedule 3(o)(ii)
|
|
Binding Contract Exceptions |
Schedule 3(o)(iii)
|
|
Exceptions to Schedule 3(o)(i) |
Schedule 3(o)(iv)
|
|
Government Contract Compliance |
Schedule 3(o)(v)
|
|
Government Investigations |
Schedule 3(o)(vi)
|
|
Absence of Claims |
Schedule 3(o)(vii)
|
|
Eligibility; Systems Compliance |
Schedule 3(o)(viii)
|
|
Test and Inspection Results |
Schedule 3(o)(ix)
|
|
Government Furnished Equipment |
Schedule 3(o)(xi)
|
|
Government Intellectual Property Assets |
Schedule 3(o)(xiii)
|
|
Estimated Completion Costs |
Schedule 3(p)
|
|
Insurance |
Schedule 3(q)
|
|
Leased Real Property |
Schedule 3(r)
|
|
Brokerage |
Schedule 3(s)
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
Schedule 3(t)
|
|
Accounts Payable; Contracts with Suppliers |
iv
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule 3(v)
|
|
Environmental Status; Permits |
Schedule 3(w)
|
|
Sufficiency of Purchased Assets |
Schedule 3(x)
|
|
Undisclosed Liabilities |
Schedule 4(c)
|
|
Governmental Approvals |
Schedule 5(b)
|
|
Conduct of Business Exceptions |
Schedule 6(b)(i)
|
|
Union Employees |
v
ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
THIS ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is dated as of November 1, 2004, by
and between Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(Buyer), and Flowserve US Inc., a Delaware corporation (Seller).
RECITALS
A. Seller, through its Government Marine Business Unit, designs, develops, manufactures and
services pumps and related equipment for use in a variety of nuclear and non-nuclear United States
Navy and commercial applications;
B. Seller desires to sell, transfer and convey to Buyer, and Buyer desires to purchase and
acquire from Seller the Purchased Assets and Buyer has agreed to assume the Assumed Liabilities,
all for the Purchase Price and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement;
C. In connection with such sale and purchase of the Purchased Assets and to enable Buyer to
utilize such Purchased Assets and operate the business heretofore conducted by Sellers Government
Marine Business Unit, Seller further desires to make available to the Buyer, and Buyer desires to
acquire from Seller, the use of certain patents, engineering software, information technology
software, documents, trademarks, service marks, trade names and other intellectual property used by
Sellers Government Marine Business Unit;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS
The following terms, when used in this Agreement, shall have the meanings indicated below:
Accounts Receivable shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b)
hereof.
Acquisition Agreements shall mean this Agreement, the Technology Transfer Agreement,
the Assumption Agreement, the Lease Assignment, the Transition Services Agreement, the Supply
Agreement, the Guaranty and any other agreements or instruments which are executed in connection
with this Agreement in order to effectuate the transfer of any of the Purchased Assets or the
assumption of any of the Assumed Liabilities, collectively.
An Affiliate of any Person shall mean any other Person, which, directly or
indirectly, controls or is controlled by or is under common control with such Person. A person
shall be deemed to control, be controlled by, or be under common control with any other person if
such other person possesses, directly or indirectly, power to direct or cause the direction of the
1
management or policies of such person whether through the ownership of voting securities,
partnership interests, member interests, profits interests, by contract, or otherwise. For
purposes of this definition, Person shall mean an individual, partnership, corporation, limited
liability company, trust, unincorporated organization, association, or joint venture.
Assumed Liabilities shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(d)
hereof.
Assumption Agreement shall mean the Assumption Agreement to be entered into between
Buyer and Seller with respect to the assumption of the Assumed Liabilities in substantially the
form of Exhibit A hereto.
Balance Sheet shall mean the unaudited balance sheet of the Business as of December
31, 2003, annexed hereto as part of the Financial Statements in Exhibit B hereto.
Bill of Materials shall mean the bill of material, if any, associated with each
Product.
Business shall mean (i) the Products and technology related thereto to manufacture
such Products that Seller, through its Government Marine Business Unit, offers for sale for United
States government naval nuclear and non-nuclear applications and foreign government naval
non-nuclear applications; (ii) the Products and technology related thereto to manufacture such
Products that Seller, through its Government Marine Business Unit, offers for sale for commercial
applications and (iii) the servicing of the Products and products sold pursuant to the Supply
Agreement. Any Product of Seller that is not identified on Schedule 1.1 shall not be considered
part of the Business.
Closing and Closing Date shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in
Section 2(a) hereof.
Closing Balance Sheet shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(e)
hereof.
Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Confidentiality Agreement shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section
6(c) hereof.
Contracts shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b)(i)(E) hereof.
Current Employees shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(i)
hereof.
Drawings shall mean the Drawings identified with Products on Schedule 1.1 hereto
that relate to the Products as set forth in such Schedule 1.1.
Employees shall mean those Persons who on the Closing Date, are employed by the
Seller in connection with the Business and who become employees of Buyer or any of its Affiliates.
2
Environmental Law shall mean any law relating to the protection of the air, surface
water, groundwater or land, and/or governing the handling, use, generation, treatment, storage or
disposal of Hazardous Materials, both domestic and foreign, but not including any law relating to
matters administered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (or by any state,
provincial, local, domestic or foreign equivalent of the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration).
Excluded Assets shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(c) hereof.
Excluded Liabilities shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section
2(d)(iv) hereof.
Facility shall mean the buildings and land situated within the complex known as the
Phillipsburg Commerce Park and located at 942 Memorial Parkway, Phillipsburg, New Jersey 08865,
used in the operations of the Business and which are described more particularly in the Lease
Assignment.
Fairfield Assets shall mean the Tangible Personal Property identified on Schedule
2(b)(i)(C) and which is located at Sellers Fairfield, New Jersey facility.
Files and Records shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b)
hereof.
Financial Statements shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(c)
hereof.
GAAP shall mean generally accepted U.S. accounting principles, applied on an accrual
basis consistent with the basis on which the Balance Sheet and the other Financial Statements were
prepared.
Government Bid shall mean, with respect to the Business, any quotation, bid or
proposal submitted to the U.S. Government or any proposed prime contractor or higher-tier
subcontractor of the U.S. Government.
Governmental Body shall mean any federal, state, local, foreign or other
governmental or administrative body, instrumentality, department or agency or any court, tribunal,
administrative hearing, arbitration panel, commission or similar dispute resolving panel or body
but shall not include any such entity in its capacity as a customer of the Business.
Government Contract shall mean, with respect to the Business, any prime contract,
subcontract, teaming agreement or arrangement, joint venture, basic ordering agreement, pricing
agreement, letter contract, purchase order, delivery order, change order, Government Bid or other
arrangement of any kind between or involving a party or any of its subsidiaries and (i) the U.S.
Government (acting on its own behalf or on behalf of another country or international
organization), (ii) any prime contractor of the U.S. Government or (iii) any subcontractor
with respect to any Contract of a type described in clauses (i) or (ii) above.
Guarantor shall mean Curtiss-Wright Corporation, a New York corporation.
3
Guaranty shall mean the Guaranty by Guarantor in substantially the form of Exhibit H
hereto.
Hazardous Materials means each and every element, compound, chemical mixture,
contaminant, pollutant, material, waste or other substance which is defined, determined or
identified as hazardous or toxic by a Governmental Body or the release of which is regulated.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term will include (a) hazardous substances
as defined in CERCLA, (b) extremely hazardous substances as defined in Title III of the United
States Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, each as amended, and regulations promulgated
thereunder, (c) hazardous waste as defined in the United States Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder, (d) hazardous materials
as defined in the United States Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, as amended, and regulations
promulgated thereunder and (e) chemical substance or mixture as defined in the United States
Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Intellectual Property Assets shall mean the Drawings, the Patterns and the Bills of
Materials.
Inventories shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b) hereof.
Leases shall mean, collectively, the material leases of equipment and personal
property listed on Schedule 2(b)(i)(I), in effect as of the date hereof, used or held for use
exclusively in connection with the Business.
Lease Assignment shall mean the partial assignment of Sellers lease in
Phillipsburg, New Jersey pursuant to the Partial Assignment and Assumption of Lease to be executed
by Buyer and Seller in substantially the form annexed hereto as Exhibit D.
Legal Requirement shall mean any federal, state, local, foreign or other
administrative order, constitution, law, ordinance, regulation or statute.
Material Adverse Effect shall mean a material adverse effect on the condition,
results of operations, properties, or assets of the Business. Material Adverse Effect shall
exclude any effects to the extent resulting from (i) changes in the United States or foreign
economies in general, (ii) changes in industries relating to the Business in general and not
specifically relating to the Business, (iii) the announcement by Seller of its intention to sell
the Business or (iv) the execution of this Agreement (including the identity of Buyer) or any of
the Acquisition Agreements and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
Novation Agreements shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 9(c)
hereof.
Parties shall mean Buyer and Seller.
Patterns shall mean each Pattern identified on Schedule 1.2 hereto that is located
at the location set forth on such Schedule 1.2.
4
Permits shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b)(i)(H) hereof.
Permitted Liens shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(e) hereof.
Person shall mean any individual, corporation (including any nonprofit corporation),
general or limited partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, estate, trust,
association, organization, labor union, or other entity or Governmental Body.
Prepaid Expenses shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b)
hereof.
Primary Working Capital shall mean the sum of (i) Accounts Receivable, plus (ii)
Inventories, minus (iii) accounts payable of the Business, in each case as of October 31, 2004.
Proceeding shall mean any action, arbitration, investigation, litigation, or suit
(including any civil, criminal, administrative, investigative, or appellate proceeding) commenced,
brought, conducted, or heard by or before any third party or Governmental Body.
Product shall mean each of the products identified on Schedule 1.1 hereto by the
serial number of such product or, if such product on Schedule 1.1 does not have a serial number,
then by the order number for such product.
Purchased Assets shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(b)
hereof.
Purchase Price shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 2(d) hereof.
Representative shall mean with respect to a particular Person, any director,
officer, employee, agent, consultant, advisor, or other representative of such Person, including
legal counsel, accountants, and financial advisors.
Seller Plan shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2(d)(iv).
Sellers Knowledge shall mean those facts of which (i) Gregory Hempfling, Mary
Saeger, Robert Bellfy and Donald Sloteman are aware in the normal exercise of their duties and (ii)
with respect to Proceedings, Ronald Shuff is aware in the normal exercise of his duties as the
General Counsel of Seller.
Supply Agreement shall mean the Supply Agreement to be entered into between Buyer
and Seller at the Closing in substantially the form of Exhibit E hereto.
Tangible Personal Property shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section
2(b) hereof.
Tax or Taxes means any federal, state, provincial, local or foreign net
income, gross income, gross receipts, sales, use, goods and services or other value-added or ad
valorem, transfer, franchise, profits, license, lease, service, service use, withholding, payroll,
employment, excise, severance, stamp, occupation, premium, property, windfall profits, capital,
consumption,
5
workers compensation, customs, duties or other tax, fee, assessment or charge,
including any related interest, penalty or addition thereto.
Tax Liabilities shall mean any and all costs, liabilities obligations and damages
incurred by Buyer or its Affiliates involving Taxes related to (i) the operation of the Business by
Seller prior to Closing or (ii) the use of the Purchased Assets by Seller prior to Closing.
Technology Transfer Agreement shall mean the Technology Transfer Agreement to be
entered into between Buyer and Seller at the Closing in substantially the form of Exhibit C hereto.
Transition Services Agreement shall mean the Transition Services Agreement to be
entered into between Buyer and Seller at the Closing in substantially the form of Exhibit F hereto.
Union Contract shall mean the Contract between Flowserve Corporation and the United
Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC Local 8228 dated January 7, 2004.
U.S. Government shall mean the federal government of the United States of America
and any of its branches and instrumentalities, including its departments, agencies, bureaus,
commissions, boards, courts, corporations, offices, and other entities, and divisions thereof.
2. PURCHASE AND SALE
(a) Closing. The purchase and sale (the Closing) provided for in this
Agreement shall take place at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time), on November 10, 2004 at 2100
McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100, Dallas, Texas 75201. Notwithstanding the actual date of the Closing,
Buyer and Seller agree that the sale of the Business shall be deemed to be effective as of 12:01
a.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on November 1, 2004 ( the Closing Date). Subject to the
provisions of Article 11, failure to consummate the purchase and sale provided for in this
Agreement on the date, time or at the place determined pursuant to this Section 2(a) will not
result in the termination of this Agreement and will not relieve any party of any obligation under
this Agreement.
(b) Purchase and Sale; Deliverables.
(i) At the Closing, Seller will sell, convey, transfer, assign and deliver to Buyer or its
designee(s), and Buyer will purchase or will cause its designee(s) to purchase from Seller,
all of Sellers right, title and interest in and to the operating assets of the Business set
forth in this Section 2(b)(i) (collectively, the Purchased Assets):
(A) All prepaid assets and prepaid expenses existing exclusively on the
accounting records of the Business as of the Closing Date (the Prepaid
Expenses);
(B) All accounts receivable of the Business created in the ordinary course of
business of Seller, and of the nature of those accounts receivable set
6
forth on the
Balance Sheet as of the Closing Date, and as identified on Schedule 3(s)
(collectively, the Accounts Receivable);
(C) (i) All items of tangible personal property of Seller used exclusively in
the ordinary course of business of the Business identified on Schedule 2(b)(i)(C)
and on hand as of the Closing Date including, without limitation, tooling,
machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures and office equipment (collectively, the
Tangible Personal Property); (ii) all assignable warranties and licenses
issued to Seller in connection with the Tangible Personal Property; and (iii) any
assignable claims, credits and rights of recovery with respect to the Tangible
Personal Property;
(D) (i) The inventories of finished goods, raw materials, work in progress,
repair stock, parts and supplies maintained by Seller exclusively for the Business
which are on hand as of the Closing Date (the Inventories); (ii) all
assignable warranties and licenses issued to Seller in connection with the
Inventories; and (iii) any assignable claims, credits and rights of recovery with
respect to the Inventories;
(E) All of Sellers interest in contracts, agreements, licenses, leases,
commitments, sales order, and purchase orders (Contracts) relating
exclusively to the Business, listed on Schedule 3(o)(i) hereto and all other
contracts that arise exclusively out of the conduct of the Business;
(F) All Intellectual Property Assets, subject to the terms of the Technology
Transfer Agreement;
(G) All papers and records in Sellers care, custody or control which relate
exclusively to any or all of the Purchased Assets or to the Business, other than
papers and records relating to Excluded Liabilities, whether in hard copy, magnetic
tape or other format including, without limitation, files relating to the United
States governmental naval operations, vendor and prospective vendor files,
maintenance records, United States governmental naval warranty and support
obligation records, sales material, documentation, specifications, technical
manuals, outstanding proposals, accounting and financial records and redacted
personnel records (collectively, Files and Records); provided,
that Seller shall be entitled to make and retain copies of any Files and Records
that Seller is permitted to retain in compliance with Legal Requirements;
(H) To the extent assignable, all of Sellers rights to all of Sellers
certificates, licenses, permits, authorizations and approvals issued by any
governmental authority, agency or other instrumentality exclusively in connection
with the Business (Permits); and
(I) All Leases.
(ii) At the Closing, Seller will execute, acknowledge and deliver, or will cause to be
executed, acknowledged and delivered to Buyer, the following:
7
(A) A Bill of Sale in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit G;
(B) The Technology Transfer Agreement;
(C) The Lease Assignment;
(D) The Transition Services Agreement; and
(E) The Supply Agreement.
(iii) At the Closing, Buyer will execute, acknowledge and deliver, or will cause to be
executed, acknowledged and delivered to Seller, the following:
(A) The Assumption Agreement;
(B) The Lease Assignment;
(C) The Technology Transfer Agreement;
(D) The Transition Services Agreement;
(E) The Supply Agreement;
(F) The Guaranty. and
(G) A sale for resale certificate with respect to the Inventories.
(c) Excluded Assets.
There shall be excluded from the Purchased Assets the following (collectively, the
Excluded Assets):
(i) All those excluded assets set forth on Schedule 2(c)(i) hereto;
(ii) Any product not identified on Schedule 1.1 hereto;
(iii) Any assets of the Business that are not listed in Section 2(b)(i) hereof; and
(iv) Any asset or property the assignment or attempted assignment of which would be
invalid or would constitute a breach of contract; provided, however, that
any asset or property referred to in this clause which is not an Excluded Asset but which is
a Purchased Asset shall be held and/or received by Seller for the use and at the direction
and for the benefit of Buyer or its designee(s).
(d) Purchase Price; Payment; Assumed Liabilities; Excluded Liabilities; Allocation.
(i) In consideration for the purchase of the Purchased Assets, Buyer will pay, or will
cause its designee(s) to pay, the Purchase Price as set forth in Section 2(d)(ii)
8
hereof, and Buyer will assume, or will cause its designee(s) to assume, at the Closing the
Assumed Liabilities specified in Section 2(d)(iii) hereof.
(ii) At the Closing, (i) Buyer will deliver, or will cause its designee(s) to deliver
the sum of Twenty-Eight Million US Dollars ($28,000,000.00) (the Purchase Price)
via wire transfer to the following account:
Bank of America
Flowserve Corporation
Account: 12332-25499
ABA: 121000358
Swift Code: BOFAUS6S
(iii) Effective as of the Closing Date and in addition to any other liabilities
expressly assumed by Buyer under this Agreement, Buyer shall assume responsibility for the
performance and satisfaction of the following (the Assumed Liabilities):
(A) All obligations and liabilities arising on or after the Closing Date and
related to (i) the ownership, use, possession or condition of the Purchased Assets,
or (ii) all operations and activities related to the Business (including under
Environmental Law, except to the extent that such liabilities relate to acts and
omissions of Seller prior to the Closing Date);
(B) All of the obligations and liabilities reflected on the Closing Balance
Sheet prepared in accordance with Section 2(e);
(C) All Taxes relating to the Purchased Assets or the operations and activities
related to the Business with respect to any period or part thereof commencing
immediately after the Closing Date. For the avoidance of doubt, Buyer shall not be
liable or responsible for any Taxes for the Business incurred during all periods
prior to the Closing Date, but which are required to be filed after the Closing
Date;
(D) All Contracts and other obligations identified on Schedule 2(d)(iii)
attached hereto;
(E) Those liabilities and obligations of the Seller with respect to the
Employees which Buyer has expressly agreed to assume pursuant to Section 6(b) of
this Agreement;
(F) All obligations, liabilities and commitments of Seller under the Permits to
the extent such obligations, liabilities and commitments relate to the period from
and after the Closing;
(G) All accounts payable incurred in the ordinary course of business of the
Business that are outstanding on the Closing Date; and
9
(H) All obligations, liabilities and commitments for refunds, adjustments,
allowances, repairs (other than warranty repairs, which are addressed in Section
9(f)), exchanges and returns or similar claims in respect of any and all products
sold by the Business prior to the Closing Date.
The assumption by Buyer of the Assumed Liabilities shall be effective upon the Closing
Date (except for the Assumed Liabilities set forth in Section 2(d)(iii)(E), which shall be
assumed by Buyer as of the date of Closing), unless the terms hereof expressly state that
such Liability shall transfer at another time. If Seller shall receive a request for
payment of any Assumed Liability after the Closing, Seller shall promptly forward such
request for payment to Buyer and Buyer shall promptly satisfy such Assumed Liability.
(iv) The Buyer will not assume, and will not be deemed to have assumed, any other
obligation or liability of the Seller whatsoever other than as set forth in Section
2(d)(iii) (collectively, the Excluded Liabilities), including, without limitation:
(A) Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, any liabilities or
obligations of the Seller under any employee pension benefit plans, material
employee welfare benefit plans and any other material employee benefit arrangements
or payroll practices (including employment agreements and severance agreements)
maintained by the Seller or to which the Seller contributes or has any existing
liability, in each case with respect to any Employees (collectively, the Seller
Plans). For the avoidance of doubt, Buyer specifically excludes any
liabilities associated with claims for benefits under post-retirement medical plans
provided by Seller (or Sellers predecessor), and for which Seller has continuing
obligations.
(B) Subject to the obligations of the Buyer pursuant to Section 6(b) of this
Agreement, any liabilities or obligations with respect to Employees for periods
prior to the Closing Date that are not set forth on the Closing Balance Sheet.
(C) Any liabilities or obligations (i) pertaining to the Business and relating
to the violation of any Legal Requirement prior to the Closing, or (ii) except as
expressly set forth herein, any third party or Governmental Body claim arising from
any act, omission or circumstance that took place prior to the Closing.
(D) Any liabilities based on products liability (including, but not limited to,
design defect), claims under product warranty or breach of warranty or other similar
liabilities related to Products manufactured by the Seller at any time prior to the
Closing (subject to Buyers undertakings pursuant to Section 9(f)), except in the
event (a) such Products are modified in any manner by Buyer, (b) are sold or sent
out by Buyer into the stream of commerce for use not as intended originally by
Seller, (c) are sent out by Buyer into the stream of commerce in a
manner inconsistent with Sellers past practices, or (d) are serviced,
refurbished or rebuilt after the Closing Date.
10
(E) Any liability arising prior to the Closing Date relating to or arising out
of any real property and/or environmental conditions.
(F) Any liability (a) related to a release, or threatened release, of Hazardous
Materials by the Seller, or any predecessor of Seller (x) at the Facility or (y) any
location at which Hazardous Materials were generated, manufactured, refined,
transferred, used or processed by the Business or any Person for whose conduct the
Business was or may be responsible, prior to Closing, or (b) arising from a breach
or violation of any Environmental Law by Seller, or any predecessor of Seller, or
any Person for whose conduct Seller is or may be responsible, prior to Closing.
(G) Any intercompany liabilities.
(H) The Tax Liabilities.
(I) Any liabilities not expressly assumed by Buyer pursuant to the Acquisition
Agreements.
The Seller shall be responsible for, and will pay, perform and discharge when due each
of the Excluded Liabilities.
(v) Purchase Price Allocation. Within 60 days after the Closing Date, Buyer
shall provide Seller with an allocation of the total consideration (including liabilities
assumed) among the Purchased Assets and the covenant not to compete described in Article 10.
If Seller does not agree with such allocation, Seller and Buyer shall use good faith
efforts to agree on an estimate, but if after good faith negotiations between the parties,
agreement has not been reached within thirty (30) days after Sellers receipt of Buyers
allocation, Buyer and Seller agree that such allocation shall be resolved pursuant to the
dispute resolution mechanism in Section 13(k). Seller (and its Affiliates) and Buyer (and
its Affiliates) agree to file all Tax returns consistent with the final versions of the
allocations and forms described in this Section 2(d)(v).
(e) Closing Balance Sheet. Seller will prepare, in good faith and in accordance with
the pro forma accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the Balance Sheet, an unaudited pro
forma balance sheet of the Business (in accordance with GAAP except to the extent described in the
footnotes thereto) as of October 31, 2004 (the Closing Balance Sheet). In the
preparation of the Closing Balance Sheet, Inventory value will be based upon a physical count as of
October 12, 2004. Seller shall deliver the Closing Balance Sheet to Buyer at or prior to the date
of Closing.
(f) Fairfield Assets. Although title to all of the Fairfield Assets will be
transferred to Buyer at the Closing, for a period of six (6) months (the Fairfield
Period) the Fairfield Assets will remain at Sellers Fairfield, New Jersey facility while
Seller performs certain servicing operations for Buyer with respect to servicing Trim and Drain
Pumps for the United States Navy pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement. Seller shall be
responsible for any risk of loss of the Fairfield Assets during the Fairfield Period. Seller shall
be responsible for maintenance of the Fairfield Assets during the Fairfield Period; provided that
Buyer shall be responsible for the
11
expense of any non-routine maintenance and repair of the
Fairfield Assets during the Fairfield Period. Within fifteen (15) days after the end of the
Fairfield Period, Buyer shall at its sole risk and expense remove the Fairfield Assets from
Sellers premises.
(g) Intellectual Property Assets Transfer. Although title to all of the Intellectual
Property Assets will be transferred to Buyer at the Closing, the physical transfer of the
Intellectual Property Assets will be effected pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement, the
Supply Agreement and the Technology Transfer Agreement.
(h) Adjustments As a Result of the Closing Date. The date of Closing will occur after
the Closing Date and it is the intention of the parties that all costs associated with the
operation of the Business after October 31, 2004 shall be borne by Buyer and all benefits of the
Business after such date shall accrue to Buyer.
(i) All amounts received by Seller with respect to any of the Purchased Assets on or
after the Closing Date shall be forwarded by Seller to Buyer within five business days of
receipt. All amounts received by Buyer with respect to any of the Excluded Assets shall be
forwarded by Buyer to Seller within five business days of receipt.
(ii) With respect to the Current Employees, Buyer shall within five business days of
invoicing by Seller reimburse Seller for the fully loaded and allocated costs of such
Current Employees (including all benefit plans and fringe benefits) from the Closing Date
through the date of Closing.
(iii) On the Closing Date, Buyer shall pay to Seller, in reimbursement of rent with
respect to the premises covered under the Lease Assignment after the Closing Date, $156,448.
(iv) With respect to any other out of pocket expenses incurred by Seller in the
ordinary course of the Business paid by Seller with respect to the period from the Closing
Date through the date of Closing, Buyer shall within five business days of invoicing by
Seller reimburse Seller for such expenses.
(v) The indemnity obligations of Buyer under Section 12(c) hereof, including with
respect to all Current Employees, shall not be affected by the fact that Seller has
operational control of the Purchase Assets and the Business from the Closing Date through
the date of Closing, except that no Seller Indemnified Party shall be indemnified for its
gross negligence or willful misconduct.
(i) Adjustment of Purchase Price.
(i) Within 45 days after the date of the Closing, Buyer shall prepare and deliver, or
cause to be prepared and delivered, to Seller a statement of Primary Working Capital as of
the date of the Closing Date Balance Sheet (the Working Capital Statement). The
Working Capital Statement shall be prepared in accordance with the preparation of the
Closing Date Balance Sheet.
12
(ii) Within 45 days following receipt by Seller of the Working Capital Statement,
Seller shall deliver written notice to Buyer of any dispute it has with respect to the
preparation or content of the Working Capital Statement. In the event that Seller does not
notify Buyer of a dispute with respect to the Working Capital Statement within such 30-day
period, such Working Capital Statement will be final, conclusive and binding on the parties.
In the event of such notification of a dispute, Buyer and Seller shall negotiate in good
faith to resolve such dispute. If Buyer and Seller, notwithstanding such good faith effort,
fail to resolve such dispute within 45 days after Seller advises Buyer of its objections,
then Buyer and Seller jointly shall engage the firm of Ernst & Young LLP (the
Arbitration Firm) to resolve such dispute. All determinations made by the
Arbitration Firm shall be final, conclusive and binding on the parties. Buyer and Seller
shall share equally the fees and expenses of the Arbitration Firm.
(iii) For purposes of complying with the terms set forth in this Section 2(i), Buyer
and the Business, on the one hand, and Seller, on the other hand, shall cooperate with and
make available to the other party and its representatives all information, records, data and
working papers, and will permit access to their facilities and personnel, as may be
reasonably required in connection with the preparation and analysis of the Working Capital
Statement and the resolution of any disputes thereunder.
(iv) The parties agree that no claim for an adjustment of the Purchase Price shall be
made by either party unless the absolute value of the difference between Primary Working
Capital as of the date of the Closing Date Balance Sheet and $9,440,000 is greater than
$300,000. Accordingly (i) if Primary Working Capital as of the date of the Closing Date
Balance Sheet (as finally determined pursuant to Section 2(i)(ii)) is less than $9,140,000,
then the Purchase Price shall be adjusted and Seller shall pay or caused to be paid, by
bank wire transfer of immediately available funds to an account designated in writing by
Buyer, an amount in cash equal to such shortfall, within five business days from the date on
which Primary Working Capital is finally determined pursuant to Section 2(i)(ii); and (ii)
if Primary Working Capital as of the date of the Closing Date Balance Sheet (as finally
determined pursuant to Section 2(i)(ii)) is greater than $9,740,000, then the Purchase Price
shall be adjusted and Buyer shall pay or cause to be paid by bank wire transfer of
immediately available funds to an account, designated in writing by Seller, an amount in
cash equal to such excess, within five business days from the date on which Primary Working
Capital is finally determined pursuant to Section 2(i)(ii).
3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER
With respect to the sale of the Business, Seller represents and warrants (it being understood
that, except in such cases as the Schedules and Exhibits expressly refer to a different date, the
Schedules and Exhibits have been prepared through October 18, 2004 and the representations and
warranties with respect to such Schedules and Exhibits are at and as of such date) to Buyer that:
(a) Organization. Seller is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization and is licensed or qualified to transact
business
13
and in good standing, under the laws of all jurisdictions where the Business would require
it to be so licensed or qualified.
(b) Authorization; Enforceability. Seller has all requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement and the
other Acquisition Agreements to which it is a party and to perform its obligations hereunder and
thereunder. All corporate acts required to be taken by Seller to authorize the execution and
delivery of the Acquisition Agreements to which it is a party, and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated herein and therein, have been taken, and no other corporate proceedings
on the part of Seller are necessary to authorize such execution, delivery and performance. This
Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Seller and constitutes a legal, valid and binding
obligation of Seller, enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms, except to the extent
such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors
rights, or by general equitable principles. Each Acquisition Agreement to which Seller is a party
will be, as of the Closing, duly executed and delivered by Seller and will constitute a legal,
valid and binding obligation of Seller in accordance with its terms, except to the extent such
enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors rights,
or by general equitable principles. The execution and performance of each Acquisition Agreement,
and the compliance with the provisions hereof and thereof by Seller, will not conflict with,
violate or result in the breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation of Seller, or any judgment, order, injunction, decree, law, regulation or ruling of
any Governmental Body to which Seller, the Purchased Assets and/or the Business are subject, except
where the same would not impede Sellers ability to perform its obligations under the Acquisition
Agreements or have a Material Adverse Effect. Except as indicated on Schedule 3(b) hereto, the
execution and performance of each Acquisition Agreement, and the compliance with the provisions
hereof and thereof by Seller, will not result in any breach of any of the terms or conditions of,
or constitute a default under, any material license, indenture, mortgage, agreement or other
instrument to which Seller is a party or by which it is bound, except where such breach or default
would not impede Sellers ability to perform its obligations under the Acquisition Agreements.
(c) Financial Statements. Exhibit B hereto contains (a) true and correct copy of
Sellers unaudited pro forma Balance Sheet of the Business dated December 31, 2003 (excluding the
Fairfield portion of the Business), and (b) the unaudited pro forma Statement of Income of the
Business for the period ended December 31, 2003 (collectively referred to as the Financial
Statements). Such Financial Statements (i) are in accordance with the books and records of
Seller, (ii) are accurate in all material respects, and (iii) fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Business as at and for the
period ended December 31, 2003. The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with
GAAP consistently applied in accordance with past practice, except to the extent described in the
footnotes thereto. Seller does not have any material debt, liability or obligation of any nature,
whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise, whether due or to become due, related to the
Business, that is not reflected or reserved against in the Financial Statements or set forth in the
Exhibits and Schedules hereto. The Closing Balance Sheet (i) is in accordance with the books and
records of Seller, (ii) is accurate in all material respects, and (iii) fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Business as at the date thereof. The Closing
Balance Sheet has been prepared on a basis consistent with the Balance Sheet. Since the date of
14
the Closing Balance Sheet, there has not occurred any change in the Business that would constitute
a Material Adverse Effect.
(d) Government Approvals. Except as set forth in Schedule 3(d) hereto, Seller is not
required to submit any notice, report or other filing with, or obtain any consent, approval or
waiver from, any Governmental Body in connection with its execution, delivery or performance of the
Acquisition Agreements, or the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein or therein,
except where the failure to make such submission or obtain such consent, approval or waiver, would
not have a Material Adverse Effect on the condition, results of operations, properties, assets or
business of Seller, taken as a whole and would not impede Buyers ability to perform its
obligations under the Acquisition Agreements. For the avoidance of doubt, this representation does
not relate to consents by the United States Navy as a customer of the Business.
(e) Fixed Assets; Properties; Liens. Seller owns and has title to, leases or has
rights to use, subject only to the terms of the Contracts, all the personal property and tangible
fixed assets included in the Purchased Assets. All Purchased Assets will at Closing be free and
clear of all liens, except (i) such liens as are set forth in Schedule 3(e), (ii) mechanics,
carriers, workmens, repairmens or other like liens arising or incurred in the ordinary course of
business, (iii) liens arising under original purchase price conditional sales Contracts or
equipment leases with third parties entered into in the ordinary course of business, (iv) liens for
Taxes and other governmental charges that are not due and payable or that may thereafter be paid
and (v) other imperfections of title, licenses or encumbrances, if any, which do not materially
impair the continued use and operation of the assets to which they relate in the conduct of the
Business as currently conducted (the liens described in clauses (i) through (v) above are referred
to collectively as Permitted Liens).
(f) [Reserved]
(g) Condition of Assets. Except as set forth in Schedule 3(g) hereto, to Sellers
Knowledge the buildings, plants, structures, and equipment included in the Purchased Assets or to
be assumed under any lease agreements by Buyer are structurally sound and are in reasonable
operating condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted.
(h) Taxes. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(h), there are no security interests of
any type on the Purchased Assets that have arisen in connection with any failure (or alleged
failure) by the Seller to pay any Tax and there are no judgments against Seller for or with respect
to any Taxes arising out of the operation of the Business. The Seller has filed or will file or
cause to be filed, within the applicable period prescribed by law, all federal, provincial, local
foreign or other tax returns, required by such law to be filed by Seller with respect to the
Business for all taxable periods ending on or prior to the Closing Date, or the Seller has filed
valid extensions of time for filing such tax returns. Seller has paid within the time and manner
prescribed by law, all Taxes shown as due on all such tax returns, and (i) Seller is not delinquent
in the payment of any Taxes
relating to the Business, (ii) no deficiencies for any Taxes have been asserted against
Seller, and (iii) no such deficiencies have been threatened. There are no actions, suits,
proceedings, investigations or claims pending or, to Sellers Knowledge, threatened against, Seller
is respect
15
of Taxes relating to the Business, nor are there any material matters under discussion
with any governmental authority relating to Taxes relating to the Business.
(i) Current Employees. Schedule 3(i) lists as of September 30, 2004, for each
employee engaged exclusively in the Business (collectively, the Current Employees), the
name, starting date, current annual salary (including bonus), and other special benefits (including
the use of an automobile). Except as identified on Schedule 3(i), Seller is not party to any
written employment agreement with any of the Current Employees. Except as set forth on Schedule
3(i), Seller is not in violation of or restricted, directly or indirectly, by any agreement to
which it is a party regarding confidentiality, non-competition, non-interference or
non-solicitation, from carrying on the Business anywhere in the United States for any period of
time. Subject to Buyers performance of its obligations under this Agreement, neither the
execution and delivery of this Agreement, the performance of the provisions hereof nor the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will trigger any severance pay obligation to
Buyer under any agreement or under any law. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(i), on the Closing
Date, there will be no bonuses or severance payments owed to employees, directors or officers of
the Business. On or prior to the Closing Date, the Current Employees will be terminated from their
current employment with Seller.
(j) Labor Relations. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(j), there are no disputes,
claims or actions pending or threatened between the Seller and any Current Employee or any labor or
other collective bargaining unit representing any Current Employee, in each case that could
reasonably be expected to result in a labor strike, slow-down or work stoppage. Except as set
forth on Schedule 3(j), with respect to the Business, Seller has complied with all Legal
Requirements relating to employment, equal employment opportunity, nondiscrimination, absence of
sexual or other harassment, immigration, wages, hours, benefits, collective bargaining, the payment
of social security and similar taxes, occupational safety and health, and plant closings, except
for such noncompliance as would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect.
(k) Compliance With Legal Requirements. Except as set forth in Schedule 3(k) hereto,
Seller it has conducted the Business in compliance with all applicable Legal Requirements, except
for such noncompliance as would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect.
(l) Legal Proceedings; Orders. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(l) hereto, there are
no Proceedings pending or to the Knowledge of Seller threatened, involving affecting or relating to
the Business, the Current Employees, the Purchased Assets or the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Except as
set forth in Schedule 3(l), there is no judgment, order, injunction or decree of any
Governmental Body relating to the Business to which Seller or any of the Purchased Assets is
currently subject.
(m) Absence of Certain Changes and Events. Except as set forth in Schedule 3(m)
hereto, since December 31, 2003, Seller has conducted the Business only in the ordinary course of
business and no event, circumstance or condition has occurred that has caused a Material Adverse
Effect.
16
(n) Intellectual Property Assets. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(n), Seller owns
or possesses and is hereby transferring to the Buyer adequate rights to use the Intellectual
Property Assets and the intellectual property licensed pursuant to the Technology Transfer
Agreement necessary to conduct the Business as presently conducted. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3(n) and except with respect to the rights of the U.S. Government, Seller owns each of the
Intellectual Property Assets, free and clear of all liens. Seller has not received written notice
of any claims, disputes, actions, proceedings, suits or appeals with respect to any Intellectual
Property Assets and none has been overtly threatened, in writing or otherwise, within the last
twelve months.
(o) Contracts; No Defaults. (i) Schedule 3(o)(i) contains an accurate and
complete list and, except for certain Government Contracts identified by Seller to Buyer,
Seller has made available to Buyer accurate and complete copies of, the following contracts
related exclusively to the Business:
(A) each Contract that involves performance of services or delivery of goods or
materials by Seller of a remaining amount or value in excess of $200,000;
(B) each Contract that involves performance of services or delivery of goods or
materials to Seller of a remaining amount or value in excess of $50,000;
(C) each Contract that was not entered into in the ordinary course of business
and that involves expenditures or receipts of Seller in excess of $50,000.00;
(D) each Contract affecting the ownership of, leasing of, title to, use of or any
leasehold or other interest in any real or personal property by Seller involving an
annual cost in excess of $100,000;
(E) each Contract with Seller and any labor union or other employee
representative of a group of employees relating to wages, hours and other conditions
of employment, including the agreement between Seller and United Steelworkers of
America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 8228, a copy of which has been made available to Buyer;
(F) each Contract (however named) involving a sharing of profits, losses, costs
or liabilities by Seller with any other Person;
(G) to Sellers Knowledge, each Contract containing covenants that in any way
purport to restrict Sellers business activity or limit the freedom of Seller to
engage in any line of business activity or limit the freedom of Seller to engage in
any line of business or to compete with any Person;
(H) each Contract providing for payments to or by any Person based on sales,
purchases or profits of Seller, other than direct payments for goods;
17
(I) except where the failure to disclose would not have a Material Adverse
Effect, each Power of Attorney of Seller that is currently effective and
outstanding;
(J) each Contract entered into that contains or provides for an express
undertaking by Seller to be responsible for consequential damages;
(K) each Contract for capital expenditures by Seller in excess of $50,000.00;
(L) each Contract of Seller not denominated in U.S. dollars;
(M) except where the failure to disclose would not have a Material Adverse Effect,
each written warranty, guaranty and/or other similar undertaking with respect to
contractual performances extended by Seller other than in the ordinary course of
business; and
(N) except where the failure to disclose would not have a Material Adverse
Effect, each amendment, supplement and modification (whether oral or written) in
respect of any of the foregoing.
With respect to each Contract required to be listed on Schedule 3(o)(i), such Schedule
sets forth reasonably complete details concerning any Government Contract a copy of which
has not been made available to Buyer, including the parties to such Government Contract and
the amount of the remaining commitment of Seller under such Government Contract.
(ii) Except as set forth in Schedule 3(o)(ii):
(A) each Contract identified in Schedule 3(o)(i) and which is to be assigned to
or assumed by Buyer under this Agreement is in all material respects valid, binding
and in full force and effect and is enforceable by Seller in accordance with its
terms subject, as to enforcement, to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium,
reorganization or similar laws affecting creditors rights generally and to general
equitable principles; and
(B) to the Knowledge of Seller, no Contract identified in Schedule 3(o)(i) and
which is to be assigned to or assumed by Buyer under this Agreement will upon
completion or performance thereof have a Material Adverse Effect on the Business or
Purchased Assets.
(iii) Except as set forth in Schedule 3(o)(iii):
(A) Seller is, and at all times since December 31, 2003, has been, in
compliance with all applicable material terms and requirements of each Contract
which is being assumed by Buyer;
18
(B) to Sellers Knowledge, each other Person that has or had any obligation or
liability under any Contract which is being assigned to Buyer is, and at all times
since December 31, 2003, has been, in compliance with all material applicable terms
and requirements of such Contract;
(C) no event has occurred or circumstance exists that (with or without notice
or lapse of time) may materially contravene, conflict with or result in a breach of,
or give Seller or any other Person the right to declare default or exercise any
remedy under, or to accelerate the maturity or performance of, or payment under, or
to cancel, terminate or modify any material Contract that is being assigned to or
assumed by Buyer;
(D) to Sellers Knowledge, no event has occurred or circumstance exists under
or by virtue of any Contract that (with or without notice or lapse of time) would
cause the creation of any encumbrance affecting any of the Purchased Assets other
than Permitted Liens;
(E) Seller has not given to or received from any other Person, at any time
since December 31, 2003, any notice or other communication (whether oral or written)
regarding any actual, alleged, possible or potential violation or breach of, or
default under, any Contract which is being assigned to or assumed by Buyer; and
(F) there are no renegotiations of or attempts to renegotiate any material
amounts paid or payable to Seller under current or completed Contracts with any
Person having the contractual or statutory right to demand or require such
renegotiation and no such Person has made written demand for such renegotiation.
(iv) Government Contract Compliance. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(o)(iv),
with respect to each Government Contract related to the Business to which Seller is a party
(each, a Seller Government Contract) and each pending Government Bid related to
the Business submitted by Seller (each, a Seller Bid), (i) Seller has complied
with all material requirements of all Laws, standards or agreements pertaining to such
Seller Government Contract or Seller Bid, including, without limitation, the Cost Accounting
Standards, the Truth in Negotiations Act and the False Claims Act; (ii) all representations
and certifications executed, acknowledged or set forth in or pertaining to such Seller
Government Contract or Seller Bid were complete and correct in all material respects as of
their effective date and Seller
has complied in all material respects with all such representations and certifications;
(iii) neither any Governmental Body nor any prime contractor, subcontractor or other Person
has notified Seller, either in writing or, to the Knowledge of Seller, orally, that Seller
has breached or violated any Law, certification, representation, clause, provision or
requirement pertaining to such Seller Government Contract or Seller Bid; (iv) no termination
for convenience, termination for default, cure notice or show cause notice is currently in
effect or has been issued within the past three (3) years pertaining to any such Seller
Government Contract or Seller Bid; (v) other than pursuant to Government Contract
19
requirements for withholding of fees under cost plus fixed fee contracts and labor
withholdings under time and materials/labor hour contracts, no money currently due to Seller
pertaining to such Seller Government Contract or Seller Bid has been withheld or set off nor
has any current claim been made to withhold or set off money, and Seller is entitled to all
progress payments received with respect thereto; (vi) Seller has complied in all material
respects with all of the provisions of such Seller Government Contract or Seller Bid
(including the clauses in General Services Administration multiple award schedule contracts
relating to Price Reductions and Commercial Sales Practices); (vii) to Sellers Knowledge,
no material cost incurred by Seller pertaining to such Seller Government Contract or Seller
Bid has been formally questioned or challenged, is the subject of any investigation or has
been disallowed by the U.S. Government; (viii) with respect to any Seller Government
Contract or Seller Bid, Seller is not a guarantor or otherwise liable for any liability or
obligation (including indebtedness) of any other Person other than Seller or any of its
subcontractors; (ix) with respect to any Seller Government Contract or Seller Bid, there
have not been any requests by any Governmental Body for a contract price adjustment based on
a claimed disallowance by any Governmental Body or at the direction of any Governmental Body
or written notice of defective pricing; (x) with respect to any Seller Government Contract
or Seller Bid, there have not been any claims or equitable adjustments by Seller against the
U.S. Government or any third party in excess of $50,000; and (xi) with respect to any Seller
Government Contract or Seller Bid, there have not been any written notices challenging,
questioning or disallowing any costs.
(v) Government Investigations. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(o)(v), (i)
Seller and, to Sellers Knowledge, any of its directors, officers or employees are not
under, and at any time since December 31, 2000 have not been under, administrative, civil or
criminal investigation, indictment or writ of information by any Governmental Body or any
audit or investigation by any Governmental Body, with respect to any alleged irregularity,
misstatement, omission or noncompliance arising under or relating to any Government Contract
or Laws applicable to Government Contracts; and (ii) since December 31, 2000, Seller has not
conducted or initiated any internal investigation or made a voluntary disclosure to any
Governmental Body, with respect to any alleged material irregularity, misstatement, omission
or noncompliance arising under or relating to any Government Contract or any Law applicable
to Government Contracts (including ITAR and ODTC). Except as set forth on Schedule 3(o)(v),
there exists no material irregularity, misstatement, omission or noncompliance arising under
or relating to any Government Contract or any Law applicable to Government Contracts that
has led or could lead to any of the consequences set forth in clause (i) or (ii) of the immediately preceding sentence or any other
material damage, penalty assessment, recoupment of payment or disallowance of cost.
(vi) Absence of Claims. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(o)(vi), with respect
to Seller, there exist (i) no outstanding claims against Seller, either by any Governmental
Body or by any prime contractor, subcontractor, vendor or other third party, arising under
or relating to any Seller Government Contract; and (ii) no disputes between Seller and any
Governmental Body under the Contract Disputes Act or any other federal statute or between
Seller and any prime contractor, subcontractor or vendor arising under or
20
relating to any
Seller Government Contract. Seller has no interest in any pending claim against any
Governmental Body or any prime contractor, subcontractor or vendor arising under or relating
to any Seller Government Contract. Schedule 3(o)(vi) lists each Seller Government Contract
which, to Sellers Knowledge, is currently under audit (other than routine audits conducted
in the ordinary course of business) by the U.S. Government or any other person that is a
party to such Government Contract.
(vii) Eligibility; Systems Compliance. Except as set forth on Schedule
3(o)(vii), since December 31, 2000, neither Seller nor any of its management has been (i)
debarred or suspended from participation in the award of Contracts with the United States
Department of Defense or any other Governmental Body (excluding for this purpose
ineligibility to bid on certain contracts due to generally applicable bidding requirements)
or (ii) subject to any debarment or suspension inquiry. To Sellers Knowledge, there exist
no facts or circumstances that would warrant the institution of suspension or debarment
proceedings or the finding of non responsibility or ineligibility on the part of Seller with
respect to any prior, current or future Government Contract. To Sellers Knowledge, no
payment or other benefit has been made or conferred by Seller or by any Person on behalf of
Seller in connection with any Government Contract in violation of applicable Laws (including
procurement Laws or the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act). Except as set forth on
Schedule 3(o)(vii), Sellers cost accounting, materials management and procurement systems,
and the associated entries reflected in the Financial Statements, with respect to the Seller
Government Contracts and the Seller Bids are in compliance in all material respects with all
applicable Laws.
(viii) Test and Inspection Results. Except as set forth on Schedule
3(o)(viii), all test and inspection results or other reports provided by Seller to any
Governmental Body pursuant to any Seller Government Contract or to any other Person pursuant
to a Seller Government Contract or as a part of the delivery to the U.S. Government or to
any other Person pursuant to a Seller Government Contract for any article, spare part,
apparatus or any intangible (including software and databases) which were designed,
developed, engineered or manufactured by Seller or any of its subcontractors, were complete
and correct in all material respects as of the date so provided. Except as set forth on
Schedule 3(o)(viii), Seller to its Knowledge
has provided all test and inspection results to the U.S. Government or to any other
Person pursuant to the Seller Government Contracts as required by applicable Law and the
terms of the applicable Seller Government Contract.
(ix) Government Furnished Equipment. Schedule 3(o)(ix) hereto, identifies by
description or inventory number and contract all material equipment and fixtures used
exclusively in the Business and loaned, bailed or otherwise furnished to or held by Seller
(or by subcontractors on behalf of Seller) by or on behalf of the U.S. Government as of the
date stated therein (said equipment and fixtures are herein referred to as the
GFE). Seller has certified to the U.S. Government in a timely manner that all GFE
is in good working order, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and otherwise meets the
requirements of the applicable contract. There are no outstanding loss, damage or
destruction reports that have been or should have been submitted to any Governmental Body in
respect of any GFE.
21
(x) Closed Years; Forward Rates. Seller has reached agreement with the
responsible U.S. Government contracting officers and applicable agencies approving and
closing all overhead and other costs charged to Seller Government Contracts for the years
prior to and through December 31, 2000, and those years are closed. Seller has submitted to
the responsible U.S. Government contracting officers and applicable agencies as to all
forward pricing indirect rates to be bid, billed and charged under Seller Government
Contracts for the years ended December 2001 and 2002, which such indirect rates have been
disclosed to Buyer. In addition, Seller has submitted to the responsible U.S. Government
contracting officers and applicable agencies incurred cost submissions for the year ended
December 2001, which such indirect rates have been disclosed to Buyer.
(xi) Intellectual Property. Schedule 3(o)(xi) hereto, identifies (a) all
Intellectual Property Assets used exclusively in the Business that were developed, in whole
or in part, with full- or partial-funding from a Governmental Body, including, without
limitation, to the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof or in efforts with other entities
receiving full- or partial-funding from a Governmental Body or any agency thereof, and (b)
all rights that such Governmental Body has with respect to such Intellectual Property
Assets.
(xii) Contracting Activity. Each Contract relating to the sale, design,
manufacture or provision of products or services of the Business has been entered into in
the ordinary course of business of Seller and has been entered into without the commission
of any act alone or in concert with any other Person, or any consideration having been paid
or promised, that is or would be in violation of any material Legal Requirement.
(xiii)
Estimates to Complete. Schedule 3(o)(xiii) sets forth for twelve specified Government Contracts Sellers good
faith estimate of all costs and expenses not reflected on the Balance Sheet that remain to
be paid after September 30, 2004 through the date of completion thereof (ETCs). The ETCs
are based upon and appropriately and accurately reflect Sellers books and records, its
experience through September 30, 2004 with such Contract, including any actual or reasonably
anticipated supply, labor, delivery, installation or other performance problems, and any
other relevant and material information known to Seller. The Parties acknowledge and agree,
however, that the ETCs are good faith estimates only, and do not accurately reflect all of
the costs and expenses that Buyer may actually incur to complete such Contracts.
(p) Insurance. Schedule 3(p) is a true and complete list of all insurance policies
held by the Seller exclusively in connection with the Business. All such insurance policies are in
full force and effect.
(q) Leased Real Property. Schedule 3(q) describes in reasonable detail all the real
property subject to Lease used exclusively in connection with the Business. With respect to such
real property subject to Lease, except as set forth on Schedule 3(q):
(i) Seller has a valid leasehold interest in the real property subject to Lease, free
and clear of all liens;
22
(ii) Seller has not received written notice of any condemnation proceedings, lawsuits
or administrative actions relating to the real property subject to Lease;
(iii) Seller has not received written notice that Sellers use or occupancy of the real
property subject to Lease violates any Law, covenant, condition or restriction that
encumbers such property, or that any such property is subject to any restriction for which
any Permits or facility certifications necessary to the current use thereof have not been
obtained; and
(iv) Except for the routine provision of office space to government employees in
connection with Sellers performance of certain Government Contracts and an office presently
occupied by the landlord of the Phillipsburg, New Jersey facility, there are no subleases,
licenses, concessions or other agreements granting to any Person the right of use or
occupancy of any portion of the real property subject to Lease.
(r) Brokerage. Except as described in Schedule 3(r), Seller has not incurred,
directly or indirectly, any obligation or liability, contingent or otherwise, for any brokerage
fees, finders fees, agents commissions or other like payment in connection with this Agreement,
or the transactions contemplated herein.
(s) Accounts Receivable. Except as described in Schedule 3(s), none of the accounts
receivable of the Business is subject to assignments, pledges, liens or other interests of third
parties, nor is any subject to any material counterclaim or set-off. All accounts receivable of
the Business as of October 31, 2004 (i) are listed on Schedule 3(s), together with an aging
analysis as of October 31, 2004; (ii) arose in the regular course of business; and (iii) represent
valid obligations.
(t) Accounts Payable; Contracts with Suppliers. Schedule 3(t) lists the accounts
payable of the Business as of October 31, 2004 and, as of September 30, 2004 each outstanding
purchase order and each agreement between the Business and its suppliers involving an aggregate
purchase price of ten thousand Dollars ($10,000) or more by (i) name of vendor, (ii) description of
goods or services, (iii) purchase order value, and (iv) balance due to vendor. Except as provided
in Schedule 3(t), no such order is subject to any escalation, renegotiation, redetermination,
rebate or similar provision. For a period of one hundred-eighty (180) days after Closing, should
the Buyer be presented with a valid invoice from a supplier relating to the delivery of goods or
services prior to the Closing Date, and which is not reflected on the Closing Balance Sheet or on
Schedule 3(t) as updated or was not incurred in the ordinary course of business of the Business
after the date of the Closing Balance Sheet, subject to the provisions of Article 12, the Buyer
shall be entitled to reimbursement from Seller for such amounts paid.
(u) Inventory. All amounts shown for inventory on the Balance Sheet have been
determined consistently in accordance with GAAP (except to the extent described in the footnotes
thereto) and Sellers historical practices in all material respects, including but not limited to
adjustments for scrap, excess and/or obsolete material and the Inventory is useable in the Business
as presently conducted and has been maintained in accordance with industry standards.
23
(v) Environmental Status; Permits. Except as disclosed in Schedule 3(v):
(i) Seller, is and at all times has been in full compliance with, and has not been and
is not in violation or liable under, any Environmental Law. Seller has no basis to expect,
nor has any other Person for whose conduct it is or may be held to be responsible received,
any actual or threatened order, notice or other communication from (i) any
Governmental Body or private citizen acting in the public interest or (ii) the current
or prior owner or operator of the Facility, of any actual or potential violation or failure
to comply with any Environmental Law, or of any actual or threatened obligation to undertake
or bear the cost of any Environmental Liabilities with respect to the Facility or other
property or asset (whether real, personal or mixed) in which the Business has or had an
interest, or with respect to any property or Facility at or to which Hazardous Materials
were generated, manufactured, refined, transferred, imported, used or processed by Seller
for the Business or any other Person for whose conduct it is or may be held responsible, or
from which Hazardous Materials have been transported, treated, stored, handled, transferred,
disposed, recycled or received.
(ii) There are no pending or, to the Sellers Knowledge, threatened claims,
encumbrances, or other restrictions of any nature resulting from any environmental, health
and safety liabilities or arising under or pursuant to any Environmental Law with respect to
or affecting the Facility or any other property or asset (whether real, personal or mixed)
in which the Business has or had an interest.
(iii) Neither Seller, nor any other Person for whose conduct Seller is or may be held
responsible, has received any citation, directive, inquiry, notice, order, summons, warning
or other communication that relates to hazardous activity, Hazardous Materials, or any
alleged, actual, or potential violation or failure to comply with any Environmental Law, or
of any alleged, actual, or potential obligation to undertake or bear the cost of any
environmental liabilities with respect to the Facility or property or asset (whether real,
personal or mixed) in which the Business has or had an interest, or with respect to any
property or facility to which Hazardous Materials are or at any time were generated,
manufactured, refined, transferred, imported, used or processed by Seller for the Business
or any other Person for whose conduct it is or may be held responsible, have been
transported, treated, stored, handled, transferred, disposed, recycled or received.
(iv) Neither Seller nor any other Person for whose conduct Seller is or may be held
responsible has violated any Environmental Law with respect to the Facility, with respect to
any other property or asset (whether real, personal or mixed) in which the Business (or any
predecessor) has or had an interest, or at any property geologically or hydrologically
adjoining any facility or any such other property or asset.
(v) Seller has provided Buyer with access to true and complete copies and results of
any reports, studies, analyses, tests, or monitoring possessed or initiated by Seller
pertaining to Hazardous Materials or hazardous activities in, on, or under the Facility or
concerning compliance by Seller or any other Person for whose conduct Seller is or may be
held responsible, with Environmental Laws.
24
(vi) Seller has not used, generated, stored or disposed of, on, under or about the
Facility any hazardous waste or toxic substances, except in compliance with applicable law.
The Seller has not generated or disposed of at any off-site locations any hazardous waste or
toxic substances except in compliance with applicable law.
(vii) Schedule 3(v) (i) contains a list of (i) all foreign, federal, state and
municipal environmental permits applied for and received for the Sellers tenancy of its
real property including identification of issuing agency, permit number, and expiration
date, (ii) all citations or enforcement actions received by the Seller in relation to the
Sellers leased property for violation of any foreign, state, federal, or local laws or
regulations issued since December 31, 2000, including description and identification of
type, date, and final resolution, and (iii) all known spills and discharges by the Seller of
hazardous or environmentally objectionable substances, including identification of exact
location and remedial action taken. All licenses, permits, registrations, approvals and
other governmental authorizations held by the Business are listed on Schedule 3(v) and are
valid and sufficient for the business being conducted.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, Buyer acknowledges and agrees that the
representations and warranties contained in this Section 3(v) are the only representations and
warranties given by Seller with respect to environmental matters or compliance with Environmental
Laws and Hazardous Materials and no other provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted as
containing any representation or warranty with respect thereto.
(w) Purchased Assets. Except as set forth on Schedule 3(w) and Schedule 2(c)(i) and
except for certain assets at Sellers Fairfield, New Jersey facility, at the Closing, the Purchased
Assets and the rights, assets, products and services to be provided by Seller under the agreements
listed in Section 2(b)(ii) will include all of the assets, rights, products and services necessary
to operate the Business immediately after the Closing, consistent with past practice.
(x) No Undisclosed Liabilities. Except as disclosed in Schedule 3(x), with respect to
the Business Seller has no material liability except for liabilities reflected and reserved for in
the Financial Statements and the Closing Balance Sheet and current liabilities incurred in the
ordinary course of business.
(y) Disclosure. To Sellers Knowledge, there is no fact that has specific application
to Seller (other than general economic or industry conditions) and that would reasonably be likely
to have a Material Adverse Effect on the Purchased Assets or Business that has not been set forth
in this Agreement or in the schedules attached hereto.
4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER
Buyer represents and warrants to Seller that:
(a) Organization. Buyer is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of its jurisdictions of organization.
(b) Authorization; Enforceability. Buyer has all requisite corporate power and
authority to enter into each Acquisition Agreement, and to perform
its obligations hereunder and
25
thereunder. All acts required to be taken by Buyer to authorize the execution and delivery of each
Acquisition Agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein,
has been taken, and no other corporate proceedings on the part of Buyer are necessary to authorize
such execution, delivery and performance. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by
Buyer and constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Buyer, enforceable against Buyer in
accordance with its terms, except to the extent such enforceability may be limited by applicable
bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors rights, or by general equitable principles. Each
Acquisition Agreement will be, as of the Closing, duly executed and delivered by Buyer, and will
constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of Buyer in accordance with its terms, except to
the extent such enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy and other laws affecting
creditors rights, or by general equitable principles. The execution and performance of each
Acquisition Agreement, and the compliance with the provisions hereof and thereof by Buyer, will not
conflict with, violate or result in the breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of the
Certificate of Incorporation or by-laws of Buyer, or any judgment, order, injunction, decree, law,
regulation or ruling of any Governmental Body to which Buyer is subject, except where the same
would not impede Buyers ability to perform its obligations under the Acquisition Agreements or
have a material adverse effect on the condition, results of operations, properties, assets or
business of Buyer, taken as a whole. The execution and performance of each Acquisition Agreement,
and the compliance with the provisions hereof and thereof by Buyer, will not result in any breach
of any of the terms or conditions of, or constitute a default under, any material license,
indenture, mortgage, agreement or other instrument to which Buyer is a party or by which it is
bound, except where such breach or default would not impede Buyers ability to perform its
obligations under the Acquisition Agreements or have a material adverse effect on the condition,
results of operations, properties, assets or business of Buyer, taken as a whole.
(c) Government Approvals. Except as set forth in Schedule 4(c) hereto, Buyer is not
required to submit any notice, report or other filing with, or obtain any consent, approval or
waiver from, any Governmental Body in connection with its execution, delivery or performance of the
Acquisition Agreements, or the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein or therein,
except where the failure to make such submission or obtain such consent, approval or waiver, would
not have a material adverse effect on the condition, results of operations, properties, assets or business of
Buyer, taken as a whole and would not impede Buyers ability to perform its obligations under the
Acquisition Agreements.
(d) Economic Ability. Buyer has the economic ability to fund the Purchase Price
payments described herein.
(e) Brokerage. Buyer has not incurred, directly or indirectly, any obligation or
liability, contingent or otherwise, for any brokerage fees, finders fees, agents commissions or
other like payment in connection with this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated herein.
5. COVENANTS OF SELLER
(a) Access and Investigation. Except for certain Government Contracts and Government
Bids identified by Seller to Buyer or as may be prohibited by Contract or Legal Requirements,
between the date of this Agreement and the Closing Date, Seller will (a) afford
26
Buyer and its
Representatives, access to Sellers personnel, properties, Contracts, books and records relating
exclusively to the Business (other than Excluded Assets), on reasonable notice and during regular
business hours, and (b) furnish Buyer with such additional financial, operating, and other data and
information relating exclusively to the Business (other than Excluded Assets) in the Sellers
possession as Buyer may reasonably request.
(b) Conduct of Business. Prior to the Closing Date, except as set forth in Schedule
5(b), Seller will with respect to the Business (a) conduct the Business only in the ordinary course
of business and consistent with past practice; and (b) use its reasonable efforts to preserve
intact its current business organization, retain the services of the Current Employees, agents and
sales representatives, and preserve the relations and goodwill with its suppliers, customer,
landlords, creditors, Current Employees, agents and others having business relations with the
Seller; (c) consult with Buyer and obtain its prior written consent before making any single
commitment or series of interdependent commitments for capital expenditures exceeding $50,000; (d)
refrain from entering into any leases, licenses, contracts or other agreements relating to the
Business, except product sales contracts and materials supply contracts in the ordinary cause of
business, committing Buyer to expend more than $50,000 in any one or a series of related
transactions; (e) refrain from selling or transferring any of the Purchased Assets other than in
the ordinary course of business; (f) account for, make appropriate filing with respect to, and pay
when due all Taxes, assessments and other governmental charges against the Purchased Assets or in
respect of the Business; (g) except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practices, not grant or agree to grant any bonuses, general increase in the rates of salaries or
compensation or any specific increase to any Current Employee or provide for any new employment
benefits to any Current Employees; and (h) provide Buyer, promptly after obtaining Sellers Knowledge thereof,
with written notice of any event or condition pertaining to the Business or the Purchased Assets
that has resulted in a Material Adverse Effect or which can reasonably expect to cause a Material
Adverse Effect, and all claims, regulatory proceedings and litigation (whether actual or
threatened) against or possibly involving the Purchased Assets, the Seller or Buyer.
(c) Required Approvals. As promptly as practicable after the date of this Agreement,
Seller will make any and all filings required by Legal Requirements to be made by it in order to
consummate the contemplated transactions. Between the date of this Agreement and the Closing Date,
Seller will (a) cooperate with Buyer with respect to any filings that Buyer is required by Legal
Requirements to make in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby, and (b) cooperate
with Buyer in obtaining all consents identified in Schedule 4(c) hereto.
(d) No Negotiation. Until such time, if any, as this Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Article 11, Seller will not, nor will Seller permit any entity that it controls or any of its
Representatives to, directly or indirectly solicit, initiate, or encourage any inquiries or
proposals from, discuss or negotiate with, provide any non-public information to any Person (other
than Buyer) relating to any transaction involving the sale of the Business.
(e) Additional Information. Seller shall promptly furnish to Buyer all such financial
and operating reports with respect to the Business as may be prepared by the Seller from time to
time between the date hereof and the Closing Date as Buyer may reasonably request. Seller shall
make available to Buyer information with respect to any document, event,
27
transaction or condition
entered into or occurring after the date hereof which, had it occurred or been in effect on or
prior to the date hereof, would have been included on the Schedules to this Agreement, and any such
information which would have been included on a Schedule shall be deemed to amend the relevant
Schedule when so provided.
(f) Confidentiality. From and after the Closing Date, Seller shall not disclose to
any Person (other than any Affiliates, agents or representatives of Seller) any Business
Information (as defined below) that is known to Seller on the Closing Date. The term Business
Information means any trade secret information exclusively concerning the Business or the
Purchased Assets that is confidential or proprietary and is necessary for the conduct of the
Business, other than information that (i) is or becomes generally available to the public other
than as a result of a disclosure by Seller after the Closing Date or (ii) Seller is required to
disclose by Law or legal process or (iii) is disclosed in the ordinary course of business in
connection with the Supply Agreement, the Transition Services Agreement or the Technology Transfer
Agreement. In the event that Seller is requested in any proceeding to disclose any Business
Information, Seller shall give Buyer prompt written notice of such request so that Buyer may seek
an appropriate protective order. If in the absence of a protective order Seller is requested in a
proceeding to disclose Business Information, Seller
may disclose such portion of the Business Information that in the opinion of Sellers counsel
Seller is required to disclose, without liability under this Agreement, provided that Seller shall
give Buyer written notice of the Business Information to be disclosed as far in advance of its
disclosure as is practicable and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain assurances
that confidential treatment will be accorded to such Business Information. The provisions of this
Section 5(f) shall not restrict Seller from using Business Information in performing its
obligations under, or enforcing the terms of, this Agreement or any Acquisition Agreement, or in
exercising its rights relating hereto or thereto or to the transactions contemplated hereby or
thereby.
(g) Reasonable Efforts. Seller will use its reasonable efforts to effectuate the
transactions hereby contemplated and to fulfill the conditions to Buyers obligations under Article
7 of this Agreement.
(h) Non Solicitation; Non-Interference. At no time after the date hereof until the
third anniversary of the Closing Date shall the Seller and/or any Affiliate:
(i) directly or indirectly, in any capacity or in association with any other person,
solicit, induce, or in any manner attempt to solicit or induce, any Employees then employed
by Buyer to terminate his or her employment or to become their employees. An employee shall
be deemed not to have been solicited for employment if such employee responded to a general
solicitation; or
(ii) directly or indirectly, interfere with Buyers relationship with, cause the
cancellation, discontinuation, termination or alteration (in a manner detrimental to Buyer)
of Buyers relationship with any party who is a customer, supplier, or manufacturer with
respect to the Business; provided, that Seller shall have the right to terminate or
alter its relationship with any party from which it is obtaining goods or services in
connection with the Supply Agreement or the Technology Transfer Agreement.
28
(i) Notice of Events or Circumstances. Seller will promptly notify Buyer promptly
after learning of the occurrence of any event or circumstance which would reasonably be expected to
cause any condition to the Closing not to be satisfied. In such event, the parties will negotiate
in good faith during the fifteen (15) calendar day period immediately after such notice to
determine the consequences of such circumstance, and Seller or Buyer, as applicable, may elect to
terminate this Agreement after the expiration of such fifteen (15) calendar day period.
6. COVENANTS OF BUYER
(a) Required Approvals. As promptly as practicable after the date of this Agreement,
Buyer will, and will cause each of its applicable Affiliates to, make any and all filings required
by Legal Requirements to be made by them in order to consummate the contemplated transactions.
Between the date of this Agreement and the Closing Date, Buyer will, and will cause each of its
applicable Affiliates to, (a) cooperate with Seller and the Affiliates with respect to any filings
that Seller and the Affiliates are required by Legal Requirements to make in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby, and (b) cooperate with Seller in obtaining all consents
identified in Schedule 3(d) hereto.
(b) Employees.
(i) Buyer shall offer employment as of the Closing Date to each Current Employee,
including employees on vacation, leave of absence, including maternity, family, sick or
short-term (but not long-term) disability leave, and temporary layoff, at the same location
where such Current Employee was employed immediately prior to the Closing Date for
substantially equivalent total cash compensation, and on such other terms and conditions
that are substantially similar to those in effect immediately prior to the Closing Date;
provided, however, in addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing,
with respect to each Current Employee listed on Sections (A) or (B) of Schedule 6(b)(i),
Buyer shall (x) offer total cash compensation of not less than 101.5% of the cash
compensation currently payable under the Union Contract, and (y) not terminate without cause
(as cause is defined in the Union Contract) such Current Employees employment during the
twelve (12) months following the Closing Date; and, provided further, that with respect to
each Current Employee listed on Section (A) of Schedule 6(b)(i), Buyer shall amend the
pension plan maintained by Buyer in which such Current Employees shall participate from and
after the Closing to include the 75/80 provisions of the Union Contract and part B-7 of
the Flowserve Pension Plan (the 75/80 Provisions); provided further,
however, with respect to each Current Employee listed on Sections (A) or (B) of
Schedule 6(b)(i), if any such Current Employee is terminated for cause and it is
subsequently determined that such termination was without cause ( as cause is defined in
the Union Contract), Buyer shall indemnify Seller for all damages, costs and expenses
incurred by Seller with respect to the 75/80 Provisions and the costs to defend any claim in
connection with such 75/80 Provisions. With respect to each such Current Employee who
accepts Buyers offer of employment (an Employee), Buyer shall (i) credit periods
of service with Seller or an Affiliate of Seller (or a predecessor of any of them) prior to
the Closing (Pre-Closing Employment), for purposes of determining eligibility,
vesting, benefit entitlement and benefit amounts under severance, vacation, and all other
compensation and benefit plans, programs and policies maintained
29
by Buyer for the
benefit of such Employees after the Closing , except for any defined benefit pension plan
maintained by Buyer, and (ii) indemnify and hold harmless the Seller Indemnified Parties
with respect to any severance benefit liabilities payable by Seller or its Affiliates
arising out Buyers breach of its obligation hereunder to offer employment in accordance
with the provisions of this Agreement. With respect to each Employee, Buyer shall credit
periods of Pre-Closing Employment for purposes of determining eligibility, vesting, and
benefit entitlement under any defined benefit pension plan maintained by Buyer in which such
Employees may participate after the Closing Date, but shall not take such Pre-Closing
Employment into account in determining the amount of benefit payable to an Employee under
such a plan, except to the extent required to meet all conditions for payment and benefit
accrual of the 75/80 Provisions referenced above. For one (1) year after the Closing Date,
if an Employee ceases to be employed by Buyer and Buyer obtains a release from such
Employee, Buyer shall use its best efforts to obtain for Seller the same release as it
obtains for Buyer. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, Buyer shall not assume any
existing benefit plans or benefit plan liabilities to which Seller is a party. Buyer agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold the Seller Indemnified Parties harmless from any claims that
Seller violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN)
and/or the New Jersey Administrative Code 12:40-1.1, 12:40-1.2, and 12:17-3.5. Buyer agrees
that it will not terminate or significantly reduce the operation of the Business at the
Phillipsburg, New Jersey facility during the twelve months following the Closing Date.
(ii) In the event that any Current Employee listed on Schedule 6(b)(i) makes a claim
against Seller for retirement benefits under the 75/80 Provisions, Seller shall with the
cooperation of Buyer defend such claim (it being understood that Seller shall control the
defense and settlement of such claim after consultation with Buyer). With respect to any
such claim that is first made more than twelve months following the Closing Date, Buyer
agrees to indemnify the Seller Indemnified Parties for 50% of all damages, costs and
expenses (including retirement benefits and all defense costs) in connection with such
claim.
(c) Confidentiality.
(i) Buyer confirms and agrees that, with respect to any information directly or
indirectly furnished by or on behalf of Seller, whether before, on or after the date hereof,
Buyer shall continue to be bound by the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of
July 2, 2002, by and between Seller and Buyer (the Confidentiality Agreement)
notwithstanding that the term of the Confidentiality Agreement may have expired.
(ii) Buyer understands and agrees that Seller is making available confidential
information and trade secrets to Buyer concerning the operations of Seller and the Business,
which information would be damaging to Seller and its Affiliates if disclosed to a
competitor or made available to any other Person, and that such information has been
divulged in confidence. Buyer acknowledges that Seller has permitted Buyer to conduct due
diligence and/or a review of the premises of the Business. Buyer shall not disclose to
30
any
Person, other than Buyers attorneys, accountants and consultants, any contents or results
of any due diligence or investigation by or on behalf of Buyer, including any information
concerning any alleged violation of any Environmental Law, without obtaining prior written
approval from Seller, except as may be required by Law, in which case Buyer will notify
Seller in writing of Buyers intent to make such disclosure and whereupon Seller shall have
the option of making such disclosure jointly with Buyer. Buyer agrees that Seller would be
irreparably harmed by any violation, or threatened violation, of this Section 6(c) and that,
therefore, Seller shall be entitled to an injunction prohibiting Buyer from any violation,
or threatened violation, of this Section 6(c).
(iii) From and after the Closing, the provisions of Sections 6(c)(i) and 6(c)(ii) above
shall not apply to or restrict in any manner Buyers use of confidential information of the
Seller relating to any of the Purchased Assets or the Assumed Liabilities.
(d) Reasonable Efforts. Buyer will use its reasonable efforts to effectuate the
transactions hereby contemplated and to fulfill the conditions to Sellers obligations under
Article 8 of this Agreement.
(e) Notices and Consents. Buyer will, prior to the Closing Date, give all notices to
third parties and will, at Buyers expense, obtain all third party approvals, consents, novations
and waivers that are required to be obtained in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement. Seller hereby agrees to reasonably cooperate with the Buyer in Buyers efforts to
obtain such third party consents; provided that the Seller will not be obligated hereunder to pay
any consideration to the third party from whom such consent is requested. Notwithstanding any
other provision of this Agreement, the failure by the parties to obtain any Novation Agreement, or
any consent, waiver, confirmation, novation or approval with respect to any Contract, shall not
relieve either party from its obligation to consummate at the Closing the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement. Buyer acknowledges that a substantial portion of the Contracts will require the
consent or a Novation Agreement of the other party or parties thereto by virtue of the execution
and delivery of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. Buyer
agrees and acknowledges that it shall be the obligation of Buyer (and not Seller) to obtain such
consents and Novation Agreements. Seller will, however, use reasonable good faith efforts to
assist Buyer in obtaining such consents and Novation Agreements.
(f) Notice
of Events or Circumstances. Buyer will promptly notify Seller promptly after learning of the occurrence of any event or
circumstance which would reasonably be expected to cause any condition to the Closing not to be
satisfied. In such event, the parties will negotiate in good faith during the fifteen (15)
calendar day period immediately after such notice to determine the consequences of such
circumstance, and Seller or Buyer, as applicable, may elect to terminate this Agreement after the
expiration of such fifteen (15) calendar day period.
7. CONDITIONS TO BUYERS OBLIGATIONS
The obligations of Buyer to consummate the transactions contemplated at the Closing are
subject to the fulfillment, at the Closing, of each of the following conditions, any or all of
which may be waived in whole or in part at or prior to the Closing by Buyer:
31
(a) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties. All the representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement shall be accurate at and as of the Closing Date as
though such representations and warranties were made at and as of such time, except to the extent
such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case such
representations and warranties shall be true and correct on and as of such earlier date), and
except for such changes therein as are contemplated by this Agreement, and in each case except for
breaches as to matters that would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Sellers Performance. Seller shall have performed and complied in all material
respects with all agreements and conditions on its part required by this Agreement to be performed
or complied with prior to or at the Closing Date.
(c) Officers Certificate. Buyer shall have received a certificate of an officer of
Seller, dated the Closing Date, certifying on behalf of Seller as to the fulfillment of the
conditions specified in Sections 7(a) and 7(b) hereof.
(d) Secretarys Certificate. A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of
the Seller, identifying the name and title and bearing the signatures of the officers of Seller
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement and the other agreements and instruments
contemplated thereby.
(e) Governmental Consents. Seller shall have made all filings and petitions required
to be made by it prior to the Closing Date (and all applicable waiting periods shall have expired),
as set forth on Schedule 3(d).
(f) No Injunctions. No court, agency or other authority shall have issued any order,
decree or judgment to set aside, restrain, enjoin or prevent the performance of Buyers obligations
hereunder, nor shall there be pending any suit, action or proceeding requesting such relief or
remedy.
(g) Conveyances. Buyer shall have received all conveyances, assignments, bills of
sale, confirmations, and further instruments as shall be necessary in order to complete the
conveyances, transfers, assignments and deliveries provided for herein and to convey to Buyer the
Purchased Assets.
(h) Technology Transfer Agreement. Seller shall have executed and delivered to Buyer
the Technology Transfer Agreement.
(i) Lease Assignment. Buyer and Seller shall have executed the Lease Assignment.
(j) Transition Services Agreement. Buyer and Seller shall have executed the
Transition Services Agreement.
(k) Supply Agreement. Buyer and Seller shall have executed the Supply Agreement.
32
(l) Physical Inventory. Buyer shall have performed a physical count of the Inventory
which confirms the accuracy of the reported balance to Buyers satisfaction.
8. CONDITIONS TO SELLERS OBLIGATIONS
All obligations of Seller under this Agreement are subject to the fulfillment, at the Closing,
of each of the following conditions, any or all of which may be waived in whole or in part at or
prior to the Closing by Seller:
(a) Accuracy of Representations and Warranties. All the representations and
warranties of Buyer contained in this Agreement shall be accurate in all material respects at and
as of the Closing Date as though such representations and warranties were made at and as of such
time, except for such changes therein as are contemplated by this Agreement, and except to the
extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date (in which case such
representations and warranties shall be true and correct on and as of such earlier date).
(b) Buyers Performance. Buyer shall have performed and complied in all material
respects with all agreements and conditions on its part required by this Agreement to be performed
or complied with prior to or at the Closing Date.
(c) Officers Certificate. Seller shall have received a certificate of an officer of
Buyer, dated the Closing Date, certifying on behalf of Buyer as to the fulfillment of the
conditions specified in Sections 8(a) and 8(b) hereof.
(d) Secretarys Certificate. A certificate of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of
the Buyer, identifying the name and title and bearing the signatures of the officers of Buyer
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement and the other agreements and instruments
contemplated thereby.
(e) Governmental Consents. Buyer shall have made all filings and petitions required
to be made by it prior to the Closing Date (and all applicable waiting periods shall have expired),
set forth on Schedule 4(c).
(f) No Injunctions. No court, agency or other authority shall have issued any order,
decree or judgment to set aside, restrain, enjoin or prevent the performance of Sellers
obligations hereunder, nor shall there be pending any suit, action or proceeding requesting such
relief or remedy.
(g) Purchase Price. Seller shall have received the Purchase Price payable to it from
Buyer pursuant to Section 2(d) hereof, by wire transfer of immediately available funds to a bank
account designated by it.
(h) Assumption Agreement. Buyer shall have executed and delivered to Seller the
Assumption Agreement.
(i) Lease Assignment. Buyer and Seller shall have executed the Lease Assignment.
33
(j) Technology Transfer Agreement. Buyer shall have executed and delivered to Seller
the Technology Transfer Agreement.
(k) Transition
Services Agreement. Buyer and Seller shall have executed the Transition Services Agreement.
(l) Supply Agreement. Buyer and Seller shall have executed the Supply Agreement.
(m) Guaranty. Guarantor shall have executed and delivered to Seller the Guaranty.
(n) Resale Certificate. A sale for resale certificate with respect to the
Inventories.
9. POST-CLOSING COVENANTS
(a) Further Assurances. From and after the Closing Date, each party to this Agreement
shall, at any time and from time to time, at the requesting partys cost and expense, make, execute
and deliver, or cause to be made, executed and delivered, such assignments, assumptions, deeds,
bills of sale, filings and other instruments, consents and assurances and take or cause to be taken
all such action as the other party may reasonably request to carry out the terms of the Acquisition
Agreements. Buyer shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause Seller to be released
from liability under the Contracts. In addition, each party agrees to cooperate fully with the
other party in connection with any Proceeding which relates to the operation or activities of the
Business prior to the Closing Date.
(b) Retention of Records. After the Closing, Seller shall, upon reasonable notice to
Buyer, have access during usual business hours to the books and records of the Business for all
periods prior to the Closing Date for all reasonable business and tax purposes, and Seller may make
copies or extracts from such books and records for all reasonable purposes. Buyer agrees to retain
the books and records of the Business prior to the Closing Date and after the Closing Date for at
least three (3) years after the Closing Date except where longer record retention is required by
applicable law (including Code requirements).
(c) Novations of Government Contracts.
(i) Without limiting the generality of Section 9(a), as soon as practicable following
the execution of this Agreement, Buyer shall prepare (with Sellers assistance, as
necessary), in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations Part 42, 142.12 and any
applicable agency regulations or policies, a written request for the novation of the
Government Contracts meeting the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulations Part
42, as reasonably interpreted by the Responsible Contracting Officer (as such term is
defined in Federal Acquisition Regulations Part 42, 142.1202(a)). The request for novation
shall be submitted by Buyer to each Responsible Contracting Officer for the United States
government (or, in the case of Government Contracts not subject to the Federal Acquisition
Regulations, Buyer and Seller shall cooperate in seeking to cause the applicable
Governmental Authority) to (i) recognize Buyer as Sellers successor in interest to the
Government Contracts and all the Purchased Assets used in the performance of the Government
Contracts and (ii) enter into one or more novation
34
agreements (collectively, Novation
Agreements) in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer, Seller and their
respective counsel, pursuant to which all of Sellers right, title and interest in and to,
and all of Sellers liabilities under, each such Government Contract shall be validly
conveyed, transferred and assigned and novated to Buyer by all parties thereto. Seller
shall promptly provide to Buyer any information regarding Seller required in connection with
such request.
(ii) Seller and Buyer will cooperate and use their respective commercially reasonable
efforts to obtain as promptly as practicable all consents required for the purpose of
processing, entering into and completing the Novation Agreements with regard to any of the
Government Contracts, including responding to any requests for information from the United
States government with regard to such Novation Agreements.
(iii) From the Closing Date until, with respect to each Government Contract, the sixth
year following the earlier of the release date or notice of final payment for such
Government Contract, Buyer agrees to provide Seller and its accountants, counsel and other
representatives access, during normal business hours, to such information, personnel and
assistance relating to the performance by Buyer of the Government Contracts and its
respective liabilities under the Novation Agreements as Seller shall reasonably request from
time to time.
(d) Employment Tax Filings. Buyer and Seller agree that, with respect to each
Employee, each of Buyer and Seller will follow the standard procedures for tax filings that are set
out in Section 4 of IRS Rev. Proc. 96-60. Buyer shall take into account wages paid by Seller to
each Employee in determining whether each such Employee has reached the Old Age Disability
Insurance taxable wage base for the 2004 calendar year.
(e) Failure to Obtain Consents or Novations.
(i)If any and all third party approvals, consents, novations and waivers (including
Novation Agreements) that are required to be obtained in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement as described in Sections 6(e) and 9(c) hereof shall not have
been obtained prior to the Closing Date, then as of the Closing, this Agreement, to the
extent permitted by Legal Requirements, shall constitute full and equitable assignment by
Seller to Buyer of all of right, title and interest of Seller in and to, and all obligations
and liabilities of Seller under, such Purchased Assets, and, in the case of the Contracts,
Buyer shall be deemed Sellers agent for purpose of completing, fulfilling and discharging
all liabilities of Seller from and after the Closing Date under any such Contract. The
Parties shall take all necessary steps and actions consistent with Legal Requirements to
provide Buyer with the benefits of such Purchased Assets, and to relieve Seller of the
performance and other obligations thereunder, including entry into subcontracts as permitted
for the performance thereof. Buyer agrees to pay, perform and discharge, and indemnify
Seller against and hold Seller harmless from, all obligations and liabilities of Seller
relating to such performance or failure to perform under such Purchased Assets.
35
(ii) In the event that Seller shall be unable to make the equitable assignment
described in Section 9(e)(i), or if such attempted assignment would give rise to any right
of termination, or would otherwise adversely affect the rights of Seller or Buyer under any
such Purchased Asset, or would not assign all of the rights of Seller thereunder at the
Closing, Seller and Buyer shall continue to cooperate and use all reasonable efforts to
provide Buyer with all such rights. To the extent that any such third party approvals,
consents, novations and waivers (including Novation Agreements) are not obtained, or until
the impediments to such assignment are resolved, Seller shall use all reasonable commercial
efforts (without the expenditure, in the aggregate, of any material sum), to the extent
permitted by Legal Requirements, to (A) provide to Buyer, at the request of Buyer, the
benefits of any such Purchased Asset, (B) cooperate in any lawful arrangement designed to
provide such benefits to Buyer and (C) enforce, at the request of and for the account of
Buyer, any rights of Seller arising from any such Purchased Asset against any third party
(including any Governmental Body), including the right to elect to terminate in accordance
with the terms thereof upon the advice of Buyer. To the extent that Buyer is provided the
benefits of any Purchased Asset referred to herein (whether from Seller or otherwise), Buyer
shall perform at the direction of Seller and for the benefit of any third party (including
any Governmental Body), and shall assume the liabilities and obligations of Seller
thereunder or in connection therewith. Buyer agrees to pay, perform and discharge, and
indemnify Seller against and hold Seller harmless from, all liabilities and obligations of
Seller relating to such performance or failure to perform.
(f) Warranty Claims of the Business.
(i) Except as provided in Section 2(d)(iv)(D), with respect to any Product manufactured
by Seller, prior to the Closing, Seller shall be responsible for any warranty claims for
such Products. Buyer shall notify Seller of any purported warranty claim for such Products
within five (5) business days of its receipt of any purported warranty claim for such
Products and provide Seller with all information available to Buyer relating to such
purported warranty claim. Seller shall evaluate such purported warranty claim in good
faith. If Seller accepts such warranty claim as valid, Seller shall be responsible for the
resolution of such claim. If Seller rejects such purported warranty claim, Seller shall be
responsible for the defense of such claim as against the claimant.
(ii) At the written request and direction of Seller, Buyer agrees to effect servicing
and repair of any Product warranty claim that Seller has determined is valid pursuant to
Section 9(f)(i). Seller shall pay to Buyer the reasonable costs of effecting such servicing
and repair, such costs not to exceed the lesser of estimates approved in advance in writing
by Seller and the costs that Buyer would charge to a continuing significant customer of the
Business requesting out of warranty servicing and repair.
36
10. NONCOMPETITION
(a) Noncompetition. Seller covenants and agrees that, for a period of five (5) years
from the Closing Date, neither it nor its Affiliates will, anywhere in the world, (i) directly or
indirectly manufacture, sell or service any of the Products (ii) or sell or service any pump
products (other than valves and seals) to or for the benefit of the United States governments
naval operations; provided, however, that the foregoing covenant shall not limit
Sellers activities with respect to (y) Product warranties that are not assumed by Buyer; or (z)
pursuant to the Transition Services Agreement or the Supply Agreement; and provided
further, however, that the foregoing covenant shall not apply if either (i) Seller is
acquired by a Person (an Acquiring Person) through a merger or consolidation or sale of
all or substantially all of its assets and the Acquiring Person was engaged in the Business prior
to the acquisition, or (ii) Seller acquires a Person (an Acquired Person) by merger or
consolidation or purchase of all or substantially all of the assets of the Acquired Person and the
Acquired Person was engaged in the Business prior to the acquisition and the Business constitutes
less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the revenues of the Acquired Person.
(b) Breach. In the event of a breach, or threatened breach of the provisions of this Article 10, in
addition to any other remedies Buyer may have at law or in equity, Buyer shall be entitled to seek
an injunction or similar remedy so as to enable it specifically to enforce such provisions.
(c) Severability. It is the desire and intent of the parties hereto that the
provisions of this Article 10 be enforced to the fullest extent permissible under the laws and
public policies applied in each jurisdiction in which enforcement is sought. Accordingly, if any
particular portion of this Article 10 should be adjudicated to be invalid or unenforceable, such
portion shall be deleted and such deletion shall apply only with respect to the operation of this
Article 10 in the particular jurisdiction in which such adjudication is made. To the extent any
provision hereof is deemed unenforceable by virtue of its scope in terms of area or length of time,
but may be enforceable with limitations thereon, the parties agree that the same shall,
nevertheless, be enforceable to the fullest extent permissible under the laws and public policies
applied in such jurisdiction in which enforcement is sought.
11. TERMINATION AND ABANDONMENT
(a) Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to or on the
Closing Date:
(i) By mutual consent of Buyer and Seller;
(ii) By either Buyer or Seller, if the Closing has not occurred (other than through the
failure of any party seeking to terminate this Agreement to comply fully with its
obligations) on or before December 31, 2004, or such later date as Buyer and Seller may
agree;
(iii) By Buyer, if (A) there has been a material violation or breach by Seller of any
agreement, representation or warranty contained in this Agreement and no cure of such
violation or
37
breach within thirty (30) days of written notice of such violation or breach
from Buyer, or (B) the satisfaction of any condition to the obligations of Buyer hereunder
becomes impossible, and such condition has not been waived by Buyer; or
(iv) By Seller, if (A) there has been a material violation or breach by Buyer of any
agreement, representation or warranty contained in this Agreement and
no cure of such violation or breach within thirty (30) days of written notice of such violation or
breach from Seller, or (B) if the satisfaction of any condition to the obligations of Seller
hereunder becomes impossible, and such condition has not been waived by Seller.
(b) No Waiver. No termination pursuant to Section 11(a) hereof shall be deemed to
constitute a release or waiver by any party to this Agreement of any claim against another party
hereto based on any breach by such party of its agreements, representations and warranties
contained herein.
(c) Return of Information. In the event of termination by Seller or Buyer pursuant to
Section 11(a), written notice thereof shall forthwith be given to the other party and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be terminated, without further action by any
party. If the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are terminated as provided herein:
(i) Buyer shall, and shall cause each of its directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives and advisors to, return to Seller all documents and other material received
from Seller relating to the transactions contemplated hereby, whether so obtained before or
after the execution hereof; and
(ii) all confidential information received by Buyer, its directors, officers,
employees, agents, representatives or advisors with respect to the businesses of Seller and
its affiliates (including with respect to the Business) shall be treated in accordance with
the Confidentiality Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding
the termination of this Agreement.
12. INDEMNIFICATION
(a) Indemnification Definitions. For the purposes of this Article 12, the following
terms shall have the following meanings:
Indemnitee shall mean the party or other person seeking indemnification pursuant to
this Agreement.
Indemnitor shall mean the party which is required or requested to provide
indemnification pursuant to this Agreement.
Indemnifiable
Claim means any claim or other proceeding with respect to which an Indemnitee may be entitled to indemnity hereunder.
Buyer Indemnified Parties shall mean Buyer, and any officer, director, employee,
agent and Affiliate of Buyer.
38
Seller Indemnified Parties shall mean Seller and any officer, director, employee,
agent and Affiliate of Seller.
(b) Indemnity by Seller.
(i) Seller agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Buyer Indemnified Parties from and
against, and to reimburse the Buyer Indemnified Parties on demand with respect to, any and
all loss, damage, liability, claims, cost and expense, including reasonable attorneys,
accountants and experts fees, incurred by the Buyer Indemnified Parties by reason of or
arising out of or in connection with (i) the breach of any representation or warranty
contained in Article 3 hereof or the representations and warranties made by Seller in the
other Acquisition Agreements; provided however, that if any such
representation or warranty is not qualified as to materiality, then this indemnification
shall only apply in the event of a material breach of such representation or warranty; (ii)
the failure of Seller to perform any agreement required by any Acquisition Agreement to be
performed by it; and (iii) the Excluded Liabilities.
(ii) Buyer agrees to give prompt notice to Seller of the allegation by any third party
of the existence of any liability, obligation, contract, other commitment or state of facts
referred to in this Section 12(b), except that a failure to provide such prompt notice shall
not be a defense against a claim for indemnity unless Seller can demonstrate that it was
materially prejudiced by the failure to provide such notice.
(iii) Except as provided in Section 12(g), Seller shall be entitled to control the
contest, defense, settlement or compromise of any such claim (including engagement of
counsel in connection therewith), at its own cost and expense, including the cost and
expense of attorneys, accountants and experts fees in connection with such contest,
defense, settlement or compromise; provided that Seller provides Buyer with written notice
of its election to control such contest, defense, settlement or compromise within ten days
of Buyers delivery of notice to Seller of its intention to seek indemnification hereunder,
and Buyer shall have the right to participate in the contest, defense, settlement or
compromise of any such claim at its own cost and expense, including the cost and expense of
attorneys, accountants and experts fees in connection with such participation;
provided,
however, that, Seller shall not settle or compromise any such claim that would
affect the future operation of the Business by Buyer without the prior written consent of
Buyer.
(iv) If prior to sixty (60) months after the Closing Date (y) the Securities and
Exchange Commission shall make a specific final finding that there has been a material
accounting error with respect to the Business prior to the Closing Date (SEC Accounting
Error) and (z) based on the specific facts in the SEC Accounting Error, the DCAA asserts a
claim against Buyer, then subject to the Indemnity Deductible and the Indemnity Cap Seller
will indemnify and hold Buyer harmless with respect to such claim in accordance with this
Section 12(b) and Section 12(g).
39
(c) Indemnity by Buyer.
(i) Buyer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Seller Indemnified Parties from and
against, and to reimburse the Seller Indemnified Parties on demand with respect to, any and
all loss, damage, liability, claims, cost and expense, including reasonable attorneys,
accountants and experts fees, incurred by Seller or the Seller Indemnified Parties by
reason of or arising out of or in connection with (i) the material breach of any
representation or warranty contained in Article 4 hereof or the representations and
warranties made by Buyer in the other Acquisition Agreements, (ii) the failure of Buyer to
perform any agreement required by any Acquisition Agreement to be performed by it, (iii) the
Assumed Liabilities; and (iv) any liability, obligation or expense arising out of or in
connection with any action, suit, claim, charge, complaint, proceeding or investigation to
the extent arising out of or in connection with the use of the Purchased Assets or the
operations of the Business on or after the Closing Date, including, without limitation, any
claims for severance of Employees terminated by Buyer or its Affiliates and any liability
under or associated with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act which may be
assessed against or imputed to Seller.
(ii) Seller agrees to give prompt notice to Buyer of the allegation by any third party
of the existence of any liability, obligation, contract, other commitment or state of facts
referred to in this Section 12(c), except that a failure to provide such prompt notice shall
not be a defense against a claim for indemnity unless Buyer can demonstrate that it was
materially prejudiced by the failure to provide such notice.
(iii)
Except as provided in Section 12(h), Buyer shall be entitled to control the contest,
defense, settlement or compromise of any such claim (including the engagement of counsel in
connection therewith), at its own cost and expense, including the cost and expense of
attorneys, accountants and experts fees in connection with such contest, defense,
settlement or compromise; provided that Buyer provides Seller with written notice of its
election to control such contest, defense, settlement or compromise within ten days of
Sellers delivery of notice to Buyer of its intention to seek indemnification hereunder, and
Seller shall have the right to participate in the contest, defense, settlement or compromise
of any such claim at its own cost and expense, including the cost and expense of attorneys,
accountants and experts fees in connection with such participation; provided, however,
that, Buyer shall not settle or compromise any such claim without the prior written consent
of Seller, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(d) Actions Related to Indemnifiable Claims. In the event of the occurrence of an
event which any party asserts constitutes an Indemnifiable Claim, the Indemnitee shall make
available to the Indemnitor all relevant information which is material to the Indemnifiable Claim
and which is in the possession of the Indemnitee. An Indemnitees failure to furnish the Indemnitor
with any relevant data and documents in connection with any third-party claim shall not constitute
a defense (in part or in whole) to any claim for indemnification by such party, except and only to
the extent that such failure shall result in any material prejudice to the Indemnitor.
40
(e) Deductible; Limits on Indemnification. The indemnification obligations of Seller
shall be subject to a cumulative deductible of $400,000 (the Indemnification Deductible)
such that Sellers indemnification obligation pursuant to Section 12(b) above shall not take effect
until the cumulative amount of actual damages for events which are indemnifiable hereunder exceeds
in the aggregate the amount of $400,000. In no event shall the Buyer Indemnified Parties or any
person, business or entity claiming by or through Buyer, individually or collectively, be entitled
to recover a combined aggregate total in excess of $14,000,000 (the Indemnification Cap),
whether directly or indirectly through actions, damages, indemnifications or otherwise, and
allowing no duplication with regard to damages or amounts paid by or remedies obtained against any
other person or entity or otherwise, in relation to this Agreement or any Acquisition Agreement or
any transaction contemplated herein or therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any claim of
indemnification for (i) any breach of representations and warranties contained in Sections 3(a),
3(b), 3(e), 3(h), 3(r) and 3(v); (ii) the Tax Liabilities; and (iii) the Excluded Liabilities shall
not be subject to the Indemnification Deductible or the Indemnification Cap.
(f) Survival of Representations, Warranties and Covenants. All representations and
warranties made by Seller or the Buyer as to any fact or condition existing on or before the
Closing Date in this Agreement or any Acquisition Agreement, in any Exhibit, Schedule, certificate
or other document delivered pursuant hereto or thereto, shall survive the Closing for a period of
fifteen (15) months, except (i) representations and warranties
contained in Sections 3(a), 3(b), 3(e), 3(r), 4(a), 4(b) and 4(e) hereof, which shall not
expire, (ii) all representations and warranties regarding Taxes shall survive until the later of
(x) the expiration of the applicable limitation period within which any assessment, reassessment or
other determination of an amount owing can be made or (y) six (6) months after such time as a final
determination of such assessment, reassessment or other determination of an amount owing has been
made and all appeal rights have been exhausted or no appeal has been made within the time
prescribed for any such appeal, and (iii) representations and warranties contained in Section 3(v)
hereof shall survive the Closing for a period of sixty (60) months. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
any claim for indemnification for breach of representations and warranties properly made pursuant
to Article 12 prior to the expiration of the survival period of the applicable representations and
warranties set forth in this Section 12(f) shall survive until such claim is finally resolved.
(g) Third-Party Claims Against Buyer Indemnified Parties.
(i) If any claim which is covered by Section 12(a) above is made by a third party
against any Buyer Indemnified Party, Buyer shall give prompt written notice of such claim to
the Seller. The Seller shall have 10 days from the receipt of such notice to give written
notice to Buyer indicating whether the Seller intends to direct the defense or dispute of
such claim. If such notice is given by Seller within such ten (10) day period, the Seller
shall have the right to direct the defense of any such claim through counsel of its own
choosing, and if Seller so elects to direct the defense of such claim, such election will
conclusively establish for purposes of this Agreement that the claims made in such third
party claim are within the scope of and subject to indemnification by Seller hereunder.
41
(ii) If such notice is given by Seller within such 10-day period, the Seller shall have
the right to direct the defense of any such claim through counsel of its own choosing.
(iii) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, Seller may not control the settlement
of a claim which involves obtaining injunctive relief against a Buyer Indemnified Party.
(iv) If prior to (i) Buyers giving notice to the Seller of an indemnified third-party
claim or (ii) the expiration of such 10-day period, Buyer takes any action with respect to
such claim indemnified hereunder, the Buyer shall surrender and waive its indemnification
rights hereunder, but only to the extent Seller is prejudiced by such action.
(v) If the Seller (a) fails to give written notice to Buyer within such 10-day period
indicating whether it intends to direct the defense of such claim, or (b) gives such notice
but fails to direct the defense of such claim diligently and continuously, then Buyer or the
Buyer Indemnified Party shall have the right to compromise or defend such claim through
counsel of its own choosing, and the right to reimbursement of such expenses and damages
shall be resolved as a dispute in accordance with Section 13(k).
(vi) So long as the Seller is contesting any Indemnifiable Claim in good faith, the
Buyer Indemnified Party shall not pay or settle such claim without the Sellers written
consent.
(h) Third-Party Claims Against Seller Indemnified Parties.
(i) If any claim which is covered by Section 12(b) above is made by a third party
against any Seller Indemnified Party, the Seller shall give prompt written notice of such
claim to the Buyer. The Buyer shall have 10 days from the receipt of such notice to give
written notice to Seller indicating whether the Buyer intends to direct the defense or
dispute of such claim. If such notice is given by Buyer within such ten (10) day period,
the Buyer shall have the right to direct the defense of any such claim through counsel of
its own choosing, and if Buyer so elects to direct the defense of such claim, such election
will conclusively establish for purposes of this Agreement that the claims made in such
third party claim are within the scope of and subject to indemnification by Buyer hereunder.
(ii) If such notice is given by Buyer within such 10-day period, the Buyer shall have
the right to direct the defense of any such claim through counsel of its own choosing.
(iii) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, Buyer may not control the settlement of
a claim which involves obtaining injunctive relief against a Seller Indemnified Party.
(iv) If prior to (i) Sellers giving notice to the Buyer of an indemnified third-party
claim or (ii) the expiration of such 10-day period, Seller takes any action with
42
respect to
such claim indemnified hereunder, the Seller shall surrender and waive its
indemnification rights hereunder, but only to the extent Buyer is prejudiced by such
action.
(v) If the Buyer (a) fails to give written notice to Seller within such 10-day period
indicating whether it intends to direct the defense of such claim, or (b) gives such notice
but fails to direct the defense of such claim diligently and continuously, then Seller or
the Seller Indemnified Party shall have the right to compromise or defend such claim through
counsel of its own choosing, and the right to reimbursement of such expenses and damages
shall be resolved as a dispute in accordance with Section 13(k).
(vi) So long as Buyer is contesting any Indemnifiable Claim in good faith, the Seller
Indemnified Party shall not pay or settle such claim without the Buyers written consent,
which consent shall not be reasonably withheld.
(i) Indemnification Limitations.
(i) Neither party hereto will be liable to the other hereunder or with respect to this
Agreement for any punitive or consequential or incidental damages (including loss of revenue
or income, business interruption, cost of capital or loss of business reputation or
opportunity) relating to any claim for which either such party may be entitled to recover
under this Agreement (other than indemnification, whether pursuant to this Article 12 or
otherwise at law or equity, of amounts paid or payable to third parties or any Governmental
Body in respect of any third party or Governmental Body claim). No claim for the recovery
of losses based upon breach of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement may be
asserted by Seller Indemnified Parties or Buyer Indemnified Parties against the Buyer or the
Seller, as the case may be, if any of the Seller Indemnified Parties or the Buyer
Indemnified Parties, as the case may be, had Knowledge of such breach on or before the
Closing Date.
(ii) Buyer acknowledges and agrees that, (i) other than the representations and
warranties of Seller specifically contained in Article 3 of this Agreement, none of Seller,
any of its Affiliates or any other person has made any representation or warranty either
expressed or implied (A) with respect to the Businesses, the Purchased Assets, the Assumed
Liabilities or the transactions contemplated hereby or (B) as to the accuracy or
completeness of any information regarding the Business, the Purchased Assets, the Assumed
Liabilities or the transactions contemplated hereby furnished or made available to Buyer and
its representatives and (ii) Buyer shall have no claim or right to indemnification pursuant
to this Article 12 and none of Seller, any of its Affiliates or any
other person shall have or be subject to any liability to Buyer or any other person
with respect to any information, documents or materials furnished by Seller, any of its
Affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, employees, agents or advisors to
Seller, any information, documents or material made available to Seller and its
representatives in certain data rooms, management presentations or any other form in
expectation of the transactions contemplated hereby. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Buyer acknowledges and agrees that, except for the representations and warranties
contained in Article 3 and the express representations and warranties made by
43
Seller in the
other Acquisition Agreements, SELLER DOES NOT MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES
RELATING TO THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, CONDITION, DESIGN, PERFORMANCE OR MARKETABILITY OF ANY
ASSET, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. SELLER ACKNOWLEDGES
AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL OBTAIN RIGHTS IN THE TRANSFERRED ASSETS IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION
AND STATE OF REPAIR, AS IS AND WHERE IS.
(j) Sole Remedy. Each of Buyer and Seller further acknowledges and agrees that,
should the Closing occur, its sole and exclusive remedy with respect to any and all claims relating
to this Agreement, the other Acquisition Agreements, the Business, the Purchased Assets, the
Excluded Assets, the Assumed Liabilities, the Excluded Liabilities or the transactions contemplated
hereby (other than claims of, or causes of action arising from, fraud) shall be pursuant to the
indemnification provisions set forth in this Article 12. In furtherance of the foregoing, Buyer
and Seller each hereby waives, from and after the Closing, any and all rights, claims and causes of
action (other than claims of, or causes of action arising from, fraud) that Buyer or any other
Buyer Indemnified Parties or Seller or any other Seller Indemnified Parties, respectively, may have
against Buyer or Seller or any of their respective Affiliates or any of their respective directors,
officers and employees arising under or based upon any Federal, state, provincial, local or foreign
statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation or otherwise (except pursuant to the indemnification
provisions set forth in this Article 12).
13. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) Expenses. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, each party to
this Agreement agrees to pay, without right of reimbursement from the other party, the costs
incurred by it incident to the performance of its obligations under this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby including, without limitation, costs incident
to the preparation of this Agreement, and the fees and disbursements of counsel, accountants and
consultants employed by such party in connection herewith.
(b) Public Announcements.
Buyer and Seller shall consult with one another before issuing any press release or public
announcement about the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and except as may be required by
applicable Legal Requirements, no party shall issue any such press release or other public
announcement without the prior written consent of the other party.
(c) Confidentiality. The Confidentiality Agreement will remain in full force and
effect until the Closing occurs, and all information received by Buyer, its Affiliates or
Representatives relating to the Business, whether orally or in writing, shall be subject thereto.
(d) Notices. All notices, consents, waivers, claims and other communications
hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given at the time (a)
personally delivered, (b) one business day after having been deposited, prepaid in a nationally
established overnight delivery firm such as Federal Express, (c) five business days after having
been mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or (d) transmitted by facsimile (which
44
shall be confirmed by a writing sent by certified mail on the same business day as such
facsimile is sent), as follows:
As to Buyer:
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
4 Becker Farm Road
Roseland, New Jersey 070768
Attn: General Counsel
and
Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation
1099E Broad Hollow Road
Farmingdale, New York 11735
Attn: President
With a copy to:
Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, LLP
230 Park Avenue, Suite 1130
New York, New York 10169
Facsimile: (212) 818-9606
Attention: William M. Jackson
As to Seller:
Flowserve US Inc.
5215 N. OConnor Blvd., Suite 2300
Irving, Texas 75039
Facsimile: (972) 443-6843
Attention: Ronald F. Shuff
with a copy to:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Facsimile: (214) 571-2953
Attention: Charles Schwartz
or to any other address that such party may have subsequently communicated to the other party by a
notice given in accordance with the provisions of this Section 13(d).
(e) Entire Agreement. This Agreement, the Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto, the Confidentiality Agreement, and
the other Acquisition Agreements contain every obligation and understanding between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof and merge all prior discussions, negotiations and agreements,
if any, between them, and none of the parties shall be
45
bound by any representations, warranties,
covenants or other understandings, other than as expressly provided herein or therein.
(f) Waiver and Amendment. Any representation, warranty, covenant, term or condition
of this Agreement which may legally be waived, may be waived, or the time of performance thereof
extended, at any time by the party hereto entitled to the benefit thereof, and any term, condition
or covenant hereto may be amended by the parties hereto at any time. Any such waiver, extension or
amendment shall be evidenced by an instrument in writing executed on behalf of the appropriate
party by a Person who has been authorized by such party to execute waivers, extensions or
amendments on its behalf. No waiver by any party hereto, whether express or implied, of its rights
under any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of such partys rights under such
provisions at any other time or a waiver of such partys rights under any other provision of this
Agreement. No failure by any party hereto to take any action against any breach of this Agreement
or default by another party shall constitute a waiver of the former partys right to enforce any
provision of this Agreement or to take action against such breach or default or any subsequent
breach or default by such other party.
(g) No Third Party Rights or Remedies Beneficiary. Nothing expressed or implied in
this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed, to confer upon or give any Person other than the
parties hereto and their respective Affiliates, successors and permitted assigns, any rights or
remedies under or by reason of this Agreement.
(h) Severability. In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in
this Agreement shall be declared invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of
this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and such invalid, void or unenforceable
provision shall be interpreted as closely as possible to the manner in which it was written.
(i) Headings and Interpretation. The titles and headings of articles and sections
herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part of or to
affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. The Schedules and Exhibits referred to
herein shall be construed with and as an integral part of this Agreement to the same extent as if
they were set forth verbatim herein. Any disclosure made on any individual schedule to this
Agreement shall be deemed to be made for purposes of all schedules to this Agreement to which such
disclosure is applicable.
(j) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of New York
without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof.
(k) Dispute Resolution. In the event of a dispute relating to this Agreement, the
Parties shall make a good faith effort to promptly settle any differences without resorting to
arbitration. If settlement of the dispute is not possible, any and all disputes shall be resolved
by arbitration. However, the Party wishing to initiate arbitration shall give 30 days prior
written notice to the other Party. During this 30-day period, senior management of the Parties
shall further attempt to resolve the dispute. Any unresolved dispute arising out of or related to
this Agreement, including its interpretation, validity, scope and enforceability, shall be resolved
by
46
binding arbitration to be held exclusively in New York City, New York and such arbitration shall
be the Parties exclusive remedy.
Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the then existing Commercial Dispute
Resolution Procedures of the American Arbitration Association. The arbitration shall be conducted
by one arbitrator to be named by the Parties. Should the Parties fail to agree as to the naming of
such arbitrator, the arbitrator shall be determined in accordance with the applicable rules of the
American Arbitration Association.
The arbitrator shall decide each issue presented in writing. The decision of the arbitrator
shall be final and binding. The arbitrator shall divide all costs in conducting the arbitration in
the final award in accordance with what is just and equitable under the circumstances. Except as
otherwise herein provided, each Party shall bear the burden of its own counsel fees incurred in
connection with the arbitration proceedings under this Agreement.
All information relating to or disclosed by any Party in connection with the arbitration of
any dispute relating to this Agreement shall be treated by the Parties, the representatives of the
Parties and the arbitrator as confidential business information and no disclosure of such
information shall be made by either Party or the arbitrator without the prior written consent of
the Party furnishing such information in connection with the arbitration proceeding.
Judgment upon award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
over the Parties or their assets; or application may be made to such court for judicial acceptance
of the award and an order of enforcement, as the case may be. None of the Parties to this
Agreement shall be liable for any incidental, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or
related any breach of this Agreement.
(l) Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided that this Agreement may not be
assigned by either party to any Person without the prior written consent of the other party.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer may assign any of its rights under this Agreement, in whole or
in part, to one or more Affiliates of Buyer. Any party so assigning this Agreement shall remain
fully liable to the other party for the performance by any designee or assignee of any obligation
of such party delegated to such designee or assignee.
(m) Taxes. Any U.S. taxes in the nature of sales or transfer taxes, documentary
stamps or similar taxes payable on the sale or transfer of all or any portion of the assets,
properties or business being transferred hereunder or the consummation of any other transaction
contemplated hereby, shall be paid by Seller.
(n) Attorneys Fees. Subject to the provisions of Section 13(k), if any action at law
or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements in addition to any other
relief to which such party may be entitled.
(o) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall constitute a single
agreement.
47
(p) Bulk Transfer Laws. Buyer hereby waives compliance by Seller with the provisions
of any so-called bulk transfer laws of any jurisdiction in connection with the sale of the
Purchased Assets to Buyer.
(q) Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY HEREBY WAIVES TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY
APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR DISPUTES RELATING HERETO.
[The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]
48
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Agreement the day and year
first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORPORATION, |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Terri L. Marts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
Terri L. Marts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
Vice President and General Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE US INC., |
|
|
|
|
a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Ronald Shuff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
Ronald Shuff |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
Vice President |
|
|
49
exv10w56
EXHIBIT
10.56
SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
This Separation Agreement and Release (Agreement) is voluntarily entered into on April 4,
2005, by Charles Scott Greer (Executive) and Flowserve Corporation (Company).
Background
WHEREAS, the Executive currently serves as the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
President pursuant to an Employment Agreement by and between the Executive and the Company dated,
June 15, 1999 that expires on June 30, 2005 (Employment Agreement).
WHEREAS, the Executive holds (i) options to purchase shares of Company common stock, including
options that will become vested on July 14, 2005, if the Executive is employed by the Company on
that date, (ii) shares of Company common stock subject to vesting, including shares that will
become vested on July 14 and July 17, 2005, if Executive is employed by the Company on those dates,
and (iii) benefits under other compensation plans, all as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto;
and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have decided to terminate their employment
relationship, as provided herein, and desire to have an effective transition of leadership prior to
the expiration of the Employment Agreement, and therefore wish to enter into this Agreement
regarding the Executives separation from the Company.
Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements set out
herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive, intending
to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
1. The Executive shall continue as the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer until
April 4, 2005. By signing this Agreement, the Executive resigns as a director (including his
capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors), Chief Executive Officer, and President of the
Company, effective as of midnight at the end of April 4, 2005. The Executive hereby acknowledges
that neither his ceasing to serve in such capacities nor any other matter contemplated by this
Agreement constitutes Good Reason for the termination of his employment within the meaning of the
Employment Agreement.
2. For the period from April 5, 2005, through June 30, 2005 (Separation Period), the
Executive shall continue as an employee of the Company performing such duties as reasonably
requested by the Companys Board of Directors. The Company shall timely pay to Executive all
compensation payable to him under his Employment Agreement and under existing compensation programs
through June 30, 2005 in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement and such
compensation programs.
3. The Executive agrees that he will fully cooperate in responding to claims against the
Company or its officers or investigations relating to periods in which the Executive was an
employee or officer of the Company and that he will fully cooperate in any litigation in which the
Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates is or may become involved by providing truthful and
1
accurate information. Such cooperation shall include the Executive making himself reasonably
available, upon the request of the Company, for depositions, court appearances and interviews by
Companys counsel. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Executive agrees that he will
notify the Company, in care of the Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Company, if he is contacted by any government agency or any other person contemplating or
maintaining any claim or legal action against the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates or by
any agent or attorney of such person.
4. Except as required by law, the Executive shall not divulge and the Company shall use its
best effort to cause its officers, employees and agents (and the officers, employees and agents of
its subsidiaries and affiliates) not to divulge, to any other entity or person (except in the case
of the Executive, to his spouse, in case of the Company, to its shareholders, and in the case of
the Company and the Executive to its, or his, legal and financial advisors) any information
concerning this Agreement or the terms thereof or the discussions relating thereto. The Executive
shall not make unfavorable comments about the Company, its business, its directors, or management;
provided, however, this obligation is not intended to impede the Executives cooperation with
appropriate governmental and regulatory authorities nor to limit Executives testimony in
connection with any legal proceedings, or as otherwise required by law.
5. In consideration of the Executives performance of his obligations pursuant to this
Agreement, and provided that the Executive, on or after June 30, 2005, executes a Release
substantially in the form set out as Exhibit B attached hereto (the Release) and does not revoke
his consent to such Release on or before the seventh (7th) day following its execution,
the Company agrees as follows:
(a) On or as soon as practicable (but in any event within two (2) business days after)
the eighth (8th) day after the date Executive has signed the Release (provided that the
Executive has not earlier revoked the Release), the Company shall pay to Executive $810,000
as a transition allowance.
(b) The Company shall cause all options and restricted stock held by the Executive and
subject to vesting after June 30, 2005 and on or before July 17, 2005 to become vested on
June 30, 2005. The Executives stock options that are vested and outstanding on June 30,
2005 (including those that first become vested on June 30, 2005 pursuant to the immediately
preceding sentence), shall be exercisable by him at any time on or before the later of (i)
December 31, 2006, or, (ii) if the Company is unable to sell stock to the Executive because
of securities laws or other restrictions on that date, ninety days after the date when the
stock can be issued by the Company in compliance with such laws and restrictions (but in any
event not beyond the expiration date of the option).
(c) The Company shall provide (at a location other than the Companys offices) for the
Executives use a furnished office, along with telephone and computer service, and
secretarial support for the period beginning April 5, 2005, and ending June 30, 2006,
provided that the Executive shall not be entitled to such office space and support after his
full-time employment by another employer.
(d) In addition to (and not in lieu of) the reimbursement of fees to which the
Executive is entitled under the Employment Agreement and existing Company compensation
programs, the Company shall reimburse the Executive for reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with and/or within the one-year period following his
2
termination of employment for financial and tax-planning and legal services (up to a
maximum of $25,000.00 over and above those amounts payable under the Employment Agreement or
the Companys existing compensation programs).
(e) The Company shall assist the Executive in the transfer of club memberships used by
the Executive, as mutually agreed to by the parties.
6. Executive acknowledges and agrees that, absent this Agreement, Executive would not be
entitled to any of the payments or benefits set forth in Section 5. Except as provided in Section
5 or Exhibit A, the Executive shall not be entitled to any further payment or benefit in connection
with the termination of his employment.
7. Following the termination of his employment, the Executive shall promptly return to the
Company any and all property belonging to the Company (such as computer equipment, keys, credit
cards, books, manuals, and documents) including, without limitation, any documents or materials
containing Confidential Information (as defined below) relating to the Company or any of its
subsidiaries or affiliates. Executive further agrees that he shall not retain any copies or
reproductions in whatever form of the foregoing. For purposes of this Agreement, the term
Confidential Information means any information, which is not publicly available (other than by
breach of this provision by Executive), including, without limitation, any information that would
be treated as confidential Company information under applicable state or federal law, customer or
client lists or records, customer or client identities, the terms of agreements (including, but not
limited to, fees charged) with any customer or client, economic and financial data and analyses,
business notes, strategic, marketing or other business plans, or research or reports. Executive
agrees to hold such Confidential Information in strictest confidence at all times. Executive
further agrees not to use or to disclose such Confidential Information for any reason at any time
without the prior written consent of the Company. Nothing in this Agreement shall in any way limit
Executives ability to provide truthful and complete information as may be required by any court or
requested by any governmental agency.
8. During his employment by the Company and for a period of one year after his termination of
employment:
(a) Executive shall not, directly or indirectly, without the prior written consent of
the Company, provide services to, have any management responsibilities for, or have any
ownership interest in (other than owning less than .1% of the shares in a publicly traded
company) the pumps, valves, mechanical seals or related flow equipment businesses of any of
the following entities: Sulzer Corporation, The Weir Group plc, Emerson Electric Co., Tyco
International, Ltd., ITT Industries, Inc. and John Crane Inc.;
(b) Executive shall not seek to acquire ownership or control of, or participate as any
member of a group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) seeking to acquire ownership or control of, any portion of
the business, operations, or assets of the Company without the prior written consent of the
Board of Directors of the Company; and
(c) Executive shall not, directly or indirectly, for his benefit or for the benefit of
any other person, firm or entity, solicit the employment or services of, or hire, any person
who was known to be employed by or a known consultant to the Company or any
3
of its subsidiaries or affiliates within one year prior to the termination of his
employment with the Company.
The Noncompetition Agreement between Executive and the Company effective as of July 1, 1999 and any
other agreements restricting Executives competition are hereby terminated and are superseded by
this Agreement.
9. The Executive acknowledges that the Company has advised him to seek legal counsel regarding
this Agreement and that he has had adequate time to review this Agreement with legal counsel. The
Executive represents that he has read this Agreement, fully understands each and every provision,
and signs it voluntarily.
10. The Executive represents and warrants that in the making, negotiation, and execution of
this Agreement, he is not relying upon any representation, statement, or assertion of fact or
opinion made by any agent, attorney, employee, or representative of the persons, parties, or
corporations being released herein, and he hereby waives any right to rely upon prior agreements
and/or oral representations made by any agent, attorney, employee, or representative of such
persons, parties, or corporations, even though made for the purpose of inducing him to enter into
this Agreement.
11. The Company represents and warrants that in the making, negotiation, and execution of this
Agreement, it is not relying upon any representation, statement, or assertion of fact or opinion
made by the Executive or any agent, attorney, employee, or representative of the Executive, and it
hereby waives any right to rely upon prior agreements and/or oral representations made by the
Executive or any agent, attorney, employee, or representative of the Executive, even though made
for the purpose of inducing it to enter into this Agreement.
12. The Executive represents and warrants that, to the knowledge of the Executive, there is no
reasonable basis for any third party to assert any claim against the Company Releasees (within the
meaning of the Release) acting in their Company capacities under any federal, state or local law,
including a breach of any applicable duty under common law. The Executive further represents and
warrants that, to the knowledge of the Executive, there are no claims, actions, suits,
investigations or proceedings threatened against the Company Releasees (within the meaning of the
Release) acting in their Company capacities under any federal, state or local law, including a
breach of any applicable duty under common law. The Executive further represents and warrants that
there is no reasonable basis for the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates to assert any claim
against the Executive for violation of any federal, state, or local law, or breach of any
applicable duty under common law.
13. Any dispute, controversy or claim arising between the parties, including but not limited
to claims arising out of or relating to this Agreement, shall be submitted to binding arbitration
to the American Arbitration Association (AAA) in Dallas, Texas, in accordance with the rules of
the AAA then in effect. The arbitration shall be conducted before a panel of three (3) arbitrators
selected in accordance with the rules and procedures of the AAA. Notwithstanding this provision,
the Company shall have the right to seek temporary, preliminary and/or permanent injunctive relief
and damages from the AAA (in accordance with any expedited injunctive relief procedures that may be
available) in the event Executive breaches any of sections 7 or 8 of this Agreement.
4
14. All payments made by the Company to the Executive pursuant to Section 5 shall be subject
to withholding of all amounts required or authorized to be withheld by law, including without
limitation tax withholdings.
15. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter hereof and supersedes all previous negotiations and agreements, except as provided herein,
whether written or oral. This Agreement may be changed only by an instrument in writing signed by
the party against whom the change, waiver, modification, extension, or discharge is sought.
16. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, may be enforced by, and shall be binding on
the parties and their heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, assigns and
successors in interest. It is understood and agreed that no breach of this Agreement shall be
cause to set it aside or to revive any of the claims being released herein or pursuant to the
Release.
17. It is the desire and intent of the parties that the provisions of this Agreement shall be
enforced to the fullest extent permissible under the laws and public policies applied in each
jurisdiction in which enforcement is sought. In the event that any one or more of the provisions
of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and
enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired
thereby. Moreover, if any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement is held to be
excessively broad as to duration, scope, activity or subject, such provisions shall be construed by
limiting and reducing them so as to be enforceable to the maximum extent compatible with applicable
law.
18. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
19. In the event of any dispute about this Agreement, the laws of the State of Texas shall
govern the validity, performance, enforcement, and all other aspects of this Agreement, subject to
the provisions of Section 13.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has executed and the Company has caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date first set out above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ C. Scott Greer
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ George T. Haymaker, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Scott Greer
|
|
|
|
|
|
George T. Haymaker, Jr., Chairman of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee |
5
EXHIBIT A
CERTAIN BENEFITS
The Company acknowledges that Executive is vested in and upon the termination of his employment
with the Company hereunder he will be entitled to benefits under the following benefit plans of the
Company in accordance with the terms of those plans:
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation Pension Plan |
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation Senior Manager Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation Retirement Savings Plan |
The Company also acknowledges that the Executive currently is credited with 66,666 shares of
Company common stock held under the Companys rabbi trust and that those shares will be
distributable to the Executive upon the termination of his employment with the Company hereunder.
The Company also acknowledges that the Executive currently holds the following vested options to
purchase the Companys common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Per Share |
Grant Date |
|
Date |
|
Plan |
|
Grant Type |
|
Covered |
|
Option Price |
July 1, 1999 |
|
July 1, 2009 |
|
1997 |
|
Incentive |
|
4,618 |
|
$18.5625 |
July 1, 1999 |
|
July 1, 2009 |
|
1997 |
|
Nonqualified |
|
195,382 |
|
$18.5625 |
July 1, 1999 |
|
July 1, 2009 |
|
99SOP |
|
Nonqualified |
|
488,456 |
|
$18.5625 |
July 1, 1999 |
|
July 1, 2009 |
|
99SOP |
|
Nonqualified |
|
2 |
|
$18.5625 |
July 1, 1999 |
|
July 1, 2009 |
|
99SOP |
|
Incentive |
|
11,542 |
|
$18.5625 |
July 17, 2002 |
|
July 17, 2012 |
|
99SOP |
|
Nonqualified |
|
36,667 |
|
$24.84 |
July 17, 2003 |
|
July 17, 2013 |
|
1997 |
|
Nonqualified |
|
18,334 |
|
$19.15 |
The Company also acknowledges that the Executive currently holds the following options to purchase
the Companys common stock that are not now vested but will become vested in accordance with
Section 5(b) hereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Per Share |
Grant Date |
|
Date |
|
Plan |
|
Grant Type |
|
Covered |
|
Option Price |
July 17, 2002 |
|
July 17, 2012 |
|
99SOP |
|
Nonqualified |
|
14,308 |
|
$24.84 |
July 17, 2002 |
|
July 17, 2012 |
|
99SOP |
|
Incentive |
|
4,025 |
|
$24.84 |
July 17, 2003 |
|
July 17, 2013 |
|
1997 |
|
Nonqualified |
|
18,333 |
|
$19.15 |
July 15, 2004 |
|
July 15, 2014 |
|
1997 |
|
Nonqualified |
|
18,000 |
|
$22.90 |
The Company also acknowledges that the Executive currently holds 10,667 restricted shares of the
Companys common stock that were granted on July 15, 2004 and that will become vested in accordance
with Section 5(b) hereof.
6
EXHIBIT B
RELEASE
In exchange for, and as a condition precedent to, the payments and benefits set forth in the
Separation Agreement and Release by and between Charles Scott Greer (the Executive) and Flowserve
Corporation (the Company) dated April 4, 2005 (the Separation Agreement):
(a) The Executive does for himself and his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assigns voluntarily, knowingly and willingly release the Company and its direct and indirect
subsidiaries and affiliates, together with their respective present and former partners, officers,
directors, insurers, shareholders, managers, attorneys, accountants, employees and agents, and each
of their respective predecessors, heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, and any
employee benefit plan maintained by the Company (other than a retirement plan under which Executive
is entitled to future benefits) and any agent or fiduciary of any such plan (collectively, the
Company Releasees) from any and all obligations, charges, complaints, claims, promises,
agreements, controversies, causes of action and demands of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown,
suspected or unsuspected, which against them Executive or Executives heirs, executors,
administrators, successors or assigns ever had, now have or hereafter can, shall or may have by
reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever arising from the beginning of time to the time
Executive executes this Agreement. This release includes, but is not limited to, any and all
rights or claims pursuant to the Employment Agreement by and between Executive and the Company
dated, June 15, 1999 (the Employment Agreement) except as expressly set forth herein, relating in
any way to Executives employment with the Company or the termination thereof, or any rights or
claims arising under any statute or regulation, including the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967 (ADEA), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, the Texas
Commission on Human Rights Act (each as amended) or any other foreign, federal, state or local law,
regulation, ordinance or common law, or under any policy, agreement, understanding or promise,
written or oral, formal or informal, between any of the Company Releasees and Executive.
(b) Executive represents that he has not commenced or joined in any claim, charge, action or
proceeding against any of the Company Releasees, arising out of or relating to any of the matters
set forth in this Release. Executive shall not be entitled to any recovery, in any action or
proceeding that may be commenced on Executives behalf in any way arising out of or relating to the
matters released under this Release.
(c) Nothing in this Release shall affect or impair (i) Executives vested benefits identified
in Exhibit A to the Separation Agreement; (ii) Executives right to enforce the terms of the
Separation Agreement; (iii) any right Executive may have to indemnification pursuant to the
Indemnification Agreement dated June 15, 1999, between him and the Company or Section 11 of the
Employment Agreement and any other rights to indemnification under the Companys articles of
incorporation, bylaws, board resolutions, or under any directors and officers insurance policies.
The Company agrees that if the Company increases, or otherwise enhances, its indemnification of
its officers or directors or its insurance of such persons, at any time and from time to time, such
enhancements and increases shall also be for the benefit of and provided to Executive. The Company
agrees to provide director and officer insurance coverage to Executive to the maximum extent
provided to any other officer or director of the Company.
7
(d) Executive acknowledges that he has twenty-one (21) days to consider this Release, although
he may elect to sign it sooner. Once Executive has signed this Release, he has seven (7) days from
the date he signs it to revoke his consent to the Release by delivering (by hand or overnight
courier) written notice of revocation to the Company. In the event Executive does not revoke his
consent, this Release shall become effective on the eighth (8th) day after the date Executive has
signed it. In the event that Executive revokes his consent, this Release shall not become
effective and the Company shall be under no obligation to make the payments or to provide the
benefits set forth in paragraph 5 of the Separation Agreement.
(e) The Executive acknowledges that the Company has advised him to seek legal counsel
regarding this Release and that he has had adequate time to review this Release with legal counsel.
The Executive represents that he has read this Release, fully understands each and every
provision, and signs it voluntarily. The Executive further acknowledges that in consideration of
agreeing to accept the payments and benefits specified in Section 5 of the Separation Agreement, he
is giving up possible administrative and/or legal claims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ C. Scott Greer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Scott Greer |
8
exv10w57
EXHIBIT
10.57
April 1, 2005
Mr. Kevin E. Sheehan
c/o CID Equity Partners
One American Square, Suite 2850
Indianapolis, IN 46282
Dear Kevin:
This will confirm the compensation arrangement between you and Flowserve Corporation for the period
during which you will serve as Interim Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company.
As you know, the Board of Directors has elected you to serve as Interim Chairman, President, and
Chief Executive effective as of the close of business on April 4, 2005. The Board expects that you
will perform all the duties of those offices until such time as a successor Chief Executive Officer
is elected by the Board and takes office. In particular, the Board has established, after
consultation with you, certain objectives provided to you in a separate document, as priorities on
which it expects you to focus during this period.
During the period of your service, you will be compensated with a salary set at a rate equal to the
sum of the current Chief Executive Officers annual Base Salary ($810,000) and Annual Incentive
Compensation Target ($700,000), adjusted pro-rata for the number of workdays you actually serve. To
illustrate, if you begin your active service on April 5, 2005, and serve through August 31, 2005,
and do not take vacation time off, that would be a total of 107 workdays of service. Each day of
service would be compensated at $6,292 ($1,510,000 divided by 240), so that your compensation for
this period of service would be a total of $673,244. You will be paid at the normal interval for
officers of the company.
Because this is an interim position, you will not be awarded Long Term Incentive opportunities, but
you will receive an award of options or restricted stock equivalent to that which you would have
received as a independent Director on the same day that the independent directors awards are made.
Additionally, in this interim position, you will not participate in the Companys qualified pension
plan, non qualified executive supplemental pension plans nor its Section 401(k) plan.
I understand that you prefer to remain with your current health and disability insurance provides
during the term of your service, and you will be reimbursed for your expenses for that coverage.
You will participate in the Companys employee group life insurance program during the term of
service.
You will also be reimbursed for appropriate living and travel expenses to and from your home for
this interim period. You may either elect to accept the existing CEO monthly automobile allowance
or to be directly reimbursed for your car rental expenses, at your option. You will also be
eligible to participate in the existing tax and estate planning allowance program for Company
officers, plus the existing Company-paid annual physical examination program for officers.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of this arrangement by signing a copy of this letter and
returning it to me.
Very truly yours,
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ George T. Haymaker Jr. |
|
/s/ Kevin E. Sheehan |
|
|
George T. Haymaker Jr. |
|
Kevin E. Sheehan
|
|
|
Chairman, Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation |
|
|
|
|
INTERIM CEO OBJECTIVES FOR KEVIN SHEEHAN
n |
|
Provide a strong leadership focus to the executive team and retain the team during the
transition period |
|
n |
|
Meet company 2005 budget objectives for sales, bookings, operating profit and cash flow |
|
n |
|
Complete financial restatements, SOX 404 assertions/field work, and 2004 10K by end of
3Q2005 |
|
n |
|
Resolve 1999-2001 IRS Tax Audit issues by year-end 2005. |
|
n |
|
Resolve leadership issues in the HR Function |
|
n |
|
Establish a different Tone at the Top during transition period |
|
n |
|
Maintain good communications and relationships with key shareholders and analysts
|
|
n |
|
Build relationships with key customers as necessary |
|
n |
|
Using the strategic work presented by John Jacko, develop a shared vision within the
executive leadership team on the strategic direction of the company |
|
n |
|
Keep the Board properly informed about important issues relating to the company, its
performance and its personnel |
|
n |
|
Actively participate in the CEO selection process |
exv10w59
Exhibit 10.59
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
2004 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
This Restricted Stock Agreement (the Agreement) is made and entered into by and between
Flowserve Corporation, a New York corporation (the
Company) and
(the Participant) as of ___(the Date of Grant).
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (the
Plan) to strengthen the ability of the Company to attract, motivate and retain Employees, Outside
Directors and Consultants who possess superior capabilities and to encourage such persons to have a
proprietary interest in the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Flowserve
Corporation believes that the grant of Restricted Stock to the Participant as described herein is
consistent with the stated purposes for which the Plan was adopted; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereafter set forth
and for other good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Participant agree as follows:
1. Restricted
Stock
In order to encourage the Participants contribution to the successful
performance of the Company, and in consideration of the covenants and promises of the Participant
herein contained, the Company hereby grants to the Participant as of the Date of Grant, an Award of
shares of Common Stock, subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth below and in the Plan
(the Restricted Stock).
2. Restrictions on Transfer Before Vesting
|
(a) |
|
The Restricted Stock will be transferred of record to the
Participant and a certificate or certificates representing said Restricted
Stock will be issued in the name of the Participant immediately upon the
execution of this Agreement. Each of such Restricted Stock certificates will
bear a legend as provided by the Company, conspicuously referring to the terms,
conditions and restrictions as permitted under Section 15.9 of the Plan. The
Company may either deliver such Restricted Stock certificate(s) to the
Participant, retain custody of such Restricted Stock certificate(s) prior to
vesting (the Restriction Period) or require the Participant o enter into an
escrow arrangement under which such Restricted Stock certificate(s) will be
held by an escrow agent. The delivery of any shares of Restricted Stock
pursuant to this Agreement is subject to the provision so Paragraph 9 below. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Absent prior written consent of the Committee, the shares of
Restricted Stock granted hereunder to the Participant may not be sold,
assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, whether voluntarily or
involuntarily, by operation of law or otherwise, from the Date of Grant until
said shares shall have become vested in the Participant over the three year
period following the Date of Grant in accordance with the following table, or
as otherwise provided in Paragraph 3: |
1
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Percentage of Shares of Restricted |
Date |
|
Stock Granted herein which are Vested |
Insert Date
|
|
331/3% |
Insert Date
|
|
662/3% |
Insert Date
|
|
100% |
|
(c) |
|
Consistent with the foregoing, except as contemplated by
Paragraph 6, no right or benefit under this Agreement shall be subject to
transfer, anticipation, alienation, sale, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or
charge, whether voluntary, involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, and
any attempt to transfer, anticipate, alienate, sell, assign, pledge, encumber
or charge the same shall be void. No right or benefit hereunder shall in any
manner be liable for or subject to any debts, contracts, liabilities or torts
of the person entitled to such benefits. If the Participant or his Beneficiary
hereunder shall become bankrupt or attempt to transfer, anticipate, alienate,
assign, sell, pledge, encumber or charge any right or benefit hereunder, other
than as contemplated by Paragraph 6, or if any creditor shall attempt to
subject the same to a writ of garnishment, attachment, execution,
sequestration, or any other form of process or involuntary lien or seizure,
then such right or benefit shall cease and terminate. |
3. Effect of Termination of Employment or Services
|
(a) |
|
The Restricted Stock granted pursuant to this Agreement shall
vest in accordance with the vesting schedule reflected in Paragraph 2(b) above,
as long as the Participant remains employed by or continues to provide services
to the Company or a Subsidiary. If, however, either: |
|
(i) |
|
the Company and its Subsidiaries terminate the
Participants employment (or if the Participant is not an Employee,
determine that the Participants services are no longer needed), or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the Participant terminates employment (or if
the Participant is not an Employee, ceases to perform services for the
Company and its Subsidiaries), |
|
|
|
then the shares of Restricted Stock that have not previously vested in
accordance with the vesting schedule reflected in Paragraph 2(b) above, as
of the date of such termination of employment (or cessation of services, as
applicable), shall be forfeited by the Participant to the Company. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Notwithstanding Paragraph 3(a) above, upon the cessation of the
Participants employment or services (whether voluntary or involuntary), the
Committee may, in its sole and absolute discretion, elect to accelerate the
vesting of some or all of the unvested shares of Restricted Stock. |
4. Forfeiture and Disgorgement Upon Competition
|
(a) |
|
Notwithstanding any provisions in this Agreement to the
contrary, in the event either (A) the Participant violates the provisions of
Paragraph 4(b) or the provisions of any confidentiality, non-competition,
non-solicitation and/or non-recruitment agreement by and between the Company
and the Participant or (B) the Participant or anyone acting on the
Participants behalf brings a claim against the Company seeking to declare any
term of this Paragraph 4 void or unenforceable or the provisions of any other
confidentiality, non-competition, non-solicitation and/or non-recruitment
agreement by and between the Company and the Participant void or unenforceable,
then: |
2
|
(i) |
|
the shares of Restricted Stock shall
immediately cease to vest and all shares of Restricted Stock that have
not previously vested in accordance with the vesting schedule reflected
in Paragraph 2(b) above, as of the date of such violation, shall be
forfeited by the Participant to the Company; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
this Agreement (other than the provisions of
this Paragraph 4) will be terminated on the date of such violation; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Participant will immediately sell to the
Company all shares of Restricted Stock acquired by the Participant
pursuant to this Agreement that had previously vested in accordance
with the vesting schedule reflected in Paragraph 2(b) above and are
still owned by the Participant on the date of such violation for the
lesser of (a) the price paid by the Participant for such Restricted
Stock or (b) the Fair Market Value of such Restricted Stock on the date
of sale to the Company; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the Participant will immediately pay to the
Company any gain that the Participant realized on the sale of shares of
Restricted Stock acquired pursuant to this Agreement and sold within
the 180-day period preceding the date of the violation and the one-year
period following such date; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
the Company shall be entitled to payment by the
Participant of its attorneys fees incurred in enforcing the provisions
of this Paragraph 4, in addition to any other legal remedies. |
|
|
|
The provisions of this Paragraph 4 shall survive the termination or
expiration of this Agreement. |
|
(b) |
|
By execution of this Agreement, the Participant, either
individually or as a principal, partner, stockholder, manager, agent,
consultant, contractor, employee, lender, investor, volunteer or as a director
or officer of any corporation or association, or in any other manner or
capacity whatsoever, agrees to the following from the date of grant until the
date one (1) year immediately following the his or her termination of
employment (for any reason): |
|
|
|
|
The Participant shall not, whether directly or indirectly, without the
express prior written consent of the Company: |
|
(i) |
|
Non-Competition |
|
|
|
|
Become employed by,
advise, perform services or otherwise engage in any capacity with a
Competing Business in the Restricted Area. For purposes of this
Agreement, Competing Business means any entity or business that is in
the business of providing flow management products and related repair
and/or replacement services. Because the scope and nature of the
Companys business is international in scope and the Participants job
duties are international in scope, the Restricted Area is worldwide.
However, the Participant may own, directly or indirectly, solely as an
investment, securities of any business traded on any national
securities exchange or NASDAQ, provided that the Participant is not a
controlling person of, or member of a group that controls such
business, and provided further that the Participant does not, directly
or indirectly, own three percent (3%) or more of any class of
securities of such business. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Non-Solicitation |
|
|
|
|
Solicit business
from, attempt to transact business with, or transact business with any
customer or prospective customer of the Company with whom the Company
transacted business or solicited within the preceding twenty-four (24)
months, and which either: (1) the Participant contacted, called on,
serviced, did business with or had |
3
|
|
|
contact with during the Participants employment or that the
Participant attempted to contact, call on, service, or do business
with during the Participants employment; or (2) the Participant
became acquainted with or dealt with, for any reason, as a result of
the Participants employment with the Company. This restriction
applies only to business that is in the scope of services or products
provided by the Company. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Non-Recruitment |
|
|
|
|
Hire, solicit for
employment, induce or encourage to leave the employment of the Company,
or otherwise cease their employment with the Company, on behalf of
himself/herself or any current supervisor, manager, director,
vice-president, president or officer of the Company or any supervisor,
manager, director, vice-president, president or officer whose
employment ceased than less than twelve (12) months earlier. |
|
(c) |
|
Confidential Information |
|
|
|
|
Immediately upon
Participants execution of this Agreement, and continuing on an ongoing basis
during Participants employment, the Company agrees to provide Participant with
new Confidential Information (defined below) to which Participant has not
previously had access. For purposes of this Agreement, Confidential
Information includes any trade secrets or confidential or proprietary
information of the Company, including, but not limited to, the following: |
|
(i) |
|
Information concerning customers, clients,
marketing, business and operational methods of the Company and their
customers or clients, contracts, financial or other data, technical
data, e-mail and other correspondence or any other confidential or
proprietary information possessed, owned or used by any of the Company; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Business records, product construction, product
specifications, financial information, audit processes, pricing,
business strategies, marketing and promotional practices (including
internet-related marketing) and management methods and information; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Financial data, strategies, systems, research,
plans, reports, recommendations and conclusions; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
Names, arrangements with, or other information
relating to, any of the Companys customers, clients, suppliers,
financiers, owners, representatives and other persons who have business
relationships with the Company or who are prospects for business
relationships with the Company; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
Any non-public matter or thing obtained or
ascertained by Participant through Participants association with the
Company, the use or disclosure of which might reasonably be construed
to be contrary to the best interests of any the Company. |
|
(d) |
|
Non-Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
In exchange for the Companys promise
to provide Participant with Confidential Information, Participant shall not,
during the period of Participants employment or at any time thereafter,
disclose to anyone, or publish, or use for any purpose, any Confidential
Information, except as: (i) required in the ordinary course of the Companys
business or the Participants work for the Company; (ii) required by law; or
(iii) directed and authorized in writing by the Company. Upon the termination
of Participants employment for any reason, Participant shall immediately
return and deliver to the Company any and all Confidential Information,
computers, hard-drives, papers, books, records, documents, memoranda, manuals,
e-mail, electronic or magnetic recordings or |
4
|
|
|
data, including all copies thereof, which belong to the Company or relate to
the Companys business and which are in Participants possession, custody or
control, whether prepared by Participant or others. If at any time after
termination of Participants employment, for any reason, Participant
determines that Participant has any Confidential Information in
Participants possession or control, Participant shall immediately return to
the Company all such Confidential Information in Participants possession or
control, including all copies and portions thereof. |
|
|
(e) |
|
By execution of this Agreement, the Participant agrees that the
provisions of this Paragraph 4 shall apply to all grants (including, without
limitation, grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and
restricted stock) made to the Participant pursuant to the Plan in 2006 and, to
the extent the provisions of such grants are inconsistent with any of the
provisions of this Paragraph 4, the Company and the Participant agree that (x)
the provisions of this Paragraph 4 shall control and (y) the provisions of any
such award agreements are hereby amended by the terms of this Paragraph 4. |
5. Limitation
of Rights
Nothing in this Agreement or the Plan shall be construed to:
|
(a) |
|
give the Participant any right to be awarded any further
restricted stock or any other Award in the future, even if restricted stock or
other Awards are granted on a regular or repeated basis, as grants of
restricted stock and other Awards are completely voluntary and made solely in
the discretion of the Committee; |
|
|
(b) |
|
give the Participant or any other person any interest in any
fund or in any specified asset or assets of the Company or any Subsidiary; or |
|
|
(c) |
|
confer upon the Participant the right to continue in the
employment or service of the Company or any Subsidiary, or affect the right of
the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate the employment or service of the
Participant at any time or for any reason. |
6. Prerequisites
to Benefits
Neither the Participant, nor any person claiming through the
Participant, shall have any right or interest in the Restricted Stock awarded hereunder, unless and
until all the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement and the Plan which affect the
Participant or such other person shall have been complied with as specified herein.
7. Rights
as a Stockholder
Subject to the limitations and restrictions contained herein, the
Participant (or Beneficiary) shall have all rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares of
Restricted Stock, including the right to vote and receive dividends.
8. Successors
and Assigns
This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the Participant, the Company and their respective permitted successors and assigns
(including personal representatives, heirs and legatees), except that the Participant may not
assign any rights or obligations under this Agreement except to the extent and in the manner
expressly permitted herein.
9. Securities
Act
The Company will not be required to deliver any shares of Common Stock pursuant
to this Agreement if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such issuance would violate the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or any other applicable federal or state
securities laws or regulations. The Committee may require that the Participant, prior to the
issuance of any such shares, sign and deliver to
the Company a written statement, which shall be in a form and contain content acceptable to the
Committee, in its sole discretion (Investment Letter):
|
(a) |
|
stating that the Participant is acquiring the shares for
investment and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof; |
5
|
(b) |
|
stating that the Participant will not sell any shares of Common
Stock that the Participant may then own or thereafter acquire except either: |
|
(i) |
|
through a broker on a national securities
exchange or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
with the prior written approval of the Company;
and |
|
(c) |
|
containing such other terms and conditions as counsel for the
Company may reasonably require to assure compliance with the Securities Act or
other applicable federal or state securities laws and regulations. |
10. Federal and State Taxes
|
(a) |
|
Any amount of Common Stock that is payable or transferable to
the Participant hereunder may be subject to the payment of or reduced by any
amount or amounts which the Company is required to withhold under the then
applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), or its successors, or any other federal, state or local tax
withholding requirement. When the Company is required to withhold any amount
or amounts under the applicable provisions of the Code, the Company shall
withhold from the Common Stock to be issued to the Participant a number of
shares necessary to satisfy the Companys withholding obligations. The number
of shares of Common Stock to be withheld shall be based upon the Fair Market
Value of the shares on the date of withholding. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Notwithstanding Paragraph 10(a) above, if the Participant
elects, and the Committee agrees, the Companys withholding obligations may
instead be satisfied as follows: |
|
(i) |
|
the Participant may direct the Company to
withhold cash that is otherwise payable to the Participant; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the Participant may deliver to the Company a
sufficient number of shares of Common Stock then owned by the
Participant to satisfy the Companys withholding obligations, based on
the Fair Market Value of the shares as of the date of withholding; or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Participant may deliver sufficient cash to
the Company to satisfy its withholding obligations. |
|
|
(iv) |
|
any combination of the alternatives described
in Paragraphs 10(b)(i) through 10(b)(iii) above. |
|
(c) |
|
Authorization of the Participant to the Company to withhold
taxes pursuant to one or more of the alternatives described in Paragraph 10(b)
above must be in a form and content acceptable to the Committee. The payment
or authorization to withhold taxes by the Participant shall be completed prior
to the delivery of any shares pursuant to this Agreement. An authorization to
withhold taxes pursuant to this provision will be irrevocable unless and until
the tax liability of the Participant has been fully paid. |
11. Governing
Law
This Award Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the state of Texas.
12. Definitions
All capitalized terms in this Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Plan unless otherwise defined in this Award Agreement.
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its officers
thereunto duly authorized, and the Participant has hereunto set his/her hand as of the day and year
first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[INSERT PARTICIPANTS NAME] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
exv10w60
Exhibit 10.60
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
2004 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
This Incentive Stock Option Agreement (the Agreement) is made and entered into by and
between Flowserve Corporation, a New York corporation (the Company) and (the Participant)
as of (the Date of Grant).
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (the
Plan) to strengthen the ability of the Company to attract, motivate and retain Employees, Outside
Directors and Consultants who possess superior capabilities and to encourage such persons to have a
proprietary interest in the Company; and
WHEREAS, Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Flowserve
Corporation believes that the granting of the Stock Option described herein to the Participant is
consistent with the stated purposes for which the Plan was adopted; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereafter set forth
and for other good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Participant agree as follows:
1. Grant of Stock Option
The Company hereby grants to the Participant the right and option (the Stock Option) to
purchase an aggregate of shares (the Shares) (such number being subject to
adjustment as provided in Paragraph 10 hereof) of the Common Stock of the Company (the Common
Stock) on the terms and conditions herein set forth. This Stock Option may be exercised in whole
or in part and from time to time hereinafter. This Stock Option is intended to qualify as an
incentive stock option within the meaning of section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. Therefore, the Participant will be required to satisfy the holding period requirements
that apply with respect to the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Stock Option in order to
be eligible for the beneficial tax treatment afforded such a grant. To the extent the requisite
holding period requirements are not satisfied, this Stock Option shall be deemed a Nonqualified
Stock Option (as defined in Section 2.17 of the Plan).
2. Exercise Price
The price at which the Participant shall be entitled to purchase the Common Stock covered by
the Stock Option shall be $ per share.
3. Term of Stock Option
The Stock Option granted hereby shall be and remain in force and effect during the Option
Period, which shall begin on the Date of Grant and end (the Expiration Date) on the first to
occur of:
|
(a) |
|
the date that is ten (10) years from the Date of Grant, or |
|
|
(b) |
|
in the case of termination of employment with the Company or a
Subsidiary, any other date specified in Paragraph 7. |
1
4. Exercise of Stock Option
This Stock Option shall vest and become exercisable over the three year period following the
Date of Grant in accordance with the following table; provided, however, that this Stock Option
shall cease to vest following the Participants termination of employment and shall cease to be exercisable with
respect to any portion that has been previously exercised or when the Stock Option lapses:
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Percentage of Shares Subject to this |
Date |
|
Stock Option which are Vested and Exercisable |
Insert Date |
|
331/3% |
Insert Date |
|
662/3% |
Insert Date |
|
100% |
5. Method of Exercising Stock Option
|
(a) |
|
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, this
Stock Option may be exercised by delivering written notice to the Organization
and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Flowserve Corporation,
or any officer or officers delegated with the authority to act on such
committees behalf pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Plan (the Committee),
setting forth: |
|
(i) |
|
the number of shares of Common Stock with
respect to which the Stock Option is to be exercised, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the Exercise Date, |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Social Security number of the Participant, |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the method of payment elected (see Paragraph 6 hereof), and |
|
|
(v) |
|
the exact name in which the shares will be
registered. |
|
(b) |
|
The notice described in Paragraph 5(a) above must be signed by
the Participant and shall be accompanied by payment of the purchase price of
such Shares. If the Stock Option is exercised by a person or persons other
than the Participant pursuant to Paragraph 7 hereof, such notice must be signed
by such other person or persons and must be accompanied by proof acceptable to
the Committee of the legal right of such person or persons to exercise the
Stock Option. |
6. Method of Payment for the Stock Option
|
(a) |
|
As a general rule, the full purchase price for the Shares
purchased upon the exercise of the Stock Option (i.e., the number of shares
being purchased multiplied by the price per shares) must be paid in cash. The
Committee may, however, in its discretion, allow the Participant to pay for the
Common Stock: |
|
(i) |
|
in an equivalent acceptable to the Committee, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
by assigning and delivering to the Company shares of Common Stock owned by the Participant or by surrendering
another Award, or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
by combination of cash, Common Stock or one or
more Awards equal in value to the purchase price. |
In addition, at the request of the Participant and to the extent permitted
by applicable law, the Committee may approve an arrangement with a brokerage
firm, under which the brokerage firm, on behalf of the Participant, will pay
for shares of Stock purchased upon the exercise of the Stock Option.
|
(b) |
|
For purposes of this Agreement, any Common Stock used or Award
surrendered to pay all or a part of the purchase price of the Stock Option will
be valued at the |
2
|
|
|
Fair Market Value on the exercise date. Further, such payment
must be accompanied by an assignment of such Common Stock on a duly executed
stock power, which is on a form separate from the certificate(s) for the Common
Stock, authorizing the transfer of such shares to the Company. |
7. Termination of Employment
Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 9 hereof, the Option Period will end and the Stock
Option, whether or not then exercisable, will lapse upon the termination of employment of a
Participant as follows:
|
(a) |
|
If the termination of employment is due to any reason other
than Cause (as defined in Paragraph 7(b)), death, Disability (as defined in
Paragraph 7(c)) or Retirement (as defined in Paragraph 7(d)), the Participant
may continue to exercise the Stock Option, in whole or in part, until the
earliest of: |
|
(i) |
|
the date specified in Paragraph 3(a); or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the date which is six (6) months following the
latter of the last date of active employment or the release or lapse of
trading restrictions, provided, however, that to the extent the
exercise date is more than three (3) months after the last date of
active employment, the Stock Option will be a non-qualified Stock
Option. |
|
(b) |
|
If the termination of employment is due to Cause (as defined in
this paragraph 7(b)), the Option Period shall end, and the Stock Option shall
cease to be exercisable, as of the date of termination of the Participants
employment. Cause shall in all cases be determined by the Committee, in its
sole and absolute discretion, and shall mean the willful and continued failure
to substantially perform the duties of employment (other than due to death or
Disability), willful conduct that is injurious to the Company or a Subsidiary,
any act of dishonesty, the commission of a felony or violation of any legal
duty to the Company or a Subsidiary. |
|
|
(c) |
|
In the event of the Participants death or total and permanent
disability (Disability), the Participant (or in the case of death, the
Participants designated beneficiary) may continue to exercise the Stock
Option, in whole or in part, until the earliest of: |
|
(i) |
|
the date specified in Paragraph 3(a); or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the date which is one (1) year following the
Participants death or Disability (as determined by the Committee). |
|
(d) |
|
In the event of the Participants Retirement (as defined in
this paragraph 7(d)), the Participant may continue to exercise the Stock
Option, to the extent then vested, in whole or in part, until the earlier of:
(i) the expiration of the term of the Stock Option (as specified in paragraph
3) or (ii) five (5) years after the Participants Retirement date, but only if,
and so long as, the Participant shall refrain from competing against the
Company or any Subsidiary. To the extent not exercised within three (3) months
after the Participants retirement, the Stock Option will cease to be treated
as an incentive stock option (unless, under the law governing incentive stock
options as then in effect, the Stock Option may continue to be accorded
incentive stock option treatment for a period longer or shorter than three (3)
months after retirement). Retirement shall in all cases be determined by the
Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, and shall mean the
Participants termination of employment with the Company and all Subsidiaries
after reaching age sixty (60) with at least ten (10) years of service with the
Company or a Subsidiary. |
3
8. Forfeiture and Disgorgement Upon Competition
|
(a) |
|
Notwithstanding any provisions in this Agreement to the
contrary, in the event either (i) the Participant violates the provisions of
Paragraph 8(b) or the provisions of any confidentiality, non-competition,
non-solicitation and/or non-recruitment agreement by and between the Company
and the Participant or (B) the Participant or anyone acting on the Participants behalf brings
a claim against the Company seeking to declare any term of this Paragraph 8
void or unenforceable or the provisions of any other confidentiality,
non-competition, non-solicitation and/or non-recruitment agreement by and
between the Company and the Participant void or unenforceable, then: |
|
(i) |
|
the Stock Option shall immediately cease to
vest and shall no longer be exercisable as of the date of such
violation; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
both the vested and unvested portion of the
unexercised Stock Option shall be immediately forfeited and the Stock
Option and this Agreement (other than the provisions of this Paragraph
8) will be terminated on the date of such violation; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Participant will immediately sell to the
Company all Shares acquired by the Participant within the 180-day period
preceding the date of such violation pursuant to the exercise of the
Stock Option that are still owned on the date of such violation for the
lesser of (a) the exercise price paid by the Participant for such Shares or
(b) the Fair Market Value of such Shares on the date of sale to the
Company; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the Participant will immediately pay to the Company
any gain that the Participant realized on the sale of the Shares acquired
pursuant to the exercise of the Stock Option and sold within the
180-day period preceding the date of the violation and the one-year
period following such date; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
the Company shall be entitled to payment by the
Participant of its attorneys fees incurred in enforcing the provisions of
this Paragraph 8, in addition to any other legal remedies. |
The provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall survive the termination or
expiration of this Agreement.
|
(b) |
|
By execution of this Agreement, the Participant, either individually
or as a principal, partner, stockholder, manager, agent, consultant,
contractor, employee, lender, investor, volunteer or as a director or officer
of any corporation or association, or in any other manner or capacity
whatsoever, agrees to the following from the date of grant until the date one
(1) year immediately following the his or her termination of employment (for
any reason): |
The Participant shall not, whether directly or indirectly, without the express
prior written consent of the Company:
|
(i) |
|
Non-Competition |
|
|
|
|
Become employed by,
advise, perform services or otherwise engage in any capacity with a
Competing Business in the Restricted Area. For purposes of this
Agreement, Competing Business |
4
|
|
|
means any entity or business that is in the business of providing
flow management products and related repair and/or replacement
services. Because the scope and nature of the Companys business is
international in scope and the Participants job duties are international
in scope, the Restricted Area is worldwide. However, the Participant
may own, directly or indirectly, solely as an investment, securities
of any business traded on any national securities exchange or NASDAQ,
provided that the Participant is not a controlling person of, or member of
a group that controls such business, and provided further that the
Participant does not, directly or indirectly, own three percent (3%) or
more of any class of securities of such business. |
|
(ii) |
|
Non-Solicitation |
|
|
|
|
Solicit business
from, attempt to transact business with, or transact business with any
customer or prospective customer of the Company with whom the Company
transacted business or solicited within the preceding twenty-four (24)
months, and which either: (1) the Participant contacted, called on,
serviced, did business with or had contact with during the Participants
employment or that the Participant attempted to contact, call on, service,
or do business with during the Participants employment; or (2) the Participant
became acquainted with or dealt with, for any reason, as a result of
the Participants employment with the Company. This restriction applies
only to business that is in the scope of services or products provided
by the Company. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Non-Recruitment |
|
|
|
|
Hire, solicit for
employment, induce or encourage to leave the employment of the Company,
or otherwise cease their employment with the Company, on behalf of
himself/herself or any other person or entity, any current supervisor,
manager, director, vice-president, president or officer of the Company
or any supervisor, manager, director, vice-president, president or
officer whose employment ceased than less than twelve (12) months
earlier. |
|
(c) |
|
Confidential Information |
|
|
|
|
Immediately upon the
Participants execution of this Agreement, and continuing on an ongoing basis during
the Participants employment, the Company agrees to provide the Participant with new
Confidential Information (defined below) to which the Participant has not previously
had access. For purposes of this Agreement, Confidential Information
includes any trade secrets or confidential or proprietary information of the
Company, including, but not limited to, the following: |
|
(i) |
|
Information concerning customers, clients,
marketing, business and operational methods of the Company and their
customers or clients, contracts, financial or other data, technical
data, e-mail and other correspondence or any other confidential or
proprietary information possessed, owned or used by any of the Company; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Business records, product construction, product
specifications, financial information, audit processes, pricing,
business strategies, marketing and promotional practices (including
internet-related marketing) and management methods and information; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Financial data, strategies, systems, research,
plans, reports, recommendations and conclusions; |
5
|
(iv) |
|
Names, arrangements with, or other information
relating to, any of the Companys customers, clients, suppliers,
financiers, owners, representatives and other persons who have business
relationships with the Company or who are prospects for business
relationships with the Company; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
Any non-public matter or thing obtained or
ascertained by the Participant through the Participants association with the
Company, the use or disclosure of which might reasonably be construed
to be contrary to the best interests of any the Company. |
|
(d) |
|
Non-Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
In exchange for the Companys promise
to provide the Participant with Confidential Information, the Participant shall not,
during the period of the Participants employment or at any time thereafter,
disclose to anyone, or publish, or use for any purpose, any Confidential
Information, except as: (i) required in the ordinary course of the Companys
business or the Participants work for the Company; (ii) required by law; or (iii)
directed and authorized in writing by the Company. Upon the termination of the
Participants employment for any reason, the documents, memoranda, manuals, e-mail,
electronic or magnetic recordings or data, including all copies thereof, which
belong to the Company or relate to the Companys business and which are in the
Participants possession, custody or control, whether prepared by the Participant or
others. If at any time after termination of the Participants employment, for any
reason, the Participant determines that the Participant has any Confidential Information
in the Participants possession or control, the Participant shall immediately return to
the Company all such Confidential Information in the Participants possession or
control, including all copies and portions thereof. |
|
|
(e) |
|
By execution of this Agreement, the Participant agrees that the
provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall apply to all grants (including, without
limitation, grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and
restricted stock) made to the Participant pursuant to the Plan in 2006 and, to the
extent the provisions of such grants are inconsistent with any of the
provisions of this Paragraph 8, the Company and the Participant agree that (x) the
provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall control and (y) the provisions of any such
award agreements are hereby amended by the terms of this Paragraph 8. |
9. Non-transferability
The Stock Option granted by this Agreement may only be exercisable during the term of the
Option Period provided in Paragraph 3 hereof and, except as provided in Paragraph 7, only by the
Participant during the Participants lifetime. No Stock Option granted by this Agreement is
transferable by the Participant other than by will or pursuant to applicable laws of descent and
distribution. The Stock Option and any rights and privileges in connection therewith, cannot be
transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by operation of law, or otherwise, and is not
otherwise subject to execution, attachment, garnishment or similar process. In the event of such
occurrence, this Agreement will automatically terminate and will thereafter be null and void.
6
10. Adjustments in Number of Shares and Option Price; Change in Control
Except as provided below, in the event that the outstanding Common Stock of the Company is
increased, decreased, or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities, or
if additional, new or different shares or securities are distributed with respect to the Common
Stock through merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company,
reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other
distribution with respect to such Common Stock, each remaining share of Common Stock subject to
this Stock Option will be substituted utilizing the principles set forth in section 424(a) of the
Code.
11. Delivery of Shares
No shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the Participant upon the exercise of the Stock
Option until:
|
(a) |
|
the purchase price is paid in full in the manner herein
provided, if applicable; |
|
|
(b) |
|
all the applicable taxes required to be withheld have been paid
or withheld in full; |
|
|
(c) |
|
the approval of any governmental authority required in
connection with the Stock Option, or the issuance of shares thereunder, has
been received by the Company; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
if required by the Committee, the Participant has delivered to
the Committee an Investment Letter in form and content satisfactory to the
Company as provided in Paragraph 12 hereof. |
12. Securities Act
The Company will not be required to deliver any shares of Common Stock pursuant to the
exercise of all or any part of the Stock Option if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such
issuance would violate the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or any other
applicable federal or state securities laws or regulations. The Committee may require that the
Participant, prior to the issuance of any such shares pursuant to exercise of the Stock Option sign
and deliver to the Company a written statement (Investment Letter):
|
(a) |
|
stating that the Participant is purchasing the shares for
investment and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof; |
|
|
(b) |
|
stating that the Participant will not sell any shares of Common
Stock that the Participant may then own or thereafter acquire except either: |
|
(i) |
|
through a broker on a national securities
exchange, or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
with the prior written approval of the Company;
and |
|
(c) |
|
containing such other terms and conditions as counsel for the
Company may reasonably require to assure compliance with the Securities Act or
other applicable federal or state securities laws and regulations. |
Such Investment Letter shall be in form and content acceptable to the Committee, in its sole
discretion.
13. Federal and State Taxes
|
(a) |
|
Upon the exercise of the Stock Option, or any part thereof, the
Participant may incur certain liabilities for federal, state or local taxes and
the Company may be required by law to withhold such taxes for payment to taxing
authorities. Upon a determination by the Company that an amount is required to
be withheld in order to satisfy federal, state or local taxes, absent an
election described in by the Participant to the contrary, the Company shall
withhold from the Common Stock to be issued to the Participant a number of shares necessary
to satisfy the Companys withholding obligations. The number of shares of Common Stock to |
7
|
|
|
be withheld shall be based upon the Fair Market Value of the shares on the
date of withholding. |
|
(b) |
|
Notwithstanding Paragraph 13(a) above, if the Participant
elects, and the Committee agrees, the Companys withholding obligations may
instead be satisfied as follows: |
|
(i) |
|
the Participant may direct the Company to
withhold cash that is otherwise payable to the Participant; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the Participant may deliver to the Company a
sufficient number of shares of Common Stock then owned by the
Participant to satisfy the Companys withholding obligations, based on
the Fair Market Value of the shares as of the date of withholding; or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Participant may deliver sufficient cash to
the Company to satisfy its withholding obligations. |
|
|
(iv) |
|
any combination of the alternatives described
in Paragraphs 13(b)(i) through 13(b)(iii) above. |
|
(c) |
|
Authorization of the Participant to the Company to withhold
taxes pursuant to one or more of the alternatives described in Paragraph 13(b)
above must be in a form and content acceptable to the Committee. The payment
or authorization to withhold taxes by the Participant shall be completed prior
to the delivery of any shares pursuant to this Agreement. An authorization to
withhold taxes pursuant to this provision will be irrevocable unless and until
the tax liability of the Participant has been fully paid. |
14. Definitions; Copy of Plan
Except as specifically provided otherwise herein, all capitalized terms used in this Agreement
shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. By the execution of this Agreement, the
Participant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan.
15. Administration
This Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Plan will be
administered by the Committee in accordance with its terms. The Committee has sole and complete
discretion with respect to all matters reserved to it by the Plan and the decisions of the majority
of the Committee with respect to the Plan and this Agreement shall be final and binding upon the
Participant and the Company. In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of this
Agreement and the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall control.
16. Continuation of Employment
This Agreement shall not be construed to confer upon the Participant any right to continued
employment with the Company or a Subsidiary and shall not limit the right of the Company or a
Subsidiary (as applicable), in its sole discretion, to terminate the employment of the Participant
at any time.
17. No Right to Stock
No Participant and no beneficiary or other person claiming under or through such Participant
shall have any right, title or interest in any shares of Common Stock allocated or reserved under
the Plan or subject to this Stock Option, except as to such shares of Common Stock, if any, that
have been issued or transferred to such Participant.
8
18. Obligation to Exercise
The Participant shall have no obligation to exercise any Stock Option granted by this
Agreement.
19. Notice
Any notice to be given to the Company or the Committee shall be addressed to the Company in
care of its Secretary at its principal office. Any such notice shall be in writing and shall be
delivered personally or shall be sent by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the Company.
20. Governing Law
This Agreement shall be interpreted and administered under the laws of the State of Texas.
21. Amendments
This Agreement may be amended only by a written agreement executed by the Company and the
Participant. Any such amendment shall be made only upon the mutual consent of the parties, which
consent (of either party) may be withheld for any reason.
22. Termination
The Company may terminate the Plan at any time; however, such termination will not modify the
terms and conditions of the Stock Option granted hereunder without the Participants consent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its officers
thereunto duly authorized, and the Participant has hereunto set his hand as of the day and year
first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[INSERT PARTICIPANTS NAME] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
exv10w61
Exhibit 10.61
NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR EMPLOYEES
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
2004 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
This Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (the Agreement) is made and entered into by and
between Flowserve Corporation, a New York corporation (the Company) and
(the Participant) as of (the Date of Grant).
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Flowserve Corporation 2004 Stock Compensation Plan (the
Plan) to strengthen the ability of the Company to attract, motivate and retain Employees, Outside
Directors and Consultants who possess superior capabilities and to encourage such persons to have a
proprietary interest in the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Flowserve
Corporation believes that the granting of the Stock Option described herein to the Participant is
consistent with the stated purposes for which the Plan was adopted; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereafter set forth
and for other good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Participant agree as follows:
1. Grant of Stock Option
The Company hereby grants to the Participant the right and option (the
Stock Option) to purchase an aggregate of shares (the Shares) (such number being subject to
adjustment as provided in Paragraph 10 hereof) of the Common Stock of the Company (the Common
Stock) on the terms and conditions herein set forth. This Stock Option may be exercised in whole
or in part and from time to time hereinafter. This Stock Option is not intended to qualify as an
incentive stock option within the meaning of section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. Therefore, the Participant will not be required to satisfy any specific holding period
requirements that might otherwise apply with respect to the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
the Stock Option.
2. Exercise Price
The price at which the Participant shall be entitled to purchase the Common Stock
covered by the Stock Option shall be $ per share.
3. Term of Stock Option
The Stock Option granted hereby shall be and remain in force and effect
during the Option Period, which shall begin on the Date of Grant and end (the Expiration Date)
on the first to occur of:
(a) the date that is ten (10) years from the Date of Grant, or
(b) in the case of termination of employment with the Company or a
Subsidiary, any other date specified in Paragraph 7.
1
4. Exercise of Stock Option
This Stock Option shall vest and become exercisable over the three year
period following the Date of Grant in accordance with the following table; provided, however, that
this Stock Option shall cease to vest following the Participants termination of employment and
shall cease to be exercisable with respect to any portion that has been previously exercised or
when the Stock Option lapses:
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Percentage of Shares Subject to this |
Date |
|
Stock Option which are Vested and Exercisable |
Insert Date |
|
331/3% |
Insert Date |
|
662/3% |
Insert Date |
|
100% |
5. Method of Exercising Stock Option
|
(a) |
|
Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, this
Stock Option may be exercised by delivering written notice to the Organization
and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Flowserve Corporation,
or any officer or officers delegated with the authority to act on such
committees behalf pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Plan (the Committee),
setting forth: |
|
(i) |
|
the number of shares of Common Stock with
respect to which the Stock Option is to be exercised, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the Exercise Date, |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Social Security number of the Participant, |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the method of payment elected (see Paragraph 6 hereof), and |
|
|
(v) |
|
the exact name in which the shares will be
registered. |
|
(b) |
|
The notice described in Paragraph 5(a) above must be signed by
the Participant and shall be accompanied by payment of the purchase price of
such Shares. If the Stock Option is exercised by a person or persons other
than the Participant pursuant to Paragraph 7 hereof, such notice must be signed
by such other person or persons and must be accompanied by proof acceptable to
the Committee of the legal right of such person or persons to exercise the
Stock Option. |
6. Method of Payment for the Stock Option
|
(a) |
|
As a general rule, the full purchase price for the Shares
purchased upon the exercise of the Stock Option (i.e., the number of shares
being purchased multiplied by the price per shares) must be paid in cash. The
Committee may, however, in its discretion, allow the Participant to pay for the
Common Stock: |
|
(i) |
|
in an equivalent acceptable to the Committee, |
|
|
(ii) |
|
by assigning and delivering to the Company shares of Common Stock owned by the Participant or by surrendering
another Award, or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
by combination of cash, Common Stock or one or
more Awards equal in value to the purchase price. |
In addition, at the request of the Participant and to the extent permitted
by applicable law, the Committee may approve an arrangement with a brokerage
firm, under which the brokerage firm, on behalf of the Participant, will pay
for shares of Stock purchased upon the exercise of the Stock Option.
2
|
(b) |
|
For purposes of this Agreement, any Common Stock used or Award
surrendered to pay all or a part of the purchase price of the Stock Option will
be valued at the Fair Market Value on the exercise date. Further, such payment
must be accompanied by an assignment of such Common Stock on a duly executed
stock power, which is on a form separate from the certificate(s) for the Common
Stock, authorizing the transfer of such shares to the Company. |
7. Termination of Employment
The Option Period will end and the Stock Option, whether or not then
exercisable, will lapse upon the termination of employment of a Participant as follows:
|
(a) |
|
If the termination of employment is due to any reason other
than Cause (as defined in this Paragraph 7(b)), death, Disability or
Retirement, the Participant may continue to exercise the Stock Option, in whole
or in part, until the earliest of: |
|
(i) |
|
the date specified in Paragraph 3(a); |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the date which is six (6) months following the
latter of the last date of active employment or the release or lapse of
trading restrictions. |
|
(b) |
|
If the termination of employment is due to Cause (as defined in
this paragraph 7(b)), the Option Period shall end, and the Stock Option shall
cease to be exercisable, as of the date of termination of the Participants
employment. Cause shall in all cases be determined by the Committee, in its
sole and absolute discretion, and shall mean the willful and continued failure
to substantially perform the duties of employment (other than due to death or
Disability), willful conduct that is injurious to the Company or a Subsidiary,
any act of dishonesty, the commission of a felony or violation of any legal
duty to the Company or a Subsidiary. |
|
|
(c) |
|
In the event of the Participants death or total and permanent
disability (Disability), the Participant (or in the case of death, the
Participants designated beneficiary) may continue to exercise the Stock
Option, in whole or in part, until the earliest of: |
|
(i) |
|
the date specified in Paragraph 3(a); or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the date which is one (1) year following the
Participants death or Disability (as determined by the Committee). |
|
(d) |
|
In the event of the Participants Retirement (as defined in
this paragraph 7(b)), the Participant may continue to exercise the Stock
Option, to the extent then vested, in whole or in part, until the earlier of:
(i) the expiration of the term of the Stock Option (as specified in paragraph
3) or (ii) five (5) years after the Participants Retirement date, but only if,
and so long as, the Participant shall refrain from competing against the
Company or any Subsidiary. Retirement shall in all cases be determined by
the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, and shall mean the
Participants termination of employment with the Company and all Subsidiaries
after reaching age sixty (60) with at least ten (10) years of service with the
Company or a Subsidiary. |
8. Forfeiture and Disgorgement Upon Competition
|
(a) |
|
Notwithstanding any provisions in this Agreement to the
contrary, in the event either (i) the Participant violates the provisions of
Paragraph 8(b) or the provisions of any confidentiality, non-competition,
non-solicitation and/or non- |
3
|
|
|
recruitment agreement by and between the Company and the Participant or (B)
the Participant or anyone acting on the Participants behalf brings a claim
against the Company seeking to declare any term of this Paragraph 8 void or
unenforceable or the provisions of any other confidentiality,
non-competition, non-solicitation and/or non-recruitment agreement by and
between the Company and the Participant void or unenforceable, then: |
|
(i) |
|
the Stock Option shall immediately cease to
vest and shall no longer be exercisable as of the date of such
violation; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
both the vested and unvested portion of the
unexercised Stock Option shall be immediately forfeited and the Stock
Option and this Agreement (other than the provisions of this Paragraph
8) will be terminated on the date of such violation; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Participant will immediately sell to the
Company all Shares acquired by the Participant within the 180-day
period preceding the date of such violation pursuant to the exercise of
the Stock Option that are still owned on the date of such violation for
the lesser of (a) the exercise price paid by the Participant for such
Shares or (b) the Fair Market Value of such Shares on the date of sale
to the Company; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the Participant will immediately pay to the
Company any gain that the Participant realized on the sale of the
Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of the Stock Option and sold
within the 180-day period preceding the date of the violation and the
one-year period following such date; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
the Company shall be entitled to payment by the
Participant of its attorneys fees incurred in enforcing the provisions
of this Paragraph 8, in addition to any other legal remedies. |
The provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall survive the termination or
expiration of this Agreement.
|
(b) |
|
By execution of this Agreement, the Participant, either
individually or as a principal, partner, stockholder, manager, agent,
consultant, contractor, employee, lender, investor, volunteer or as a director
or officer of any corporation or association, or in any other manner or
capacity whatsoever, agrees to the following from the date of grant until the
date one (1) year immediately following the his or her termination of
employment (for any reason): |
The Participant shall not, whether directly or indirectly, without the
express prior written consent of the Company:
|
(i) |
|
Non-Competition |
|
|
|
|
Become employed by,
advise, perform services or otherwise engage in any capacity with a
Competing Business in the Restricted Area. For purposes of this
Agreement, Competing Business means any entity or business that is in
the business of providing flow management products and related repair
and/or replacement services. Because the scope and nature of the
Companys business is international |
4
|
|
|
in scope and the Participants job duties are international in scope,
the Restricted Area is worldwide. However, the Participant may
own, directly or indirectly, solely as an investment, securities of
any business traded on any national securities exchange or NASDAQ,
provided that the Participant is not a controlling person of, or
member of a group that controls such business, and provided further
that the Participant does not, directly or indirectly, own three
percent (3%) or more of any class of securities of such business; |
|
(ii) |
|
Non-Solicitation |
|
|
|
|
Solicit business
from, attempt to transact business with, or transact business with any
customer or prospective customer of the Company with whom the Company
transacted business or solicited within the preceding twenty-four (24)
months, and which either: (1) the Participant contacted, called on,
serviced, did business with or had contact with during the
Participants employment or that the Participant attempted to contact,
call on, service, or do business with during the Participants
employment; or (2) the Participant became acquainted with or dealt
with, for any reason, as a result of the Participants employment with
the Company. This restriction applies only to business that is in the
scope of services or products provided by the Company; or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Non-Recruitment |
|
|
|
|
Hire, solicit for
employment, induce or encourage to leave the employment of the Company,
or otherwise cease their employment with the Company, on behalf of
himself/herself or any other person or entity, any current supervisor,
manager, director, vice-president, president or officer of the Company
or any supervisor, manager, director, vice-president, president or
officer whose employment ceased than less than twelve (12) months
earlier. |
|
(c) |
|
Confidential Information |
|
|
|
|
Immediately upon the
Participants execution of this Agreement, and continuing on an ongoing basis
during the Participants employment, the Company agrees to provide the
Participant with new Confidential Information (defined below) to which the
Participant has not previously had access. For purposes of this Agreement,
Confidential Information includes any trade secrets or confidential or
proprietary information of the Company, including, but not limited to, the
following: |
|
(i) |
|
Information concerning customers, clients,
marketing, business and operational methods of the Company and their
customers or clients, contracts, financial or other data, technical
data, e-mail and other correspondence or any other confidential or
proprietary information possessed, owned or used by any of the Company; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Business records, product construction, product
specifications, financial information, audit processes, pricing,
business strategies, marketing and promotional practices (including
internet-related marketing) and management methods and information; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Financial data, strategies, systems, research,
plans, reports, recommendations and conclusions; |
5
|
(iv) |
|
Names, arrangements with, or other information
relating to, any of the Companys customers, clients, suppliers,
financiers, owners, representatives and other persons who have business
relationships with the Company or who are prospects for business
relationships with the Company; and |
|
|
(v) |
|
Any non-public matter or thing obtained or
ascertained by the Participant through the Participants association
with the Company, the use or disclosure of which might reasonably be
construed to be contrary to the best interests of any the Company. |
|
(d) |
|
Non-Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
In exchange for the Companys promise
to provide the Participant with Confidential Information, the Participant shall
not, during the period of the Participants employment or at any time
thereafter, disclose to anyone, or publish, or use for any purpose, any
Confidential Information, except as: (i) required in the ordinary course of
the Companys business or the Participants work for the Company; (ii) required
by law; or (iii) directed and authorized in writing by the Company. Upon the
termination of the Participants employment for any reason, the Participant
shall immediately return and deliver to the Company any and all Confidential
Information, computers, hard-drives, papers, books, records, documents,
memoranda, manuals, e-mail, electronic or magnetic recordings or data,
including all copies thereof, which belong to the Company or relate to the
Companys business and which are in the Participants possession, custody or
control, whether prepared by the Participant or others. If at any time after
termination of the Participants employment, for any reason, the Participant
determines that the Participant has any Confidential Information in the
Participants possession or control, the Participant shall immediately return
to the Company all such Confidential Information in the Participants
possession or control, including all copies and portions thereof. |
|
|
(e) |
|
By execution of this Agreement, the Participant agrees that the
provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall apply to all grants (including, without
limitation, grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and
restricted stock) made to the Participant pursuant to the Plan in 2006 and, to
the extent the provisions of such grants are inconsistent with any of the
provisions of this Paragraph 8, the Company and the Participant agree that (x)
the provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall control and (y) the provisions of any
such award agreements are hereby amended by the terms of this Paragraph 8. |
9. Non-transferability
The Stock Option granted by this Agreement may only be exercisable during
the term of the Option Period provided in Paragraph 3 hereof and, except as provided in Paragraph
7, only by the Participant during the Participants lifetime. No Stock Option granted by this
Agreement is transferable by the Participant other than by will or pursuant to applicable laws of
descent and distribution. The Stock Option and any rights and privileges in connection therewith,
cannot be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by operation of law, or otherwise, and is
not otherwise subject to execution, attachment, garnishment or similar process. In the event of
such occurrence, this Agreement will automatically terminate and will thereafter be null and void.
6
10. Adjustments in Number of Shares and Option Price; Change in Control
Except as provided below,
in the event that the outstanding Common Stock of the Company is increased, decreased, or exchanged
for a different number or kind of shares or other securities, or if additional, new or different
shares or securities are distributed with respect to the Common Stock through merger,
consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, reorganization,
recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other distribution with
respect to such Common Stock, each remaining share of Common Stock subject to this Stock Option
will be substituted utilizing the principles set forth in section 424(a) of the Code.
11. Delivery of Shares
No shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the Participant upon the
exercise of the Stock Option until:
|
(a) |
|
the purchase price is paid in full in the manner herein
provided, if applicable; |
|
|
(b) |
|
all the applicable taxes required to be withheld have been paid
or withheld in full; |
|
|
(c) |
|
the approval of any governmental authority required in
connection with the Stock Option, or the issuance of shares thereunder has been
received by the Company; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
if required by the Committee, the Participant has delivered to
the Committee an Investment Letter in form and content satisfactory to the
Company as provided in Paragraph 12 hereof. |
12. Securities Act
The Company will not be required to deliver any shares of Common Stock pursuant
to the exercise of all or any part of the Stock Option if, in the opinion of counsel for the
Company, such issuance would violate the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act)
or any other applicable federal or state securities laws or regulations. The Committee may require
that the Participant, prior to the issuance of any such shares pursuant to exercise of the Stock
Option sign and deliver to the Company a written statement (Investment Letter):
|
(a) |
|
stating that the Participant is purchasing the shares for
investment and not with a view to the sale or distribution thereof; |
|
|
(b) |
|
stating that the Participant will not sell any shares of Common
Stock that the Participant may then own or thereafter acquire except either: |
|
(i) |
|
through a broker on a national securities
exchange, or |
|
|
(ii) |
|
with the prior written approval of the Company;
and |
|
(c) |
|
containing such other terms and conditions as counsel for the
Company may reasonably require to assure compliance with the Securities Act or
other applicable federal or state securities laws and regulations. |
Such Investment Letter shall be in form and content acceptable to the Committee, in its sole
discretion.
13. Federal and State Taxes
|
(a) |
|
Upon the exercise of the Stock Option, or any part thereof, the
Participant may incur certain liabilities for federal, state or local taxes and
the Company may be required by law to withhold such taxes for payment to taxing
authorities. Upon a determination by the Company that an amount is required to
be withheld in order
to satisfy federal, state or local taxes, absent an election described in by
the Participant to the contrary, the Company shall withhold from the Common
Stock to be issued to the Participant a number of shares necessary to
satisfy the Companys withholding obligations. The number of shares of
Common Stock to |
7
|
|
|
be withheld shall be based upon the Fair Market Value of the shares on the date of withholding. |
|
(b) |
|
Notwithstanding Paragraph 13(a) above, if the Participant
elects, and the Committee agrees, the Companys withholding obligations may
instead be satisfied as follows: |
|
(i) |
|
the Participant may direct the Company to
withhold cash that is otherwise payable to the Participant; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
the Participant may deliver to the Company a
sufficient number of shares of Common Stock then owned by the
Participant to satisfy the Companys withholding obligations, based on
the Fair Market Value of the shares as of the date of withholding; or |
|
|
(iii) |
|
the Participant may deliver sufficient cash to
the Company to satisfy its withholding obligations. |
|
|
(iv) |
|
any combination of the alternatives described
in Paragraphs 13(b)(i) through 13(b)(iii) above. |
|
(c) |
|
Authorization of the Participant to the Company to withhold
taxes pursuant to one or more of the alternatives described in Paragraph 13(b)
above must be in a form and content acceptable to the Committee. The payment
or authorization to withhold taxes by the Participant shall be completed prior
to the delivery of any shares pursuant to this Agreement. An authorization to
withhold taxes pursuant to this provision will be irrevocable unless and until
the tax liability of the Participant has been fully paid. |
14. Definitions; Copy of Plan
Except as specifically provided otherwise herein, all capitalized
terms used in this Agreement shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. By the
execution of this Agreement, the Participant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan.
15. Administration
This Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Plan
will be administered by the Committee in accordance with its terms. The Committee has sole and
complete discretion with respect to all matters reserved to it by the Plan and the decisions of the
majority of the Committee with respect to the Plan and this Agreement shall be final and binding
upon the Participant and the Company. In the event of any conflict between the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall control.
16. Continuation of Employment
This Agreement shall not be construed to confer upon the Participant
any right to continued employment with the Company or a Subsidiary and shall not limit the right of
the Company or a Subsidiary (as applicable), in its sole discretion, to terminate the employment of
the Participant at any time.
17. No Right to Stock
No Participant and no beneficiary or other person claiming under or through
such Participant shall have any right, title or interest in any shares of Common Stock allocated or
reserved under the Plan or subject to this Stock Option, except as to such shares of Common Stock,
if any, that have been issued or transferred to such Participant.
18. Obligation to Exercise
The Participant shall have no obligation to exercise any Stock Option
granted by this Agreement.
8
19. Notice
Any notice to be given to the Company or the Committee shall be addressed to the Company
in care of its Secretary at its principal office. Any such notice shall be in writing and shall be
delivered personally or shall be sent by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the Company.
20. Governing Law
This Agreement shall be interpreted and administered under the laws of the State
of Texas.
21. Amendments
This Agreement may be amended only by a written agreement executed by the Company
and the Participant. Any such amendment shall be made only upon the mutual consent of the parties,
which consent (of either party) may be withheld for any reason.
22. Termination
The Company may terminate the Plan at any time; however, such termination will not
modify the terms and conditions of the Stock Option granted hereunder without the Participants
consent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its officers
thereunto duly authorized, and the Participant has hereunto set his hand as of the day and year
first above written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[INSERT PARTICIPANTS NAME] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
exv10w62
EXHIBIT
10.62
AMENDMENT
TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
1. Preamble. On February 14, 1988, The Duriron Company, Inc., (predecessor to Flowserve
Corporation (Flowserve)), established a Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan). The Plan was
thereafter amended, in particular by a Amendment No. 2 effective January 1, 1992, which permitted
participants to defer the receipt of cash Performance Units in the form of deferred cash or in the
form of shares (the former shares now consisting of Flowserve shares). Shares and cash so deferred
were credited to an account under the Plan. Payment is to be made under Section X D of the Plan
upon the occurrence of specified events. Since such amendment, section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), has been enacted and has become effective with
respect to the Plan. The Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with section 409A of
the Code. In the interim, Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1 permits
distribution of certain amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable limitations of section
409A. By this amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the Plan to provide for such
distributions. Section VIII of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of Flowserve to amend the
Plan.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section VIII of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by adding
the following Section X D(v) to the Plan, to follow Section X D (iv):
(v) 2005 DISTRIBUTION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Plan, the entire amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Cash Awards account and
all Deferred Shares of former employee Participant William Jordan, and the entire
amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Cash Awards account of Participant
Ronald F. Shuff will be distributed in full in lump sums to William Jordan and
Ronald F. Shuff, respectively, prior to December 31, 2005. Such distribution will
be includible in the reportable taxable income of such Participants for taxable
year 2005. These distributions are in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of
Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, and shall terminate the participation of
such former employee Participant William Jordan in the Plan, and shall terminate
the prior deferrals of Participant Ronald F. Shuff under the Plan. Such
distribution shall be made in kind or in cash, as applicable.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc.,
Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Plan, as heretofore amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv10w63
EXHIBIT
10.63
AMENDMENT TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR KEY EMPLOYEES
AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1992
1. Preamble. The Duriron Company, Inc., predecessor to Flowserve Corporation
(Flowserve), amended and restated its Incentive Compensation Plan (the Plan) effective January
1, 2002. Section VIII B of the Plan as so amended and restated permitted deferral of Incentive
Awards. Section IX of the Plan prescribes a procedure and schedule for payment of deferred cash
awards. Since such amendment and restatement, section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), has been enacted and has become effective with respect to the Plan. The
Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with section 409A of the Code. In the interim,
Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1 permits distribution of certain
amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable limitations of section 409A. By this
amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the Plan to provide for such distributions.
Section XI of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of Flowserve to amend the Plan.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section XI of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following Section IX E to the Plan, to follow Section IX D and to precede Section X:
E. 2005 DISTRIBUTION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, the
entire amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Compensation accounts of former
employee Participant William Jordan and current employee Participant Ronald F.
Shuff will be distributed in full to such Participants, respectively, prior to
December 31, 2005. Such distributions will be includible in the reportable
taxable income of such Participants for the taxable year 2005. This distribution
is in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice
2005-1, and shall terminate the participation of such former employee Participant
in the Plan and shall terminate the prior deferrals under the Plan of Participant
Ronald F. Shuff. Such distributions shall be made through payment of single cash
lump sums.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc.
Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Employees as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1992,
the Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 1992, and as it may have been amended thereafter,
shall remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv10w64
EXHIBIT
10.64
AMENDMENT
TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AS RESTATED NOVEMBER 1, 1993
1.
Preamble. Commencing with 1993, The Duriron Company, Inc., predecessor to Flowserve
Corporation (Flowserve), established a Long-Term Incentive Plan as restated November 1, 1993 (the
Plan). The Plan was thereafter amended, in particular by an Amendment No. 1 effective July 21,
1995, which permitted participants to defer the receipt of cash Awards of Performance Units in the
form of deferred cash or in the form of shares (the former shares now consisting of Flowserve
shares). Shares and cash so deferred were credited to an account under the Plan. Payment is to be
made under Section X B of the Plan upon the occurrence of specified events. Since such amendment,
section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), has been enacted and
has become effective with respect to the Plan. The Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall
compliance with section 409A of the Code. In the interim, Question and Answer 20 of Internal
Revenue Service Notice 2005-1 permits distribution of certain amounts without respect to the
otherwise applicable limitations of section 409A. By this amendment, Flowserve intends to
accomplish amendment of the Plan to provide for such distributions. Section VIII of the Plan
permits the Board of Directors of Flowserve to amend the Plan.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section VIII of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by adding
the following Section X F(v) to the Plan, to follow Section X F(iv):
(v) 2005 Distribution. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
this Plan, the entire amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Cash Performance
Unit Awards account and all Deferred Shares of former employee Participant William
Jordan, and the entire amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Cash Performance
Unit Awards account of current employee Participant Ronald F. Shuff, will be
distributed in full in lump sums to William Jordan and Ronald F. Shuff,
respectively, prior to December 31, 2005. Such distributions will be includible
in the reportable taxable income of such Participants for taxable year 2005.
These distributions are in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of Internal
Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, and shall terminate the participation of such
former employee Participant William Jordan in the Plan, and shall terminate such
prior cash deferrals of Participant Ronald F. Shuff under the Plan. Such
distributions shall be made in kind and in cash, as applicable.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc.,
Long-Term Incentive Plan as Restated November 1, 1993, the Plan, as heretofore amended, shall
remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exv10w65
EXHIBIT
10.65
AMENDMENT
TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
1996 1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
1. Preamble. The Duriron Company, Inc., predecessor to Flowserve Corporation
(Flowserve), established a 1996 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan). Subsection F of
the Plan permitted participants to defer the receipt of incentive awards in the form of deferred
cash or in the form of deferred shares (the former shares now consisting of Flowserve shares).
Shares and cash so deferred were credited to an account under the Plan. Payment is to be made
under Section F of the Plan upon the occurrence of retirement. Since adoption of the Plan, section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), has been enacted and has become
effective with respect to the Plan. The Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with
section 409A of the Code. In the interim, Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service
Notice 2005-1 permits distribution of certain amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable
limitations of section 409A. By this amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the
Plan to provide for such distributions.
2. Amendment. The Plan is hereby amended by adding the following Section H to the Plan, to
follow Section G:
(H) 2005 Distribution. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
this Plan, the entire amount credited as Deferred Cash Awards and all Deferred
Shares under the Plan of former employee Participant William Jordan, and the
entire amount of Deferred Cash Awards credited to current employee Participant
Ronald F. Shuff, will be distributed in full in lump sums to William Jordan and
Ronald F. Shuff, respectively, prior to December 31, 2005. Such distribution will
be includible in the reportable taxable income of such Participants for taxable
year 2005. These distributions are in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of
Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, and shall terminate the participation of
such former employee Participant William Jordan in the Plan, and shall terminate
the prior cash deferrals of Participant Ronald F. Shuff under the Plan. Such
distribution shall be made in kind or in cash, as applicable.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc.,
1996 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv10w66
EXHIBIT
10.66
AMENDMENT TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
FIRST MASTER BENEFIT TRUST AGREEMENT
PREAMBLE
On October 1, 1987, THE DURIRON COMPANY, predecessor of FLOWSERVE CORPORATION (Flowserve),
established the FIRST MASTER BENEFIT TRUST (the Trust) pursuant to a Trust Agreement between The
Duriron Company, Inc. and Bank One, Dayton, as Trustee. The Trust was established to hold assets
to pay deferred obligations of the grantor for incentive and deferral compensation amounts. Since
the Trust was established, section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), has been enacted and has become effective with respect to the benefit plans funded under
the Trust. The Trust Agreement will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with section 409A of
the Code. In the interim, Questions and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1
permits distribution of certain amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable limitations of
section 409A. By this amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the Trust Agreement
to provide for such distributions. Section 13.2 of the Trust Agreement permits Flowserve to amend
the Trust Agreement, with the consent of participants having at least a cumulative sixty-five
percent (65%) interest in the assets of each respective Plans subject to any such amendment. The
Trust Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1. Section 4.1 of the Trust Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence, at
the end thereof:
Section 4.6 of the Trust Agreement shall be deemed to constitute the last
effective Payment Schedules for Ronald F. Shuff, Diane Harris, William Jordan and
Robert Frazer, respectively.
2. Section 4.2 of the Trust Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence, at
the end thereof:
Section 4.6 of the Trust Agreement shall be deemed to constitute the last
effective Modified Payment Schedules for Ronald F. Shuff, William Jordan, Robert
Frazer and Diane Harris, respectively.
3. A new Section 4.6 is hereby added to the Trust Agreement, to follow Section 4.5 and to
precede Article V, and shall read as follows:
4.6 2005 Distributions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Trust
Agreement, all deferred shares and all cash or other assets accounts held for William Jordan and
Robert Frazer under any Plan funded through this Trust shall be distributed by the Trustee at the
direction of the Companys General Counsel prior to December 31, 2005. Such distribution will be
includible in the reportable taxable incomes of William Jordan and Robert Frazer, respectively for
the taxable year 2005. This distribution is in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of Internal
Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, and shall terminate the participation of such individuals in the
Trust Fund. Such distribution shall be made in cash or in kind, as
1
applicable. The cash and
other asset account amounts (other than any shares of Flowserve Corporation stock or dividends
thereon) held for the benefit of Ronald F. Shuff under the following employee benefit plans:
|
|
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan as Restated November 1, 1993 |
|
|
|
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors |
|
|
|
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. Incentive Plan for Key Employees Amended and Restated
Effective January 1, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
The Duriron Company Inc. 1996-1008 Long-Term Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan |
shall be distributed prior to January 1, 2006, to Ronald F. Shuff. Such amounts shall constitute
payment of all Flowserve non-stock deferrals and accruals thereon and will be included in the
taxable income of Ronald F. Shuff for taxable year 2005. This distribution is in accordance with
Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1. Such payment shall be made in
cash. The cash and other assets accounts (other than any shares of Flowserve Corporation stock or
dividends thereon) held for the benefit of Diane Harris under the following benefit plans:
|
|
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. Retirement Compensation Plan for Directors |
|
|
|
|
The Duriron Company, Inc. Amended and Restated Director Deferral Plan |
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation Amended and Restated Director Cash Deferral Plan |
shall be distributed to Diane Harris prior to January 1, 2006. Such amounts shall constitute
payment of all Flowserve non-stock deferrals and accruals thereon and shall be included in the
income of Diane Harris for taxable year 2005. This distribution is in accordance with Question and
Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1. Such payment shall be made in cash.
4. Exempt as amended hereby, the Duriron Company, Inc. First Master Benefit Trust Agreement,
as heretofore amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Corporation |
|
|
|
Bank One, Dayton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
Its: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: December 14, 2005
2
exv10w67
EXHIBIT
10.67
AMENDMENT
TO
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED DIRECTOR CASH DEFERRAL PLAN
1. Preamble. Flowserve Corporation (Flowserve) established the Flowserve Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Original Plan), which was amended and restated November 1, 1993.
Effective October 1, 2000, the Original Plan was amended and restated as two plans, the Flowserve
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the Flowserve Incentive Plan. The Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan
was restated as the Amended and Restated Director Cash Deferral Plan (the Plan) on January 19,
2001. Since such restatement, section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), has been enacted and has become effective with respect to the Plan. The Plan will be
amended in 2006 for overall compliance with section 409A of the Code. In the interim, Question and
Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1 permits distribution of certain amounts without
respect to the otherwise applicable limitations of section 409A. By this amendment, Flowserve
intends to accomplish amendment of the Plan to provide for such distributions. Section 9 of the
Plan permits the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Flowserve to
amend the Plan.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following Section 7(d) to the Plan, to follow Section 7(c) and to precede Section 8:
(d) 2005 DISTRIBUTION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Plan, the entire amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Compensation Cash
accounts of former Director Robert Frazer and of current Director Diane Harris
will be distributed in full to such former Director and to such current Director
prior to December 31, 2005. Such distribution will be includible in the
reportable taxable income of such former Director and such current Director for
the taxable year 2005. This distribution is in accordance with Question and
Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, and shall terminate the
participation of such former Director in the Plan, and terminate the prior
deferrals. Such distribution shall be made in cash, as required by Section 7(a).
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this First Amendment to Flowserve Corporation
Amended and Restated Director Cash Deferred Plan, the Plan, as amended and restated January 19,
2001, shall remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv10w68
EXHIBIT
10.68
AMENDMENT
TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
RETIREMENT COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
1. Preamble. Effective January 1, 1989, Duriron Company, Inc. (Duriron), the predecessor
of Flowserve Corporation (Flowserve) established the Duriron Company, Inc. Retirement
Compensation Plan for Directors (the Plan). Subsequent to the Plans adoption, section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), has been enacted and has become
effective with respect to the Plan. The Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with
section 409A of the Code. In the interim, Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service
Notice 2005-1 permits distribution of certain amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable
limitations of section 409A. By this amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the
Plan to provide for such distributions.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan and the delegation of the authority to
amend the Plan by Flowserves Board of Directors to Flowserves Organization and Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following Section
4(g) to the Plan, to follow Section 4(f) and to precede Section 5:
(g) 2005 DISTRIBUTION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Plan, the entire amount credited to the Accounts/accrued benefits of former
Director Robert Frazer and of current Director Diane Harris will be distributed in
full to such former Director and to such current Director prior to December 31,
2005. Such distribution will be includible in the reportable taxable income of
such former Director and such current Director for the taxable year 2005. This
distribution is in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue
Service Notice 2005-1, and shall terminate the participation of such former
Director and such current Director in the Plan.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment to The Duriron Company, Inc.
Retirement Compensation Plan for Directors, the Plan, as previously amended on July 1, 1989, shall
remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv10w69
EXHIBIT
10.69
AMENDMENT TO
THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED DIRECTOR DEFERRAL PLAN
1. Preamble. The Duriron Company, Inc., predecessor to Flowserve Corporation (the
Flowserve) established a Director Deferral Plan (the Plan). Effective July 1, 1995, the Plan
was amended and restated in the entirety. Since the most recent amendment, section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), has been enacted and has become effective
with respect to the Plan. The Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with section
409A of the Code. In the interim, Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1
permits distribution of certain amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable limitations of
section 409A. By this amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the Plan to provide
for such distributions. Section 9 of the Plan permits Flowserve to amend the Plan.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following Section 7(d), to follow Section 7(c) and precede Section 8:
(d) 2005 DISTRIBUTION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Plan, the entire amount credited to the unsecured Deferred Shares account and the
entire amount credited to the deferred cash account of former Director Robert
Frazer will be distributed in full to such former Director prior to December 31,
2005. The entire amount credited to the deferred cash account of current Director
Diane Harris will be distributed in full to such Director prior to December 31,
2005. Such distributions will be includible in the reportable taxable income of
such former Director and such current Director for the taxable year 2005. This
distribution is in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue
Service Notice 2005-1, shall terminate the participation of such former Director
in the Plan, and shall terminate such deferrals for such current Director. Such
distributions shall be made in cash or kind, as applicable.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this current Amendment to The Duriron
Company, Inc. Amended and Restated Director Deferral Plan, the Plan, as heretofore amended, shall
remain in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Pension and Investment
Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv10w70
EXHIBIT
10.70
AMENDMENT
TO
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
1. Preamble. Flowserve Corporation (Flowserve) established a deferred compensation plan,
most recently amended and restated as the Flowserve Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan)
effective June 1, 2000. Since such restatement, section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), has been enacted and has become effective with respect to the Plan. The
Plan will be amended in 2006 for overall compliance with section 409A of the Code. In the interim,
Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1 permits distribution of certain
amounts without respect to the otherwise applicable limitations of section 409A. By this
amendment, Flowserve intends to accomplish amendment of the Plan to provide for such distributions.
Section 9.01 of the Plan permits the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Flowserve to amend the Plan.
2. Amendment. Pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following Section 7.09 to the Plan, to follow Section 7.08 and to precede Article VIII:
SECTION 7.09 2005 DISTRIBUTION. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
this Plan, the entire amount credited to the Deferral Account of each of former
employee Participant William Jordan and current employee Ronald F. Shuff will be
distributed in full to such Plan Participants prior to December 31, 2005. Such
distribution will be includible in the reportable taxable income of such
Participants for the taxable year 2005. This distribution is in accordance with
Question and Answer 20 of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2005-1, and shall
terminate the participation of such former employee Participant William Jordan in
the entirety and shall terminate the deferrals of current employee Ronald F. Shuff
solely with respect to such amounts. Such distributions shall be made in a single
lump sum in cash to each such Participant, as required under Section 7.01.
3. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended by this First Amendment to Flowserve Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan, the Plan, as amended effective June 1, 2000, shall remain in full force
and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOWSERVE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Pension and Investment Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn, Member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed December 14, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
exv21w1
EXHIBIT 21.1
Flowserve Corporation
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
Percentage |
Name of Subsidiary |
|
of Incorporation |
|
Owned |
Flowserve Argentina S.A.
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invensys Flow Control Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson, Kelly & Lewis Pty. Ltd.
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve (Austria) GmbH
|
|
Austria
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve FSD N.V.
|
|
Belgium
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Belgium N. V.
|
|
Belgium
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve do Brasil Ltda.
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Ltda.
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valtek Registros, Ltda.
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Canada Corp.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Canada Holding Corp.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Canada Limited Partnership
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Nova Scotia Holding Corp.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Churchill Casualty Limited
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Chile S.A.
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Shangai Limited
|
|
China
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Colombia, Ltda.
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Finance ApS
|
|
Denmark
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naval OY
|
|
Finland
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve France Holding S.N.C.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve France S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pleuger S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Polyvalves S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pompes S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Sales International S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve S.A.S.
|
|
France
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argus GmbH & Co. K.G.
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Ingersoll-Dresser Pumpen GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Ahaus GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Dortmund GmbH & Co. KG
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Dortmund Verwaltungs GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
Percentage |
Name of Subsidiary |
|
of Incorporation |
|
Owned |
Flowserve Essen GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Flow Control GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Hamburg GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gestra AG
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDP Pumpen GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ingersoll-Dresser Pumpen GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPSCO GmbH
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audco India Ltd.
|
|
India
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve India Controls Pvt. Ltd.
|
|
India
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Microfinish Pumps Pvt. Ltd.
|
|
India
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Microfinish Valves Pvt. Ltd.
|
|
India
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Sanmar Limited India
|
|
India
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitorque India Limited
|
|
India
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PT Flowserve
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audco Italiana Srl
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve S.p.A.
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ingersoll-Dresser Pumps S.p.A.
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worthington S.p.A.
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ebara-Byron Jackson, Ltd.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Japan K.K.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Niigata Equipment Maintenance Co., Ltd.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Niigata Worthington Company Ltd.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hyosung-Ebara Co. Ltd.
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Korea Seal Master Company Ltd.
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Finance S.a.r.l.
|
|
Luxembourg
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve SAAG Sdn Bhd
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve (Mauritius) Corporation
|
|
Mauritius
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrias Medina S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inmobiliaria Industrial de Leon S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maquiladora Industrial de Leon S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabromatic B.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve B.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Netherlands C.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Global Lending B.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
Percentage |
Name of Subsidiary |
|
of Incorporation |
|
Owned |
Flowserve International B.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Repair & Services BV
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Finance B.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Flow Control Benelux B.V.
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve New Zealand Limited
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Peru S.A.C.
|
|
Peru
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gestra Polonia SP. z.o.o.
|
|
Poland
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Portuguesa Mecanismos de Controlo de
Fluxos, Lda.
|
|
Portugal
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arabian Seals Company, Ltd.
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Abahsain Co. Ltd.
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Flow Control Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitorque Asia Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve South Africa (Proprietary) Limited
|
|
South Africa
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Spain S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gestra Espanola, S.A.
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Sweden AB
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAF AB
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palmstierna International AB
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve International S.A.
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve S.A.
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Trading Sarl
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve (Thailand) Limited
|
|
Thailand
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Al Mansoori Services Company, Ltd.
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audco Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automax UK Ltd.
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Durco UK Ltd.
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Flow Control (U.K.) Ltd
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Flow Control Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve International Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Pumps Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve UK Finance Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
Percentage |
Name of Subsidiary |
|
of Incorporation |
|
Owned |
IPSCO (UK) Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PMV Controls Limited
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BW/IP New Mexico, Inc.
|
|
United States Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowcom Insurance Company, Inc.
|
|
United States Hawaii
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Holdings, Inc.
|
|
United States Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve International, Inc.
|
|
United States Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Management Company
|
|
United States Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve Receivables Corporation
|
|
United States Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve US Inc.
|
|
United States Delaware
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PMV USA, Inc.
|
|
United States Texas
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flowserve de Venezuela S.A.
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hot Tapping & Plugging C.A.
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
100 |
% |
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-62044) and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-46234, 333-81707, 333-57773, 333-50667, 033-72372, 333-82081, 333-29541, and 033-62527) of
Flowserve Corporation of our report, dated February 13, 2006, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 13, 2006
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Lewis M. Kling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Flowserve Corporation, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, of Flowserve Corporation; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
Date:
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Lewis M. Kling |
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis M. Kling |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark A. Blinn, Chief Financial Officer of Flowserve Corporation, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, of Flowserve Corporation; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
Date:
February 13, 2006 |
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn |
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Blinn |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Flowserve Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report), I, Lewis M. Kling, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: February 13, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lewis M. Kling
|
|
|
Lewis M. Kling |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Flowserve Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report), I, Mark A. Blinn, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: February 13, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Blinn
|
|
|
Mark A. Blinn |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|